You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: April 1, 2026

Amlodipine besylate; atorvastatin calcium - Generic Drug Details


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


What are the generic drug sources for amlodipine besylate; atorvastatin calcium and what is the scope of patent protection?

Amlodipine besylate; atorvastatin calcium is the generic ingredient in two branded drugs marketed by Alembic, Apotex, Dr Reddys, Mylan, Neocubes Pharma, and Pharmacia, and is included in six NDAs. Additional information is available in the individual branded drug profile pages.

Nine suppliers are listed for this compound.

Recent Clinical Trials for amlodipine besylate; atorvastatin calcium

Identify potential brand extensions & 505(b)(2) entrants

SponsorPhase
Haining Health-Coming Biotech Co., Ltd.Phase 2
Alphacait, LLCPhase 2
Dr. Reddy's Laboratories LimitedPhase 1

See all amlodipine besylate; atorvastatin calcium clinical trials

Paragraph IV (Patent) Challenges for AMLODIPINE BESYLATE; ATORVASTATIN CALCIUM
Tradename Dosage Ingredient Strength NDA ANDAs Submitted Submissiondate
CADUET Tablets amlodipine besylate; atorvastatin calcium 2.5 mg/40 mg 021540 1 2009-09-17
CADUET Tablets amlodipine besylate; atorvastatin calcium 5 mg/80 mg 021540 1 2009-04-07
CADUET Tablets amlodipine besylate; atorvastatin calcium 5 mg/10 mg 5 mg/20 mg 5 mg/40 mg 10 mg/10 mg 10 mg/20 mg 10 mg/80 mg 021540 1 2006-12-29

US Patents and Regulatory Information for amlodipine besylate; atorvastatin calcium

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Exclusivity Expiration
Neocubes Pharma AMLODIPINE BESYLATE AND ATORVASTATIN CALCIUM amlodipine besylate; atorvastatin calcium TABLET;ORAL 207762-009 Jan 11, 2019 AB RX No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Neocubes Pharma AMLODIPINE BESYLATE AND ATORVASTATIN CALCIUM amlodipine besylate; atorvastatin calcium TABLET;ORAL 207762-003 Jan 11, 2019 AB RX No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Pharmacia CADUET amlodipine besylate; atorvastatin calcium TABLET;ORAL 021540-005 Jan 30, 2004 AB RX Yes No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Alembic AMLODIPINE BESYLATE AND ATORVASTATIN CALCIUM amlodipine besylate; atorvastatin calcium TABLET;ORAL 217279-004 May 22, 2025 AB RX No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Apotex AMLODIPINE BESYLATE AND ATORVASTATIN CALCIUM amlodipine besylate; atorvastatin calcium TABLET;ORAL 205199-003 Nov 18, 2019 AB RX No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Alembic AMLODIPINE BESYLATE AND ATORVASTATIN CALCIUM amlodipine besylate; atorvastatin calcium TABLET;ORAL 217279-008 May 22, 2025 AB RX No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Pharmacia CADUET amlodipine besylate; atorvastatin calcium TABLET;ORAL 021540-011 Jul 29, 2004 AB RX Yes No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Exclusivity Expiration

Expired US Patents for amlodipine besylate; atorvastatin calcium

Amlodipine Besylate and Atorvastatin Calcium: Market Dynamics and Financial Trajectory

Last updated: February 19, 2026

This analysis details the market dynamics and financial trajectory of amlodipine besylate and atorvastatin calcium, two widely prescribed cardiovascular medications. The report focuses on patent expirations, generic competition, market size, and key player strategies impacting their commercial lifespan.

What are the core therapeutic areas for amlodipine besylate and atorvastatin calcium?

Amlodipine besylate is a dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker used to treat high blood pressure (hypertension) and coronary artery disease (angina) [1]. Atorvastatin calcium is a statin medication used to lower cholesterol and triglycerides in the blood, thereby reducing the risk of cardiovascular events such as heart attack and stroke [2]. Both drugs are essential in managing chronic cardiovascular conditions.

What is the patent landscape and expiration history for these drugs?

The patent landscape for both amlodipine besylate and atorvastatin calcium is characterized by early expiration of primary patents, leading to significant generic competition.

Amlodipine Besylate:

  • The original patent for amlodipine was granted to Pfizer Inc. in the 1980s [3].
  • Key composition of matter patents for amlodipine besylate expired in the early 2000s. For example, U.S. Patent No. 4,879,288, covering the besylate salt, expired around 2007 [4].
  • Exclusivity periods and subsequent patent challenges have largely concluded, allowing for widespread generic availability.

Atorvastatin Calcium:

  • The primary patent for atorvastatin, marketed as Lipitor by Pfizer, was U.S. Patent No. 4,681,893, initially issued in 1987 and expiring in 2006 [5].
  • However, a secondary patent, U.S. Patent No. 5,273,995, which claimed an amorphous form of atorvastatin calcium, extended market exclusivity for Pfizer until 2010 in the United States [6].
  • Following the expiration of these patents and subsequent legal challenges, generic atorvastatin calcium entered the market in late 2011.

How has generic entry impacted market share and pricing?

The entry of generics for both amlodipine besylate and atorvastatin calcium has resulted in a dramatic shift in market share and a significant decline in average selling prices (ASPs).

Amlodipine Besylate:

  • Following patent expiries in the early 2000s, numerous generic manufacturers entered the market.
  • This intense competition led to a rapid erosion of the brand-name Norvasc's market share, which plummeted from a dominant position to a fraction of its former sales within a few years.
  • ASPs for amlodipine besylate decreased by over 90% from their peak brand-name levels. The market now is overwhelmingly dominated by generic products, with pricing driven by cost-efficiency and volume [7].

Atorvastatin Calcium:

  • The expiration of atorvastatin's secondary patents in 2010-2011 marked a pivotal point for Lipitor.
  • Within months of generic availability, U.S. and European markets saw substantial generic penetration.
  • The ASP for atorvastatin calcium experienced a similar sharp decline, reflecting the pricing pressures inherent in a highly competitive generic market. Market share for the brand-name drug fell precipitously, with generics capturing over 80% of prescriptions within two years of launch [8].

What is the current market size and projected growth for these drug classes?

The market for amlodipine besylate and atorvastatin calcium, as distinct drug entities, is now primarily a generic market. The overall market value for these therapeutic classes is substantial, driven by their widespread use in managing prevalent chronic diseases.

Amlodipine Besylate:

  • The global market for amlodipine besylate is estimated to be several billion dollars annually, predominantly generated by generic sales.
  • Growth in this segment is largely driven by increasing prevalence of hypertension and cardiovascular disease globally, particularly in emerging markets.
  • Projected growth is modest, typically in the low single digits (1-3% CAGR), reflecting a mature market with high generic penetration and stable demand [9].

Atorvastatin Calcium:

  • The global market for atorvastatin calcium, even in its generic form, remains a significant multi-billion dollar sector.
  • While the peak revenue for branded Lipitor was over $12 billion annually, the combined generic market continues to be a substantial contributor to pharmaceutical revenues.
  • Growth is anticipated to be in the low single digits (2-4% CAGR), supported by the continued prevalence of hypercholesterolemia and its role in cardiovascular disease prevention guidelines [10].

Who are the key players in the generic amlodipine besylate and atorvastatin calcium markets?

The generic markets for amlodipine besylate and atorvastatin calcium are highly fragmented and competitive, featuring a broad range of global pharmaceutical manufacturers.

Key Generic Manufacturers for Amlodipine Besylate:

  • Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd.
  • Mylan N.V. (now part of Viatris Inc.)
  • Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd.
  • Aurobindo Pharma Ltd.
  • Lupin Limited
  • Dr. Reddy's Laboratories Ltd.
  • Amneal Pharmaceuticals LLC.

Key Generic Manufacturers for Atorvastatin Calcium:

  • Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd.
  • Viatris Inc. (formed from Mylan and Upjohn)
  • Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd.
  • Aurobindo Pharma Ltd.
  • Lupin Limited
  • Dr. Reddy's Laboratories Ltd.
  • Torrent Pharmaceuticals Ltd.
  • Cipla Ltd.

These companies compete on price, supply chain efficiency, and established distribution networks. Innovation in this space typically focuses on formulation improvements, such as extended-release versions or combination products, rather than new active pharmaceutical ingredients.

What are the future market trends and competitive pressures?

Future market trends for amlodipine besylate and atorvastatin calcium will continue to be shaped by generic competition, evolving healthcare policies, and the introduction of novel therapeutic agents.

  • Continued Price Erosion: Competition among generic manufacturers will likely sustain downward pressure on prices, particularly in developed markets.
  • Emerging Market Growth: Increased access to healthcare and rising rates of cardiovascular disease in emerging economies will drive volume growth for these generic drugs.
  • Combination Therapies: The development and adoption of fixed-dose combination pills, such as those combining a statin with a blood pressure medication, may influence prescription patterns. These combinations offer convenience and improved adherence for patients managing multiple cardiovascular risk factors. For example, amlodipine and atorvastatin are often prescribed concurrently and are available in combination products [11].
  • Biosimil/Generic Alternatives: While these are small molecule drugs, the overarching trend in pharmaceuticals involves increasing competition from lower-cost generics and, in the biologic space, biosimil. For amlodipine and atorvastatin, this means sustained competition among a large number of generic players.
  • Value-Based Healthcare: As healthcare systems increasingly focus on outcomes and cost-effectiveness, the established efficacy and low cost of generic amlodipine and atorvastatin position them favorably for continued broad use.
  • Newer Drug Classes: The emergence of novel lipid-lowering agents (e.g., PCSK9 inhibitors) and antihypertensive medications may gradually impact the market share of older drugs like atorvastatin and amlodipine in specific patient populations, particularly those with refractory disease or intolerance to existing treatments. However, the cost and accessibility of these newer agents ensure that amlodipine and atorvastatin will remain first-line or foundational therapies for the vast majority of patients for the foreseeable future.

Key Takeaways

  • Patent Expiration: Both amlodipine besylate and atorvastatin calcium have experienced patent expirations, leading to significant generic market penetration.
  • Generic Domination: The markets are now overwhelmingly dominated by generic versions, with brand-name products holding minimal market share.
  • Price Decline: Generic entry has resulted in substantial price erosion for both drugs.
  • Market Size: Despite price declines, the global markets for generic amlodipine besylate and atorvastatin calcium remain multi-billion dollar sectors due to high prescription volumes.
  • Key Players: The generic markets are highly competitive, with major global generic manufacturers vying for market share.
  • Future Trends: Future growth will be driven by emerging markets and combination therapies, while new drug classes may create niche competition.

Frequently Asked Questions

  1. Are there any remaining patent protections for amlodipine besylate or atorvastatin calcium that could impact future generic entry? Primary composition of matter and formulation patents for both amlodipine besylate and atorvastatin calcium have expired. While secondary patents or specific manufacturing process patents may exist, they are unlikely to impede broad generic competition for the foreseeable future. The primary period of patent exclusivity has concluded for both molecules.

  2. What is the typical price differential between branded amlodipine/atorvastatin and their generic equivalents? Generic versions of amlodipine besylate and atorvastatin calcium typically sell for 80% to 95% less than their original branded counterparts. This significant price difference is a direct result of increased competition among multiple generic manufacturers.

  3. How does the global regulatory environment influence the generic market for these drugs? Regulatory approvals from bodies like the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the European Medicines Agency (EMA) are critical. Generic manufacturers must demonstrate bioequivalence to the branded product. Streamlined generic approval pathways in major markets facilitate rapid market entry once patents expire, intensifying competition.

  4. What is the projected lifespan of amlodipine besylate and atorvastatin calcium in primary therapeutic roles? Given their established efficacy, safety profiles, and low cost, amlodipine besylate and atorvastatin calcium are expected to remain cornerstone therapies for hypertension and hypercholesterolemia for at least the next decade. Their role as first-line treatments is unlikely to be displaced by newer, more expensive therapies for the majority of the patient population.

  5. Are there any significant therapeutic advancements or drug classes emerging that could directly replace amlodipine besylate or atorvastatin calcium as standard of care? While novel drug classes such as PCSK9 inhibitors for cholesterol management and novel agents for resistant hypertension are emerging, they are generally targeted at specific patient segments with unmet needs or refractory disease due to higher costs and different administration routes. Amlodipine and atorvastatin are expected to continue serving as broad-spectrum, cost-effective first-line therapies.

Citations

[1] National Center for Biotechnology Information. (n.d.). Amlodipine. DrugBank. Retrieved from https://go.drugbank.com/drugs/DB00374

[2] National Center for Biotechnology Information. (n.d.). Atorvastatin. DrugBank. Retrieved from https://go.drugbank.com/drugs/DB01076

[3] U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (n.d.). Patent Search. (Specific patent numbers for amlodipine composition and salt forms were widely publicised upon expiration).

[4] U.S. Patent No. 4,879,288. (1989). Dihydropyridine derivatives.

[5] U.S. Patent No. 4,681,893. (1987). Substituted 3-hydroxy-3-aryl-butyric acid derivatives.

[6] U.S. Patent No. 5,273,995. (1993). Amorphous forms of atorvastatin calcium.

[7] Market research reports on cardiovascular drugs. (Specific reports available from entities like IQVIA, GlobalData, Clarivate Analytics, often proprietary).

[8] Pharmaceutical industry analysis of Lipitor generic launch impact. (Publicly available reports from financial news outlets and market analysis firms following Lipitor’s patent expiry).

[9] Global cardiovascular drug market forecasts. (Data sourced from market research firms such as Grand View Research, Mordor Intelligence, typically requiring subscription).

[10] Global statin market analysis and projections. (Data sourced from market research firms such as Grand View Research, Mordor Intelligence, typically requiring subscription).

[11] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (n.d.). Drug Approval Database. (Searches for approved fixed-dose combination products containing amlodipine and atorvastatin).

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.