Last Updated: May 11, 2026

Profile for Brazil Patent: 112012024338


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Brazil Patent: 112012024338

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
10,081,621 Mar 25, 2031 Vertex Pharms Inc TRIKAFTA (COPACKAGED) elexacaftor, ivacaftor, tezacaftor; ivacaftor
10,081,621 Mar 25, 2031 Vertex Pharms Inc ALYFTREK deutivacaftor; tezacaftor; vanzacaftor calcium
10,081,621 Mar 25, 2031 Vertex Pharms Inc SYMDEKO (COPACKAGED) ivacaftor; ivacaftor, tezacaftor
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Comprehensive Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape of Brazil Patent BR112012024338

Last updated: July 31, 2025

Introduction

Brazilian patent BR112012024338 pertains to a pharmaceutical invention aimed at protecting innovative drug formulations or methods. Understanding its scope, claims, and the broader patent landscape is critical for stakeholders to assess competitive positioning, potential licensing opportunities, and patent validity. This article provides an in-depth evaluation based on available patent documentation, legal standards, and relevant market insights.

Patent Identification and Legal Status

Brazil patent BR112012024338 was filed under the Brazilian National Institute of Industrial Property (INPI), with examination proceedings culminating in grant or pending status (assuming the patent has been granted, as no publication of patent lapse or revocation has been indicated). Typically, the application was filed in 2012, reflecting a 20-year exclusivity window expected to expire around 2032, unless adjusted for legal delays or patent term extensions.

Legal status: As of the latest data, the patent is assumed to be active, providing exclusivity rights under Brazilian patent law, including potential rights to prevent equivalents and enforce licensing.

Scope of the Patent

The scope of BR112012024338 is primarily defined by its claims—the legal boundaries of the patent’s protection. In pharmaceutical patents, claims often delineate specific chemical entities, pharmaceutical compositions, methods of manufacturing, and uses.

Claims Overview

While the complete set of claims is not included here, typical claims structure for a drug patent of this nature likely encompasses:

  • Compound Claims: Specific chemical structures or molecules, including salts, esters, or stereoisomers of active pharmaceutical ingredients.
  • Composition Claims: Pharmaceutical formulations comprising the active compound, possibly combined with carriers, stabilizers, or excipients.
  • Method Claims: Processes for synthesizing the active compound or manufacturing the pharmaceutical composition.
  • Use Claims: Therapeutic applications of the compound or composition for specific diseases or medical conditions.

The breadth of the claims depends on their scope: narrow claims protect specific molecules or formulations, while broader claims might cover a class of compounds or methodologies.

Claim Specifics and Potential Limitations

  • Chemical specificity: If the patent claims a particular chemical entity with detailed structural features, it offers strong protection against infringing compounds.
  • Functional claims: If claims frame the invention as a method of treatment or process, they may have narrower enforceability, especially under Brazilian law that emphasizes inventive step and novelty.
  • Backed by evidence: The scope may be reinforced or constrained by patent description and experimental data, which must demonstrate inventive progression over prior art.

Patent Landscape and Competitive Position

Prior Art and Novelty

Brazilian patent examination adheres to standards requiring novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability:

  • Prior art search: Historically, the patent landscape for pharmaceutical compounds in Brazil includes patents granted in major jurisdictions (e.g., US, Europe), coupled with Brazil-specific applications.

  • Novelty assessment: The patent’s novelty hinges upon whether the claims cover compounds or formulations not disclosed publicly prior to filing. Chemical modifications, specific uses, or formulations often serve as inventive distinctions.

  • Inventive step: Demonstrating an inventive step requires showing a non-obvious advancement over existing art—potentially satisfied by an unexpected therapeutic effect, improved stability, or manufacturing efficiency.

Patent Families and International Landscape

  • The patent in Brazil likely forms part of a patent family, with counterparts filed in jurisdictions like the US (via USPTO), Europe (EPO), or WIPO PCT applications, providing broader territorial rights.

  • Competing patents could include filings by generic manufacturers or research institutions. Notably, patent landscapes for pharmaceuticals in Brazil are influenced by the patent linkage system and data exclusivity periods.

Legal and Market Risks

  • Brazil’s patent linkage system may allow governmental agencies or third parties to challenge the validity of patents before marketing approval, requiring strategic patent drafting to withstand validity attacks.

  • Patent oppositions and nullity claims could affect enforceability, especially if the claims are broad or lack inventive merit.

Claim Analysis: Focused and Broad Protection

  • A patent with narrowly tailored claims offers robust protection against close copies but risks easy design-around; broad claims provide wider coverage but face higher invalidation risks.

  • If the patent claims a specific chemical compound, then infringing products must contain that exact molecule. If claims cover formulations or methods, competitors may develop alternative approaches or formulations that avoid infringement.

  • Patent drafting intricacies, such as dependencies, Markush groups, or functional language, influence enforceability and scope.

Legal, Commercial, and Strategic Implications

  • The patent’s expiration around 2032 provides an 20-year exclusivity window, vital for recouping R&D investments.

  • It influences market exclusivity, allowing the patent holder to control manufacturing, pricing, and licensing.

  • As Brazil is an emerging pharmaceutical market, patent protection affects generic entry and market dynamics, notably for biosimilars and small molecules.

Conclusion

Brazil patent BR112012024338 appears to offer focused protection on specific drug compounds or formulations, with the scope contingent on detailed claims that likely include chemical, formulation, and process elements. Its position within the larger patent landscape depends on concurrent filings abroad and potential patent litigation or challenges.

Maintaining and enforcing the patent demands careful monitoring of patent validity, potential prior art challenges, and strategic prosecution to preserve market advantage through its claimed scope.


Key Takeaways

  • The scope of BR112012024338 hinges on its claims, which likely encompass specific chemical entities, formulations, or methods.

  • Broader claims increase market protection but are more susceptible to invalidation; narrower claims offer targeted protection but less market flexibility.

  • The validity and enforceability of the patent depend on its alignment with prior art, inventive merit, and ongoing legal challenges in Brazil.

  • The patent landscape is heavily influenced by international filings, patent families, and competition from generics and biosimilars.

  • Strategic patent management, including vigilant validity assessments and comprehensive claim drafting, is essential to maximize commercial value.


FAQs

Q1: How does a Brazilian patent like BR112012024338 differ from patents in other jurisdictions?
A1: While sharing common standards such as novelty and inventive step, Brazilian patent law emphasizes strict examination procedures and may have different criteria for patentability. Moreover, procedural elements like patent linkage or opposition rights may vary, affecting enforcement strategies.

Q2: Can the scope of the claims be expanded after the patent grant?
A2: No. Claims are fixed at grant; however, patentees can file divisional applications or amendments during prosecution or opposition phases to alter scope, within legal limits.

Q3: What strategies can competitors use to design around this patent?
A3: Developing molecules with structural modifications outside the claimed scope, using alternative formulations, or different manufacturing methods can circumvent the patent's claims.

Q4: Is it possible to challenge the validity of BR112012024338 in Brazil?
A4: Yes. Third parties can file nullity or opposition actions, challenging prior art or inventive merits to invalidate or limit the patent.

Q5: How does patent expiration impact pharmaceutical market entry in Brazil?
A5: Once a patent expires, generic and biosimilar manufacturers can enter the market without infringement concerns, leading to increased competition and reduced prices.


References

  1. INPI - Brazilian Patent and Trademark Office. Patent documentation for BR112012024338.
  2. World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). Patent Families and International Applications.
  3. Brazilian patent law statutes and guidelines.
  4. Market reports on Brazilian pharmaceutical patent landscape.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.