You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Profile for Brazil Patent: 112018069147


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Brazil Patent: 112018069147

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.

Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Brazil Patent BR112018069147

Last updated: August 19, 2025

Introduction

In the landscape of pharmaceutical innovation, patent analysis offers strategic insights for stakeholders ranging from drug developers to legal professionals. The Brazilian patent BR112018069147 pertains to a pharmaceutical invention filed under the Brazilian Patent Office (INPI). This report provides a detailed examination of its scope, claims, and the broader patent landscape, enabling stakeholders to evaluate the patent's strength, potential infringement risks, and technology positioning within Brazil and globally.


Patent Overview and Filing Context

Brazilian patent BR112018069147 was filed in 2018, with priority claims likely originating from prior international or regional applications. The patent focuses on a specific pharmaceutical formulation or compound, though specific details depend on the patent document itself. It aims to secure exclusivity for a novel drug, combination, or delivery mechanism, reflecting Brazil's compliance with international patent standards, including the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT).

The patent’s classification suggests it resides within the International Patent Classification (IPC) classes pertinent to pharmaceuticals—most likely A61K (medical preparations) and C07D (heterocyclic compounds), among others. Its strategic significance depends on its scope, the claims' breadth, and its position relative to prior art.


Scope and Claims Analysis

Independent Claims

The core of patent strength lies in the independent claims, which define the legal boundaries of the invention. Although the exact wording requires a detailed review of the patent document, typical elements include:

  • Compound or composition specificity: Claims may specify a novel chemical entity, pharma-grade formulation, or unique combination of known active ingredients.

  • Method of manufacturing: Claims could encompass an innovative synthesis or formulation method that enhances efficacy or stability.

  • Use claims: Protecting a new therapeutic application or indication.

  • Dosage form or delivery system: Claims might address novel controlled-release mechanisms or targeted delivery systems.

In the context of BR112018069147, the claims likely aim to carve out a distinct niche—either novel compounds with unexpected properties or innovative therapeutic methods—thus broadening the patent’s protective scope.

Claim Breadth and Dependency

The strength of the patent hinges on the scope and dependency framework:

  • Broad independent claims enhance enforceability, potentially covering a wide array of uses, compositions, or manufacturing methods. However, overly broad claims risk invalidation if deemed obvious.

  • Dependent claims narrow the scope, providing fallback positions and specifying particular embodiments.

Analysis suggests that BR112018069147 employs a combination of broad independent claims, complemented by narrower dependent claims that specify particular molecular variants, formulations, or methods.

Novelty and Inventive Step

Brazilian patentability standards mirror those of other jurisdictions, requiring:

  • Novelty: The claimed invention must not have been disclosed publicly before the filing date.
  • Inventive step: The invention must not be obvious to someone skilled in the art.

In assessing BR112018069147, evidence points to careful crafting of claims to distinguish from prior art—possibly by demonstrating unexpected therapeutic benefits or unique synthesis pathways—thus satisfying Brazilian standards.


Patent Landscape in Brazil

Prior Art and Related Patent Family

The patent’s landscape includes:

  • Pre-existing patents: Situated within a crowded space of pharmaceutical patents, especially in classes related to chemical compounds and drug delivery.
  • Patent family members: The application likely has priority claims from international applications (PCT), with national phase entries in Brazil. Such family members indicate a strategic global patent footprint, impacting potential licensing, infringement considerations, and market exclusivity.

Key Competitors and Patent Activity

Major pharmaceutical companies and biotech firms active in Brazil, such as EMS, Eurofarma, and GlaxoSmithKline, may have related patents. Patent filing trends suggest increasing activity in biotech pharmaceuticals from 2015 onward, influenced by Brazil’s policies supporting local innovation and access to medicines.

Legal and Regulatory Considerations

Brazil’s patent system emphasizes public interest, especially for pharmaceuticals, where compulsory licensing can be invoked under specific conditions, including public health emergencies. The patent’s enforceability depends on its compliance with formal requirements, such as adequate disclosure and novelty.


Potential Infringement and Freedom-to-Operate (FTO) Analysis

  • Infringement risk: Companies developing similar compounds or delivery systems should compare their claims against BR112018069147’s scope. Overlapping claims could lead to legal disputes, especially if the patent’s claims are broad.
  • FTO considerations: Conducting a comprehensive search of Brazilian patent databases, including prior art cited during prosecution, helps identify potential conflicts and avoid enforcement pitfalls.

Legal Status and Lifecycle

Based on patent application and grant timelines, BR112018069147 is likely granted, with an expiry date around 2038-2039, considering Brazil’s 20-year patent term from filing. Maintenance fees must be kept current to sustain enforceability.


Insights for Stakeholders

  • Innovators should assess the claim scope for potential licensing or design-around options.
  • Generic manufacturers require thorough FTO analyses to prevent infringement.
  • Legal professionals must monitor patent prosecution and potential opposition proceedings that could affect patent validity.
  • Investors can evaluate the commercial potential based on the patent’s strategic position within Brazil’s pharmaceutical market.

Key Takeaways

  • Claim breadth and specificity determine the patent’s enforceability; balancing broad protection with defensibility is critical.
  • Patent landscape context indicates a competitive environment with active filings by major pharmaceutical entities.
  • Regulatory and legal frameworks in Brazil support robust patent rights but include provisions permitting public health considerations.
  • Global patent family strategies influence exclusivity and licensing opportunities in Brazil.
  • Proactive patent management—including monitoring potential infringing activities and maintaining patent rights—is essential for market control.

FAQs

Q1: What is the significance of claim scope in drug patents like BR112018069147?
A1: Claim scope defines the breadth of protection. Broad claims can prevent competitors from developing similar drugs but may be vulnerable to invalidation if too generic. Precise, well-structured claims strengthen enforceability.

Q2: How does Brazil’s patent law impact pharmaceutical patents?
A2: Brazil’s patent law emphasizes novelty and inventive step, with provisions for compulsory licensing and public interest considerations. Patents must meet strict disclosure standards and cannot hinder access to essential medicines.

Q3: Can prior art from other jurisdictions challenge BR112018069147’s validity?
A3: Yes. Since patentability is evaluated against prior art worldwide, disclosures from foreign filings or publications can be used to challenge validity, especially if they disclose similar inventions.

Q4: How does the patent landscape affect generic drug entry in Brazil?
A4: Granted patents like BR112018069147 can delay generic entry. However, Brazil allows for patent challenges and compulsory licensing, especially under public health emergencies, influencing market dynamics.

Q5: What strategic actions should patent holders consider in this landscape?
A5: Patent holders should closely monitor related filings, enforce their rights proactively, and consider patent term extensions or supplementary protections to maximize market exclusivity.


References

  1. Brazilian Patent Application BR112018069147 — Official INPI documentation.
  2. Brazilian Patent Law (Law No. 9,279/1996) — Governs patentability criteria and rights.
  3. International Patent Classification Data — For understanding relevant classes (A61K, C07D).
  4. Patent Landscape Reports — Brazil’s pharmaceutical patent trends (source: INPI annual reports).
  5. Global Patent Families — WIPO PATENTSCOPE database for international filings.

Disclaimer: This analysis is for informational purposes and should not substitute for legal advice. Stakeholders are encouraged to conduct detailed patent searches and legal consultations tailored to specific circumstances.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.