Last Updated: June 23, 2026

Linerixibat - Generic Drug Details


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


What are the generic sources for linerixibat and what is the scope of freedom to operate?

Linerixibat is the generic ingredient in one branded drug marketed by Glaxosmithkline and is included in one NDA. There is one patent protecting this compound. Additional information is available in the individual branded drug profile pages.

Linerixibat has forty-two patent family members in thirty-nine countries.

One supplier is listed for this compound.

Summary for linerixibat
International Patents:42
US Patents:1
Tradenames:1
Applicants:1
NDAs:1
Finished Product Suppliers / Packagers: 1
Clinical Trials: 7
Patent Applications: 184
DailyMed Link:linerixibat at DailyMed
DrugPatentWatch® Estimated Loss of Exclusivity (LOE) Date for linerixibat
Generic Entry Date for linerixibat*:
Constraining patent/regulatory exclusivity:

TREATMENT OF CHOLESTATIC PRURITUS ASSOCIATED WITH PRIMARY BILIARY CHOLANGITIS (PBC) IN ADULT PATIENTS

Dosage:

TABLET;ORAL

*The generic entry opportunity date is the latter of the last compound-claiming patent and the last regulatory exclusivity protection. Many factors can influence early or later generic entry. This date is provided as a rough estimate of generic entry potential and should not be used as an independent source.

Recent Clinical Trials for linerixibat

Identify potential brand extensions & 505(b)(2) entrants

SponsorPhase
GlaxoSmithKlinePhase 3
GlaxoSmithKlinePhase 1

See all linerixibat clinical trials

Pharmacology for linerixibat
Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) Classes for linerixibat

US Patents and Regulatory Information for linerixibat

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Exclusivity Expiration
Glaxosmithkline LYNAVOY linerixibat TABLET;ORAL 220295-001 Mar 17, 2026 RX Yes Yes ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial Y Y ⤷  Start Trial
Glaxosmithkline LYNAVOY linerixibat TABLET;ORAL 220295-001 Mar 17, 2026 RX Yes Yes ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Glaxosmithkline LYNAVOY linerixibat TABLET;ORAL 220295-001 Mar 17, 2026 RX Yes Yes ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Exclusivity Expiration

International Patents for linerixibat

Country Patent Number Title Estimated Expiration
Argentina 081337 DERIVADOS DE 1,4-BENZOTIAZEPINAS, COMPOSICIONES FARMACEUTICAS QUE LOS COMPRENDEN Y SU USO EN LA PREPARACION DE UN MEDICAMENTO PARA EL TRATAMIENTO DE TRASTORNOS METABOLICOS ⤷  Start Trial
Australia 2011245393 ⤷  Start Trial
Brazil 112012026767 composto, sal farmaceuticamente aceitável de um composto, composição farmacêutica, método para tratar ou previnir distúrbios, e, uso de um composto ou sal ⤷  Start Trial
Canada 2795543 COMPOSES CHIMIQUES (CHEMICAL COMPOUNDS) ⤷  Start Trial
>Country >Patent Number >Title >Estimated Expiration

LINERIXIBAT: Market Dynamics and Financial Trajectory

Last updated: May 2, 2026

What is LINERIXIBAT’s market position?

LINERIXIBAT is a niche gastrointestinal (GI) asset with market formation driven by (1) payer coverage for chronic GI indications, (2) gastroenterology prescribing concentration, and (3) competitive intensity from established small-molecule and biologic GI franchises. Because LINERIXIBAT’s commercial footprint is not evidenced in the public patent and regulatory record provided in this task, no defensible market sizing, channel allocation, pricing claims, or uptake curve can be produced.

Which market dynamics shape adoption?

LINERIXIBAT’s adoption pattern is determined by the standard GI-commercial levers below, with payer and prescriber behavior typically responding to these observable drivers:

  • Indication clarity and label breadth: Products with tightly defined responder populations and clear diagnostic pathways see faster payer uptake than broad, hard-to-measure symptom targets.
  • Dosing and regimen simplicity: Once-daily or otherwise low-burden oral dosing generally improves persistence and reduces prior authorization friction versus multi-step regimens.
  • Safety and discontinuation risk: In GI, adverse event profiles that increase discontinuations (particularly treatment-limiting events) compress net revenue by lowering long-term retention.
  • Formulary placement and step edits: Early losses in preferred status force reliance on non-preferred channels, increasing discounting and expanding administrative costs.
  • Competition within the care pathway: GI therapies often substitute within the same treatment line. Competitive entry changes real-world utilization even when the drug’s MOA remains differentiated.

These dynamics govern how quickly LINERIXIBAT can translate regulatory approval into paid prescriptions and net sales, but the underlying numeric indicators (pricing, uptake, reimbursement rates, payer coverage timelines) are not included in the provided material.

How does competition likely affect LINERIXIBAT’s financial trajectory?

Without verified competitor mappings for LINERIXIBAT’s specific indication, line of therapy, and geography, any direct competitive schedule and pricing pressure analysis would be non-actionable. In general terms, GI assets face one of two financial paths:

  • Consolidation path: If LINERIXIBAT is positioned as a replacement for a standard-of-care within the same treatment line, revenue growth is constrained by cannibalization rather than net-expansion of the treated population.
  • Adjacency path: If it expands the eligible population or improves outcomes across comorbid subgroups, revenue can grow faster, but payer restrictions may delay uptake until real-world evidence accumulates.

A defensible trajectory requires label-specific competitor lists, which are not present here.

What does a realistic revenue and margin path look like for GI niche assets?

A practical financial trajectory for a GI niche asset usually tracks these line items:

  1. Gross-to-net compression
    • Rebates, patient assistance, and contracting intensity rise as formulary access lags.
  2. Cost structure
    • High field-force and HEOR spend lowers near-term margins but can lift paid coverage in later periods.
  3. Commercial scale-up
    • Marketing and access teams expand after initial uptake is demonstrated, which reduces per-unit overhead only after sales volume stabilizes.
  4. Lifecycle pressure
    • If additional indications or line-of-therapy data are not secured, growth tends to flatten earlier than broader franchise assets.

For LINERIXIBAT, the numeric trajectory cannot be calculated without: net sales history, segmental data by geography, and disclosed expense lines.

What can be concluded about LINERIXIBAT’s cashflow and investment profile?

No credible investment and cashflow profile can be derived for LINERIXIBAT from the information supplied in this task. Cash burn, gross margin, SG&A ratio, and runway are determined by actual financial statements, which are not provided.

Market dynamics scorecard (evidence-based only)

Because no verified commercialization or financial metrics for LINERIXIBAT are available in the provided context, the only evidence-based “scorecard” is structural: which known levers matter for GI drugs. Assigning numeric scores would be speculative and is not produced.

Driver Directional impact on LINERIXIBAT economics Required proof not provided
Formulary access timeline Faster access lifts early net sales and reduces discounts Formulary placement data, claims, payer communications
Price and contracting Higher net price lifts revenue per treated patient Wholesale acquisition price and net-to-gross
Persistence Better safety and tolerability increases LTV Discontinuation/retention data
Competitive intensity More substitutes compress price and volume Competitor mapping by indication and geography
Evidence generation Stronger RWE supports coverage and reduced PA Outcomes datasets and payer dossiers

Key constraints on estimating LINERIXIBAT’s market outcome

The task does not include:

  • regulatory approval dates by geography
  • branded product identity and INN-to-trade mapping
  • initial launch geography and distribution partners
  • net price and discount rates
  • prescription uptake curves (TRx, new starts, persistence)
  • competitor set and treatment-line positioning
  • financial statements or guidance

Under these conditions, no defensible market dynamics quantification or financial trajectory forecast can be produced.

Key Takeaways

  • LINERIXIBAT’s financial trajectory in GI is governed by formulary access, net price, persistence, safety-related discontinuation, and competitive substitution within the treatment line.
  • A market forecast or revenue path for LINERIXIBAT cannot be produced from the information provided in this task because commercialization and financial inputs (pricing, uptake, claims, and disclosed financials) are not present.
  • Actionable due diligence for investors and R&D leaders requires verified label-specific market entry data and actual net sales or claims-based uptake metrics for the marketed product.

FAQs

  1. What drives first-year revenue for a niche GI drug like LINERIXIBAT?
    Formulary access speed, prior authorization friction, and early prescriber adoption within gastroenterology practices.

  2. Does safety profile typically affect GI drug profitability?
    Yes. Treatment-limiting adverse events increase discontinuation and reduce lifetime value, raising cost per retained patient.

  3. How does competition shape net price outcomes in GI?
    Substitution within the same treatment line pushes payers to tighten restrictions and increases discounting through contracting.

  4. What is the most reliable way to model GI adoption?
    Claims-based metrics (paid TRx, new starts, persistence) tied to formulary and PA status rather than early headline prescription counts.

  5. What financial metrics matter most for estimating LINERIXIBAT’s trajectory?
    Net sales growth, gross-to-net compression, SG&A intensity, and retention/discontinuation rates.


References

[1] No source material was provided in the prompt text to cite for LINERIXIBAT’s market or financial metrics.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.