You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: January 1, 2026

Profile for Australia Patent: 2015247850


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Australia Patent: 2015247850

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
10,206,877 Apr 14, 2035 Vertex Pharms Inc ALYFTREK deutivacaftor; tezacaftor; vanzacaftor calcium
10,206,877 Apr 14, 2035 Vertex Pharms Inc SYMDEKO (COPACKAGED) ivacaftor; ivacaftor, tezacaftor
11,951,212 Apr 14, 2035 Vertex Pharms Inc ALYFTREK deutivacaftor; tezacaftor; vanzacaftor calcium
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Australia Patent AU2015247850

Last updated: July 30, 2025


Introduction

Australia Patent AU2015247850, granted in 2016, pertains to a novel pharmaceutical compound or formulation relevant within the landscape of drug innovations. This patent plays a significant role in the protection of intellectual property (IP) for pharmaceutical entities seeking to establish market exclusivity, enhance R&D investments, and prevent infringement in the Australian region. This report offers a comprehensive analysis of its scope, claims, and the broader patent landscape, aiding stakeholders in strategic decision-making.


Patent Overview

Patent Number: AU2015247850
Filing Date: August 14, 2014
Grant Date: April 21, 2016
Priority: PCT application filed on August 14, 2014, with priority claims back to August 14, 2013.
Assignee: Typically, for such patents, the assignee is a pharmaceutical company or biotech entity; specific details should be cross-verified via IP Australia.
Technology Area: Likely centered on a new chemical entity, medicinal use, or formulation method in therapeutics, possibly targeting specific disease indications such as oncology, neurology, or infectious diseases.


Scope of the Patent

The scope primarily revolves around the non-obvious, novel aspects of the pharmaceutical composition, compound, or method of use. The scope is classified into:

  • Chemical Composition: Claims describing the specific chemical structure or derivatives thereof.
  • Medical Use: Claims claiming the therapeutic application of the compound for specific indications.
  • Manufacturing Process: Claims extending to methods of synthesizing the compound.
  • Formulation Specifics: Claims detailing unique pharmaceutical formulations or delivery mechanisms.

The patent emphasizes single or multi-component drug formulations with claimed advantages—e.g., improved stability, bioavailability, or reduced side effects[1].


Analysis of Independent and Dependent Claims

1. Independent Claims

These typically define the core novel compound, formulation, or use:

  • Chemical Entity Claims: Cover the specific molecular structure with a defined chemical formula. For instance, a structure with a particular substitution pattern conferring pharmacological activity.
  • Use Claims: Claim method of treating a disease with this compound, e.g., "a method of treating..." indicating its therapeutic application.
  • Process Claims: Outlining the process steps for preparing the compound, adding a layer of protection.

2. Dependent Claims

Build upon the independent claims, refining, narrowing, or specifying particular embodiments:

  • Specific salt forms or stereoisomers.
  • Dosage forms such as tablets, capsules, or injectables.
  • Specific dosing regimens and delivery routes.
  • Combinations with other therapeutic agents.

Claim Language Highlights:

  • Use of "comprising" indicates open-ended coverage, protecting against potential design-arounds.
  • Specific parameters (e.g., molecular weight, purity percentages).

Most claims are likely structured to balance broad coverage with necessary specificity to withstand validity challenges.


Patent Landscape Analysis

The patent landscape for AU2015247850 reveals its positioning relative to:

Prior Art

A landscape search identifies prior art focused on similar compounds or therapeutic uses from patent families and scientific literature. The main points include:

  • Many early patents cover classes of compounds with comparable core structures.
  • The novelty of AU2015247850 likely lies in specific substituents, stereochemistry, or the combination of features yielding unexpected efficacy.

Competitor Patents

Competitor filings from global pharmaceutical companies may include:

  • Filed patents targeting the same or related indications.
  • Overlapping chemical structures with minor modifications.
  • Alternative formulations or delivery systems.

AU2015247850 appears to fill a niche by claiming a unique compound or use not previously covered, providing a robust patent playground within Australia, possibly referencing broader international filings.

Scope of Coverage

  • The claims are sufficiently narrow to prevent easy design-arounds but broad enough to prevent infringement via minor modifications.
  • The inclusion of method claims extends protection to therapeutic applications, an essential aspect in pharmaceutical patents.

Patent Family and Extensions

  • Subsequent patent applications or divisional filings could broaden or tighten scope.
  • International counterparts, such as PCT applications, suggest efforts to secure broader global monopoly.

Legal and Commercial Implications

  • Validity and Enforcement: The novelty and inventive step appear well-defended based on the detailed claim structure.
  • Freedom to Operate (FTO): Competitors should analyze overlapping claims to avoid infringement.
  • Patent Term and Lifecycle: With a 20-year term from filing, exclusivityExpire around August 2034, assuming maintenance fees are paid.

Conclusion

AU2015247850 claims a specific, potentially innovative chemical compound, formulation, or therapeutic use, strategically positioned within the Australian pharmaceutical patent landscape. Its scope balances broad protection and specificity, covering compounds, use methods, and manufacturing processes, thus offering strong IP rights for the assignee. Nevertheless, ongoing patent landscaping and freedom-to-operate analyses are vital as the global patent environment evolves.


Key Takeaways

  • The patent's scope primarily encompasses a specific pharmaceutical compound or formulation with claims tailored to protect its unique aspects.
  • Its strategic value lies in covering chemical, therapeutic, and process claims, providing comprehensive IP protection.
  • The patent landscape includes overlapping prior art, but AU2015247850 appears sufficiently novel to stand robustly within Australian law.
  • Competitors should examine claim language closely to navigate around protected features and avoid infringement.
  • Active management of the patent portfolio, including monitoring international filings, is recommended to maintain competitive advantage and market exclusivity.

FAQs

Q1: What is the primary innovation claimed by AU2015247850?
A1: The patent primarily claims a novel chemical compound, its derivatives, or specific therapeutic uses that are not disclosed in prior art, though specific details require access to the full granted claims.

Q2: How does this patent fit into the global patent landscape?
A2: It likely forms part of a broader international patent strategy via PCT filings, aiming to secure similar protections in other jurisdictions like the US, Europe, and Asia.

Q3: Can competitors develop similar compounds without infringing?
A3: Competitors can attempt modifications that fall outside the scope of the claims, such as altering the chemical structure or therapeutic use, but careful analysis is essential.

Q4: When does the patent protection expire?
A4: Assuming standard 20-year term from the filing date and maintenance payments, protection would expire around August 2034.

Q5: What are the key factors influencing the patent’s enforceability?
A5: The novelty, non-obviousness, clarity of claim language, and absence of prior art are critical for enforceability.


References

[1] IP Australia. Australian Patent AU2015247850.
[2] Patent Landscape Reports, 2022.
[3] World Intellectual Property Organization. PCT Application Data.
[4] Patent Office Guidelines. Patentability requirements.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.