Last Updated: June 22, 2026

Clavulanate potassium; ticarcillin disodium - Generic Drug Details


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


What are the generic drug sources for clavulanate potassium; ticarcillin disodium and what is the scope of freedom to operate?

Clavulanate potassium; ticarcillin disodium is the generic ingredient in two branded drugs marketed by Glaxosmithkline and is included in three NDAs. Additional information is available in the individual branded drug profile pages.

Summary for clavulanate potassium; ticarcillin disodium
US Patents:0
Tradenames:2
Applicants:1
NDAs:3
Clinical Trials: 1
DailyMed Link:clavulanate potassium; ticarcillin disodium at DailyMed
Recent Clinical Trials for clavulanate potassium; ticarcillin disodium

Identify potential brand extensions & 505(b)(2) entrants

SponsorPhase
Phillip Brian SmithPhase 1

See all clavulanate potassium; ticarcillin disodium clinical trials

Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) Classes for clavulanate potassium; ticarcillin disodium

US Patents and Regulatory Information for clavulanate potassium; ticarcillin disodium

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Exclusivity Expiration
Glaxosmithkline TIMENTIN clavulanate potassium; ticarcillin disodium INJECTABLE;INJECTION 050590-001 Apr 1, 1985 DISCN No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Glaxosmithkline TIMENTIN clavulanate potassium; ticarcillin disodium INJECTABLE;INJECTION 050590-003 Aug 18, 1987 DISCN No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Glaxosmithkline TIMENTIN IN PLASTIC CONTAINER clavulanate potassium; ticarcillin disodium INJECTABLE;INJECTION 050658-001 Dec 15, 1989 DISCN No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Glaxosmithkline TIMENTIN clavulanate potassium; ticarcillin disodium INJECTABLE;INJECTION 050590-002 Apr 1, 1985 DISCN No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Exclusivity Expiration

Market dynamics and financial trajectory for clavulanate potassium + ticarcillin disodium (ticarcillin/clavulanate)

Last updated: April 25, 2026

What is the market structure for ticarcillin disodium + clavulanate potassium?

Ticarcillin disodium + clavulanate potassium is a fixed-dose combination antibiotic (beta-lactam plus beta-lactamase inhibitor). In the US and most large markets, its commercial footprint is driven by (1) hospital formularies, (2) inventory and supply reliability, (3) payer contracting for generics and authorized equivalents, and (4) competitive substitution when multiple ANDA products are available.

Core market pattern

  • Institutional buying dominates: acute-care hospitals and ID/hospitalist purchasing groups.
  • Price compression is the norm: after generic entry, net price tracks contracting leverage rather than brand-like list price behavior.
  • Tender cyclicality matters: supply assurance and short lead times affect winning bids more than marginal pharmacology.

Competitive set

  • Multiple generic versions exist across common strengths and dosage forms in major markets, leading to near-homogeneous clinical positioning and fast substitution once therapeutically equivalent status is established under local regulation.
  • Competition intensifies around procurement cycles, which increases price volatility even when overall demand is stable.

How do demand drivers behave for this combination?

Demand is relatively steady but sensitive to hospital antibiotic stewardship and infection incidence patterns.

Primary demand drivers

  • Nosocomial and complicated infections where clinicians choose broad coverage plus beta-lactamase inhibition.
  • Antibiotic stewardship protocols that favor or restrict beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor regimens depending on local resistance profiles.
  • Seasonality and hospital utilization: admissions and ICU occupancy influence volume.

Constraints on demand

  • Broad substitution pressure from other beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor regimens (same class).
  • Resistance trends that can reduce relative use in certain pathogens, even if overall antibiotic use remains high.

What do the financial trajectory indicators show (pricing, reimbursement, and supply)?

For older, combination antibiotics with generic availability, the financial trajectory typically follows a predictable pattern:

  1. Brand-to-generic transition compresses price.
  2. Volume becomes the main lever, with contracting outcomes determining profitability.
  3. Manufacturing and quality execution can create temporary supply disruptions that lift pricing briefly, then normalize.

Net price dynamics in generic antibiotics

  • Post-generic entry, pricing converges toward low-to-mid single-digit discounting versus benchmark products depending on contract terms.
  • Margin is often protected by supply capacity, procurement scale, and formulation/manufacturing efficiency rather than differentiated clinical value.

Supply and contracting impact

  • Since hospitals stock for continuity, product availability can affect both short-term sales and longer-term formulary retention.
  • Procurement contracts reward vendors with stable supply and compliant manufacturing, which can shift market share without changing therapeutic positioning.

How does market access and regulation shape unit economics?

Across the US, the pathway is generally generic substitution with bioequivalence demonstration for approved products, and then payer and hospital formularies decide the effective market.

Market access mechanics that affect revenue

  • Tender-based placement: hospital procurement uses competitive bidding; the lowest total cost with reliable supply wins.
  • Therapeutic equivalence: once ANDA products are approved and accepted, prescribers face limited incentive to select a higher-cost alternative unless there is a supply issue.
  • Safety and quality compliance: manufacturing deviations increase substitution to alternate suppliers, reducing revenue even if clinical demand exists.

What do historical pricing and sales trends imply for current profitability?

For ticarcillin/clavulanate, the dominant financial facts that matter to investors and R&D decision-makers are:

  • Baseline demand is institutional and recurring, but
  • Revenue growth is typically volume-led, with price growth limited by generic competition,
  • Earnings are more sensitive to manufacturing throughput and contract wins than to marketing or clinical differentiation.

Trajectory takeaways from generic antibiotics

  • Revenue tends to track market share and contract geography more than therapeutic expansion.
  • Profitability tends to track cost of goods, batch yields, and compliance.
  • When multiple approved suppliers exist, market value is capped unless a company has a cost or supply advantage.

What are the product-level commercialization milestones that typically drive financial inflection?

Because this is an established antimicrobial combination, the financial inflection points are usually non-innovation events:

  • Generic launches and authorized generics (market share transfer).
  • Supply interruptions or recalls (temporary price spikes and contract reallocation).
  • Regulatory actions affecting manufacturing sites (switching between suppliers).
  • Formulary updates tied to antibiotic stewardship guidelines (rate of institutional uptake).

What is the competitive positioning versus related beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor options?

Clinically, ticarcillin/clavulanate sits among broad beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor choices. In procurement, competition behaves like a commodity:

  • Formularies include preferred agents by local antibiogram and stewardship.
  • Clinicians shift based on susceptibility and availability.
  • Economic competition is driven by net cost per course and contract coverage, not by novel efficacy.

Practical implications

  • If a buyer can meet coverage needs with alternative agents at lower net cost, ticarcillin/clavulanate volume can shrink.
  • If stewardship guidelines favor broader activity in specific hospital units, volume can stabilize.

What financial trajectory should be expected for companies active in this product?

The likely financial trajectory for companies selling ticarcillin/clavulanate is:

  • Steady revenue with periodic share shifts from contracting cycles.
  • Pressure on gross margins as net pricing compresses under competition.
  • Greater earnings sensitivity to:
    • manufacturing efficiency and yield,
    • stable supply,
    • compliance history at manufacturing sites,
    • ability to hold contracted volumes during shortages.

Where upside can appear

  • Shortages due to production downtime across the supplier base.
  • Contract wins in large ID hospital networks.
  • Cost improvements in API/formulation manufacturing that reduce unit cost.

Where downside appears

  • Loss of a major tender.
  • Supply interruptions at a key site.
  • Expanded formulary preference for competitor beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor regimens at lower net price.

How does the market typically handle innovation (or lack of it) for this combination?

For established antibiotics, true innovation is limited unless there is:

  • a novel delivery system,
  • a dosing regimen with demonstrated outcome benefit,
  • a meaningful spectrum advantage tied to specific resistance mechanisms,
  • or a clinically validated use expansion.

Without new differentiation, the financial trajectory remains governed by generic pricing and procurement dynamics.

Key Takeaways

  • Ticarcillin disodium + clavulanate potassium is a hospital-centric, commodity-like antibiotic market where net pricing and contract execution dominate the financial trajectory.
  • Demand is driven by infection incidence and stewardship protocols, but generic substitution caps price growth and makes volume and supply reliability the main revenue levers.
  • Profitability depends more on manufacturing throughput, cost of goods, compliance, and tender wins than on differentiated clinical value.
  • Market share shifts are most likely from procurement cycles, supply reliability events, and formulary updates, not from innovation.

FAQs

1) Is this product priced like a brand or like a generic?

It prices like a generic/authorized-equivalent class product in most large markets because multiple approved equivalents exist and hospital contracting governs net price.

2) What determines whether a manufacturer gains share?

Contract placement in major hospital systems and sustained supply reliability during procurement cycles.

3) Are there meaningful revenue growth opportunities?

Revenue growth is typically volume-led via tender wins and geographic expansion rather than through premium pricing.

4) What events most affect near-term financial results?

Manufacturing disruptions, recalls/regulatory actions affecting supply availability, and major tender outcomes that reallocate hospital purchasing.

5) How does antibiotic stewardship influence demand?

Stewardship policies and local antibiograms can either stabilize utilization by supporting appropriate indications or reduce use when competitor agents are preferred at lower net cost.


References

[1] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Drug Approval and Databases (Drugs@FDA). https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cder/daf/
[2] National Center for Biotechnology Information. PubChem compound records for clavulanate potassium and ticarcillin disodium. https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/
[3] Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Antibiotic resistance and stewardship resources (background for prescribing patterns). https://www.cdc.gov/antibiotic-use/

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.