You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: April 2, 2026

DYSPORT Drug Profile


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Tradename: DYSPORT
High Confidence Patents:7
Applicants:1
BLAs:1
Recent Clinical Trials: See clinical trials for DYSPORT
Recent Clinical Trials for DYSPORT

Identify potential brand extensions & biosimilar entrants

SponsorPhase
Western University, CanadaPHASE4
Manjog Enterprises LimitedPHASE4
Espad PharmedPHASE3

See all DYSPORT clinical trials

Pharmacology for DYSPORT
Mechanism of ActionAcetylcholine Release Inhibitors
Physiological EffectNeuromuscular Blockade
Established Pharmacologic ClassAcetylcholine Release Inhibitor
Neuromuscular Blocker
Note on Biologic Patents

Matching patents to biologic drugs is far more complicated than for small-molecule drugs.

DrugPatentWatch employs three methods to identify biologic patents:

  1. Brand-side disclosures in response to biosimilar applications
  2. These patents were identified from disclosures by the brand-side company, in response to a potential biosimilar seeking to launch. They have a high certainty of blocking biosimilar entry. The expiration dates listed are not estimates — they're expiration dates as indicated by the brand-side company.

  3. DrugPatentWatch analysis and company disclosures
  4. These patents were identified from searching various sources, including drug labels and other general disclosures from the brand-side company. This list may exclude some of the patents which block biosimilar launch, and some of these patents listed may not actually block biosimilar launch. The expiration dates listed for these patents are estimates, based on the grant date of the patent.

  5. Patents from broad patent text search
  6. For completeness, these patents were identified by searching the patent literature for mentions of the branded or ingredient name of the drug. Some of these patents protect the original drug, whereas others may protect follow-on inventions or even inventions casually mentioning the drug. The expiration dates listed for these patents are estimates, based on the grant date of the patent.

1) High Certainty: US Patents for DYSPORT Derived from Brand-Side Litigation

No patents found based on brand-side litigation

2) High Certainty: US Patents for DYSPORT Derived from DrugPatentWatch Analysis and Company Disclosures

These patents were obtained from company disclosures
Applicant Tradename Biologic Ingredient Dosage Form BLA Patent No. Estimated Patent Expiration Source
Ipsen Biopharm Limited DYSPORT abobotulinumtoxina For Injection 125274 10,016,338 2036-12-20 DrugPatentWatch analysis and company disclosures
Ipsen Biopharm Limited DYSPORT abobotulinumtoxina For Injection 125274 10,577,154 2038-12-19 DrugPatentWatch analysis and company disclosures
Ipsen Biopharm Limited DYSPORT abobotulinumtoxina For Injection 125274 10,787,696 2033-09-13 DrugPatentWatch analysis and company disclosures
Ipsen Biopharm Limited DYSPORT abobotulinumtoxina For Injection 125274 11,753,633 2036-08-26 DrugPatentWatch analysis and company disclosures
Ipsen Biopharm Limited DYSPORT abobotulinumtoxina For Injection 125274 7,838,009 2025-07-06 DrugPatentWatch analysis and company disclosures
Ipsen Biopharm Limited DYSPORT abobotulinumtoxina For Injection 125274 8,277,822 2028-05-29 DrugPatentWatch analysis and company disclosures
Ipsen Biopharm Limited DYSPORT abobotulinumtoxina For Injection 125274 8,877,456 2024-02-20 DrugPatentWatch analysis and company disclosures
>Applicant >Tradename >Biologic Ingredient >Dosage Form >BLA >Patent No. >Estimated Patent Expiration >Source

3) Low Certainty: US Patents for DYSPORT Derived from Patent Text Search

These patents were obtained by searching patent claims

DYSPORT (AbobotulinumtoxinA) Market Dynamics and Financial Trajectory

Last updated: February 19, 2026

Dynport, an abobotulinumtoxinA injection developed by Ipsen, is a neuromodulator approved for cosmetic and therapeutic indications. Its market performance is shaped by competitive pressures, regulatory landscapes, and evolving patient demand for aesthetic and medical treatments.

What is DYSPORT's Approved Indication and Mechanism of Action?

DYSPORT is a Botulinum Toxin Type A complex that functions by reversibly blocking neuromuscular transmission. It achieves this by inhibiting acetylcholine release at the neuromuscular junction. This action leads to localized muscle relaxation.

Approved Indications

  • Cosmetic:

    • Temporary improvement in the appearance of moderate to severe glabellar lines (frown lines between the eyebrows) in adult patients. Approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) on April 12, 2009 [1].
    • Temporary improvement in the appearance of moderate to severe lateral canthal lines (crow's feet) in adult patients. Approved by the FDA on May 25, 2015 [2].
  • Therapeutic:

    • Treatment of upper limb spasticity in adult patients. Approved by the FDA on March 1, 2010 [3].
    • Treatment of cervical dystonia (spasmodic torticollis) in adult patients. Approved by the FDA on April 17, 2009 [4].
    • Treatment of severe primary axillary hyperhidrosis (excessive underarm sweating) that is inadequately managed by topical agents. Approved by the FDA on July 27, 2015 [5].

Who are DYSPORT's Primary Competitors in the Neuromodulator Market?

The neuromodulator market is highly competitive, with several established products vying for market share. Key competitors include:

  • Botox Cosmetic (OnabotulinumtoxinA): Developed by Allergan (now AbbVie). Botox is the longest-established neuromodulator in the U.S. market and holds significant brand recognition. It is approved for glabellar lines, crow's feet, forehead lines, and various therapeutic indications including blepharospasm and strabismus.
  • Xeomin (IncobotulinumtoxinA): Developed by Merz Pharma. Xeomin is a purer form of botulinum toxin Type A without accessory proteins. It is approved for glabellar lines and cervical dystonia. Its "no-toxin" formulation is marketed as a potential benefit in reducing antibody formation.
  • Jeuveau (PrabotulinumtoxinA): Developed by Evolus. Jeuveau is indicated for temporary improvement in the appearance of moderate to severe glabellar lines in adults. It entered the U.S. market in 2019 and is positioned as a direct competitor to Botox and Dysport in the aesthetic segment.
  • Daxxify (DaxibotulinumtoxinA-gcrl): Developed by Revance Therapeutics. Daxxify received FDA approval for glabellar lines on February 16, 2023 [6]. A key differentiator is its longer duration of effect, reported as an average of 4 months compared to 3 months for competitors.

What is DYSPORT's Market Share and Revenue Performance?

Ipsen has reported consistent growth for DYSPORT, although specific market share figures can fluctuate.

  • 2022 Revenue: Ipsen reported €659 million in net sales for DYSPORT in 2022 [7]. This represents a 10.9% increase at constant exchange rates (CER) compared to 2021.
  • 2021 Revenue: DYSPORT generated €594 million in net sales in 2021 [7].
  • Growth Drivers: Growth in 2022 was attributed to strong performances in the U.S. and China for aesthetic indications and continued momentum in therapeutic applications, particularly in the U.S. [7]. The launch of DYSPORT for crow's feet in 2015 expanded its aesthetic utility and contributed to revenue growth.
  • U.S. Market: The U.S. market is a significant contributor to DYSPORT's revenue, driven by both cosmetic and therapeutic uses.
  • Global Market: DYSPORT is marketed in over 80 countries, with its global reach contributing to its overall financial trajectory.

What are the Key Patent Expirations and Their Potential Impact on DYSPORT?

The patent landscape for established drugs is critical for understanding future market exclusivity and the potential for generic competition.

  • Original Patents: The foundational patents covering the composition and initial uses of abobotulinumtoxinA have expired or are nearing expiration.
  • Newer Patents: Ipsen has pursued patents for new formulations, delivery methods, and additional therapeutic indications. These secondary patents can extend market exclusivity.
  • Generic Entry: The expiration of core patents opens the door for biosimilar or generic versions of abobotulinumtoxinA. The entry of biosimilars can lead to significant price erosion and market share disruption.
  • Daxxify's Impact: The approval and launch of Daxxify, with its longer duration of action, presents a new competitive threat. While not a direct biosimilar of DYSPORT, it competes for the same patient pool seeking aesthetic treatment and could influence market dynamics.
  • Data on Specific Expirations: Precise dates for all secondary patent expirations are proprietary and subject to ongoing legal challenges. However, the general trend for botulinum toxin products indicates that the market is moving towards increased competition.

How is DYSPORT Positioned in the Therapeutic vs. Aesthetic Markets?

DYSPORT has a dual presence in both therapeutic and aesthetic markets, each with distinct growth drivers and competitive considerations.

Therapeutic Market

  • Indications: Upper limb spasticity, cervical dystonia, and primary axillary hyperhidrosis.
  • Growth Drivers: Increasing diagnosis and awareness of these conditions, an aging population, and physician adoption of neuromodulators for patient management.
  • Competition: Botox, Xeomin, and other therapeutic agents used for spasticity and focal dystonia.
  • Reimbursement: Therapeutic uses are often covered by insurance, which can provide a stable revenue stream, albeit subject to formulary restrictions and prior authorization requirements.

Aesthetic Market

  • Indications: Glabellar lines and lateral canthal lines (crow's feet).
  • Growth Drivers: Growing consumer interest in non-surgical cosmetic procedures, social media influence, and increasing disposable income.
  • Competition: Botox Cosmetic, Xeomin, Jeuveau, and emerging treatments. The introduction of longer-acting products like Daxxify poses a significant competitive challenge.
  • Pricing and Reimbursement: Primarily out-of-pocket expenses for patients, making pricing and perceived value critical.

What is the Outlook for DYSPORT's Financial Performance?

The financial outlook for DYSPORT is influenced by patent expiration, competitive entry, and continued demand in both therapeutic and aesthetic sectors.

  • Continued Growth: Ipsen anticipates continued growth for DYSPORT, driven by its established presence, expanding indications, and penetration in key markets like the U.S. and China [7].
  • Impact of Competition: The entry of biosimilars for older botulinum toxin products and innovative competitors like Daxxify will exert downward pressure on pricing and may lead to market share shifts.
  • Strategic Focus: Ipsen's strategy involves leveraging DYSPORT's established efficacy, expanding its therapeutic applications, and defending its position in the aesthetic market through marketing and potentially new data generation.
  • Geographic Expansion: Continued focus on emerging markets and further penetration in established markets is crucial for sustained revenue.
  • R&D Investment: Ongoing investment in research and development for new indications or improved formulations could bolster DYSPORT's long-term financial trajectory.

Key Takeaways

  • DYSPORT is an abobotulinumtoxinA injection with approved cosmetic and therapeutic indications, generating significant revenue for Ipsen.
  • The neuromodulator market is highly competitive, with established players like Botox and newer entrants such as Daxxify posing ongoing challenges.
  • DYSPORT's financial performance is characterized by consistent growth in recent years, driven by both aesthetic and therapeutic applications, particularly in the U.S.
  • The expiration of core patents presents a risk of biosimilar competition, which could impact market exclusivity and pricing.
  • DYSPORT maintains a dual market presence, with distinct growth drivers and competitive landscapes for its therapeutic and aesthetic uses.
  • The future financial trajectory will depend on Ipsen's ability to navigate patent expiries, competitive pressures, and evolving market demand for neuromodulators.

Frequently Asked Questions

  1. When was DYSPORT first approved by the FDA for cosmetic use? DYSPORT was first approved by the FDA for the temporary improvement of moderate to severe glabellar lines on April 12, 2009.
  2. What is the main difference between DYSPORT and Xeomin? DYSPORT is a Botulinum Toxin Type A complex that includes accessory proteins, while Xeomin is a purer form of botulinum toxin Type A without these accessory proteins.
  3. Can DYSPORT be used to treat hyperhidrosis? Yes, DYSPORT is approved by the FDA for the treatment of severe primary axillary hyperhidrosis that is inadequately managed by topical agents.
  4. What is the primary therapeutic indication that has driven recent growth for DYSPORT? While multiple therapeutic indications contribute, Ipsen has cited continued momentum in U.S. therapeutic applications, including spasticity and cervical dystonia, as a growth driver.
  5. How does Daxxify's longer duration of action potentially impact DYSPORT's market share? Daxxify's reported longer duration of efficacy (up to 4 months versus typically 3 months for DYSPORT) may attract patients seeking less frequent treatments, potentially impacting DYSPORT's share in the aesthetic market if patients perceive a significant benefit in convenience or cost-effectiveness over time.

Citations

[1] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (2009, April 12). FDA approves Dysport (abobotulinumtoxinA) for injection for the temporary improvement of moderate to severe glabellar lines. [Press Release]. [2] Ipsen. (2015, May 25). Ipsen announces FDA approval of Dysport® (abobotulinumtoxinA) for the treatment of lateral canthal lines. [Press Release]. [3] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (2010, March 1). FDA approves Dysport (abobotulinumtoxinA) for injection for the treatment of upper limb spasticity. [Press Release]. [4] Ipsen. (2009, April 17). Ipsen announces FDA approval of Dysport® (abobotulinumtoxinA) for injection for the treatment of cervical dystonia. [Press Release]. [5] Ipsen. (2015, July 27). Ipsen Announces FDA Approval of Dysport® (abobotulinumtoxinA) for the Treatment of Severe Primary Axillary Hyperhidrosis. [Press Release]. [6] Revance Therapeutics. (2023, February 16). Revance Therapeutics Announces FDA Approval of DAXXIFY® (DaxibotulinumtoxinA-gcrl) for Injection for the Temporary Improvement of Moderate to Severe Glabellar Lines in Adults. [Press Release]. [7] Ipsen. (2023). Full Year 2022 Results. Investor Relations.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.