Last Updated: June 23, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR CLAVULANATE POTASSIUM; TICARCILLIN DISODIUM


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for clavulanate potassium; ticarcillin disodium

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT01229046 ↗ Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Ticarcillin-clavulanate in Infants Withdrawn Phillip Brian Smith Phase 1 2010-09-01 This study will evaluate the safety, tolerability and PK of ticarcillin-clavulanate in infants
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for clavulanate potassium; ticarcillin disodium

Condition Name

Condition Name for clavulanate potassium; ticarcillin disodium
Intervention Trials
Sepsis 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for clavulanate potassium; ticarcillin disodium
Intervention Trials
Sepsis 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for clavulanate potassium; ticarcillin disodium

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for clavulanate potassium; ticarcillin disodium
Location Trials
United States 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for clavulanate potassium; ticarcillin disodium
Location Trials
New York 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for clavulanate potassium; ticarcillin disodium

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for clavulanate potassium; ticarcillin disodium
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 1 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for clavulanate potassium; ticarcillin disodium
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Withdrawn 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for clavulanate potassium; ticarcillin disodium

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for clavulanate potassium; ticarcillin disodium
Sponsor Trials
Phillip Brian Smith 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for clavulanate potassium; ticarcillin disodium
Sponsor Trials
Other 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial
Last updated: April 25, 2026

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projection for CLAVULANATE POTASSIUM; TICARCILLIN DISODIUM

What is the drug and what is its current clinical footprint?

Drug: Ticarcillin disodium + Clavulanate potassium (combination antibiotic; penicillin-class with beta-lactamase inhibitor).
Common clinical use: Serious infections where beta-lactamase producing pathogens are a concern, including hospital-acquired and other complicated infections.
Clinical development status (global): The combination is established medicine with no clear, widely documented late-stage registrational pipeline in the open literature as of the most recent major trial registry snapshots. The clinical landscape is dominated by use as an established product and by smaller comparative or pharmacology studies rather than new Phase 3 programs seeking new labeling.

Trial activity pattern:

  • No dominant Phase 3 “registrational” signal is visible in recent public trial registries for this exact fixed combination.
  • Most recent identifiable activity trends are consistent with: retrospective evaluations, observational infection outcomes, antimicrobial stewardship studies, and small pharmacokinetic or practical-use studies rather than large pivotal trials.

What do the trial data show by phase and timeframe?

The public record for this specific combination is sparse in late-stage investigational terms, so the operational read-through is: trial data are not currently driving new market expansion via new indications; instead, use persists through existing indications and formulary dynamics.

Operational implication: market outcomes are driven more by:

  • hospital purchasing and contracting
  • antimicrobial stewardship restrictions
  • resistance trends and local antibiogram requirements
  • substitution by other beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor (BLBLI) regimens
  • generic availability and price competition

What is the competitive market structure?

Therapeutic class: Broad-spectrum penicillin plus beta-lactamase inhibitor.
Competitive set: Other BLBLIs and advanced penicillin/beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations used in hospital settings, typically including:

  • piperacillin/tazobactam
  • cefepime-based regimens (in some settings)
  • other BLBLIs that can displace older regimens through guideline adoption and formulary preference
  • carbapenems in resistant infections
  • narrower-spectrum alternatives where stewardship applies

Key market mechanics:

  • Formulary position often hinges on local resistance patterns and stewardship protocols.
  • Acute care demand is driven by infection incidence plus antibiotic utilization policies.
  • Loss of exclusivity / generic entry typically compresses price and shifts share to cost-competitive supply.

What is the pricing and exclusivity situation likely to be?

This combination has been used for decades and is widely represented in hospital formularies. In mature antibiotic markets:

  • Genericization is common
  • pricing is highly sensitive to group purchasing organization (GPO) contracts, tenders, and distributor terms
  • innovation risk is lower because product-level innovation is limited relative to newer BLBLIs and cephalosporin-based platforms

What is the addressable market for this combination?

Without presenting speculative country-by-country numbers, the defensible market frame for this antibiotic combination is acute-care hospital and long-term acute care infectious disease utilization.

Primary demand channels:

  • inpatient hospital formularies
  • hospital contracts via wholesalers and GPOs
  • specialty centers with high rates of beta-lactamase producing pathogens
  • institutions that stock older BLBLI regimens for stewardship or culture-directed therapy

Primary procurement determinants:

  • unit price and contract pricing
  • availability and supply reliability
  • dosing convenience and infusion protocols
  • susceptibility patterns and internal guideline alignment

How should investors and R&D leaders project revenue given the likely maturity of the product?

For a mature antibiotic combination where late-stage new-indication trials are not visibly active, projections should be built around utilization and contract dynamics rather than label expansion.

A practical projection model uses three levers:

  1. Volume (V): driven by infection incidence and prescribing policies
  2. Net price (P): driven by generic competition, contracting, and tender outcomes
  3. Mix (M): driven by local resistance patterns and guideline adherence

Projection logic for a mature combination:

  • Volume: relatively stable to modestly declining in many settings due to substitution by newer BLBLIs and stewardship limits.
  • Price: more likely declining or flat due to generic pressure and tender resets.
  • Mix: can fluctuate based on susceptibility and antibiograms.

Net effect (typical maturity pattern):

  • Revenue growth is rarely driven by unit growth; it is usually flat-to-declining unless a contracting cycle or supply advantage changes utilization share.

What does the clinical evidence imply for utilization going forward?

The combination’s clinical role depends on:

  • susceptibility of local pathogens
  • beta-lactamase prevalence
  • comparative guidance versus other BLBLIs

Given the absence of a visible new late-stage registrational wave, the forward view is that clinical use continues where:

  • it remains guideline-consistent
  • it is cost-advantaged versus alternatives
  • it matches culture and susceptibility outcomes

Market projection summary (directional, scenario-based)

Because the public record shows mature status without a clear late-stage pivot, the most decision-relevant market view is scenario direction rather than a single numeric forecast.

Base case:

  • Revenue flat to low-single-digit decline over a short horizon, driven by contracting price pressure and modest substitution.

Bear case:

  • Mid-single-digit decline where stewardship and updated local antibiogram trends favor alternatives (newer BLBLIs or narrower regimens), combined with competitive tender outcomes.

Bull case:

  • Low growth only if contracting and formulary decisions retain or expand share (e.g., supply reliability, favorable resistance profile, or narrow competitive weakness).

What are the key risks that can move share?

  1. Guideline and stewardship shifts that reduce use of older BLBLIs in favor of alternatives
  2. Local antibiogram changes (higher resistance rates to penicillin derivatives)
  3. Tender and contracting dynamics that reprice the product downwards
  4. Safety and practical administration factors relative to competing regimens
  5. Supply chain reliability during high demand seasons or manufacturing disruptions

What are the key opportunities?

  • Institution-level stewardship adoption where the combination aligns with culture-directed pathways
  • Cost competitiveness during major tender cycles
  • Targeted use for beta-lactamase producing organisms when local susceptibility supports efficacy
  • Contract-driven volume retention via guaranteed supply and formulary permanence

Key Takeaways

  • Ticarcillin disodium + clavulanate potassium is a mature, established hospital antibiotic combination with limited visible late-stage registrational trial momentum in public records.
  • Market outcomes are driven by procurement and utilization contracts rather than new indication growth.
  • Projection should assume flat-to-declining revenue pressure in most scenarios due to generic pricing and substitution by newer BLBLIs and other regimens.
  • Share can still move based on local antibiograms, stewardship protocols, and tender outcomes.

FAQs

1) Is there active late-stage (Phase 3) development for ticarcillin/clavulanate?

Publicly visible late-stage registrational activity is not prominent for this fixed combination; most recent activity patterns are consistent with non-pivotal studies and real-world or pharmacology work rather than new label-seeking Phase 3 programs.

2) What most affects near-term sales?

Hospital contracting, tender pricing, and formulary placement, with utilization shaped by antimicrobial stewardship and local pathogen susceptibility.

3) How do competitors typically displace this regimen?

Through guideline and formulary preferences for other BLBLIs or alternative beta-lactam regimens that match local resistance and stewardship rules, plus cost and supply competitiveness.

4) Does resistance trends change demand quickly?

Yes, especially where antibiograms shift in prevalence of beta-lactamase producing organisms, changing susceptibility and prescribing patterns.

5) What is the most realistic revenue driver for the next cycle?

Net price containment or maintenance plus volume retention through contracts, not label expansion.


References

  1. ClinicalTrials.gov. “Ticarcillin; Clavulanic Acid” and related combination search results. (Accessed 2026-04-25). https://clinicaltrials.gov/
  2. FDA. Drug labeling and prescribing information for ticarcillin and clavulanate combination products (as applicable by product/label). (Accessed 2026-04-25). https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cder/daf/
  3. EMA. Public product information and assessment documents for ticarcillin/clavulanate combination products (as applicable). (Accessed 2026-04-25). https://www.ema.europa.eu/

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.