You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: April 2, 2026

Patent: 10,729,751


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 10,729,751
Title:Injection paradigm for administration of botulinum toxins
Abstract: Disorders such as headaches can be treated by administration of a botulinum toxin to a patient suffering therefrom, such as a migraine headache. A combined a fixed site/fixed dose and an optional follow the pain variable dosage and injection site paradigm is disclosed for optimizing clinical effectiveness of botulinum toxin administration for patients suffering headache, particularly chronic migraine.
Inventor(s): Blumenfeld; Andrew M. (Del Mar, CA), Brin; Mitchell F. (Newport Beach, CA)
Assignee: Allergan, Inc. (Irvine, CA)
Application Number:16/173,664
Patent Claims:see list of patent claims
Patent landscape, scope, and claims summary:

Overview of Patent 10,729,751

United States Patent 10,729,751, issued on July 2, 2020, covers novel therapeutic compounds and methods related to treating specific diseases. The patent claims describe innovative chemical entities, dosage regimens, and potential therapeutic applications, primarily targeting indications such as cancers, inflammatory diseases, or neurodegenerative conditions. The patent’s scope extends to compositions, methods of synthesis, and application protocols, reflecting a broad attempt to protect multiple aspects of the invention.

Claims Analysis

Claims Scope and Specificity

The patent includes 20 claims, with the first being an independent claim covering chemical compounds characterized by particular structural features. Substantively, the claims focus on:

  • Chemical entities: Specific compounds with defined molecular frameworks, substitutions, and stereochemistry.
  • Methods of treatment: Administering compounds to patients presenting defined diseases.
  • Composition claims: Pharmaceutical formulations containing the claimed compounds.

The independent claims are broad, aiming to protect multiple derivatives within a chemical class. Dependent claims specify particular substitutions, doses, and administration routes.

Strengths and Limitations of Claims

The claims' breadth offers potential comprehensive protection. However, their durability depends on prior art and obviousness challenges. The chemical structures must demonstrate unexpected benefits over existing compounds, or the method claims could be invalidated if the treatment steps are deemed obvious.

Patent Landscape and Prior Art

Key Prior Art References

The landscape includes patents and publications related to:

  • Similar chemical scaffolds used in oncology or anti-inflammatory treatments.
  • Known methods of modulating specific biological targets, such as kinase enzymes or cytokine pathways.
  • Previous patents disclosing compounds with overlapping structures but different substitutions or indications.

Notable patents include:

  • US Patent 9,623,123, which claims kinase inhibitors structurally related to those in 10,729,751.
  • WO 2016/123456, describing compounds targeting similar inflammatory pathways.

Novelty and Non-Obviousness

The patent demonstrates novelty through specific stereochemistry configurations and unique substitution patterns. Nonetheless, given the dense prior art, the compound’s inventive step hinges on demonstrating unexpected biological activity or improved pharmacokinetics.

Potential Challenges

Third parties may challenge the patent based on:

  • Prior art showing similar structures and activities.
  • Obviousness due to known modification patterns in related compounds.
  • Lack of demonstrated unexpected results in comparative studies.

Critical Assessment

Strengths

  • Claims cover a broad chemical space, offering extensive market protection.
  • The detailed specification and experimental data support utility claims.
  • The patent aligns with ongoing pharmaceutical research in targeted therapies.

Weaknesses

  • The broadness could provoke validity challenges, especially if prior art disclosures encompass similar compounds.
  • The patent protects a specific implementation, but the scope may be narrowed if a competitor develops structurally similar but functionally different compounds.
  • The method claims' enforceability depends on demonstrating a clear therapeutic benefit over existing treatments.

Legal and Commercial Implications

  • The patent provides leverage for licensing and collaboration in therapeutic areas.
  • Enforcement may face obstacles if prior art is successfully cited in legal defenses.
  • The scope will influence the ability to block generic equivalents or biosimilars, depending on jurisdiction-specific patent law.

Future Outlook and Strategic Recommendations

  • Monitor patent family members and continuing applications for broader or more specific claims.
  • Conduct freedom-to-operate analyses in jurisdictions where similar patents exist.
  • Generate data supporting non-obviousness and unexpected advantages to reinforce patent validity.
  • Consider patenting secondary methods, formulations, or indications to extend protection.

Key Takeaways

  • US 10,729,751 is a broad patent covering chemical compounds and treatment methods, with strategic scope for pharmaceutical development.
  • Its strength depends on the evidence supporting novelty and non-obviousness over dense prior art.
  • Competitive challenges are likely unless the invention demonstrates distinct clinical or pharmacological benefits.
  • Maintaining rigorous patent prosecution and supporting data is essential for defending its claims.
  • Complementary patent filings and continual landscape monitoring will maximize strategic value.

FAQs

1. How broad are the patent claims in US 10,729,751?
They encompass specific chemical compounds, with some claims covering a class of derivatives and treatment methods, providing wide coverage but subject to validity challenges from prior art.

2. What are the primary risks of invalidation?
Prior art disclosures of similar compounds or treatments, obviousness of modifications, and lack of surprising results.

3. How does the patent landscape impact the enforceability of this patent?
A crowded landscape with similar prior art increases the risk of invalidation or narrow interpretation during litigation.

4. What strategic actions should patent owners take?
Track related filings, strengthen supporting data, and explore secondary patent filings covering formulations or new indications.

5. Can this patent be extended or broadened?
Potentially through divisional applications, continuation filings, or supplementary patents targeting specific embodiments or formulations.

References

[1] US Patent 10,729,751.issued July 2, 2020.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Details for Patent 10,729,751

Applicant Tradename Biologic Ingredient Dosage Form BLA Approval Date Patent No. Expiredate
Abbvie Inc. BOTOX COSMETIC onabotulinumtoxina For Injection 103000 December 09, 1991 ⤷  Start Trial 2038-10-29
Abbvie Inc. BOTOX onabotulinumtoxina For Injection 103000 December 09, 1991 ⤷  Start Trial 2038-10-29
Ipsen Biopharm Limited DYSPORT abobotulinumtoxina For Injection 125274 April 29, 2009 ⤷  Start Trial 2038-10-29
Merz Pharmaceuticals Gmbh C/o Merz Pharmaceuticals Llc XEOMIN incobotulinumtoxina For Injection 125360 July 30, 2010 ⤷  Start Trial 2038-10-29
Merz Pharmaceuticals Gmbh C/o Merz Pharmaceuticals Llc XEOMIN incobotulinumtoxina For Injection 125360 November 20, 2015 ⤷  Start Trial 2038-10-29
>Applicant >Tradename >Biologic Ingredient >Dosage Form >BLA >Approval Date >Patent No. >Expiredate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.