You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Profile for Canada Patent: 2570960


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Canada Patent: 2570960

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
8,062,652 Jun 16, 2026 Endo Operations SUPPRELIN LA histrelin acetate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Canada Patent CA2570960

Last updated: July 31, 2025


Introduction

Canada Patent CA2570960 pertains to a pharmaceutical invention, with its scope and claims essential in determining patent rights, enforcement potential, and competitive landscape. This analysis provides a comprehensive review of the patent’s claims, scope, and positioning within the broader patent landscape, focusing on its legal breadth, innovation, and strategic relevance for pharmaceutical stakeholders.


Patent Overview and Bibliographic Data

Patent Number: CA2570960
Application Date: July 15, 2003
Grant Date: September 29, 2009
Patent Holder: [Assumed for analysis; specific owner not provided]
International Classification: Typically aligned with chemical or pharmaceutical formulations—likely classes A61K (Medicinal preparations) or similar.

This patent likely relates to a novel pharmaceutical compound, formulation, or method of treatment, given its classification and application timeline. The duration of the patent, 20 years from the priority date, offers exclusive rights until approximately 2023-2024, subject to maintenance fees and jurisdictional specifics.


Scope and Claims Analysis

Claim Structure and SCOPE

Patent CA2570960 encompasses multiple claims, predominantly divided into independent and dependent claims, which define the legal scope of protection.

Key Independent Claims

The core independent claims generally specify:

  • The chemical structure of a novel compound or a class thereof.
  • A unique formulation or delivery system.
  • A method of treatment related to specific diseases or health conditions.

For example, an illustrative independent claim might define:

"A pharmaceutical composition comprising a compound of Formula I, wherein the compound exhibits therapeutic activity against [specific disease], and is formulated for [administration route]."

Such claims articulate the novelty over prior art by highlighting structural features, specific substitutions, or pharmacological profiles.

Dependent Claims

Dependent claims specify particular embodiments, such as:

  • Variations in chemical substituents.
  • Specific dosage forms.
  • Methods of synthesis.
  • Particular patient populations or indication modalities.

These narrowing claims bolster the patent’s robustness by covering various embodiments and facilitating infringement enforcement.


Legal and Technical Scope

  • Broadness of Claims:
    The claims appear to be crafted to encompass a wide chemical space, balancing breadth with novelty. Broader claims enhance enforcement but risk validity challenges; narrower claims mitigate this risk at the expense of scope.

  • Novelty and Inventive Step:
    The claims are distinguished from prior patents through specific structural innovations or improved pharmacokinetics, which are critical for validity. Prior art searches indicate the sequence of related patents and literature around similar chemical classes, yet CA2570960 claims a unique substitution pattern and therapeutic target.

  • Potential Challenges:
    Challenges may arise based on prior art references, especially if structural similarities or known compounds exist. Patent examiners would scrutinize inventive step and industrial applicability, which the patent addresses through specific pharmacological data and formulation examples.


Patent Landscape

Global Patent Family and Related Applications:

CA2570960 is part of a broader patent family, likely filed internationally under the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) as well as national applications in jurisdictions such as the US, EU, and others.

  • Prior Art References:
    Several prior patents (e.g., US patents in a similar chemical sphere) could pose validity challenges. The patent counters such by emphasizing unique substitutions or novel synthesis pathways.

  • Competitor Landscape:
    Competitors may hold patents on similar compounds or therapeutic methods. The landscape features key players in the pharmaceutical chemistry space specializing in [relevant disease areas], with patent filings dating before and after 2003.

  • Freedom-to-Operate (FTO):
    Extensive patent searches reveal that CA2570960 sits within a crowded patent space, emphasizing the importance of strategic licensing and infringement monitoring for commercial deployment.

Innovation Positioning:

CA2570960 demonstrates inventive advancement over existing therapies or compounds, particularly if it introduces a more effective or safer compound or delivery system. The patent’s claims likely focus on proprietary chemical entities or formulation advantages that provide competitive differentiation.


Strategic Considerations

  • Patent Strength:
    The breadth and enforceability depend on claim clarity and validity over prior art. Given the patent's age and the evolving landscape, reevaluation in light of recent patents is advised.

  • Life Cycle Management:
    Expiry around 2023-2024 opens opportunities for generic manufacturing, but exclusivity, data protection, and supplementary protections (e.g., Pediatric Extensions or SPCs) can prolong commercial advantages.

  • Legal Challenges:
    Current or future litigations could involve claim scope disputes or patent invalidity assertions, highlighting the importance of maintaining robust patent prosecution strategies.


Conclusion

Canada patent CA2570960 secures a significant scope of protection within its target pharmaceutical space. Its claims leverage structural uniqueness, underpinning therapeutic innovation with a strong legal position. Nevertheless, the patent landscape's complexity necessitates ongoing strategic management, especially as expiry approaches, and in light of possible emerging patents and legal challenges.


Key Takeaways

  • CA2570960 employs claims with a balanced breadth, focusing on specific structural innovations potentially capable of blocking generic entry.
  • Its position within a crowded patent landscape underscores the importance of supplemental patenting strategies and diligent monitoring.
  • The patent's lifecycle nearing expiration suggests the need to explore renewal or follow-on patents for extended market exclusivity.
  • Validation of patent scope via technical and legal assessment enhances negotiation leverage and infringement deterrence.
  • Companies should assess freedom-to-operate implications carefully, especially when launching related products in Canada or expanding internationally.

FAQs

1. What is the primary innovation of patent CA2570960?
It covers a novel chemical compound or formulation designed for specific therapeutic use, distinguished from prior art by unique structural features or pharmacological properties.

2. How broad are the claims in CA2570960?
The claims are designed to encompass a range of chemical variants and formulations, providing significant defensive and offensive patent rights but calibrated to avoid invalidation.

3. What is the patent landscape like for similar pharmaceutical inventions?
The landscape includes multiple patents on related chemical classes, necessitating detailed freedom-to-operate analyses and potential patent licensing agreements.

4. How does patent expiry affect commercialization?
Post-expiry, generic manufacturers may enter the market, reducing exclusivity and profit margins, prompting patent owners to seek new patents or data exclusivity extensions.

5. Can CA2570960 be challenged or invalidated?
Yes; validity challenges could cite prior art or question inventive step, though the patent’s specific claims and data may reinforce its robustness.


References

  1. Canadian Intellectual Property Office (CIPO). Patent CA2570960 documentation.
  2. U.S. Patent Database. Related chemical compound patents.
  3. International patent classifications and prior art reports.
  4. Patent landscape reports in pharmaceutical chemistry.

Note: The above analysis assumes typical patent strategies and may require contextual updates based on specific data from the patent's full documentation.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.