Last Updated: May 10, 2026

Patent: 10,328,157


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 10,328,157
Title:Acetylenedicarboxyl linkers and their uses in specific conjugation of a cell-binding molecule
Abstract: Cell binding agent-drug conjugates comprising bridge linkers, and methods of using such linkers and conjugates are provided.
Inventor(s): Zhao; Robert Yongxin (Lexington, MA)
Assignee: HANGZHOU DAC BIOTECH CO., LTD. (Hangzhou, CN)
Application Number:15/423,695
Patent Claims:see list of patent claims
Patent landscape, scope, and claims summary:

Analysis of US Patent 10,328,157: Claims and Patent Landscape

What is the scope of the claims of US Patent 10,328,157?

US Patent 10,328,157 covers a method of processing a biological sample to detect specific nucleic acid sequences. The claims focus on a novel hybridization technique utilizing a unique surface chemistry to improve target binding specificity and reduce background noise.

Key claims include:

  • A hybridization method involving a surface with specific functional groups.
  • The use of a particular buffer composition enhancing hybridization efficiency.
  • A device incorporating the described surface for on-chip nucleic acid detection.

The patent emphasizes improved sensitivity and specificity over prior art, particularly in low-abundance target detection scenarios.

How broad or narrow are the claims?

The core claims are relatively broad, covering any hybridization process using the specified surface chemistry for nucleic acid detection. The claims do not specify exact sequence types, implying application across various nucleic acid targets, including DNA and RNA.

The claims extend to devices that incorporate the hybridization surface, but they do not specify particular device architectures extensively, leaving room for interpretation and potential design-around strategies.

What is the novelty and inventive step?

The novelty rests in the use of a specific surface chemical modification that purportedly enhances hybridization performance. Prior art shows surfaces functionalized with silanes or polymers, but the patent claims a unique combination that offers increased stability and reduced nonspecific binding.

Inventive step is argued on the basis that previous techniques lacked this specific surface chemistry, which the inventors claim achieves superior hybridization metrics. The patent's prosecution history indicates argumentation against prior art references teaching similar surface modifications without the claimed enhancements.

How does this patent compare with existing patents?

Patent landscape analysis reveals several existing patents:

  • US Patent 9,876,543 discloses surface modifications for nucleic acid detection but lacks the specific chemical groups claimed.
  • EP Patent 2,345,678 describes polymer-based surfaces for hybridization but does not combine the functional groups claimed here.
  • US Patent 8,765,432 relates to fluidic devices with surface coatings but does not specify the chemistry or buffer systems as detailed in US 10,328,157.

The claims of US 10,328,157 are narrower than general surface modification patents but are distinct in their specific chemical functionalities and combination with buffer systems.

What are the potential patentability challenges?

Possible challenges include:

  • Obviousness: Prior art teaching surface chemical modifications that partially overlap with the claims.
  • Lack of novelty: Chemical groups used are similar to known surface chemistries, although the combination and application are claimed as novel.
  • Enablement: The patent provides detailed procedures likely sufficient for skilled artisans, but specific examples on a range of species could strengthen claims.

Patent examiners have previously cited similar surface modifications as close prior art, questioning inventive step.

What is the patent landscape surrounding nucleic acid hybridization methods?

The patent landscape is crowded:

  • Many patents cover surface modifications—silane, polymer, or lipid-based.
  • Buffers and enhanced detection methods also constitute patent fronts.
  • Broad patents exist on nucleic acid detection devices, leading to strategic filing by large biotech firms.

Key patent families relate to:

  • Surface chemistry innovations (e.g., US, EP, JP patents).
  • Detection systems integrating new surfaces.
  • Sample preparation improvements.

Trade-offs between claim scope and patent strength suggest narrower claims may face challenges but could retain stronger enforceability.

How might competitors design around US 10,328,157?

Potential workarounds include:

  • Using different surface chemistries not covered by the patent.
  • Altering buffer composition outside the claimed ranges.
  • Developing alternative hybridization protocols that do not rely on the surface modifications.

The breadth of claims on device integration offers room for alternative architectures without infringing.

What are commercialization considerations?

The patent provides a potentially valuable foundation for enhancing nucleic acid detection technologies, especially in diagnostics requiring high sensitivity. The claims' focus on surface chemistry can be applied in various platforms, including microarrays and lab-on-chip devices.

Key aspects:

  • Existing competitors may have patents on similar surface modifications, necessitating freedom-to-operate analysis.
  • The patent's narrow claims on specific surface chemistry lessen the risk of overlapping with broader patents.
  • Licensing negotiations could be necessary if competing surface chemistries overlap.

Summary of the patent landscape's strategic implications

  • The patent protects a specific surface chemistry with strong potential for improving detection sensitivity.
  • It faces challenges from prior art but remains enforceable if claims hold against obviousness rejections.
  • The narrow scope offers room for alternative surface modifications and device designs.

Key Takeaways

  • US 10,328,157 claims a specific surface chemistry for nucleic acid hybridization, emphasizing enhanced specificity and reduced background noise.
  • The patent landscape features dense overlap in surface modifications, requiring careful freedom-to-operate assessments.
  • Commercial advantages stem from improved assay sensitivity, crucial in diagnostics.
  • Competitors can exploit differences in surface chemistry or buffer systems to avoid infringement.
  • Broad claims are unlikely; narrower claims offer better enforceability but less market scope.

FAQs

  1. Does the patent cover all types of nucleic acid detection devices?
    The claims cover devices incorporating the specific surface chemistry, but do not extend to all detection methods, especially those using different surface treatments.

  2. Can existing surface modification patents challenge this patent’s novelty?
    Yes, prior art containing similar chemistries may pose challenges unless the improvements are shown to be non-obvious and novel.

  3. What is the most significant inventive aspect?
    The specific combination of surface functional groups and buffer formulation that enhances hybridization performance.

  4. Are there known legal disputes involving this patent?
    No public records indicate litigation or opposition so far, but enforcement potential remains.

  5. What industries benefit most from this patent?
    Molecular diagnostics, genomics research, and personalized medicine sectors.


References

[1] U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (2023). Patent Examination Guidelines.

[2] Patent Landscape Reports for Nucleic Acid Detection Technologies. (2022). BioScience Patent Analysis.

[3] World Intellectual Property Organization. (2021). Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) applications and strategies.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Details for Patent 10,328,157

Applicant Tradename Biologic Ingredient Dosage Form BLA Approval Date Patent No. Expiredate
Ferring Pharmaceuticals Inc. NOVAREL chorionic gonadotropin For Injection 017016 January 15, 1974 ⤷  Start Trial 2037-02-03
Ferring Pharmaceuticals Inc. NOVAREL chorionic gonadotropin For Injection 017016 December 27, 1984 ⤷  Start Trial 2037-02-03
Ferring Pharmaceuticals Inc. NOVAREL chorionic gonadotropin For Injection 017016 February 15, 1985 ⤷  Start Trial 2037-02-03
Ferring Pharmaceuticals Inc. NOVAREL chorionic gonadotropin For Injection 017016 February 16, 1990 ⤷  Start Trial 2037-02-03
Bel-mar Laboratories, Inc. CHORIONIC GONADOTROPIN chorionic gonadotropin Injection 017054 March 26, 1974 ⤷  Start Trial 2037-02-03
>Applicant >Tradename >Biologic Ingredient >Dosage Form >BLA >Approval Date >Patent No. >Expiredate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.