You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: January 1, 2026

Viet Nam Drug Patents


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Drug Patents in Viet Nam and US Equivalents

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
Patent Number Estimated Expiration Equivalent US Patent US Expiry Date Generic Name US Applicant US Tradename
34404 ⤷  Get Started Free 8410103 2031-02-04 cabotegravir; rilpivirine Viiv Hlthcare CABENUVA KIT
34404 ⤷  Get Started Free 10927129 2026-04-28 cabotegravir; rilpivirine Viiv Hlthcare CABENUVA KIT
34404 ⤷  Get Started Free 8410103 2031-02-04 cabotegravir sodium Viiv Hlthcare VOCABRIA
34404 ⤷  Get Started Free 10927129 2026-04-28 cabotegravir sodium Viiv Hlthcare VOCABRIA
34404 ⤷  Get Started Free 10927129 2026-04-28 cabotegravir Viiv Hlthcare APRETUDE
34404 ⤷  Get Started Free 8410103 2031-02-04 cabotegravir Viiv Hlthcare APRETUDE
>Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Equivalent US Patent >US Expiry Date >Generic Name >US Applicant >US Tradename

Key Insights for Patentability, Enforceability, and the Scope of Claims for Biopharmaceutical Patents at the Vietnam Patent Office

Last updated: July 31, 2025

Introduction

Vietnam’s pharmaceutical sector has witnessed significant growth, prompting increasing patent filings, especially in the biopharmaceutical domain. Navigating Vietnam’s patent landscape requires understanding local patentability standards, enforceability challenges, and strategic claim drafting to secure and defend innovations effectively. This article provides a comprehensive analysis of these core aspects, equipping stakeholders with actionable insights to optimize patent strategies in Vietnam.

Patentability of Biopharmaceutical Inventions in Vietnam

Legal Framework and Patent Criteria

Vietnam’s intellectual property system aligns with global standards, primarily governed by the Law on Intellectual Property (LIP), which incorporates criteria for patentability: novelty, inventive step (non-obviousness), and industrial applicability (utility). These are in accordance with the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT), to which Vietnam is a signatory.

Novelty and Prior Art Considerations

Vietnamese examination authorities scrutinize whether a biopharmaceutical invention is novel. As per Clause 1, Article 59 of the Law on IP, an invention lacks novelty if it has been disclosed publicly before filing. Given the global landscape of patent disclosures, applicants must conduct exhaustive prior art searches, especially focusing on:

  • Published scientific literature
  • Existing patents in international databases
  • Public disclosures within Vietnam

Inventive Step and Non-Obviousness

Vietnam’s patent law emphasizes an inventive step, requiring that the invention not be obvious to someone skilled in the relevant technical field. Biopharmaceutical inventions often involve complex biological processes, but Vietnam tends to interpret inventive step stringently. Demonstrating unexpected results or technical advantages can bolster patent applications.

Industrial Applicability and Utility

The requirement for industrial applicability is generally straightforward for biopharmaceuticals: the invention must have a credible therapeutic, diagnostic, or prophylactic application. Disclinations should clearly specify the intended use to satisfy this criterion.

Biopharmaceutical Patent-Specific Challenges

  • Patentability of Biological Material: Vietnam permits patents for bio-products, but strict disclosures are necessary, including deposit evidence per WHO guidelines. The biological material must be sufficiently described to enable reproduction.
  • Methods of Treatment and Use Claims: Vietnamese law restricts patent protection for methods of medical treatment in certain cases. However, patent claims on novel drug compositions or manufacturing processes are generally permissible.
  • Patent Term and Data Exclusivity: Unlike some jurisdictions, Vietnam does not explicitly provide data exclusivity periods; patent terms are 20 years from the filing date, emphasizing the importance of early filing.

Enforceability of Biopharmaceutical Patents in Vietnam

Challenges with Enforcement

While the legal framework supports patent rights, enforcement faces challenges:

  • Limited Judicial Resources: Patent enforcement often involves administrative proceedings before the National Office of Intellectual Property (NOIP) or civil courts with limited specialized expertise.
  • Patent Litigation Landscape: Historically, patent disputes are less frequent; however, the increasing importance of pharmaceutical patents is prompting more enforcement actions.

Strategies for Strengthening Enforceability

  • Robust Patent Drafting: Narrow, clear claims backed by comprehensive specifications reduce ambiguities during enforcement.
  • Patent Monitoring and Infringement Detection: Continuous surveillance of the local market helps identify potential infringements early.
  • Administrative Enforcement: Vietnam’s IP Rights Protection Office (IPRPO) facilitates administrative actions, including cease-and-desist orders and fines.
  • Legal Action in Courts: Filing for infringement damages or injunctions through specialized courts tasked with IP rights is possible but may be hampered by procedural delays.

Patent Prosecution and Maintenance

Regular maintenance fees must be paid to uphold patent rights, and patent lapses due to non-payment can undermine enforceability. Strategic lifecycle management, including patent term extensions for pharmaceutical innovations (where applicable), enhances enforceability.

Scope of Claims for Biopharmaceutical Patents in Vietnam

Claim Drafting Best Practices

  • Balance Breadth and Specificity: Craft claims that are broad enough to cover variations but specific enough to withstand validity challenges.
  • Use of Multiple Claim Types: Incorporate independent and dependent claims, process and product claims, and composition claims to maximize scope.
  • Inclusion of Markush Claims: For chemical and biological variants, Markush structures can effectively cover multiple embodiments.

Types of Claims Commonly Accepted

  • Composition Claims: Covering active pharmaceutical ingredients, drug formulations, or bio-specific compounds.
  • Process Claims: Covering methods of manufacturing or biological production processes.
  • Use Claims: Covering specific therapeutic applications, provided that method-of-treatment patents are permissible under current law.
  • Formulation and Combination Claims: Covering drug combinations to expand protection scope.

Limitations on Scope

  • Method of Treatment Claims: Generally, Vietnam restricts patenting of medical or surgical methods. Use claims related to a composition or device are preferable.
  • Biological Material Claims: Require deposit evidence and detailed descriptions as per Budapest Treaty standards.

Claim Language and Clarity

Claims must meet clarity requirements per NOIP Examination Guidelines. Vague or overly broad claims risk rejection or invalidation. Precise terminology and consistent definitions are essential, especially for complex biological molecules or processes.

Key Challenges and Opportunities

  • Patent Term and Regulatory Data: The absence of data exclusivity makes patent drafting and filing strategy crucial to protect innovations. Early filing and comprehensive disclosures can prevent prior art challenges.
  • International Harmonization: Vietnam’s alignment with international standards facilitates patent protection for biopharmaceuticals filed through PCT routes, enabling broader territorial coverage.
  • Emerging Focus on Patent Quality: The Vietnamese patent office emphasizes quality examination, encouraging applications with clear inventive steps and robust claims, signifying an opportunity for high-quality patent assets.

Conclusion

Vietnam presents a dynamic environment for biopharmaceutical patenting, with specific patentability nuances, enforcement considerations, and scope-defining strategies. Stakeholders should prioritize thorough prior art searches, precise claim drafting, and proactive enforcement to secure and defend biopharmaceutical innovations effectively. While legal and procedural challenges remain, Vietnam’s evolving IP landscape offers promising avenues for robust patent protection aligned with international standards.


Key Takeaways

  • Patentability criteria in Vietnam demand thorough novelty, inventive step, and utility disclosures, especially for complex biological inventions.
  • Biopharmaceutical patents must navigate restrictions on method-of-treatment claims, emphasizing compositions and manufacturing processes.
  • Enforcement requires strategic patent drafting, market monitoring, and potentially administrative and judicial actions, despite resource limitations.
  • Claim scope should balance breadth and specificity, leveraging various claim types to maximize protection while avoiding invalidation.
  • Early filing and detailed disclosures are crucial due to the absence of data exclusivity and to prevent prior art challenges, ensuring strong patent rights.

FAQs

1. Can I patent biological materials, such as genetically modified cells, in Vietnam?
Yes. Biological materials can be patented if they are sufficiently disclosed, deposit evidence is provided per guidelines, and they meet patentability criteria. Proper description and deposit are essential.

2. Are method-of-treatment inventions patentable in Vietnam?
Vietnam generally restricts patenting of therapeutic methods; however, claims concerning drug compositions, manufacturing processes, or medical devices are permissible.

3. How does Vietnam’s patent term impact biopharmaceutical patent strategy?
The standard 20-year patent term from filing underscores the importance of early filing and robust patent applications to maximize market exclusivity.

4. What are effective enforcement mechanisms for pharmaceutical patent infringement in Vietnam?
Combining administrative actions via the IPRPO, strategic civil litigation, and vigilant market monitoring provides the most comprehensive enforcement approach.

5. How can applicants broaden the scope of their biopharmaceutical patent claims?
By drafting multiple dependent and independent claims, utilizing Markush structures, and covering various formulations, processes, and uses, patent owners can expand protection scope.


Sources:
[1] Law on Intellectual Property of Vietnam, 2005 (amended 2009).
[2] NOIP Examination Guidelines for Patents, 2022.
[3] World Health Organization, “Guidelines on the Deposit of Biological Materials,” 2019.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.