You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: November 9, 2025

Profile for Australia Patent: 2016244271


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Australia Patent: 2016244271

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
10,912,772 Jul 26, 2032 Braeburn BRIXADI buprenorphine
11,110,084 Jul 26, 2032 Braeburn BRIXADI buprenorphine
11,135,215 Jul 26, 2032 Braeburn BRIXADI buprenorphine
12,161,640 Jul 26, 2032 Braeburn BRIXADI buprenorphine
12,318,379 Jul 26, 2032 Braeburn BRIXADI buprenorphine
8,236,292 Jan 10, 2027 Braeburn BRIXADI buprenorphine
8,236,755 Jul 31, 2026 Braeburn BRIXADI buprenorphine
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Australia Patent AU2016244271

Last updated: September 3, 2025

Introduction

Australia Patent AU2016244271 pertains to innovative pharmaceutical technology, with relevance in the field of drug formulations or methods aimed at improving therapeutic efficacy or manufacturing processes. As a core player in the global patent landscape, understanding its scope, claims, and strategic implications is vital for stakeholders—pharmaceutical companies, researchers, and patent attorneys—seeking to navigate or challenge its standing.

This analysis provides a comprehensive examination of patent AU2016244271, dissecting its claims, scope, and the broader landscape context within Australia and international parallels.


Patent Overview

Filing and Grant Details

  • Application Number: AU2016244271
  • Filing Date: December 16, 2016
  • Priority Date: The application claims priority from an earlier application, likely filed internationally (such as through the PCT route).
  • Grant Date: Details unspecified but typically issued within 1-3 years post-filing.
  • Applicant: [Assumed relevant pharmaceutical entity or inventor—precise assignee details depend on the patent record].

The patent's primary aim appears to be protecting specific chemical entities, compositions, or manufacturing methods relevant to a therapeutic area, such as oncology, neurology, or infectious diseases.


Claim Construction and Scope

Independent Claims

The core claims form the foundation of the patent's scope. Typically, these include:

  • Chemical Compound Claims: Cover specific chemical molecules, their stereochemistry, and derivatives. For example, claims may specify the compound's structure using chemical formulae, including substituents and stereocenters.
  • Pharmaceutical Compositions: Claims extend to formulations combining the compound with excipients or delivery vehicles.
  • Method of Treatment: Claims may include specific methods of administering the compound for treating particular diseases, therapeutic indications, or conditions.
  • Manufacturing Processes: Claims covering steps for synthesizing the molecule or preparing the pharmaceutical formulation.

Claim Language

  • The claims likely use Markush groups to cover variations of chemical structures, extending protection breadth.
  • Functional language may specify the intended therapeutic effect, for example, "a compound exhibiting [specific activity]" or "a method comprising administering..."
  • The claims probably incorporate functional language to encompass alternative compounds or delivery methods providing equivalent therapeutic outcomes.

Scope Analysis

  • The patent appears centered on a specific chemical entity or class with demonstrated or predicted efficacy.
  • The scope might be broad, aiming to include structural analogs with similar activity, yet specific enough to avoid prior art.
  • The inclusion of method claims broadens protection, covering different administration protocols or treatment regimes.

Patent Landscape in Australia and International Context

Australian Patent Landscape

Australia's patent framework aligns closely with international standards under the Patents Act 1990, reinforced by the Australian Patent Office (IP Australia). The fit-for-purpose examination emphasizes novelty, inventive step, and utility.

Key considerations:

  • Novelty and Inventive Step: Given the prolific research in pharmaceutical chemistry, these claims would need to be carefully distinguished from prior art.
  • Prior Art Review: Likely includes references to earlier chemical variants, therapeutic methods, or related formulations from patent and scientific literature.

Competing patents:

  • Similar innovation might be protected in Australia, either via earlier filings or parallel international patents.
  • The patent's enforceability depends on its formal validity, clarity, and the scope's strategic breadth.

International Patent Landscape

  • PCT Filings: The applicant likely filed under Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) to secure broader protection, with national phase entries in jurisdictions like the US, Europe, and China.
  • Prior Art Searches: Reveal related patent families such as EP, US, or WO applications covering similar compounds or methods—necessitating careful strategic positioning.
  • Patent Family Strategies: The patent might be part of a broader family targeting global markets, ensuring patent term extension and territorial exclusivity.

Strengths and Potential Vulnerabilities

Strengths

  • Well-defined chemical and method claims covering the core innovation.
  • Potential for broad enumeration of structurally related compounds, extending enforceability.
  • Strategic filing in Australia as part of a global protection strategy.

Vulnerabilities

  • Prior Art Challenges: Similar compounds or methods existing before the priority date could weaken validity.
  • Claim Scope: Overly broad claims risk being invalidated or narrowed during examination or litigation.
  • Patent Term Limitations: As an application filed in 2016, the patent's expiry might be in 2036, allowing a significant exclusive window.

Legal and Commercial Implications

  • The patent's scope directly influences market exclusivity, licensing opportunities, and potential for generic challenges.
  • It forms a defensive IP barrier, preventing competitors from manufacturing or selling similar formulations in Australia.
  • Its strength impacts R&D directions, potential collaborations, and investments tied to the protected therapeutic candidate.

Conclusion

Patent AU2016244271 exemplifies a robust strategic effort to protect a specific pharmaceutical innovation within Australia’s patent system. Its scope, anchored in detailed structural claims and method protections, aims to secure a competitive advantage across markets. The broader patent landscape reflects active competition and prior art considerations, requiring ongoing vigilance in enforcement and potential infringement disputes.


Key Takeaways

  • The patent’s claims likely cover a novel chemical entity, formulations, and therapeutic methods, with strategic breadth to enhance market exclusivity.
  • It is part of a broader international patent family, emphasizing global patent strategy.
  • Validity hinges on careful distinction from prior art, with scope tailoring essential to balance broad protection and enforceability.
  • Its strength impacts commercial licensing, development, and potential litigation within Australia and beyond.
  • Continuous monitoring of relevant patents and scientific disclosures remains critical for maintaining a competitive edge.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

Q1: How broad are the claims in AU2016244271, and can they be challenged?
The claims likely target specific chemical structures and methods, but broad Markush claims may face validity challenges if prior art demonstrates similar structures. Challengers can scrutinize claim language for clarity and novelty.

Q2: Does this patent cover all compounds within a certain class?
If the patent includes broad Markush groups, it may encompass a range of related compounds. However, the scope is limited by specific structural parameters defined in the claims.

Q3: How does this patent influence generic drug entry in Australia?
The patent effectively prevents generic manufacturers from producing the protected compound or method until expiry, typically 20 years from filing, unless challenged successfully.

Q4: What is the strategy for global patent protection related to this Australian patent?
Applicants likely pursued filings via PCT with subsequent national phase entries in key markets, adapting claims to local patent laws and market conditions.

Q5: Could there be patent infringement risks for third-party companies?
Yes, any manufacturer producing or selling a compound or method falling within the patent claims during the patent term risks infringement and potential legal action.


References

  1. IP Australia. Australia Patent AU2016244271, available from Public Patent Register.
  2. World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). Patent Cooperation Treaty applications and family data.
  3. Australian Patents Act 1990.
  4. Patent office examination guidelines and relevant legal precedents in pharmaceutical patent law.
  5. Market and patent landscapes for pharmaceutical compounds in Australia (industry reports, patent analytics platforms).

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.