Last Updated: May 11, 2026

COLISTIMETHATE SODIUM - Generic Drug Details


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


What are the generic sources for colistimethate sodium and what is the scope of freedom to operate?

Colistimethate sodium is the generic ingredient in two branded drugs marketed by Avet Lifesciences, Fresenius Kabi Usa, Nexus, Pharmobedient, Sagent Pharms Inc, Xellia Pharms Aps, and Ph Health, and is included in seven NDAs. Additional information is available in the individual branded drug profile pages.

There are two drug master file entries for colistimethate sodium. Five suppliers are listed for this compound.

Summary for COLISTIMETHATE SODIUM
Drug Prices for COLISTIMETHATE SODIUM

See drug prices for COLISTIMETHATE SODIUM

Recent Clinical Trials for COLISTIMETHATE SODIUM

Identify potential brand extensions & 505(b)(2) entrants

SponsorPhase
University Hospital Fattouma BourguibaPHASE2
Beni-Suef UniversityPHASE4
Ain Shams UniversityPHASE2

See all COLISTIMETHATE SODIUM clinical trials

Pharmacology for COLISTIMETHATE SODIUM

US Patents and Regulatory Information for COLISTIMETHATE SODIUM

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Exclusivity Expiration
Nexus COLISTIMETHATE SODIUM colistimethate sodium INJECTABLE;INJECTION 065177-001 Mar 19, 2004 DISCN No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Ph Health COLY-MYCIN M colistimethate sodium INJECTABLE;INJECTION 050108-002 Approved Prior to Jan 1, 1982 AP RX Yes Yes ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Fresenius Kabi Usa COLISTIMETHATE SODIUM colistimethate sodium INJECTABLE;INJECTION 065364-001 Apr 17, 2008 AP RX No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Exclusivity Expiration

EU/EMA Drug Approvals for COLISTIMETHATE SODIUM

Company Drugname Inn Product Number / Indication Status Generic Biosimilar Orphan Marketing Authorisation Marketing Refusal
Teva B.V. Colobreathe colistimethate sodium EMEA/H/C/001225Colobreathe is indicated for the management of chronic pulmonary infections due to Pseudomonas aeruginosa in patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) aged six years and older.Consideration should be given to official guidance on the appropriate use of antibacterial agents. Authorised no no no 2012-02-13
>Company >Drugname >Inn >Product Number / Indication >Status >Generic >Biosimilar >Orphan >Marketing Authorisation >Marketing Refusal

COLISTIMETHATE SODIUM: Market Dynamics and Financial Trajectory

Last updated: April 25, 2026

What market does colistimethate sodium serve and how is it priced?

Colistimethate sodium is a polymyx in antibiotic prodrug (converted to colistin) used primarily for infections caused by Gram-negative, multidrug-resistant organisms, with use patterns shaped by (1) resistance prevalence, (2) stewardship restrictions, and (3) safety perceptions around nephrotoxicity and neurotoxicity. In practice, demand is concentrated in hospital formularies and is driven by ICU and inpatient infection volumes rather than outpatient retail.

Pricing is dominated by:

  • Generic and biosimilar-equivalent market structure: The product class is largely generic in most mature markets, so price levels track local generic tendering and the cost of API supply rather than patent-protected monopoly pricing.
  • Tender dynamics: Many countries’ hospital procurement uses periodic tenders that compress unit price and shift volume between suppliers.
  • Regulatory-driven prescribing: Label constraints, local guidelines, and monitoring requirements impact net realized use even when microbiology supports treatment.

How does competition shape demand?

Competition for colistimethate sodium is mostly among manufacturers of the same active ingredient and competing brands of polymyxins (notably colistin sulfate in some regions). The competitive structure has three consistent effects:

  1. Price compression when supply is adequate
    • When multiple generic manufacturers are available, acquisition cost declines and formulary access becomes the key battleground.
  2. Volume volatility when supply tightens
    • API disruptions and manufacturing deviations can reduce tender eligibility for some suppliers, shifting volumes temporarily.
  3. Conversion and dosing practices influence switching
    • Because dosing can be expressed in different units depending on reference standards and local labeling, hospitals can prefer the formulation that aligns with existing protocols and pharmacy conversion workflows.

What are the key demand drivers?

Demand is structurally supported by a persistent burden of Gram-negative resistance. The proximate drivers for year-to-year use include:

  • Hospital antibiotic pressure (ICU admissions, ventilator-associated infections, bloodstream infections)
  • Local antimicrobial stewardship and susceptibility patterns
  • Outbreak-driven usage where hospitals prioritize broad coverage for resistant organisms

Counterweights that limit demand:

  • Prescribing restrictions tied to stewardship programs and toxicity risk management
  • Treatment substitution when other older or newer agents show comparable outcomes in local practice (this substitution is often constrained by resistance profiles, but it still affects volumes)

What is the product’s financial trajectory under a generic economics model?

Colistimethate sodium’s financial trajectory is typically shaped by generic lifecycle economics rather than brand innovation. In an investable view, the trajectory usually follows this path:

  • Phase 1: Post-launch normalization
    • Early diffusion stabilizes in-hospital uptake as clinicians gain comfort and pharmacies standardize dosing workflows.
  • Phase 2: Margin compression
    • As additional generic suppliers enter, tender pricing drives downward unit margins.
  • Phase 3: Supplier concentration periods
    • If supply constraints emerge or if regulatory actions remove certain manufacturers from eligible lists, unit price can rise in the short term while competitors capture volume.
  • Phase 4: Mature-market churn
    • Demand stays relatively steady in absolute terms but is volatile in realized revenue per unit due to tender renegotiations and currency conversion.

In practical terms, the revenue line tends to exhibit:

  • Stable-to-slow growth in volume (driven by hospital infection prevalence)
  • Declining or flat gross price over multi-year spans (driven by generic competition)
  • Discrete revenue “jumps” aligned to procurement cycles, supply events, and regional tender outcomes

How do reimbursement and procurement patterns affect revenue conversion?

The financial trajectory depends less on reimbursement innovation and more on procurement rules:

  • Hospital reimbursement frameworks translate into stable budget constraints, making purchases tender-driven and price-sensitive.
  • Switching friction (protocol alignment, dosing conversions, stock availability) reduces rapid switching, which can cause delayed adoption of new suppliers after tenders are awarded.
  • Contracting terms (delivery schedules, volume discounts, penalties) can swing realized revenue versus list price.

Net result: market share changes are often faster than price recovery when suppliers face shortages, but sustained price increases require broader supply disruption.

What role does regulatory oversight play in market stability?

For colistimethate sodium, regulatory oversight impacts financial trajectory through:

  • Market authorization status by region
  • Manufacturing quality and batch release reliability
  • Label and safety wording that shapes prescribing behavior

These factors affect whether suppliers can remain on formularies and tender lists, creating periodic reallocation of volume between manufacturers.

Is colistimethate sodium primarily hospital-driven, and what does that mean for financial risk?

Yes. The implied revenue base is hospital-centric:

  • Benefit: Hospital demand is less discretionary than outpatient spending, so volume is typically resilient even in weaker macro environments.
  • Risk: Volume can drop sharply when stewardship policies tighten, when clinicians switch to alternatives, or when susceptibility patterns shift away from polymyxin-heavy regimens.

Financial risk is therefore concentrated in:

  • Tender pricing risk (margin erosion)
  • Supply continuity risk (revenue disruptions)
  • Clinical substitution risk (loss of share within resistant Gram-negative subsets)

How does safety perception affect long-run uptake?

Even when efficacy exists for resistant Gram-negative infections, nephrotoxicity monitoring requirements shape prescribing:

  • Clinicians may reserve use for cases where culture and susceptibility justify polymyxin therapy.
  • Protocolized dosing and monitoring can reduce variability in outcomes, but it does not eliminate hesitancy.

This keeps demand more stable than discretionary antibiotics but caps upside growth compared with breakthrough therapies.

What market indicators matter most for forecasting?

For a colistimethate sodium financial model, the most predictive indicators are:

  • Hospital tender prices and awarded shares by region and calendar quarter
  • In-stock availability and distribution constraints (API supply, manufacturing batch release)
  • Guideline language and stewardship thresholds that influence “when to use” decisions
  • Resistance trend proxies (Gram-negative MDR rates), used to estimate prescribing intensity

Financial trajectory summary (investment framing)

The generic structure means the financial profile is characterized by:

  • Broad demand base tied to resistant Gram-negative infections and inpatient care
  • Low differentiation on efficacy, shifting competition to price, supply reliability, and contracting
  • Earnings sensitivity to supply and tender outcomes
  • Limited revenue growth unless a region experiences supply contraction or stewardship constraints ease

Key Takeaways

  • Colistimethate sodium demand is hospital-driven and anchored to MDR Gram-negative infection burden, with use governed by stewardship and toxicity monitoring.
  • Competition is largely generic; tender pricing compresses margins and limits sustained price growth.
  • Financial trajectory typically shows stable-to-slow volume growth with flat or declining unit pricing, punctuated by supply-driven revenue shifts and procurement-cycle volatility.
  • Forecasting accuracy depends most on tender awarded volumes, realized net pricing, and manufacturing supply continuity rather than on patent-driven dynamics.

FAQs

1) What drives short-term revenue swings for colistimethate sodium?
Tender awards and supplier availability. Supply disruptions or eligibility losses can reallocate volume quickly and change realized net pricing for the winning suppliers.

2) Does colistimethate sodium behave like a growing specialty asset?
No. Its market economics track generic procurement cycles and hospital adoption practices, not specialty innovation curves.

3) What is the main competitive threat?
Price and supply reliability among generic manufacturers, plus therapeutic substitution to other agents when local guidelines and susceptibility profiles permit.

4) Why is nephrotoxicity monitoring relevant to market dynamics?
It constrains prescribing to justified cases and increases friction in adoption, which stabilizes baseline demand but limits upside.

5) What is the best indicator for predicting next-quarter results?
Recent tender outcomes (awarded share and net unit price) combined with current stock and manufacturing batch release reliability.


References

[1] FDA. Safety and effectiveness information for antimicrobial drugs (polymyxin-related safety and prescribing considerations within approved labeling). U.S. Food and Drug Administration. https://www.fda.gov/
[2] EMA. European public assessment reports and product information for colistimethate sodium/colistin products (EPARs, label information impacting use and safety wording). European Medicines Agency. https://www.ema.europa.eu/
[3] CLSI. Guidance on antimicrobial susceptibility testing and interpretive criteria for polymyxins and resistant Gram-negative organisms. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. https://clsi.org/
[4] WHO. Global and regional antimicrobial resistance and surveillance burden context relevant to polymyxin utilization. World Health Organization. https://www.who.int/
[5] IDSA. Guidelines and stewardship recommendations for management of resistant Gram-negative infections and antibiotic use constraints. Infectious Diseases Society of America. https://www.idsociety.org/

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.