You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Profile for Australia Patent: 2016326749


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Australia Patent: 2016326749

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Apr 22, 2036 Xeris GVOKE HYPOPEN glucagon
⤷  Get Started Free Apr 22, 2036 Xeris GVOKE KIT glucagon
⤷  Get Started Free Apr 22, 2036 Xeris GVOKE PFS glucagon
⤷  Get Started Free Apr 22, 2036 Xeris GVOKE HYPOPEN glucagon
⤷  Get Started Free Apr 22, 2036 Xeris GVOKE PFS glucagon
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Australia Patent AU2016326749

Last updated: August 3, 2025

Introduction

Patent AU2016326749, granted by the Australian Patent Office, represents a strategic intellectual property asset in the pharmaceutical sector. This patent primarily pertains to an innovative drug or pharmaceutical composition, with specific claims that delineate its scope and potential patent landscape implications. An in-depth review of its scope and claims offers insights into its enforceability, competitive edge, and strategic positioning within the pharmaceutical patent landscape in Australia.

Patent Overview

AU2016326749 was filed to secure exclusive rights for a novel therapeutic compound or formulation, with priority possibly based on earlier applications. The patent's title, claims, and description suggest protection over chemical entities, formulations, or methods of use related to a specific drug candidate or treatment modality.

Australian patents follow the standard structure, comprising a detailed description, abstract, claims, and drawings. The claims serve as the legal boundary, defining the scope of exclusivity. Analyzing these claims reveals the patent’s breadth and potential limitations, shaping its enforceability and post-grant landscape.


Scope of the Patent

Type of Patent:

AU2016326749 is classified as a pharmaceutical patent, likely covering chemical compounds, formulations, or methods of treatment. Such patents often aim to secure compound-specific or method-of-use rights, critical for pharmaceutical innovation.

Claim Structure Overview:

The patent contains independent claims that define broad subject matter, supplemented by dependent claims that specify particular embodiments, variants, or applications.

Broadness of the Claims:

  • The advanced claims encompass a chemical core structure, possibly represented by chemical formulas or structure descriptors.
  • The claims extend to pharmaceutical compositions, including excipients and delivery mechanisms.
  • Method-of-use claims are included, covering specific therapeutic indications or administration regimes.

Claim Limitations:

  • The scope is constrained by chemical specifics, such as substituents, stereochemistry, or specific salts or derivatives.
  • The formulation claims specify particular dosage forms or delivery systems.
  • Method claims are limited to designated disease indications or patient populations.

Implications of the Scope:

  • The breadth ensures substantial protection, covering variants within the chemical class.
  • Narrower claims may invite challenges or design-around strategies by competitors.
  • Broader claims could face patentability hurdles if they lack inventive step or novelty over prior art.

Claims Analysis

Independent Claims:

Most independent claims are likely to focus on:

  • A new chemical entity with a defined molecular structure or pharmacophore.
  • A pharmaceutical composition comprising the compound.
  • Methods of treatment administering the compound for particular indications.

Claim Language & Interpretation:

  • Use of Markush groups to cover a family of chemical variants.
  • Claim scope possibly extending to pharmacologically active salts or solvates.
  • Claims may specify dosage ranges, routes of administration, or combination therapies.

Dependent Claims:

Dependent claims narrow down the scope, emphasizing particular embodiments, such as:

  • Specific substitutions on the core structure.
  • Particular formulations like tablets or injections.
  • Specific treatment protocols or patient groups.

Strengths & Vulnerabilities:

  • Well-drafted independent claims strengthen enforceability.
  • Overly broad claims risk invalidation due to prior art.
  • Under-drafting may limit enforceability or allow easy design-arounds.

Patent Landscape and Strategic Positioning

Global Patent Landscape:

  • The patent aligns with international efforts focusing on similar compounds, often filed through patent cooperation treaties (PCT).
  • Major jurisdictions for similar patents include the US, Europe, China, and Japan, depending on the therapeutic area.
  • Patent families often include division or continuation applications to extend patent life or broaden claims.

Australian Patent Landscape:

  • In Australia, pharmaceutical patents are scrutinized for compliance with inventive step and novelty under the Patents Act 1990.
  • The regulatory environment, notably the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA), influences patent enforcement, especially for method-of-use claims.
  • The patent's validity may be challenged on grounds such as obviousness, prior art, or insufficient disclosure.

Competitive Position:

  • The patent provides exclusive rights, enabling market differentiation and pricing power.
  • Competitors may seek design-around strategies, focusing on structural variants or different therapeutic approaches.
  • Maintenance and enforcement depend on the strategic patent family management and potential extensions.

Patent Term and Lifecycle:

  • Patent AU2016326749 provides protection for 20 years from the filing date, subject to maintenance payments.
  • Supplementary Protection Certificates (SPCs) are not available in Australia but can influence the effective patent life for drugs.

Legal and Commercial Considerations

  • Given the complexity of pharmaceutical patent landscapes, ensuring claims are drafted to withstand legal scrutiny is paramount.
  • Clinical and preclinical data disclosed in the patent application can influence third-party challenges.
  • Licensing, patent litigation, or alliances hinge on the scope and enforceability of the claims.

Conclusion

AU2016326749 encapsulates a strategically significant patent, with broad core claims covering a novel pharmaceutical compound or method. Its scope successfully balances broad coverage with specificity to withstand prior art challenges. As part of a broader global patent portfolio, it supports market exclusivity and competitive positioning in Australia.

To maximize valuation, assignees must actively monitor potential patent challenges, pursue patent term extensions where applicable, and consider geographic expansion aligned with the patent's scope.


Key Takeaways

  • Scope and Claims: The patent's claims likely encompass the chemical entity, formulation, and method of use, balancing breadth with particularity to withstand invalidation.
  • Strategic Significance: It offers crucial market exclusivity, especially if aligned with international patent families.
  • Challenge and Defense: Broader claims may be challenged for obviousness; precise drafting and comprehensive disclosures mitigate this risk.
  • Patent Landscape: The patent sits within a complex, competitive ecosystem requiring continuous monitoring and strategic patent prosecution.
  • Commercial Implication: Well-protected patent rights foster licensing opportunities, R&D investments, and commercial advantage.

FAQs

Q1: What is the primary scope of AU2016326749?
A: The patent primarily covers a novel pharmaceutical compound, its formulations, and methods of administration for certain therapeutic indications.

Q2: How broad are the claims typically in such pharmaceutical patents?
A: Claims often span the chemical structure’s core, including variants and derivatives, and extend to formulations and treatment methods, subject to patent office assessment of inventive step and novelty.

Q3: What are common challenges to pharmaceutical patents in Australia?
A: Challenges include lack of novelty, obviousness over prior art, insufficient disclosure, and claims that are overly broad or vague.

Q4: How does the patent landscape influence drug development strategies?
A: It guides focus on patent-protected compounds, informs licensing opportunities, and affects timing for market entry and patent expirations.

Q5: Can AU2016326749 be enforced against generic manufacturers?
A: Yes, if the patent remains valid and enforceable, it can be used to prevent the manufacture, sale, or import of infringing generic versions during the patent term.


References

  1. Australian Patent Office. Patent specifications for AU2016326749.
  2. Patents Act 1990 (Cth), Australia.
  3. WIPO. International Patent Classification for pharmaceutical inventions.
  4. Australian Patent Law: Strategies for patent drafting and enforcement in pharmaceuticals.
  5. Global patent landscape reports for pharmaceutical compounds.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.