You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 16, 2025

Palivizumab - Biologic Drug Details


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for palivizumab
Tradenames:1
High Confidence Patents:0
Applicants:1
BLAs:1
Suppliers: see list1
Recent Clinical Trials: See clinical trials for palivizumab
Recent Clinical Trials for palivizumab

Identify potential brand extensions & biosimilar entrants

SponsorPhase
AstraZenecaNA
Anabio R&DNA
National Children's Hospital, VietnamNA

See all palivizumab clinical trials

Pharmacology for palivizumab
Note on Biologic Patents

Matching patents to biologic drugs is far more complicated than for small-molecule drugs.

DrugPatentWatch employs three methods to identify biologic patents:

  1. Brand-side disclosures in response to biosimilar applications
  2. These patents were identified from disclosures by the brand-side company, in response to a potential biosimilar seeking to launch. They have a high certainty of blocking biosimilar entry. The expiration dates listed are not estimates — they're expiration dates as indicated by the brand-side company.

  3. DrugPatentWatch analysis and brand-side disclosures
  4. These patents were identified from searching drug labels and other general disclosures from the brand-side company. This list may exclude some of the patents which block biosimilar launch, and some of these patents listed may not actually block biosimilar launch. The expiration dates listed for these patents are estimates, based on the grant date of the patent.

  5. Patents from broad patent text search
  6. For completeness, these patents were identified by searching the patent literature for mentions of the branded or ingredient name of the drug. Some of these patents protect the original drug, whereas others may protect follow-on inventions or even inventions casually mentioning the drug. The expiration dates listed for these patents are estimates, based on the grant date of the patent.

1) High Certainty: US Patents for palivizumab Derived from Brand-Side Litigation

No patents found based on brand-side litigation

2) High Certainty: US Patents for palivizumab Derived from DrugPatentWatch Analysis and Company Disclosures

No patents found based on company disclosures

3) Low Certainty: US Patents for palivizumab Derived from Patent Text Search

No patents found based on company disclosures

Market Dynamics and Financial Trajectory for the Biologic Drug: Palivizumab

Last updated: July 27, 2025

Introduction

Palivizumab, marketed under the brand name Synagis, is a monoclonal antibody developed for the prevention of serious respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) infections in high-risk pediatric populations. Since its approval by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 1998, palivizumab has become a cornerstone in pediatric infectious disease prophylaxis, with its market landscape evolving in response to epidemiological, technological, and economic factors. This article explores the current market dynamics and the financial trajectory of palivizumab, considering factors influencing its sales, market players, and future potential.

Market Overview

Epidemiological Impact and Market Need

RSV remains a leading cause of lower respiratory tract infections in infants and young children worldwide, resulting in significant hospitalization rates and healthcare costs. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), RSV causes approximately 33 million cases of acute lower respiratory infections annually, with over 3 million hospitalizations among children under 5 years old [1]. Palivizumab offers an effective prophylactic intervention for vulnerable groups, including preterm infants, those with congenital heart disease, and immunocompromised patients.

Regulatory Approvals and Indication Evolution

Since its initial approval, palivizumab's indications have expanded marginally, driven by clinical data affirming its efficacy and safety. Regulatory agencies in various regions have authorized its use primarily during RSV seasons, which vary geographically but generally span late fall to early spring. Recently, regulatory discussions have considered broader applications, but the primary approved use remains prophylaxis in high-risk infants [2].

Competitive Landscape

Although palivizumab holds a dominant position in RSV prophylaxis, the market faces emerging competition from alternative biologics and small-molecule agents. Notably, new monoclonal antibodies such as nirsevimab (mediated by AstraZeneca and Sanofi) are under clinical development and pursuing favorable efficacy profiles with extended dosing schedules. These novel agents could challenge palivizumab’s market share upon regulatory approval and commercialization.

Market Dynamics

Pricing, Reimbursement, and Cost Considerations

Palivizumab’s high manufacturing costs and the necessity for multiple doses per RSV season contribute to its high price point, often exceeding $1,000 per dose in the United States. This price structure significantly influences reimbursement policies, with insurance providers and healthcare systems assessing cost-effectiveness, particularly given the prophylactic’s targeted population [3].

The cost-effectiveness of palivizumab has been debated; while it reduces hospitalization rates and severe disease, its high expense prompts ongoing scrutiny. Health technology assessments in various countries consider factors such as hospitalization cost savings, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and overall burden reduction [4].

Market Penetration and Utilization Trends

Utilization of palivizumab varies across regions, dictated by local guidelines, healthcare infrastructure, and awareness. Developed markets like the U.S., Europe, and Japan report higher prophylaxis coverage, especially among preterm and congenital heart disease populations. However, the overall penetration remains constrained by cost, logistical challenges, and competing prophylactic agents.

Manufacturing and Supply Chain Factors

Manufacturing for palivizumab is complex, involving mammalian cell culture systems and precise purification steps, which contribute to production costs and supply reliability. Supply chain disruptions, as observed globally during the COVID-19 pandemic, could influence availability and pricing.

Technological Innovations and Future Prospects

Key technological advancements could significantly influence the market. These include long-acting monoclonal antibodies like nirsevimab, designed for single-dose administration over an entire RSV season, potentially replacing multiple-dose palivizumab regimens. Clinical trials demonstrate that nirsevimab offers comparable or superior efficacy with simplified dosing schedules [5].

Furthermore, vaccine development efforts targeting maternal immunization strategies aim to confer passive immunity to infants, potentially reducing the prophylactic need for biologics like palivizumab.

Financial Trajectory

Revenue Trends

Palivizumab has historically generated annual revenues exceeding $1 billion globally. Pfizer, the primary manufacturer, reported revenues of approximately $1.4 billion in 2021 from palivizumab sales, reflecting its market dominance [6]. The sales trajectory is influenced by seasonal demand, regulatory changes, and competitive drug entries.

Market Growth and Forecasts

Industry analysts project modest growth in the palivizumab market, driven by increased awareness, expanding indications, and demographic trends such as birth rates. However, this growth could be offset by the entry of next-generation biologics and evolving guidelines that might restrict use or favor alternative prophylactic options.

Impact of Competitive Innovations

Upcoming agents like nirsevimab have the potential to disrupt the existing market. Clinical trials reveal that a single dose of nirsevimab provides season-long protection, which could significantly reduce the demand for palivizumab’s multiple dosing regimen. If regulatory approval is granted, these innovations could diminish palivizumab’s revenue streams, especially in mature markets.

Pricing Pressures and Payer Strategies

Payers are increasingly employing value-based pricing, restricted coverage, and prior authorization to control costs, impacting palivizumab’s sales. Manufacturers may respond with pricing adjustments and patient assistance programs to sustain market share.

Patent Expiry and Biosimilar Development

Palivizumab’s patent life is approaching its expiration, which could facilitate biosimilar development. Although antibody biosimilars face regulatory and manufacturing challenges, biosimilar entry could induce price competition, further constraining revenues.

Conclusion

The market ecosystem for palivizumab is characterized by high efficacy within a niche high-risk pediatric population, substantial economic considerations, and a landscape poised for disruption. While current revenues remain significant, the confluence of emerging biologics, vaccines, and evolving clinical guidelines portends a potential decline post-patent expiry. Strategic positioning, including pipeline diversification and engagement with health authorities, will be vital for sustained commercial viability.


Key Takeaways

  • Palivizumab continues to be a primary prophylactic agent against RSV in high-risk infants, with steady but potentially plateauing revenues.
  • Cost considerations, healthcare policies, and reimbursement strategies heavily influence its market penetration and utilization.
  • Technological innovations like nirsevimab threaten to replace palivizumab due to simplified dosing and comparable efficacy.
  • Entry of biosimilars post-patent expiry could induce significant price competition, impacting future revenues.
  • Strategic investments in combination therapies and vaccines could redefine the prophylactic landscape for RSV.

FAQs

1. What are the primary factors affecting palivizumab’s market growth?
Market growth depends on regulatory approvals, pricing and reimbursement policies, clinical guideline adoption, competition from emerging biologics like nirsevimab, and demographic trends. Cost-effectiveness debates also influence utilization.

2. How does palivizumab compare to upcoming monoclonal antibodies like nirsevimab?
Nirsevimab offers a single-dose administration covering an entire RSV season, simplifying logistics, and possibly improving compliance. Clinical data suggest comparable efficacy, which could reduce demand for palivizumab’s multi-dose regimens.

3. What is the potential impact of biosimilars on palivizumab’s financial trajectory?
Biosimilar entry post-patent expiry could dramatically lower prices, reduce revenues, and increase market competition, similar to antihuman growth hormone biosimilars.

4. Are there any recent regulatory developments affecting palivizumab?
Regulatory agencies continue to evaluate new indications, dosing schedules, and the safety profile of palivizumab. Ongoing clinical trials for novel agents are closely monitored by regulators.

5. What emerging therapies could replace palivizumab in the future?
Long-acting monoclonal antibodies like nirsevimab and maternal immunization vaccines are in advanced stages of development and could supplant palivizumab for RSV prophylaxis if approved.


References

[1] WHO. "Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV)". 2022.
[2] U.S. FDA. "Synagis (Palivizumab) Prescribing Information". 2021.
[3] Shearer, RF et al. "Cost-effectiveness of palivizumab prophylaxis..." Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2018.
[4] Nissen, S. et al. "Economic evaluations of prophylactic interventions for respiratory syncytial virus." Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2019.
[5] Madhi, SA et al. "Nirsevimab for Prevention of RSV in Infants." N Engl J Med. 2022.
[6] Pfizer. "Pfizer Reports Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2021 Results." 2022.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.