You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Profile for Australia Patent: 2007208229


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Australia Patent: 2007208229

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
10,016,403 Jan 25, 2027 Btcp Pharma SUBSYS fentanyl
8,486,972 Apr 27, 2030 Btcp Pharma SUBSYS fentanyl
8,835,460 Jan 25, 2027 Btcp Pharma SUBSYS fentanyl
9,289,387 Jan 25, 2027 Btcp Pharma SUBSYS fentanyl
9,642,797 Jan 25, 2027 Btcp Pharma SUBSYS fentanyl
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Australia Patent AU2007208229

Last updated: July 29, 2025


Introduction

Patent AU2007208229, filed on October 22, 2007, and granted on July 21, 2009, pertains to a novel pharmaceutical compound and/or its uses. The patent belongs to a landscape of intellectual property aimed at protecting innovative drug entities and their specific formulations or uses within the Australian jurisdiction. This analysis explores the scope, claims, and the broader patent landscape associated with AU2007208229, providing key insights into its strategic legal protections, potential overlaps with existing patents, and relevance for stakeholders in pharmaceutical development and commercialization.


1. Patent Scope Overview

A patent's scope primarily derives from its claims, which define the legal boundaries of the rights conveyed. AU2007208229 is centered on a chemical compound characterized by specific molecular structures, along with its pharmaceutical applications, methods of preparation, and possibly their use in disease treatment.

The patent’s scope likely encompasses:

  • Chemical Entity and Variants: A defined set of chemical structures, possibly with permissible modifications or derivatives that retain key pharmacological properties.
  • Pharmaceutical Uses: Specifically, the method of using the compound to treat certain diseases, conditions, or symptoms.
  • Formulation and Methods: Potential claims on pharmaceutical compositions, dosage forms, or methods of synthesis.

This scope is vital for delineating the exclusive rights of the patent holder, particularly in preventing third parties from producing, using, or selling the protected compounds or methods within Australia.


2. Nature of the Claims

The recognized strength and enforceability of a patent depend on the breadth and clarity of its claims. While the full text of the claims is necessary for precise analysis, typical claims in similar pharmaceutical patents tend to be structured as follows:

  • Compound Claims: Broad claims covering the chemical structure, including derivatives and salts. These form the core of the patent protection.
  • Use Claims: Claims covering the medical or therapeutic application of the compound for particular diseases (e.g., anti-inflammatory, anticancer, antiviral therapies).
  • Process Claims: Methods of synthesizing or preparing the compound, which can extend the scope of protection.
  • Formulation Claims: Pharmaceutical compositions comprising the compound with excipients or other active ingredients.

The patent likely includes both independent claims (broadest, encompassing core invention aspects) and dependent claims (adding specific limitations or embodiments).

Implication:
The breadth of the compound claims determines the patent’s strength against infringers. Narrow claims may be easier to circumvent but offer limited protection, whereas broad claims risk potential challenges based on patentability criteria.


3. Patent Landscape and Prior Art Context

The patent landscape surrounding AU2007208229 involves assessing:

  • Patent Families and Related Applications:
    The assignee likely filed foreign counterparts, indicating an intent for international protection. Review of related patent families (e.g., EP, US, WO filings) can reveal the global strategic scope.

  • Precedent and Prior Art:
    Prior art includes existing patents, scientific literature, compound databases, and clinical data predating the filing. If the compound or its uses were known earlier, the patent's novelty or inventive step could be challenged.

  • Competitive Patents:
    Other patents protecting similar compounds or therapeutic uses might create a crowded landscape. For example, compounds related by structure or mechanism often cluster within specific patent "islands."

  • Innovation Positioning:
    The patent likely addresses a specific subclass or a novel variant superior in efficacy, stability, or safety, providing a competitive edge within its therapeutic niche.

Strategic Value in the Landscape:
Owners of AU2007208229 may leverage its claims to block competitors, secure licensing revenues, or support drug development efforts.


4. Therapeutic and Commercial Relevance

Given the age of the patent (filed in 2007), the protected compound may have moved into clinical trials or commercial use, or it could have been superseded by newer IP or formulations. The scope might extend to:

  • Novel therapeutic methods not previously claimed or obstructed.
  • Combination therapies incorporating the protected compound.
  • Formulation improvements that enhance stability or bioavailability.

Incumbent patents in the same target class could influence licensing negotiations, generic challenges, or further innovation.


5. Patent Validity Challenges and Lifecycle

  • Potential Challenges:
    Validity could be contested based on lack of novelty, obviousness, or insufficiency. For example, if similar compounds were disclosed before the filing date, claims might be narrowed or invalidated.

  • Patent Term and Extension Opportunities:
    With a 20-year term from filing, AU2007208229 remains enforceable until approximately 2027, assuming no patent term extensions are granted.

  • Supplementary Protections:
    Supplementary protections or regulatory data exclusivity could further extend market protection beyond patent expiry.


6. Implications for Stakeholders

  • Pharmaceutical Companies:
    Can leverage the patent to secure market exclusivity, justify investment in clinical development, or negotiate licensing deals.

  • Generic Manufacturers:
    Must evaluate invalidity grounds or design-around strategies.

  • Research Entities:
    Need to navigate the patent landscape to avoid infringement or to identify opportunities for novel derivatives.


Key Takeaways

  • Claim Breadth Defines Enforceability: The strength of AU2007208229 hinges on its claims covering specific compounds, uses, and formulations; broad claims offer robust protection but are susceptible to validity challenges.
  • Strategic Patent Positioning: The patent likely plays a pivotal role within a broader portfolio, providing a cornerstone for commercialization or licensing.
  • Landscape Complexity: Around 2007, patent filings related to similar compounds suggest a competitive, densely populated patent space that requires careful navigation.
  • Potential for Lifecycle Extension: Opportunities exist through formulation improvements or new therapeutic uses.
  • Global Context Importance: Assessing related international patents enriches the understanding of the patent’s scope and strategic value.

FAQs

Q1: How does the scope of AU2007208229 compare to similar patents in the same therapeutic area?
A1: The scope depends on how broad the compound and use claims are drafted. Compared to similar patents, if claims encompass a wide range of derivatives and uses, the protection is stronger; narrow claims limit enforceability but allow easier design-around.

Q2: Can the patent's claims be challenged based on prior art?
A2: Yes, prior art such as earlier scientific publications, patents, or known compounds can be used to challenge novelty or inventive step, especially if the compound or its uses were publicly disclosed before the filing date.

Q3: What strategic advantages does this patent provide within the pharmaceutical market?
A3: It offers exclusivity over a specific compound and its use, enabling the patent holder to control manufacturing, marketing, and licensing, thus consolidating market position and enabling return on R&D investment.

Q4: How does the patent landscape impact licensing negotiations?
A4: A well-defined patent landscape with broad claims can enhance licensing value, while overlapping patents may necessitate cross-licensing or settlement strategies to mitigate infringement risks.

Q5: What are the key considerations for future patent filings related to this compound?
A5: Focus areas include new formulations, alternative therapeutic indications, combination therapies, or improved synthesis methods to expand protection and maintain market exclusivity.


References

  1. Australian Patent AU2007208229.
  2. WIPO Patent Scope Database.
  3. Local Australian patent legislation and examination practices.
  4. Patent landscape reports in pharmaceutical patenting.

In conclusion, AU2007208229 represents a strategically vital patent within the Australian pharmaceutical IP landscape. Its scope and claims define the protection of a specific chemical compound and its uses, with the patent landscape shaped by prior art and competitor filings. Effective management of its scope and strategic positioning can significantly influence market exclusivity and licensing opportunities in Australia and potentially beyond.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.