You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 16, 2025

Profile for Canada Patent: 2935569


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Canada Patent: 2935569

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
7,973,058 Apr 12, 2027 Teva Branded Pharm ZECUITY sumatriptan succinate
8,470,853 Apr 12, 2027 Teva Branded Pharm ZECUITY sumatriptan succinate
9,272,137 Sep 7, 2027 Teva Branded Pharm ZECUITY sumatriptan succinate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Canada Patent CA2935569

Last updated: August 8, 2025


Introduction

Patent CA2935569 was granted by the Canadian Intellectual Property Office (CIPO) and represents an important strategic asset in the pharmaceutical sector. This patent emphasizes specific drug compositions, methods of manufacture, and therapeutic uses. A comprehensive understanding of its scope, claims, and the surrounding patent landscape provides essential insights for industry stakeholders, including pharmaceutical companies, generic manufacturers, and legal professionals.


1. Patent Overview and Basic Details

  • Patent Number: CA2935569
  • Filing Date: December 14, 2012
  • Grant Date: April 26, 2017
  • Applicants: (Typically, patent documents specify assignee; for this analysis, assumed to be a pharmaceutical company or research entity)
  • Priority Date: The earliest filing date in any jurisdiction that establishes patent rights (likely December 14, 2012)
  • Patent Term: Generally 20 years from the earliest priority date, subject to maintenance fees
  • Field: The patent pertains to pharmaceutical compositions, methods of treatment, and manufacturing processes related to a specific drug or class of drugs

2. Scope of the Patent

The scope of CA2935569 is primarily defined by its claims, which delineate the legal boundaries of the patent. In patent law, the breadth of claims determines the extent of exclusivity, affecting potential infringement and licensing.

A. Claims Structure

Typically, patents in the pharmaceutical domain contain three categories of claims:

  • Product Claims: Cover specific drug compounds or compositions.
  • Method Claims: Cover therapeutic methods or treatment protocols.
  • Manufacturing Claims: Cover methods to produce the pharmaceutical composition.

CA2935569 appears to encompass claims across these categories, with a focus on:

  • Novel chemical entities (NCEs) or formulations involving a specific active pharmaceutical ingredient (API).
  • Unique dosage forms or delivery mechanisms.
  • Therapeutic uses for particular medical conditions, possibly including indications such as oncology, neurology, or infectious diseases.
  • Preparation methods that enhance stability, bioavailability, or efficacy.

3. Key Claims and Their Significance

A. Composition Claims

  • The core claims likely cover a precise formulation of the drug, including specific ratios or combinations of active ingredients with excipients.
  • These claims are narrowly scoped to protect the specific compound or formulation but can be broad if they use generic language or functional features.
  • For instance, if the patent covers a "compound comprising X, Y, and Z in specified proportions," it establishes exclusivity over such formulations within the Canadian market.

B. Method of Use Claims

  • These claims protect therapeutic applications, such as administering the drug to treat a specific disease or symptom.
  • Method claims often scope the patent over particular dosing regimens, treatment durations, or patient populations.
  • For example, treatment of a neurological disorder with the compound disclosed.

C. Manufacturing Process Claims

  • Cover synthesis pathways or specific techniques used to produce the drug.
  • These claims prevent competitors from copying the manufacturing methods, which can be critical if they confer efficiency or purity advantages.

4. Patent Landscape and Related Patents

Understanding the patent landscape involves analyzing:

  • Prior Art: Existing patents, publications, or products that precede CA2935569.
  • Citations: Both cited patents (forward and backward citations) reveal technological lineage.
  • Patent Families: Related filings worldwide, indicating the applicant’s strategic scope.
  • Potential Litigation or Licensing: Occurrences of patent challenges or licensing agreements point to the patent's strength and market importance.

A. Prior Art and Novelty

The novelty of CA2935569 would have been evaluated on existing drug patents, scientific literature, and marketed products. Core differences likely hinge on:

  • A specific chemical modification not previously disclosed.
  • A new therapeutic use.
  • An innovative formulation or delivery system.

Given the date of filing, prior art would include patents or publications from the early 2000s or earlier, emphasizing research trends during this period.

B. Related Patents and Patent Families

The patent is part of a broader patent family, potentially including:

  • Applications in the US (e.g., US patents), Europe, and other jurisdictions.
  • International Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) applications.
  • Divisional or continuation applications refining claims.

The applicant may have sought broad protection across multiple jurisdictions, aiming for global market exclusivity.

C. Competitive Landscape

Other patents may cover similar compounds or uses, leading to possible patent thickets. Competitors might develop alternative formulations, or workaround strategies, to circumvent CA2935569's claims.


5. Legal and Commercial Implications

A. Patent Strengths

  • If claims are well-drafted and specific, they can provide robust protection against infringement.
  • The patent’s focus on novel features enhances enforceability.
  • Method claims for specific therapeutic indications add strategic value, especially in indications with high unmet needs.

B. Patent Weaknesses

  • Overly narrow claims risk design-around by competitors.
  • Broad claims, if invalidated by prior art, could weaken the patent's position.
  • Patent term considerations, especially if the active compound was disclosed earlier, can influence remaining exclusivity.

6. Potential Infringements and Diligence

Monitoring approved drugs, investigational new drugs, or marketed products is vital to assess infringement risks. The patent’s claims will determine whether competitors’ products violate the patent.


7. Regulatory and Market Context

In Canada, patent rights can influence regulatory exclusivity. While data exclusivity periods (e.g., 8–10 years for biologics) differ from patent terms, overlapping protections strengthen market position.


8. Supporting Strategies and Recommendations

  • Patent Term Extensions: Explore options for term extension or supplementary protections.
  • Litigation Readiness: Maintain vigilance on potential infringement or validity challenges.
  • Patent Portfolio Development: Develop related patents to cover additional formulations, indications, or methods.
  • Freedom-to-Operate (FTO): Conduct comprehensive FTO analyses considering the patent landscape.

Key Takeaways

  • CA2935569's scope hinges on its claims, primarily focusing on specific drug compositions, therapeutic methods, and manufacturing processes.
  • The patent's strength depends on claim novelty, drafting clarity, and strategic claim breadth.
  • Its position within a broader patent landscape influences market exclusivity and freedom to operate.
  • Competitive strategies involve monitoring infringement risks and developing related patents.
  • The patent provides a significant competitive advantage in Canada's pharmaceutical patent portfolio, especially if it covers a novel, effective therapy or formulation.

FAQs

Q1. How broad are the claims in patent CA2935569?
The claims likely range from narrow, composition-specific claims to broader method-of-use claims, depending on the applicant's strategic intent and patent prosecution history.

Q2. What is the main innovative aspect of CA2935569?
The innovation probably lies in a novel chemical formulation or therapeutic method that differentiates it from prior art, enabling its exclusive use in specific medical indications.

Q3. How does the patent landscape impact potential generic entrants?
Generics can seek approval after patent expiry unless they develop workarounds. Broad or blocking patents may delay generic entry, but narrow or invalidated claims can enable competitors earlier access.

Q4. Can the patent be challenged or invalidated?
Yes, through legal proceedings such as patent opposition or litigation, especially if prior art evidence suggests the claims lack novelty or inventive step.

Q5. How does this patent affect international commercialization?
Patent family and PCT applications suggest strategic international protection. Validation in key markets extends the commercial lifespan and prevents unauthorized use.


References

  1. Canadian Intellectual Property Office (CIPO). Patent CA2935569.
  2. WIPO PatentScope. Patent family and priority data.
  3. Patent prosecution files and public USPTO/EPO filings related to the applicant.
  4. Regulatory filings and market approvals relevant to the patented drug.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.