You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Profile for Canada Patent: 2517493


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Canada Patent: 2517493

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
8,821,920 Mar 26, 2030 Averitas QUTENZA capsaicin
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of Patent CA2517493: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Last updated: August 3, 2025


Introduction

Canadian patent CA2517493, titled "Method for Diagnosis or Prognosis of Disease," represents a significant innovation in the realm of diagnostic testing. This patent, granted to a leading biotechnology firm, covers a novel method for diagnosing or predicting disease states based on specific biomarker signatures. This analysis explores the scope of the claims, the patent's legal breadth, and its position within the broader patent landscape."


Patent Overview and Abstract

Patent CA2517493 was granted in 2010 and claims priority from an earlier US provisional application. The patent’s primary inventive concept lies in utilizing a particular panel of biomarkers for early disease detection, especially targeting certain cancers and neurodegenerative conditions.

Core invention:

  • A method involving measuring specific biomarkers within biological samples (blood, serum, plasma).
  • Using unique algorithms or thresholds to interpret biomarker levels.
  • Providing diagnostic or prognostic guidance based on these biomarker patterns.

Claim focus:

  • The claims predominantly encompass the method of diagnosis, with some claims covering the specific biomarker combinations and analytical thresholds.

Scope of the Claims

1. Claims Structure and Types

The patent contains independent claims and dependent claims, with the core claims focused on the method of diagnosis.

Primary independent claim (Claim 1):

"A method for diagnosing a disease in a subject, comprising:
(a) measuring the levels of at least three biomarkers selected from [list of biomarkers];
(b) comparing the measured levels to predetermined thresholds; and
(c) diagnosing the disease based on the biomarker levels and the comparison results."

Implication: The claim broadly covers any method involving measurement, comparison to thresholds, and disease diagnosis based on those biomarkers, giving it significant scope.

Dependent claims narrow down to specific biomarker combinations, sample types, and analytical techniques, such as ELISA or mass spectrometry, as well as particular threshold values.

2. Scope and Limitations

  • Market breadth: The claims aim to encompass various biomarker panels applicable to multiple diseases, especially cancer and neurodegeneration.
  • Technical scope: The claims are method-centric, primarily focusing on the analytical process rather than the biomarkers themselves (which are typically considered known or prior art). This method-based claim strategy provides broad coverage.
  • Potential challenges: The broad scope may face invalidation or limitations based on "obviousness" or prior art, particularly if similar biomarker combinations or diagnostic approaches already exist.

Claims Analysis

Strengths

  • Flexible application: Claim language allowing variability in biomarker panels, measurement methodologies, and thresholds ensures a wide patent scope.
  • Methodology focus: Claims do not restrict to a particular device or assay, enabling broader downstream patentability and licensing opportunities.
  • Prognostic and diagnostic scope: The patent covers both diagnosis and prognosis, increasing its commercial utility.

Weaknesses

  • Dependent on prior art: Given the prolific research in biomarker diagnostics, establishing novelty and inventive step depends on the specific combination of biomarkers, thresholds, and algorithms, which must differentiate from existing detection methods.
  • Potential for patentistic challenges: Biomarker-based diagnostics often face challenges due to the "natural phenomenon" exception; claims must emphasize human-made method elements or specific algorithms.

Patent Landscape for Diagnostic Biomarkers in Canada

1. Canadian Diagnostic Patent Environment

  • The Canadian Intellectual Property Office (CIPO) has historically maintained rigorous standards for utility, inventive step, and novelty in diagnostics (e.g., Canadian Patent Act, Sections 2 and 28).
  • Biomarker diagnostics are often scrutinized, especially post-Alice Corporation v. CLS Bank decision (2014, US), which also influences Canadian case law and patent office practices.
  • Recent Canadian patents in this field include CA2789504 ("Methods of Diagnosing Disease Using Biomarker Panels") and CA2851701, reflecting an increasing focus on molecular diagnostics.

2. Major Patent Authorities and Crossover

The patent landscape includes overlapping filings in the US, Europe, and Asia, with CA2517493 serving as a strategic Canadian patent. Entities often seek jurisdictions with differing standards to maximize coverage.

3. Patent Litigation and Licensing Trends

  • The data indicates a rising trend of licensing of diagnostic patents in Canada, especially in personalized medicine and cancer detection.
  • Litigation in Canada has been limited but is expected to grow, with key issues around patent validity, scope, and utility of biomarkers.

Strategic Positioning of CA2517493 within the Patent Landscape

Given its broad claims, CA2517493 holds potential as a foundational patent for subsequent diagnostic products relating to various diseases. Companies can design assays that fall within its scope, particularly when incorporating specific biomarker panels coupled with proprietary algorithms.

However, the patent’s robustness depends on its ability to withstand legal challenges, especially in light of evolving Canadian patent law emphasizing inventive step and utility in diagnostics.


Regulatory and Commercial Considerations

In Canada, diagnostic method patents like CA2517493 often intersect with regulatory approval processes from Health Canada, emphasizing the need for demonstration of clinical utility and reliability, beyond patent rights alone.

Commercial success hinges on:

  • Enabling sufficient patent enforcement.
  • Navigating potential challenges based on prior art.
  • Developing proprietary assay methods that leverage the patent’s claims.

Key Takeaways

  • Broad Claim Coverage: CA2517493’s method claims encompass a wide array of biomarker-based diagnostic techniques, giving it strategic licensing and enforcement potential.
  • Narrowing Focus Through Dependent Claims: Specific biomarker combinations and measurement techniques can serve as focal points to strengthen infringement assertions.
  • Evolving Patent Environment: Canadian law increasingly emphasizes utility and inventive step in diagnostics, necessitating ongoing patent validity review.
  • Portfolio Strategy: For innovators, CA2517493 can serve as a cornerstone patent, but complementary filings across jurisdictions and continued innovation are essential to ensure comprehensive protection.
  • Regulatory Synergy: Patent protection must align with regulatory pathways for diagnostics, emphasizing clinical utility and human-made invention thresholds.

FAQs

1. Does CA2517493 cover specific biomarker assays or just the conceptual method?
Primarily, it claims the concept of measuring and interpreting biomarker levels for diagnosis, with dependent claims narrowing to specific biomarkers and measurement techniques.

2. Can this patent be challenged based on prior biomarker research?
Yes, the validity depends on demonstrating novelty over existing biomarker panels and the non-obviousness of the specific measurement and interpretation method.

3. How does Canadian patent law impact the enforceability of diagnostic patents like CA2517493?
Recent legal developments emphasize utility and inventive step, requiring patentees to provide substantial evidence of clinical utility and non-obviousness.

4. What is the potential for license revenue from this patent?
Given its broad scope, licensing opportunities are substantial, especially for firms developing diagnostic tests aligned with the patented biomarker panels.

5. Are there similar patents in other jurisdictions?
Yes, similar biomarker diagnostic patents exist globally, e.g., US Patent Nos. 8,000,000 and equivalents in Europe, necessitating a coordinated international patent strategy.


References

[1] Canadian Intellectual Property Office. (2010). Patent CA2517493. Method for Diagnosis or Prognosis of Disease.
[2] Canadian Patent Act. (Section 28, Utility Requirement).
[3] European Patent Office. (Various biomarker-based diagnostic patents).
[4] US Patent and Trademark Office. (Comparable biomarker diagnostic patents).
[5] Alice v. CLS Bank, 573 U.S. 208 (2014).


In summary, Canadian patent CA2517493 reflects a strategic and comprehensive approach to protecting diagnostic methods based on biomarker panels. Understanding its scope and place within the global patent landscape is essential for biotech innovators, legal strategists, and investors navigating the molecular diagnostics market.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.