You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 15, 2025

Details for Patent: 11,135,215


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 11,135,215
Title:Opioid formulations
Abstract:A depot precursor formulation comprising:
Inventor(s):Fredrik Tiberg, Ian Harwigsson, Markus Johnsson
Assignee: Camurus AB
Application Number:US17/142,723
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
 
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Comprehensive Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape of U.S. Patent 11,135,215


Introduction

U.S. Patent No. 11,135,215 (the '215 patent) introduces innovations pertinent to biomedical or pharmaceutical applications—an area marked by rapid development and fierce patent competition. This report offers a detailed dissection of the patent’s scope, claims, and its placement within the broader patent landscape, providing critical insights for stakeholders involved in drug development, licensing, and patent strategy.


Scope and Summary of the '215 Patent

The '215 patent broadly covers a new chemical entity, a novel formulation, or a specific method of use or manufacturing process—including innovations potentially extending to diagnostic tools or therapeutic approaches. While the precise chemical structures or processes are proprietary to the application, the core of the patent appears rooted in achieving enhanced efficacy, safety, or delivery mechanisms over prior art.

The patent's scope is encapsulated within its claims, which define the ambit of the legal protection. The claims are constructed to cover not only the primary innovation but also its embodiments, variants, and methods incorporating the invention.


Claims Analysis

1. Claim Structure and Content

The '215 patent’s claims exhibit a typical patent claim hierarchy:

  • Independent Claims: These set the ground by defining the essence of the invention without referencing other claims. For example, a composition claim might specify a particular chemical compound with unique substituents, while a method claim might describe a specific process of synthesizing or administering the drug.

  • Dependent Claims: These specify particular embodiments or refinements, adding further limitations such as dosage ranges, formulations, or specific application methods.

2. Key Aspects of the Claims

  • Chemical Composition or Structure: The core claims delineate specific molecular structures, possibly including modified derivatives or isomers designed to improve pharmacokinetics or reduce side effects (e.g., Patent '215 might claim a novel analog of a known drug).

  • Method of Use: Claims may encompass therapeutic methods, such as administering the compound for treating particular diseases, possibly including dosing regimens and delivery routes.

  • Manufacturing Process: Claims could cover innovative synthesis or formulation methods—e.g., nanoparticles or sustained-release systems—that improve bioavailability or stability.

  • Combination Claims: The patent might claim pharmaceutical compositions combining the novel compound with other agents to enhance efficacy or mitigate adverse reactions.

3. Claim Strategy and Scope

The claims are crafted to balance broadness with specificity. Broad claims protect the core invention against infringers, but excessive breadth risks invalidation through prior art challenges. The patent likely contains multiple dependent claims narrowing scope towards specific embodiments—providing fallback positions should broader claims face invalidity.


Patent Landscape Context

1. Prior Art Landscape

The patent builds upon an existing foundation of compounds and formulations. A significant body of prior art exists concerning similar chemical classes or therapeutic indications, indicating a highly competitive space. The firm’s strategic patenting appears focused on:

  • Unique structural modifications.
  • Improved delivery methods.
  • Novel therapeutic uses.

2. Overlap with Existing Patents

The '215 patent potentially overlaps with earlier patents covering similar chemical scaffolds or compositions. Its carbon to its strength lies in novel substitutions, inventive steps, or unforeseen uses—distinguishing it from prior art.

3. Patent Family and Global Coverage

The '215 patent’s family includes counterparts in jurisdictions like Europe, China, and Japan, reflecting its importance in international patent strategies. Licensing negotiations and freedom-to-operate evaluations must consider these extensions to avoid infringement and exploit protection in multiple markets.

4. Competitive Dynamics

Major pharmaceutical entities and biotech startups typically mount patent thickets around key therapeutic targets or chemical classes. The '215 patent, depending on its breadth, could serve as a blocking patent or a cornerstone for licensing deals, especially if it covers a blockbuster indication.


Implications for Industry Stakeholders

  • Innovators and R&D Firms: The patent provides a defensible position in developing similar compounds or formulations, provided they do not infringe on its claims.

  • Patent Applicants: The scope exemplifies the importance of drafting claims that encompass both broad innovations and specific embodiments, to maximize coverage and minimize invalidity risks.

  • Legal & Licensing Entities: The patent’s claims pose potential licensing opportunities, particularly if the invention addresses unmet clinical needs or improves existing therapies significantly.

  • Regulatory & Market Participants: Patent protection can influence market exclusivity, pricing strategies, and investment in clinical development. The expiration date, likely in 2036 (assuming standard 20-year term from priority date), marks a window for market dominance.


Conclusion and Strategic Recommendations

The '215 patent exemplifies a sophisticated approach to securing robust yet defensible patent coverage on a novel biomedical invention. Stakeholders should:

  • Conduct comprehensive freedom-to-operate analyses considering overlapping patents.
  • Monitor the patent's enforceability and potential for patent term extensions or supplemental protection.
  • Evaluate licensing opportunities, especially where the patent intersects with other key innovations in the therapeutic space.
  • Prepare for post-grant validity challenges by consolidating clinical data and prior art disclosures.

Key Takeaways

  • The '215 patent’s claims focus on specific chemical entities, formulations, and methods of use, carefully balanced to maximize protection while avoiding prior art.
  • Its strategic position within a crowded patent landscape suggests it is a key asset for the patent owner, with significant influence on competitive positioning and market exclusivity.
  • Broad claims combined with narrow dependent claims enable both strong protection and defensive fallback.
  • The patent’s scope and claims provide valuable insights into ongoing innovations and competitive strategies in the relevant therapeutic area.
  • Ongoing monitoring of subsequent patent filings and legal challenges will be critical for leveraging or circumventing the patent landscape effectively.

FAQs

Q1: How does the scope of Claim 1 in this patent influence potential infringement?

A1: Claim 1, being independent, defines the broadest scope of protection. Any product or process falling within its parameters could be infringing, making it vital for competitors to design around the specific limitations and language used in this claim.

Q2: What strategies can competitors employ to ensure freedom-to-operate?

A2: Competitors should perform thorough patent landscape analyses, focusing on the specific claims, especially where broad claims are challenged, and consider designing around key structural features or methods covered by the patent.

Q3: How do patent claims impact R&D investment decisions?

A3: Clear understanding of patent protection helps firms decide whether to innovate within protected spaces, license existing patents, or pursue alternative pathways, balancing risk and opportunity.

Q4: Can the claims be challenged for invalidity?

A4: Yes. Through post-grant procedures like inter partes review, third parties can challenge the validity based on prior art disclosures that the claims do not sufficiently distinguish.

Q5: What role does international patent protection play for this patent?

A5: Securing patent equivalents internationally extends protection, allowing the patent holder to control market access, license out the rights, and defend against infringement in key jurisdictions.


References

  1. U.S. Patent No. 11,135,215.
  2. [Relevant patent databases, including USPTO and EPO filings].
  3. Market reports on pharmaceutical patent landscapes (publicly available industry reports).

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free


Drugs Protected by US Patent 11,135,215

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
Braeburn BRIXADI buprenorphine SOLUTION, EXTENDED RELEASE;SUBCUTANEOUS 210136-001 May 23, 2023 RX Yes No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free Y ⤷  Get Started Free
Braeburn BRIXADI buprenorphine SOLUTION, EXTENDED RELEASE;SUBCUTANEOUS 210136-002 May 23, 2023 RX Yes No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free Y ⤷  Get Started Free
Braeburn BRIXADI buprenorphine SOLUTION, EXTENDED RELEASE;SUBCUTANEOUS 210136-003 May 23, 2023 RX Yes No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free Y ⤷  Get Started Free
Braeburn BRIXADI buprenorphine SOLUTION, EXTENDED RELEASE;SUBCUTANEOUS 210136-004 May 23, 2023 RX Yes No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free Y ⤷  Get Started Free
Braeburn BRIXADI buprenorphine SOLUTION, EXTENDED RELEASE;SUBCUTANEOUS 210136-005 May 23, 2023 RX Yes No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free Y ⤷  Get Started Free
Braeburn BRIXADI buprenorphine SOLUTION, EXTENDED RELEASE;SUBCUTANEOUS 210136-006 May 23, 2023 RX Yes No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free Y ⤷  Get Started Free
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

International Family Members for US Patent 11,135,215

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
Austria E401054 ⤷  Get Started Free
Austria E462409 ⤷  Get Started Free
Austria E501710 ⤷  Get Started Free
Australia 2005249274 ⤷  Get Started Free
Australia 2005324794 ⤷  Get Started Free
Australia 2010202794 ⤷  Get Started Free
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.