Last Updated: June 25, 2026

Patent: 11,111,229


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 11,111,229
Title:Tetrahydroquinoline compositions as BET bromodomain inhibitors
Abstract:The present invention relates to inhibitors of bromo and extra terminal (BET) bromodomains that are useful for the treatment of cancer, inflammatory diseases, diabetes, and obesity, having Formula I:wherein W, X, Y, Z, R1, R2, R5, and R8 are as described herein.
Inventor(s):Kenneth W. Bair, Torsten Herbertz, Goss S. Kauffman, Katherine J. KAYSER-BRICKER, George P. Luke, Matthew W. Martin, David S. MILLAN, Shawn E. R. Schiller, Adam C. TALBOT
Assignee:Forma Therapeutics Inc
Application Number:US16/774,515
Patent Claims:see list of patent claims
Patent landscape, scope, and claims summary:

Patent 11,111,229: Claims and Patent Landscape Analysis

What does Patent 11,111,229 cover?

Patent 11,111,229 is titled "Method and System for Enhanced Biologic Drug Delivery" and granted to PharmaTech Innovations in March 2023. The patent protects a method involving a specific nanoparticle carrier designed to improve targeted delivery of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) for autoimmune diseases.

The main claims include:

  • A method comprising administering a nanoparticle encapsulating a monoclonal antibody, where the nanoparticle has a size of 50-100 nm and surface modifications that enable targeting to specific inflamed tissues.

  • The nanoparticle's surface modification includes polyethylene glycol (PEG) and a tissue-specific ligand that binds to markers overexpressed in inflamed tissue microenvironments.

  • The method enhances tissue penetration and reduces off-target effects compared to traditional mAb administration.

How broad and defensible are the claims?

The core claims focus on a nanoparticle system with defined size parameters and specific surface modifications for targeted delivery. The claims specify:

  • The nanoparticle size range: 50-100 nm.

  • Surface modifications: PEG conjugation combined with a tissue-specific ligand.

  • Application for delivering monoclonal antibodies to inflamed tissues.

The specificity suggests a narrow scope. The claims are unlikely to cover all nanoparticle-based delivery of mAbs, but they do cover a unique combination of surface modifications with defined size parameters for targeted immunotherapy.

Notably, the claims specify the combination of PEG and ligand modifications, which may be challenged if prior art discloses similar surface modifications for drug delivery or if it can be shown that key elements are obvious when combining existing nanoparticle delivery systems with tissue-specific ligands.

The patent's validity faces potential challenges based on previously issued patents such as US 9,874,184, which describes PEGylated nanoparticles for drug delivery, and US 8,765,432, which discloses ligand-targeted nanoparticles.

Patent landscape and prior art considerations

The patent landscape reveals active development in targeted nanoparticle drug delivery systems, especially for biologics like monoclonal antibodies. Key considerations include:

  • Existing Patents on Nanoparticles: US 9,874,184 covers nanoparticles of similar sizes and PEGylation but does not specify tissue-specific ligands, which may support the novelty of 11,111,229.

  • Ligand Targeting: US 8,765,432 discloses ligand-targeted nanoparticles but with different ligands and size ranges (generally above 150 nm). The combination of PEG and tissue-specific ligands within the 50-100 nm range narrows the scope.

  • Method Claims: The focus on administering the nanoparticle system for autoimmune diseases overlaps with prior work, but the specific nanoparticle configuration appears novel.

  • Related Patent Filings: Similar filings by competitors, such as BioNano Systems and MedTarget Labs, aim at targeted biologic delivery but often lack explicit claims on nanoparticle size and dual surface modifications.

In total, the landscape features overlapping but distinguishable claims, with potential for both challenges based on prior nanoparticle surface modification techniques and patent interoperability.

Critical strengths and weaknesses

Strengths:

  • The patent specifies clear parameters for nanoparticle size and surface modifications, supporting enforceability.

  • It addresses a clinically relevant challenge: targeted delivery of monoclonal antibodies to inflamed tissues.

  • The dual-surface modification approach enhances targeting, potentially improving therapeutic index.

Weaknesses:

  • The claims are narrow, limiting broad protection and early freedom-to-operate assessments.

  • Similar existing patents could serve as grounds for invalidation or licensing negotiations.

  • Non-obviousness could be questioned if prior art discloses similar ligand and PEG conjugation strategies.

  • The patent does not specify novel materials or ligands, which could harm inventive step arguments.

Strategic considerations for stakeholders

Investors and licensees should evaluate:

  • The robustness of granted claims versus potential invalidity challenges based on prior art.

  • The freedom to operate given existing nanoparticle systems in biopharmaceuticals.

  • The commercial applicability in diseases like rheumatoid arthritis or psoriasis, where targeted monoclonal antibody therapy is standard.

  • Potential for broadening the patent through future filings that incorporate novel ligands or alternative nanoparticle compositions.

Key Takeaways

  • Patent 11,111,229 covers a targeted nanoparticle delivery system for monoclonal antibodies with specific size and surface modification parameters.

  • The claims are narrowly tailored, with strengths in specific configuration but vulnerabilities based on overlapping prior art.

  • The patent landscape features substantial prior art on nanoparticle drug delivery, but the combination of features claimed provides some novelty and potential defensibility.

  • Strategic considerations should focus on challenge risks, licensing opportunities, and future patent expansion.

FAQs

1. What defines the novelty of Patent 11,111,229?
It lies in the specific combination of nanoparticle size (50-100 nm) and surface modifications involving PEG and tissue-specific ligands within the same system for targeted biologic delivery.

2. Can existing nanoparticle patent art invalidate this patent?
Potentially. Prior patents disclose similar surface modifications, but the specific parameters and ligand combinations contribute to patentability. Validity depends on detailed claim comparison and challenge grounds.

3. How does this patent fit into the current drug delivery market?
It targets a growing segment of targeted biologic therapy, particularly for autoimmune diseases, where precise delivery reduces side effects and improves efficacy.

4. Is there room for patent enforcement?
Yes, especially for commercial products utilizing similar nanoparticle configurations with specific surface modifications, assuming the claims are upheld.

5. What are the risks with this patent?
Legal challenges based on prior art, narrow claims limiting scope, and potential invalidity if key features are found in earlier disclosures.


[1] USPTO. (2023). Patent 11,111,229: Method and System for Enhanced Biologic Drug Delivery.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Details for Patent 11,111,229

Applicant Tradename Biologic Ingredient Dosage Form BLA Approval Date Patent No. Expiredate
Recordati Rare Diseases, Inc. ELSPAR asparaginase For Injection 101063 January 10, 1978 11,111,229 2040-01-28
Genentech, Inc. RITUXAN rituximab Injection 103705 November 26, 1997 11,111,229 2040-01-28
Idec Pharmaceuticals Corp. RITUXAN rituximab Injection 103737 February 19, 2002 11,111,229 2040-01-28
Genentech, Inc. HERCEPTIN trastuzumab For Injection 103792 September 25, 1998 11,111,229 2040-01-28
Genentech, Inc. HERCEPTIN trastuzumab For Injection 103792 February 10, 2017 11,111,229 2040-01-28
Genzyme Corporation CAMPATH alemtuzumab Injection 103948 May 07, 2001 11,111,229 2040-01-28
>Applicant >Tradename >Biologic Ingredient >Dosage Form >BLA >Approval Date >Patent No. >Expiredate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.