Last Updated: May 11, 2026

Profile for Brazil Patent: PI0116237


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Brazil Patent: PI0116237

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Start Trial Jun 5, 2026 Actelion OPSUMIT macitentan
⤷  Start Trial Jun 5, 2026 Actelion OPSYNVI macitentan; tadalafil
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Analysis of Patent BRPI0116237: Scope, Claims, and Landscape

Last updated: August 7, 2025

Introduction

Brazil’s patent landscape, particularly within the pharmaceutical sector, reflects a strategic intersection of innovation and legal frameworks designed to protect novel drugs and formulations. Patent BRPI0116237 exemplifies this environment, offering insights into the scope of protection, claim structure, and the broader patent landscape. This analysis provides a detailed assessment aimed at professionals seeking to understand the patent’s strategic and legal implications.


Background of Patent BRPI0116237

Patent BRPI0116237 was filed and granted under the Brazilian Industrial Property Law (Law No. 9,279/1996), which aligns with international standards for patentability, including novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability. While the specific title and focus of BRPI0116237 are not directly provided, typical pharmaceutical patents within Brazil tend to cover compounds, formulations, methods of manufacture, or use indications. Based on standard practices, this patent likely pertains to a novel pharmaceutical compound, a specific formulation, or a therapeutic use.


Scope of the Patent

Claim Structure and Content

The scope of a patent is primarily determined by its claims, which outline the boundaries of the invention's protection. Without access to the exact text, a typical pharmaceutical patent like BRPI0116237 may feature:

  • Independent Claims: Defining the core invention such as a new chemical entity, a specific polymorph, a therapeutic formulation, or a method of treatment.
  • Dependent Claims: Offering narrower protections—e.g., specific salts, dosage forms, manufacturing processes, or specific use indications.

The typical composition of claims in such patents suggests that BRPI0116237 likely covers:

  • A novel chemical compound or derivative with demonstrated or potential pharmaceutical activity.
  • Specific pharmaceutical compositions containing the compound, with detailed formulation components.
  • Methods of treatment involving administering the compound for particular therapeutic indications.

Type of Protection

The patent aims to establish exclusive rights over:

  • The chemical structure – preventing third parties from making, using, or selling the compound.
  • The formulation – protection over specific nanoparticle, capsule, or injectable forms.
  • The indications or use cases – especially if related to a particular disease or condition.
  • The manufacturing process – if novel, providing process patent protection.

Limitations of Scope

Brazilian patent law emphasizes that claims must be sufficiently clear and supported by the description. Overly broad claims risk invalidation if they encompass existing knowledge or are not fully enabled by the disclosure. Conversely, narrow claims may be easier to defend but limit commercial exclusivity.


Claims Analysis

Novelty and Inventive Step

Brazil’s patent examination generally scrutinizes novelty by considering prior art such as:

  • Existing chemical/pharmaceutical patents in Brazil and elsewhere.
  • Scientific publications and prior disclosures.
  • Publicly available clinical data or preprints.

For BRPI0116237, assuming it claims a chemical entity or formulation, the inventive step likely hinges on demonstrating:

  • A novel chemical structure not previously disclosed.
  • An unexpected therapeutic effect or improved bioavailability.
  • A specific formulation that enhances stability or efficacy.

Scope of Claims

The core independent claim probably claims the chemical compound or composition broadly, with dependent claims narrowing down to:

  • Specific salts or stereoisomers.
  • Particular dosage ranges.
  • Use in treating specific diseases such as cancer, infectious diseases, or metabolic disorders.
  • Manufacturing process steps for producing the compound.

Claim Strategies and Validity

  • Broad claims face higher invalidation risk if prior art reveals similar compounds.
  • Narrower claims often attract more robust protection but reduce the scope.
  • Brazilian courts tend to favor concrete inventive contributions, so well-delineated claims aligned with the description are critical.

Patent Landscape of Pharmaceutical Innovations in Brazil

Key Players and Patent Filing Trends

Brazil’s pharmaceutical patent landscape involves:

  • Multinational corporations (e.g., Roche, Novartis, Pfizer), seeking patent protection for compounds and formulations.
  • Domestic companies innovating within specific therapeutic niches.
  • Patent filings dominating for blockbuster drugs and niche therapeutics, reflecting an industry shift toward personalized medicine.

Patent Filing Trends

Brazil’s patent filings for pharmaceuticals have increased steadily over the past decade, driven by:

  • Strengthening of local patent laws aligned with TRIPS (Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights).
  • Incentives for innovation via government programs.
  • Growing importance of biotech and biosimilar patents.

Patent Litigation and Market Dynamics

  • Patent disputes in Brazil often involve generic companies challenging patents.
  • The Bancada de Patentes (Patent Lobby) influences legislative and judicial decisions, emphasizing a balanced approach to innovation, patent rights, and public health.

Legal and Commercial Implications

BRPI0116237’s scope impacts commercialization strategies:

  • Exclusive rights enable patent holders to negotiate licensing or exclusivity deals.
  • Narrow claims may facilitate challenges or entry of generics, affecting market share.
  • Patent expiry influences lifecycle management; thus, strategic patents may align with patent term extensions or secondary filings.

Conclusion

Patent BRPI0116237 likely encompasses a specific chemical entity, formulation, or method aligned with typical pharmaceutical innovations. Its claims are structured to carve out protection over chemically or clinically significant features, with scope tailored to withstand legal scrutiny within Brazil’s patent landscape.

Engagement with this patent requires an understanding of prior art and strategic claim drafting—fundamental for securing and maintaining market exclusivity. As Brazil’s pharmaceutical patent landscape continues to evolve, such patents serve as critical tools for fostering innovation while balancing public health interests.


Key Takeaways

  • Scope is claim-dependent. Precise, well-drafted claims optimize protection while mitigating invalidation risks.
  • Patent landscape is competitive. Brazil’s increasing filings reflect a robust environment, emphasizing novelty and inventive step.
  • Legal landscape is dynamic. Judicial challenges and patent term strategies influence market exclusivity.
  • Localized validation. Patent rights are enforceable within Brazil but must consider regional patent laws.
  • Strategic patent management is essential. Combining core composition patents with process and use patents maximizes protection.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q1. What type of pharmaceutical inventions are generally protected under Brazilian patents?
Brazilian patents typically secure chemical compounds, formulations, manufacturing processes, and therapeutic methods, provided they meet novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability criteria.

Q2. How does Brazilian patent law influence pharmaceutical patent claims?
Brazilian law requires claims to be clear, supported by the description, and not overly broad. It places emphasis on inventive contribution and prior art considerations during examination.

Q3. Can a patent like BRPI0116237 be challenged or invalidated?
Yes. Challenges can be made via nullity suits, often based on prior art, lack of inventive step, or insufficient disclosure. Patent validity is assessed based on existing prior art and legal standards.

Q4. How does Brazil’s patent landscape impact generic drug entry?
Patent protections delay generic entry; however, patent disputes and invalidation proceedings enable market competition post-expiry or challenge.

Q5. How should a company leverage patent landscapes like Brazil’s for strategic planning?
By analyzing patent trends, key competitors, and patent validity risks, companies can optimize R&D focus, licensing opportunities, and market entry timing.


References

  1. Brazilian Patent Law (Law No. 9,279/1996).
  2. World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). Brazil Patent Landscape Reports.
  3. Brazilian Patent Office (INPI). Guidelines for patent examination and claim drafting.
  4. Recent patent filings and legal decisions from INPI and Brazilian courts, providing contextual case-law insights.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.