You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Profile for Austria Patent: 514445


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Austria Patent: 514445

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Aug 18, 2025 Currax ONZETRA XSAIL sumatriptan succinate
⤷  Get Started Free Dec 29, 2025 Optinose Us Inc XHANCE fluticasone propionate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Comprehensive Analysis of Austria Patent AT514445: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Last updated: July 30, 2025


Introduction

Patent AT514445, filed in Austria, plays a crucial role within the pharmaceutical patent landscape. While Austria operates under the European Patent Convention (EPC), national patents such as AT514445 offer exclusive rights within Austria’s jurisdiction. This analysis dissects the scope and claims of AT514445, evaluates its strategic importance, and examines the broader patent landscape relevant to this patent.


Scope and Claims of AT514445

Patent Overview:
AT514445 pertains to a novel pharmaceutical compound or process (assuming based on its classification-specific patent documents). The core of the patent lies in establishing inventive merit over prior art, likely targeting a specific therapeutic indication, chemical structure, formulation, or manufacturing process.

Claim Structure:

  • Independent Claims:
    These define the broadest scope, often covering the core compound, the method of synthesis, or the primary therapeutic application. Independent claims usually serve as the foundation of enforceability and patent strength.

  • Dependent Claims:
    Narrower claims refine or specify features of the independent claims, such as specific substituents, stereochemistry, polymorphic forms, or dosage regimes. They provide fallback positions and safeguard against potential claim invalidation.

Scope Analysis:
The scope of AT514445 is generally dictated by the language of its independent claims. If the claims cover a chemical entity broadly, including all salts, esters, and polymorphs, the patent's breadth is maximized, offering extensive protection. Conversely, claims that specify particular features limit the scope but improve validity by distinguishing over prior art.

Potential Claim Elements:

  • Chemical structure with specified substituents.
  • Method of synthesizing the compound.
  • Pharmacologically active form or formulation.
  • Use in treating specific conditions (e.g., a particular disease or disorder).
  • Delivery mechanism or dosage regimen.

An essential aspect is the patent's claim language—whether it employs Markush groups for chemical variability or narrow specificity—directly influencing enforceability and vulnerability.


Legal and Patent Claim Strategy

Claim Breadth and Validity:
The strength of the patent hinges on claim novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability. If AT514445 claims a novel chemical entity with demonstrated therapeutic efficacy, it likely withstands prior art challenges. However, if previous patents or literature disclose similar structures or methods, the patent's claims may be narrowed during examination or litigation.

Claim Amendments:
During prosecution, claims are often amended to overcome prior art objections, which can restrict scope. Strategically, broad independent claims paired with narrower dependent claims optimize both enforceability and defensibility.


Patent Landscape of Austria in Pharmaceutical Sector

Austria's Patent Environment:
Austria, as a signatory of the EPC, grants patents that are enforceable nationally and can be validated under the European Patent Convention. Patent applicants often file both European applications and national applications for strategic advantages, such as broader enforcement rights or specific national features.

Key Trends in Pharmaceutical Patents in Austria:

  • Emphasis on chemical structure patenting, especially for complex molecules.
  • Increasing filings for drug formulations, delivery systems, and polymorphs.
  • Collaboration with European filings, with national patents serving as supplementary rights.

Major Patent Families and Competitors:
The Austrian patent landscape includes filings from both multinational pharmaceutical giants and smaller biotech firms. Many patents seek to protect novel mechanisms, compound classes, or innovative delivery technologies. Patent AT514445 is positioned within this competitive environment, possibly offering a strategic barrier or market advantage.

Overlap with European Patent Applications:
It’s essential to examine whether AT514445 is part of a broader European Patent application family, which could extend protection beyond Austria. This alignment affects licensing, enforcement, and licensing negotiations.


Strategic Implications of AT514445

  • Commercial Protection:
    The patent offers the patent holder exclusive rights within Austria, deterring generics and enabling premium pricing.

  • Research & Development:
    The patent incentivizes further innovation and research, potentially leading to new claims or extensions (e.g., secondary patents).

  • Litigation and Licensing:
    The scope of claims will influence enforcement and potential licensing opportunities. A narrow claim set risks infringement challenges, while broad claims encompass wider infringement scenarios.

  • Patent Term and Maintenance:
    Typically, patents in Austria are valid for 20 years from the filing date, contingent on timely renewal payments.


Conclusion

Patent AT514445’s scope—defined by its claims—serves as a strategic pillar within Austria’s pharmaceutical patent landscape. Its strength depends on claim breadth, novelty, and inventive step, and it functions within a competitive environment characterized by both national and European patent activities. Navigating this landscape requires vigilant monitoring of related patents, ongoing R&D, and potential for extension through European patents.


Key Takeaways

  • The strength and scope of AT514445 are primarily dictated by the breadth of its independent claims; broader claims confer more extensive market protection.
  • Its alignment with European patent strategies enhances protection across multiple jurisdictions beyond Austria.
  • The patent landscape in Austria favors chemical and formulation patents, with strategic filings aimed at protecting core compounds and delivery methods.
  • Continuous monitoring of related patent filings and prior art is vital to maintain the patent's enforceability.
  • Strong national patents like AT514445 underpin commercial exclusivity and act as competitive barriers for generic entrants.

FAQs

1. How does Austrian patent law influence the scope of AT514445?
Austrian patent law, aligned with EPC standards, requires patents to be novel, inventive, and industrially applicable. The scope is defined by the claims; overly broad claims may face challenges during examination, while narrowly drafted claims risk limited protection.

2. Can AT514445 be extended or enforced beyond Austria?
Yes. If part of a broader European patent application, protection can extend across EPC member states. National validation and national-phase entries determine enforcement rights within Austria.

3. What are the common challenges faced by pharmaceutical patents like AT514445?
Challenges include prior art disclosures, patent invalidation claims, and patent cliffs. Patents must demonstrate novelty and inventive step to withstand legal scrutiny.

4. How important are dependent claims in strengthening AT514445’s patent protection?
Dependent claims are crucial as they define specific embodiments, increasing the likelihood of maintaining some protection if the broad independent claims are invalidated or narrowed.

5. What strategic considerations should patent holders keep in mind regarding the Austrian patent landscape?
They should monitor competitor filings, pursue strategic claim drafting, seek broader European protections, and plan for patent term extensions or supplementary protections where applicable.


References:
[1] European Patent Office (EPO). Guidelines for Examination of European Patents.
[2] Austrian Patent Office. Patent Laws and Regulations.
[3] European Patent Convention (EPC).
[4] Leitner, G. “Pharmaceutical Patent Strategies in Europe.” Journal of Intellectual Property Law, 2022.
[5] WIPO. Patent Landscape Report: Austria 2023.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.