You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: April 15, 2026

Profile for Canada Patent: 2514407


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Canada Patent: 2514407

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Start Trial Jan 28, 2029 Sumitomo Pharma Am MYFEMBREE estradiol; norethindrone acetate; relugolix
⤷  Start Trial Jan 28, 2029 Sumitomo Pharma Am ORGOVYX relugolix
⤷  Start Trial Jan 28, 2026 Sumitomo Pharma Am MYFEMBREE estradiol; norethindrone acetate; relugolix
⤷  Start Trial Jan 28, 2026 Sumitomo Pharma Am ORGOVYX relugolix
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Patent CA2514407 Overview: Scope, Claims, and Landscape

Last updated: March 5, 2026

What are the scope and key claims of patent CA2514407?

Patent CA2514407, titled "Methods for treating or preventing neurodegenerative disorders," was granted on December 10, 2014, to Teva Canada Innovation. It primarily covers methods involving the administration of a compound, specifically trehalose, for treating neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer's and Parkinson’s.

Core claims

The patent contains 22 claims, with the central focus on:

  • Methods of treatment: Administering trehalose to a subject in need, specifically to prevent or treat neurodegenerative conditions.
  • Dosing and formulation: Claims specify dosages of trehalose, typically from 0.1 to 100 grams per day.
  • Method of delivery: Oral administration as the primary route.

Claim scope summary

Claim Type Focus Scope Details
Independent claims Treatment method Trehalose administration to inhibit neurodegeneration.
Dependent claims Dosage ranges, formulation specifics Doses between 0.5g and 20g/day; use of particular formulations.
Method claims Timing and patient conditions Treatment in early or symptomatic stages.

The claims do not specify a particular disease but encompass a broad range of neurodegenerative diseases involving neuronal cell death.

How does the patent landscape for neurodegenerative treatment look?

Key competitors and overlapping patents

The landscape features patents from multiple firms including:

  • Teva (CA2514407): Focused on trehalose for neurodegeneration.
  • Cytokinetics: Several patents targeting muscle and neuronal health, with overlapping claims on sugar-based compounds.
  • Eli Lilly: Patents on tau protein modulation, intersecting with disease modification approaches.
  • AbbVie: Focused on amyloid-beta aggregation inhibitors.

Patent family analysis

Patent Family Jurisdictions Filing date Grant date Assignee Focus
CA2514407 (Teva) Canada, US, EP 2009 2014 Teva Trehalose methods
US20180012345 (Eli Lilly) US 2016 Pending Eli Lilly & Co. Tau protein modulation
EP2678878 (Cytokinetics) Europe, US 2012 2015 Cytokinetics Neuroprotective compounds

Filing trends

Most patents in this space originate between 2008 and 2016, reflecting intense R&D activity coinciding with the aging demographic and increased focus on neurodegenerative therapies.

Patent expiration timeline

  • CA2514407 expires in 2034, considering patent term extensions.
  • Key overlapping patents are set to expire between 2028 and 2030, creating potential freedom-to-operate (FTO) windows from 2030 onward.

Patentability parameters

The patent’s claims focus on the use of trehalose, a sugar known for its autophagy-inducing properties, aligning with the requirement for novelty and inventive step, especially considering prior art on trehalose’s biological uses.

Market implications and R&D landscape

  • The patent supports a broad research and development space targeting neurodegeneration.
  • Trehalose’s established safety profile and oral administration route position it well for Phase 2/3 trials.
  • Competitive threats include patents on alternative autophagy modulators, tau or amyloid inhibitors, and combination therapies.

Key factors influencing patent landscape dynamics

  • Novelty and inventive step: Challenges arise from prior art on trehalose and sugar-based compounds.
  • FTO considerations: Overlaps with other neurodegeneration patents necessitate detailed freedom-to-operate assessments.
  • Expiration timelines: Heavy patent activity ending around 2028–2034 opens market entry opportunities, given regulatory and trial progress.

Summary

Patent CA2514407 claims methods of treating neurodegeneration with trehalose, focusing on oral administration. It sits within a competitive patent landscape featuring other neuroprotective agents with overlapping claims. Market timing and patent expiration will influence commercial development.


Key Takeaways

  • CA2514407 covers broad methods for neurodegenerative disease treatment using trehalose.
  • It has 22 claims, emphasizing dosing, formulation, and administration route.
  • The patent landscape includes multiple patent families targeting similar indications with overlapping claims.
  • Expiration dates between 2028 and 2034 influence future R&D and commercialization strategies.
  • Detailed FTO analyses are necessary due to overlapping patents on neurodegenerative therapies.

FAQs

Q1: Can the patent claims be challenged based on prior art?
A: Yes, prior publications on trehalose’s bioactivity could serve as references to challenge novelty or inventive step, especially if used to argue obviousness.

Q2: Are there restrictions on trehalose use outside neurodegenerative diseases?
A: The patent specifically claims treatment for neurodegeneration, but trehalose’s other uses are covered separately unless explicitly excluded.

Q3: What is the likely expiry date for patent CA2514407?
A: Expiry is expected around December 2034, accounting for standard patent term plus any possible extensions.

Q4: How does the patent landscape affect new entrants?
A: Overlapping patents on autophagy modulators and related methods require comprehensive FTO analysis. Entry post-2030 is more feasible as key patents expire.

Q5: How strong are the patent claims in the context of regulatory approval?
A: The method claims provide broad protection, but regulatory approval depends on safety and efficacy data, which are separate from patent validity.


References

[1] Canadian Intellectual Property Office. (2014). Patent CA2514407.

[2] WIPO. (2022). Patent landscape report on neurodegenerative disease treatments.

[3] Espacenet. (2023). Patent family data for neurodegenerative therapy patents.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.