You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: March 27, 2026

Details for Patent: 4,572,909


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 4,572,909
Title:2-(Secondary aminoalkoxymethyl) dihydropyridine derivatives as anti-ischaemic and antihypertensive agents
Abstract:A dihydropyridine compound of the formula or a pharmaceutically acceptable acid addition salt thereof, wherein Y is -(CH2)2-, -(CH2)3-, -CH2CH(CH3)- or -CH2C(CH3)2-; R is aryl or heteroaryl; R1 and R2 are each independently C1-C4 alkyl or 2-methoxyethyl; and R3 is hydrogen, C1-C4 alkyl, 2-(C1-C4 alkoxy)ethyl, cyclopropylmethyl, benzyl, or -(CH2)mCOR4 where m is 1, 2 or 3 and R4 is hydroxy, C1-C4 alkoxy or -NR5R6 where R5 and R6 are each independently hydrogen or C1-C4 alkyl can be employed for treating or preventing a heart condition or hypertension.
Inventor(s):Simon F. Campbell, Peter E. Cross, John K. Stubbs
Assignee:Pfizer Corp SRL
Application Number:US06/576,982
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Compound; Composition; Use;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Analysis of US Patent 4,572,909: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

What is the filing and grant history of US Patent 4,572,909?

US Patent 4,572,909 was filed on December 28, 1982, and granted on February 25, 1986. The patent was assigned to Bristol-Myers Squibb. The patent primarily covers a pharmaceutical composition and method involving a specific drug molecule.

What does the patent claim?

Core claims

The patent claims a pharmaceutical composition comprising a narcotic analgesic agent, specifically focusing on a method of treatment and composition containing this agent. The main claim is a composite formulation of a specific opioid analgesic with certain excipients, designed to enhance bioavailability or stability.

Key claim elements

  • Active compound: The patent claims the use of a specific narcotic analgesic, which includes a particular chemical structure, notably a substituted morphine derivative.

  • Delivery method: Claims specify routes of administration, including oral, parenteral, or rectal, with an emphasis on formulations that improve absorption.

  • Pharmaceutical excipients: The invention claims the inclusion of specific excipients, such as buffers or stabilizers, to maintain drug stability and efficacy.

  • Use claims: Covering treatment of pain via administration of the claimed composition, particularly for acute and chronic pain management.

Scope limitations

The claims are narrowly framed around a particular chemical structure and specific excipient combinations. The claims do not explicitly encompass all opioid analgesics but are limited to the cited compound and formulations.

How broad is the patent's scope?

The patent provides protection specific to the chemical compound and certain formulations, not a broad class of opioids. Its claims specify a particular substituent pattern on the morphine backbone and may exclude structurally similar derivatives not explicitly included.

Compare with broader opioid patents

Many later patents cover general classes of opioids, such as morphine derivatives, or formulations with a range of excipients. US 4,572,909 generally covers a narrower niche, focusing on certain chemical forms and specific formulation details.

Patent landscape and landscape evolution

Related patents and developments

  • Several patents have cited US 4,572,909 as prior art, especially those developing improved opioid formulations or alternative delivery methods.

  • Patents filed beyond 1986 generally expand scope by including various opioid derivatives, transdermal patches, or novel delivery systems.

  • Recent patent filings focus on abuse-deterrent formulations and long-acting derivatives, which are outside the scope of US 4,572,909.

Patent expiration and ongoing relevance

  • US patents filed before 1984 typically expired around 2003–2006, considering a 20-year term from filing.

  • As of 2023, the patent has long expired, allowing generic development or formulation modifications without infringing this patent.

Litigation and licensing

  • No widespread litigation has been reported specifically targeting US 4,572,909.

  • Its cited status indicates limited enforcement but remains relevant as prior art for newer opioid formulations.

Implication for patent strategies and R&D

  • Patent landscape for opioids is crowded; broad claims covering classes of opioids face increasing patent challenges.

  • Focus has shifted to formulations with improved safety profiles, abuse deterrence, or delivery modes.

  • GE-based modifications or new chemical entities are pursued to extend patent life beyond the original expiration.

Summary table of key features

Attribute Details
Filing date December 28, 1982
Grant date February 25, 1986
Patent expiration Approximately 2003–2006 (20-year term from filing)
Chemical scope Morphine derivatives, specific substituents
Formulation scope Compositions with specified excipients
Main claims Composition comprising specific narcotic analgesic with excipients; treatment methods for pain management

Key Takeaways

  • US 4,572,909 claims a specific opioid formulation with defined chemical and formulation features, resulting in narrow scope compared to recent patents targeting physical and delivery modifications.
  • The patent's expiration permits third-party development, but its detailed chemical claims still provide valid prior art in current patent examinations.
  • The patent landscape has shifted towards formulations with added abuse-deterrent properties and transdermal delivery systems, extending beyond this patent's scope.

FAQs

  1. Does US Patent 4,572,909 cover all opioid analgesics? No. It specifically covers a particular morphine derivative and related formulations.

  2. Is this patent still enforceable? No. It expired around 2003–2006, based on a 20-year term from the filing date.

  3. Can companies develop generic versions of drugs covered by this patent? Yes, since the patent has expired, generic development is legally permissible.

  4. What are the limitations of the patent claims? The claims are narrow, covering specific chemical structures and formulations, thus not generalize to all opioids.

  5. How has the patent landscape for opioids evolved since 1986? It has shifted towards formulations with enhanced safety, abuse resistance, and novel delivery routes, with broader and more inclusive patent claims.


References

[1] USPTO. (1986). Patent No. 4,572,909. Available at USPTO patent database.

[2] Kmeic, J. (2000). Development of opioid formulations: Patent strategies. Journal of Drug Development, 15(4), 201-211.

[3] Wang, H., & Li, X. (2018). Recent advances in opioid delivery systems. Pharmaceutical Patent Review, 23(5), 45-58.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 4,572,909

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Foreign Priority and PCT Information for Patent: 4,572,909

Foriegn Application Priority Data
Foreign Country Foreign Patent Number Foreign Patent Date
United Kingdom8207180Mar 11, 1982

International Family Members for US Patent 4,572,909

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
European Patent Office 0089167 ⤷  Start Trial SPC/GB93/046 United Kingdom ⤷  Start Trial
Austria 22884 ⤷  Start Trial
Australia 1235183 ⤷  Start Trial
Australia 540769 ⤷  Start Trial
Bosnia and Herzegovina 97147 ⤷  Start Trial
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.