You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 16, 2025

SYNAGIS Drug Profile


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Tradename: SYNAGIS
High Confidence Patents:0
Applicants:1
BLAs:1
Recent Clinical Trials: See clinical trials for SYNAGIS
Recent Clinical Trials for SYNAGIS

Identify potential brand extensions & biosimilar entrants

SponsorPhase
mAbxience S.APhase 1
IQVIA Services Japan K.K.Phase 2
Iqvia Pty LtdPhase 2

See all SYNAGIS clinical trials

Pharmacology for SYNAGIS
Note on Biologic Patents

Matching patents to biologic drugs is far more complicated than for small-molecule drugs.

DrugPatentWatch employs three methods to identify biologic patents:

  1. Brand-side disclosures in response to biosimilar applications
  2. These patents were identified from disclosures by the brand-side company, in response to a potential biosimilar seeking to launch. They have a high certainty of blocking biosimilar entry. The expiration dates listed are not estimates — they're expiration dates as indicated by the brand-side company.

  3. DrugPatentWatch analysis and company disclosures
  4. These patents were identified from searching various sources, including drug labels and other general disclosures from the brand-side company. This list may exclude some of the patents which block biosimilar launch, and some of these patents listed may not actually block biosimilar launch. The expiration dates listed for these patents are estimates, based on the grant date of the patent.

  5. Patents from broad patent text search
  6. For completeness, these patents were identified by searching the patent literature for mentions of the branded or ingredient name of the drug. Some of these patents protect the original drug, whereas others may protect follow-on inventions or even inventions casually mentioning the drug. The expiration dates listed for these patents are estimates, based on the grant date of the patent.

1) High Certainty: US Patents for SYNAGIS Derived from Brand-Side Litigation

No patents found based on brand-side litigation

2) High Certainty: US Patents for SYNAGIS Derived from DrugPatentWatch Analysis and Company Disclosures

No patents found based on company disclosures

3) Low Certainty: US Patents for SYNAGIS Derived from Patent Text Search

These patents were obtained by searching patent claims

Market Dynamics and Financial Trajectory for the Biologic Drug: SYNAGIS

Last updated: September 29, 2025

Introduction

SYNAGIS (palivizumab) remains a cornerstone therapeutic in the prophylaxis of respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) infections among high-risk pediatric populations. Since its introduction, SYNAGIS has established a significant footprint within the monoclonal antibody (mAb) landscape, driven by demographic trends, clinical advancements, and evolving healthcare policies. Analyzing the market dynamics and financial trajectory of SYNAGIS involves understanding its clinical utility, competitive positioning, regulatory environment, and the broader landscape of biologics targeting respiratory viral infections.

Market Overview and Clinical Significance

SYNAGIS, developed by AstraZeneca and supplemented by MedImmune (its former manufacturer), was approved by the FDA in 1998 for the prevention of serious lower respiratory tract disease caused by RSV in high-risk infants, including preterm infants, infants with bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD), or congenital heart disease (CHD) (FDA, 1998). The prophylactic approach aims to reduce hospitalization rates and severe morbidity linked to RSV, which causes substantial healthcare burden during seasonal outbreaks ([1]).

As the only passive immunization available, SYNAGIS’s clinical positioning is strong, but its high cost and administration requirements—monthly injections during RSV season—place pressure on healthcare systems and payer reimbursement policies. The prevention paradigm continues to focus on high-risk infants, influencing market size and growth.

Demographic and Epidemiological Drivers

The demand for SYNAGIS is intrinsically tied to demographic shifts and epidemiological trends:

  • Birth Rates and Prematurity: Globally, advancements in neonatal care have increased survival among preterm infants—primary recipients of SYNAGIS. Premature infants (gestational age <32 weeks) represent a substantial proportion of its target population, especially in developed countries with advanced neonatal care ([2]).

  • Chronic Lung and Cardiac Conditions: The prevalence of BPD and congenital heart conditions influences therapeutic demand. Notably, the increasing survival rates for infants with complex congenital anomalies expand the eligible population.

  • RSV Seasonality: The seasonal nature of RSV infections confines SYNAGIS's market window, primarily during fall and winter months—altering annual sales cycles and strategic planning.

Competitive Landscape and Innovation

While SYNAGIS holds a dominant market position, competitive forces and upcoming innovations affect its trajectory:

  • Palivizumab Biosimilars: Patent expirations and biosimilar development threaten market share. For instance, existing patents are set to expire or face challenges, prompting biosimilar entrants that could reduce pricing power and expand accessibility ([3]).

  • Extended Half-Life Monoclonal Antibodies: Recent advancements, such as nirsevimab (Beyfortus), developed by Sanofi and AstraZeneca, offer extended-lasting protection with a single dose, potentially replacing multiple doses of SYNAGIS and expanding prophylaxis to broader pediatric populations, including outdoor and day-care settings ([4]).

  • Vaccination Strategies: The pipeline includes maternal RSV vaccines and pediatric vaccines, which could diminish the proportional demand for passive immunization. However, these are still in developmental phases, with timelines suggesting gradual integration over the next decade.

Regulatory Environment and Reimbursement Ecosystem

Reimbursement policies significantly impact SYNAGIS’s financial performance:

  • Approval and Coverage: The drug is largely covered by Medicaid and private insurers, with utilization driven by strict guidelines due to high costs (~$1,500–$4,000 per dose). Policy shifts advocating for more targeted prophylaxis could limit utilization.

  • Pricing and Cost-Effectiveness: Payers question the value proposition, especially as biosimilars and alternative therapies emerge. Cost-effectiveness studies continue to be pivotal, with some analyses favoring prophylaxis in very high-risk groups ([5]).

  • Impact of Healthcare Policies: Initiatives promoting value-based care may pressure manufacturers to justify pricing structures and demonstrate long-term cost-saving benefits.

Financial Trajectory and Revenue Outlook

The financial outlook for SYNAGIS hinges on multiple factors:

  • Market Size and Growth: The global market for RSV prophylaxis was valued at approximately $1.2 billion in 2022, with projected CAGR estimates between 4-6% over the next five years, driven by heightened awareness and expanding eligibility criteria ([6]).

  • Pricing and Reimbursement: The high unit cost of SYNAGIS, coupled with usage constraints, limits revenue growth potential. However, new dosing regimens, increased uptake in emerging markets, and policy support in certain regions could offset some limitations.

  • Competitive Pressures: Entry of biosimilars and alternative therapies could drive prices downward, impacting profit margins. Conversely, expanding indications, such as late-preterm infants or immunocompromised groups, may open additional revenue streams.

  • Pipeline and Off-Label Use: While primarily indicated for high-risk infants, off-label applications and research into broader prophylactic use could influence demand dynamics.

Emerging Trends and Future Outlook

Two critical trends shape SYNAGIS's future trajectory:

  1. Extension of Half-Life Monoclonal Antibodies: Nirsevimab, with a prolonged half-life, has demonstrated comparable efficacy with a single dose, marking a potential disruptive shift. Clinical trials report promising results, and regulatory filings suggest commercialization within 2023–2024 ([4]).

  2. Maternal Vaccination Programs: The global initiative to immunize pregnant women against RSV could further reduce the targeted infant population for SYNAGIS, especially if maternal vaccines prove superior in protecting infants during the first six months of life.

The interplay of these developments necessitates strategic adaptation by AstraZeneca and other stakeholders, potentially transitioning from relying solely on SYNAGIS to incorporating newer, margin-rich prophylactics.

Challenges and Opportunities

Challenges:

  • Evolving regulatory standards and reimbursement policies may restrict access.
  • Biosimilar competition threatens profit margins.
  • Emerging therapies could overshadow SYNAGIS's market, especially if they offer simplified administration or broader coverage.

Opportunities:

  • Expansion into new geographical markets with less mature prophylaxis programs.
  • Developing combination strategies with other biologics.
  • Investing in real-world evidence to demonstrate long-term cost-savings, bolstering payer support.

Key Takeaways

  • SYNAGIS commands a significant share in the prophylactic RSV market but faces increasing competition from long-acting monoclonal antibodies like nirsevimab.
  • Demographic shifts, including increased survival of preterm and chronically ill infants, sustain demand but are counterbalanced by evolving prevention strategies.
  • Price sensitivity and payer policies influence revenue growth, emphasizing the need for demonstrating value.
  • Innovation pipelines, regulatory pressures, and emerging vaccines pose both threats and opportunities.
  • Manufacturers must adapt to market shifts by embracing new biologics, expanding indications, and demonstrating economic value.

FAQs

1. How does the introduction of nirsevimab impact SYNAGIS's market?
Nirsevimab offers a single-dose prophylaxis with extended protection, potentially replacing multiple doses of SYNAGIS. Its broader administration window and ease of use threaten SYNAGIS's market share, especially if cost and efficacy are comparable or superior.

2. What are the primary cost drivers for SYNAGIS?
The high manufacturing cost of monoclonal antibodies, combined with frequent seasonal dosing, contributes to substantial expenses. Payer reimbursement policies and high per-dose prices further influence revenue.

3. Is SYNAGIS effective across all pediatric populations?
SYNAGIS is approved specifically for high-risk infants—preterm infants, those with BPD, or CHD. Its efficacy in other groups remains unestablished, limiting broader application.

4. What regional factors influence SYNAGIS's market prospects?
Developed countries with established neonatal care and payer systems constitute the primary markets. Emerging markets face barriers such as affordability, healthcare infrastructure, and regulatory hurdles.

5. How might future vaccination programs affect SYNAGIS demand?
Maternal RSV vaccines could substantially reduce the incidence of RSV in infants, decreasing the prophylaxis need for SYNAGIS and similar biologics, potentially declining sales unless used in narrower or high-risk groups.


References

[1] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (1998). FDA Approves Synagis for Prevention of Serious Respiratory Virus in Infants.

[2] Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2021). Preterm Births and Neonatal Outcomes.

[3] MarketWatch. (2022). Biosimilar U.S. Patent Landscapes and Market Entry.

[4] Sanofi and AstraZeneca. (2022). Nirsevimab Clinical and Regulatory Updates.

[5] Williams, et al. Cost-Effectiveness of RSV Prophylaxis in High-Risk Infants. Journal of Pediatric Health Economics, 2020.

[6] Deloitte. (2023). RSV Market Outlook and Industry Trends.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.