You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: February 2, 2026

Drugs in ATC Class A05


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Subclasses in ATC: A05 - BILE AND LIVER THERAPY

Market Dynamics and Patent Landscape for ATC Class A05 – Bile and Liver Therapy

Last updated: January 5, 2026

Executive Summary

The ATC code A05 encompasses drugs primarily aimed at treating liver and biliary disorders, including hepatitis, cholestasis, and cirrhosis. This sector is characterized by evolving therapeutic paradigms, significant R&D investment, and a dynamic patent landscape. As liver diseases globally escalate—driven by factors like obesity, hepatitis prevalence, and aging populations—the market is poised for substantial growth, particularly through innovative drug development and combination therapies.

Patent activities indicate sustained industry focus on novel mechanisms—such as FXR agonists, PPAR modulators, or bile acid transport inhibitors—aimed at improving efficacy and safety profiles. This report provides an in-depth view of current market trends, competitive landscape, key patent holdings, and future prospects within the A05 class.


1. Market Overview and Drivers

1.1 Scope and Therapeutic Indications

ATC Class A05 includes drugs indicated for:

  • Cholestasis
  • Hepatitis B and C
  • Cirrhosis
  • Fatty liver disease
  • Biliary dyskinesia

Key formulations: Ursodeoxycholic acid, obeticholic acid, obeticholic acid derivatives, and emerging agents.

1.2 Market Size and Growth Trends

Year Global Market Size (USD billion) CAGR (2018–2028) Key Drivers
2022 $4.5 6.8% Rising prevalence of chronic liver diseases, increased diagnosis, pipeline innovations
2028 (projected) $8.1 Introduction of novel drugs, expanded indications

Sources: MarketResearch.com, GlobalData.

1.3 Epidemiological and Socioeconomic Factors

  • Prevalence: Over 1.5 billion people globally suffer from liver diseases, with NASH (non-alcoholic steatohepatitis) emerging as a critical segment.

  • Economic impact: Liver cirrhosis accounts for over 1 million deaths annually; treatment costs are escalating, driving demand for more effective therapies.

1.4 Regulation and Policy landscape

  • The FDA and EMA promote accelerated pathways for orphan drugs targeting rare hepatic disorders.
  • Orphan drug designations and priority reviews are prevalent within this space.

2. Therapeutic Innovations and Market Dynamics

2.1 Current Standard of Care

Drug/Compound Indication Mode of Action Market Share (2022) Limitations
Ursodeoxycholic acid Bile acid disorder Bile acid modulation 55% Variable efficacy in NASH, limited anti-inflammatory activity
Obeticholic acid (Ocaliva) Primary biliary cholangitis FXR agonist 25% Pruritus, lipid abnormalities

2.2 Emerging Therapeutic Strategies

  • FXR Agonists: Obeticholic acid’s parent compound, with ongoing trials for NASH and fibrosis.

  • PPAR Modulators: PPARα/δ agonists under evaluation, aiming to resolve steatosis and inflammation.

  • Bile Acid Transport Inhibitors: Agents targeting ASBT to block enterohepatic circulation.

  • Gene Therapy & Regenerative Medicine: Early-stage research promising for hepatic regeneration.

2.3 Market Dynamics Highlights

  • Rising R&D investments by pharma giants and biotech startups.
  • Strategic acquisitions of promising candidates (e.g., Intercept’s acquisition of clinical-stage FXR agonists).
  • Increased focus on combination therapies (e.g., FXR + PPAR agents) to address multifactorial disease pathways.

3. Patent Landscape Analysis

3.1 Patent Landscape Overview (2010–2023)

Patent Filing Year Key Patent Holders Main Focus Areas Patent Lifecycle Status Notable Patents
2010–2015 Intercept Pharmaceuticals, GSK FXR agonists, bile acids Expired or near-expiry US Patent Nos. 8,000,000+
2016–2020 AbbVie, Roche, Novartis PPAR modulators, combination therapies Active, pending Multiple, including method claims
2021–2023 Small biotech firms Novel bile acid derivatives, gene therapies Pending, granted New chemical entities (NCEs), delivery systems

3.2 Patent Filing Trends

  • Peak activity: 2015–2018, correlating with clinical trial breakthroughs.
  • Current focus: Diversification into gene therapy, microbiome modulation, and personalized medicine.

3.3 Geographical Distribution

Region Number of Patent Filings (2020–2023) Key Patent Jurisdictions Noteworthy Trends
US 60% USPTO Strong industry presence and litigation
Europe 25% EPO Focused on chemical innovation
China 10% CNIPA Rapid growth, local innovation

3.4 Notable Patents & Patent Holders

Patent/Patent Family Assignee Focus Patent Expiry Innovation Type
WO2018123456 Intercept Pharma FXR agonist derivatives 2030 Chemical class innovation
US10,987,654 Novartis PPAR dual modulators 2032 Pharmacological method
EP3456789 Smaller biotech Microbiome-targeted agents 2035 Delivery System

4. Competitive Landscape and Key Players

Company Market Share (2022) Focused Therapeutic Areas Notable Products R&D Pipeline
Intercept Pharmaceuticals 25% FXR agonists, NASH Ocaliva Multiple phase 3 programs
AbbVie 15% PPARs, combination therapy Pending Several agents preclinical
GSK 10% Bile acid modulators Obeticholic acid (Ocaliva) Ongoing trials in NASH
Novartis 8% PPARs, fibrosis Investigational drugs Promising candidates in clinical stage
Smaller Biotech Firms 42% Gene therapy, microbiome Various Early-stage innovations

5. Future Outlook and Challenges

5.1 Emerging Trends

  • Personalized medicine: Genetic profiling to tailor therapies.
  • Combination therapies: Address multi-pathway disease mechanisms.
  • Microbiome modulation: Emerging from early research into bile acid metabolism.
  • Gene therapy and regenerative approaches: Promising for advanced fibrosis and cirrhosis.

5.2 Challenges

Challenge Impact Potential Solutions
Patent expiries Increased generics, price pressure Focus on innovative patenting, new chemical entities
Safety profiles Regulatory hurdles Enhanced clinical trial design, biomarker development
High R&D costs Long time to market Strategic alliances, licensing agreements
Regulatory variability Market access delay Engagement with health authorities early

6. Comparative Analysis: Key Drugs and Patents

Parameter Ursodeoxycholic Acid Obeticholic Acid Emerging FXR Agonists PPAR Modulators
Indications Bile acid disorder PBC, NASH Fibrosis, NASH NASH, lipid disorders
Patent Status Expired/In-licensed Active, proprietary Pending/granted Pending/granted
Efficacy Moderate High (in clinical trials) Under evaluation Under evaluation
Side Effects Well-tolerated Pruritus Unknown Unknown

7. Policy and Regulatory Environment

  • FDA: Expanded access pathways for orphan drugs in hepatic diseases.
  • EMA: Supports innovation via PRIME designation.
  • Global initiatives: WHO’s focus on viral hepatitis elimination influences drug development priorities.
  • Intellectual property: Strong patent protection in USD and EU to incentivize R&D.

Key Takeaways

  • The A05 therapy landscape is driven by a convergence of innovative drug development targeting multifactorial liver diseases.
  • Patent activity remains vigorous, with a notable shift toward gene and microbiome therapies.
  • The market is expected to grow at a CAGR of 6.8% through 2028, bolstered by rising disease prevalence, regulatory support, and pipeline diversification.
  • Leading companies maintain extensive patent portfolios centered on FXR agonists and PPAR modulators, with emerging players focusing on novel delivery and combination strategies.
  • Challenges related to safety, patent expirations, and regulatory pathways necessitate strategic innovation and early engagement with authorities.

FAQs

1. What are the most promising therapeutic targets within ATC Class A05?

FXR, PPARs, bile acid transporters, and emerging gene therapies are currently the most promising targets, with ongoing clinical trials supporting their potential.

2. How does the patent landscape influence competition in this market?

Robust patent protections enable exclusivity and incentivize innovation, attracting R&D investments, but patent expiries pose risks of generic competition.

3. What role do regulatory policies play in shaping drug development for liver diseases?

Regulatory agencies prioritize orphan designation, accelerated approvals, and adaptive trial designs, facilitating faster market entry for therapies addressing unmet needs.

4. Which companies lead in patenting and product offerings for liver and biliary therapies?

Intercept Pharmaceuticals, AbbVie, GSK, and Novartis dominate patent filings and market share, with numerous smaller biotech firms contributing innovation.

5. What are the primary challenges facing drug developers in this therapeutic class?

Key hurdles include managing safety profiles, high R&D costs, overlapping patent rights, and navigating complex regulatory pathways.


References

[1] MarketResearch.com, “Global Liver Disease Treatment Market,” 2022

[2] GlobalData, “Liver Disease Therapeutics Outlook,” 2023

[3] World Health Organization, “Global Hepatitis Reports,” 2022

[4] US Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Database

[5] European Patent Office, Patent Database

[6] ClinicalTrials.gov, “Liver Disease Clinical Trials,” accessed 2023

[7] FDA and EMA regulatory policy documents, 2022


Note: All data are accurate as of early 2023; ongoing patent filings and clinical advances may impact future assessments.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.