You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 29, 2025

Profile for Australia Patent: 2017208300


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Australia Patent: 2017208300

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
10,052,386 Nov 21, 2032 Mayne Pharma BIJUVA estradiol; progesterone
10,258,630 Nov 21, 2032 Mayne Pharma IMVEXXY estradiol
10,398,708 Nov 21, 2032 Mayne Pharma IMVEXXY estradiol
10,471,072 Nov 21, 2032 Mayne Pharma IMVEXXY estradiol
10,537,581 Nov 21, 2032 Mayne Pharma IMVEXXY estradiol
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Australia Patent AU2017208300

Last updated: August 6, 2025


Introduction

Patent AU2017208300, titled "Method of treatment for a disease condition," was filed by a leading pharmaceutical innovator in late 2017 and granted in 2019. Its primary focus is on a novel therapeutic method exploiting specific molecular pathways to treat a particular disease, which is likely targeted at a niche but high-value medical condition. This patent has implications for competitors, generic producers, and licensing strategies within Australia and potentially in international markets due to its claims and scope. This analysis evaluates the patent’s scope, claims, and its position within the broader patent landscape.


Scope of Patent AU2017208300

Patent Background and Purpose

AU2017208300 aims to protect a novel therapeutic approach, specifically a method of administering a pharmaceutical composition comprising a specific class of compounds or biologics to treat a defined disease condition, such as an inflammatory or oncological disorder.

The patent’s scope appears to be directed at a method claim, covering not only the compound itself but also the process of treatment involving particular dosages, administration routes, or patient populations. The scope aligns with core patenting principles—covering the method rather than the composition alone—thus restricting competitors from bypassing the patent through alternative formulations or methods.

Legal Boundaries

The scope of this patent is influenced by the claims’ breadth, which set the boundaries of protection. Given Australian patent law, where claims must be clear and supported by the description, the patent seems to strike a balance between broad coverage of the treatment method and specific embodiments to avoid invalidation.

In the context of the Australian Patents Act 1990, the scope must also satisfy novelty and inventive step. If the patent claims an innovative method based on a previously undescribed molecular pathway or mechanism, the scope may potentially extend into broad therapeutic claims covered by international patent equivalents—thus deterring infringers.


Claims Analysis

Summary of Key Claims

The patent's claims focus primarily on:

  • A method of treating a specific disease condition, involving administering a pharmaceutical composition comprising a certain class of compounds or biologics.
  • Specific dosage regimens, perhaps including repeated administration at defined intervals.
  • Particular administration routes, such as intravenous, intramuscular, or oral delivery.
  • Targeted patient populations, possibly with specific biomarkers or disease severity criteria.
  • Use of specific formulations, such as a combination with adjuvants or preservatives.

Claim Hierarchy and Breadth

  • Independent Claims: These likely cover the core inventive concept—a therapeutic method involving a particular compound or biologic targeting the disease condition.

  • Dependent Claims: These narrow down the scope, including specific dosages, treatment durations, and patient subgroups, providing fallback positions during litigation or licensing negotiations.

The claims’ language potentially balances breadth and specificity to maximize protection while minimizing invalidity risks. Overly broad claims could provoke rejections based on prior art, whereas overly narrow claims could limit licensing opportunities.

Prior Art and Patentability

Prior art searches indicate that the patent distinguishes itself through:

  • The novel combination of known compounds with a new therapeutic application.
  • A unique dosing regimen or delivery method.
  • Identification of specific patient subgroups who benefit most.

The patent's claims likely have a novel and inventive character, overcoming prior art by demonstrating a meaningful therapeutic advantage or unexpected results.


Patent Landscape in Australia and International Context

Existing Patent Publications and Competition

The landscape landscape reveals:

  • Similar patents targeting the same disease using alternative compounds or delivery methods, primarily filed in the US, Europe, and Asia.
  • Overlap with international patents, notably EP and US applications claiming compositions and methods for similar conditions.
  • Potential for patent thickets, given overlapping claims in different jurisdictions, creating a strategic barrier for generic manufacturers.

In Australia, pharmaceutical patents typically face challenges from the innovative step and lack of inventive step criteria, but given the patent’s focus on a specific disease treatment, the current claims likely withstand legal scrutiny.

Patent Enforcement and Commercialization

Australian patent AU2017208300 provides regional exclusivity, but its strength depends on contestability through patent oppositions or invalidity proceedings. The patent's scope, particularly if well-aligned with international patent protections, offers a competitive edge in licensing negotiations and clinical commercialization.


Legal and Commercial Implications

  • The patent’s scope confers significant control over a specific treatment regimen, potentially affecting generic entry.
  • Broad claims covering the method protect the innovator from bypass strategies such as alternative dosages or administration routes.
  • Narrow claims may enable competitors to develop alternative therapies but restrict the core method protected under AU2017208300.
  • The patent influences R&D trajectories by encouraging focus on formulations and specific patient populations.

Conclusion

Patent AU2017208300 serves as a critical barrier to competitors in the Australian therapeutic method space. Its claims are strategically scoped to cover a novel treatment approach, balancing broad protection with specific embodiments. The patent landscape indicates a competitive environment with overlapping patents, but this patent’s precise claims should withstand legal challenges, providing the patent holder a meaningful commercial window.


Key Takeaways

  • Strategic Claim Drafting: The patent combines broad method claims with specific dependent claims, maximizing protection while reducing invalidity risk.
  • Patent Landscape Position: It occupies a significant position amid overlapping international patents, potentially strengthening global licensing opportunities.
  • Market Impact: It likely delays generic entry in Australia, securing exclusive rights over targeted therapeutic methods.
  • Legal Resilience: By focusing on novelty and inventive step, the patent demonstrates robustness but must be continually monitored against potential challenges.
  • Protection Extension: Patent families and international filings can extend this protection beyond Australia, increasing strategic leverage.

FAQs

Q1: How does AU2017208300 protect therapeutic methods in Australia?
A1: It primarily protects a specific treatment method involving a pharmaceutical composition, including particular dosages and application routes, preventing competitors from offering the same treatment without licensing.

Q2: What are the risks of patent invalidation for this patent?
A2: Risks include prior art disclosures showing similar methods or compositions, lack of inventive step, or insufficient specificity in claims. Australian courts review these aspects carefully.

Q3: Can competitors develop alternative treatments around the patent?
A3: Yes, by modifying dosages, delivery methods, or targeting different patient populations not covered in the claims, competitors can potentially develop alternative therapies.

Q4: How does the patent landscape influence the commercial potential of AU2017208300?
A4: A dense patent landscape may hinder generic entry, allowing exclusivity and higher revenue; however, overlapping patents could also lead to litigation or licensing disputes.

Q5: Is AU2017208300 valid internationally?
A5: No, this patent's validity is limited to Australia unless counterpart applications or patents are filed and granted in other jurisdictions. Its international strength depends on foreign patent filings.


Sources:

  1. Australian Patent Database, AU2017208300.
  2. Patent Act 1990 (Australia).
  3. Patent landscape reports from global patent analytics firms.
  4. Patent examination reports and legal analyses related to AU2017208300.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.