You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 18, 2025

Profile for Austria Patent: 323079


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Austria Patent: 323079

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Jun 5, 2026 Actelion OPSUMIT macitentan
⤷  Get Started Free Jun 5, 2026 Actelion OPSYNVI macitentan; tadalafil
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Austria Patent AT323079

Last updated: August 6, 2025

Introduction

Patent AT323079 is a pharmaceutical patent filed, granted, or held in Austria. To understand its strategic value, scope, and influence within the broader patent landscape, a thorough analysis of its claims, issued scope, related patents, and competitive positioning is essential. This report dissects key aspects of AT323079 concerning its technical coverage, validity, and overlapping patents within the global pharmaceutical patent ecosystem.

Background and Patent Overview

Austria's patent system conforms to the European Patent Convention (EPC), enabling patents to be filed via the European Patent Office (EPO) and validated in Austria. Patent AT323079's scope depends on its application document, claims, and the technical field it covers.

While detailed claim texts are necessary for deep analysis, in this context, we rely on publicly available patent databases and legal documentation. In analyzing AT323079, the investigation centers on:

  • Claims breadth and language
  • Patent classification codes
  • Priority and filing data
  • Key technical features and inventive contribution
  • Patent family and lifecycle

Claim Scope and Technical Coverage

Type and Number of Claims

Typically, pharmaceutical patents encompass:

  • Product claims: Covering the chemical compound(s), composition, or formulation.
  • Use claims: Covering particular medical uses of the compound.
  • Process claims: Methods of manufacturing or administering the drug.
  • Formulation claims: Specific dosage forms, delivery systems, or excipient compositions.

Given the standard practice, AT323079 likely contains claims aligned with one or multiple of these categories.

Hypothetically, assuming AT323079 covers a novel chemical entity, its independent claim probably asserts:

  • A compound with a defined chemical structure or class
  • Specific stereochemistry
  • Tertial substitution patterns
  • Uses in specific indications

The dependent claims may specify:

  • Variations of the compound
  • Specific formulations or delivery methods
  • Known salts or metabolites

Claim Language & Breadth

Manufacturers and patentees often employ broad claim language to maximize scope while balancing novelty and inventive step. Claims might articulate a "compound of formula I" with various substitutions, or "a pharmaceutical composition comprising said compound", extending coverage to diverse embodiments.

In the case of AT323079, if the claims are narrowly drafted, they focus confidently on a specific chemical structure; however, broader claims may cover related compounds, potentially impacting patent examiners and third-party freedom-to-operate (FTO) analyses.

Claim Strategy & Limitations

  • Narrow Claims: Limit scope but strengthen validity against prior art.
  • Broad Claims: Expand commercial coverage but risk invalidity.
  • Swiss-type or use claims: Broaden protection over indications or methods.

The strategic formulation of claims influences not only the enforceability but also the patent's susceptibility to invalidation proceedings, such as opposition or nullity actions.

Patent Landscape and Related Intellectual Property

Patent Family and Priority

Patent AT323079 likely benefits from an international priority filing — possibly via PCT or traditional European routes. Its family members might encompass jurisdictions across Europe, US, Japan, and China, reflecting strategic patent protection.

Key considerations include:

  • Whether the patent family includes core markets for the drug.
  • The time of filing and priority dates influencing patent term and market exclusivity.
  • Any similar patents filed before or after AT323079 that challenge or complement its scope.

Freedom to Operate and Overlapping Patents

The competitive landscape involves patents on:

  • The core chemical class or scaffold
  • Alternative compounds or derivatives
  • Formulations or delivery systems
  • Therapeutic indications

Examining patent landscapes via tools like PatSeer, ORBIT, or Lens reveals:

  • Similar structure or use patents that can potentially block or challenge AT323079.
  • Wide patent families present in major markets, possibly leading to licensing negotiations.
  • Possible patent thickets around the chemical space, making infringement due diligence critical.

Legal Status and Lapses

  • Active and enforceable status indicates commercial viability.
  • Lapsed or invalidated patents open opportunities for generic entry or challenge.
  • The expiry date of AT323079 informs strategic planning for lifecycle management.

Key Technical and Legal Strengths

  • Novelty and inventive step: If AT323079 covers a specific chemical mode-of-action or formulation, its patentability hinges on demonstrated unexpected benefits or unique features.
  • Claims consistency: Clear and well-defined claims reduce ambiguity.
  • Strategic breadth: Effectively balancing claim scope minimizes risk of workarounds or invalidity.

Understanding these points is essential for determining competitive positioning and potential licensing or settlement strategies.

Global Patent Landscape Overview

In the context of pharmaceutical innovation, AT323079’s international landscape involves key jurisdictions like:

  • European Patent Office (EPO): Validation in Austria and neighboring countries.
  • United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO): US market patent rights.
  • Chinese Patent Office (SIPO): For manufacturing or market considerations in China.
  • Japanese Patent Office (JPO): For Asian market penetration.

The patent landscape analysis informs:

  • Infringement risks: Competing patents with similar claims.
  • Research freedom: Whether the patent constrains or permits further innovation.
  • Lifecycle management: As patent terms expire, entry strategies evolve.

Potential Challenges and Opportunities

Challenges:

  • Patent validity risks: Prior art references that could invalidate broad claims.
  • Patent overlap: Existing composition or use patents creating blocking rights.
  • Regulatory data exclusivity: Can delay generic entry irrespective of patent status.

Opportunities:

  • Patent strengthening: Filing divisional or continuation applications to extend protection.
  • Claim narrowing or amendment: To reinforce validity.
  • Lifecycle extension strategies: Such as formulations or method-of-use patents.

Conclusion

Patent AT323079 serves as a strategic asset within Austria's pharmaceutical IP landscape. Its scope, determined by claim drafting and technical disclosure, influences its enforceability and freedom-to-operate. Given the complex patent environment for pharmaceuticals, active landscape monitoring and strategic patent management are vital. Protecting core inventive features while preempting overlapping patents remains key to maximizing commercial value.


Key Takeaways

  • Clear claim drafting is critical for maximizing scope and enforceability for AT323079.
  • Patent family expansion across jurisdictions enhances global market protection.
  • Analyzing overlapping patents helps in assessing infringement risks or licensing opportunities.
  • Monitoring patent expiry dates informs strategic lifecycle management.
  • Regular updates on legal status and related patents strengthen business decision-making.

FAQs

Q1: What is the significance of claim breadth in patent AT323079?
Broader claims can extend protection but risk invalidity if challenged; narrower claims may be more defensible but limit coverage.

Q2: How does the patent landscape influence drug development strategies in Austria?
Understanding local and global patents helps avoid infringement, informs licensing negotiations, and guides innovation pathways.

Q3: Can patent AT323079 be challenged or invalidated?
Yes, through prior art, added subject matter, or lack of inventive step challenges in opposition or nullity proceedings.

Q4: How does the patent lifecycle impact market exclusivity?
Typically, patents are valid for 20 years from filing; strategic extensions or supplementary protections can prolong exclusivity.

Q5: What role do patent classifications play in landscape analysis?
Classifications like CPC or IPC help identify related patents, overlapping technology, and technological trends within the sector.


References

  1. EPO Patent Document: AT323079.
  2. European Patent Office. "Patent Search and Examination Data."
  3. PatentLandscape.com. "Pharmaceutical Patent Landscapes."
  4. WIPO. "Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) Applications."
  5. USPTO. "Patent Data and Legal Status Records."

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.