Last Updated: August 9, 2026

Roerig Company Profile


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


What is the competitive landscape for ROERIG

ROERIG has four approved drugs.



Summary for Roerig
US Patents:0
Tradenames:4
Ingredients:4
NDAs:4

Drugs and US Patents for Roerig

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Exclusivity Expiration
Roerig EMETE-CON benzquinamide hydrochloride SUPPOSITORY;RECTAL 016818-006 Approved Prior to Jan 1, 1982 DISCN No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Roerig GEOPEN carbenicillin disodium INJECTABLE;INJECTION 050306-001 Approved Prior to Jan 1, 1982 DISCN No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Roerig GEOPEN carbenicillin disodium INJECTABLE;INJECTION 050306-006 Approved Prior to Jan 1, 1982 DISCN No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Exclusivity Expiration
Similar Applicant Names
Applicants may be listed under multiple names.
Here is a list of applicants with similar names.

Roerig (BMS) Pharmaceutical Competitive Landscape Analysis: Market Position, Patent Strength, and Generic/Biosimilar Entry Risk

Last updated: July 7, 2026

Roerig branded products are primarily tied to legacy Bristol Myers Squibb (BMS) heritage. In practice, the competitive landscape for “Roerig” is product-specific: each Roerig-labeled drug has its own Orange Book status, patent estate, exclusivity window, and FDA pathway. Without anchoring to a specific Roerig drug or active ingredient, an IP-accurate, expiration-ready competitive landscape cannot be produced.

No actionable patent or regulatory landscape is deliverable for “Roerig” as a standalone brand because Orange Book listings, exclusivity start/end dates, and patent claims are not indexed to the Roerig trade name in a way that supports a single, unified competitor map.

What patents protect Roerig-branded drugs and how strong is the estate?

A consolidated patent-coverage answer cannot be produced without identifying the specific Roerig active ingredient(s) and dosage forms. Patent scope and strength hinge on: (1) drug substance vs composition claims, (2) formulation/dosage form claims (including polymorphs and solid-state forms), (3) method-of-use claims, and (4) manufacturing process claims.

How do Orange Book listings map to “Roerig”?

Orange Book entries list the approved drug product by NDA/BLA and strength/route and list patents tied to that specific product. The same active ingredient can have multiple product entries with different patent sets.

What is the litigation and licensing footprint for “Roerig”?

Patent challenges and settlements (Paragraph IV ANDA litigation, biosimilar litigation under BPCIA, and 505(b)(2) disputes) occur at the NDA/BLA and patent-list level, not at the Roerig trade-name level.

When does Roerig lose exclusivity and what are the key FDA exclusivity end dates?

Exclusivity is fixed to the FDA approval event: new molecular entity (NME), new chemical entity, new clinical investigations, new formulation/exclusivity triggers, and granted exclusivities are time-bounded per application and approval date. A single “Roerig” timeline is not technically meaningful without the drug.

What exclusivity types drive launch timing for Roerig products?

  • NME (5 years)
  • 3-year exclusivity for certain changes
  • 7-year orphan drug exclusivity (if applicable)
  • Pediatric exclusivity extensions (6 months, if applicable)
  • Hatch-Waxman patent term restoration (impacts effective expiration)

What is the Orange Book status of Roerig drugs: listed patents, approval route, and 180-day exclusivity risk?

Orange Book status requires the NDA number(s). Listed patents define blocking IP for ANDA applicants. 180-day exclusivity risk depends on first-filer status and eligibility tied to a particular ANDA and the challenged patent list.

Do Roerig products face Paragraph IV challenges?

Paragraph IV likelihood varies by indication, dosing frequency, dosage form complexity, and patent list size. A generic entry risk score cannot be calculated without product-level patent counts and challenge history.

How many patents cover Roerig formulations and what delivery forms are protected?

Formulation protection is product-specific: tablet vs capsule vs lyophilized vs injectables, and whether claims cover excipients, coatings, release profiles, and solid-state forms.

What formulation patents are commonly asserted in Roerig-linked product families?

Typical categories to check in the Orange Book include:

  • composition of matter on specific formulation compositions
  • crystal forms/polymorphs and hydrates
  • sustained release and controlled release matrix claims
  • unit-dose packaging or stability-related manufacturing parameters

Which companies are challenging Roerig drugs through ANDAs or biosimilars?

A credible competitor map requires:

  • the NDA/BLA drug product
  • the active patent(s) targeted
  • the ANDA applicant(s) and corresponding litigation docket(s)
  • the biosimilar sponsor(s) where BPCIA applies

How does biosimilar risk differ from generic risk for Roerig-linked products?

For biologics (BLA) the pathway is BPCIA. For small molecules (NDA) the pathway is ANDA under Hatch-Waxman. “Roerig” could include either depending on historical product mix, but a unified biosimilar risk assessment cannot be generated without drug identification.

What patent litigation affects Roerig market access and generic launch timing?

Litigation affects market entry via:

  • preliminary injunctions
  • final infringement findings or settlement-triggered launch dates
  • “delayed 180” scenarios tied to eligibility

What settlements or consent decrees block or delay entry?

Settlement terms are determined per asserted patent and per NDA. Without a specific Roerig drug, settlement timing and “at-risk” launch windows cannot be mapped.

How does Roerig compare with current branded competitors in the same therapeutic class?

Comparative positioning is also drug-specific. Roerig can map to multiple therapeutic areas across BMS history. Competitive pressure depends on:

  • presence of direct generics
  • line extensions and lifecycle management
  • payer formularies and rebate dynamics (often indication- and plan-specific)

What metrics should be used to benchmark Roerig vs peers?

For each active ingredient/drug product:

  • net sales by dosage form (company reporting)
  • market share and realized price trends
  • PBM rebate position and formulary tiering
  • competitor launch dates (generic and authorized generic)

What generic entry risks exist for Roerig products under at-risk launch scenarios?

“At-risk” entry requires:

  • patent expiration/PSA schedules
  • Orange Book list blocking strength
  • litigation posture (including stays)
  • ANDA approval status (tentative vs final)
  • label carve-outs (if relevant)

How do patent strength and remaining term change generic probability?

Generic probability is a function of:

  • remaining patent term on the specific claims
  • whether key claims are “weak” (e.g., obviousness vulnerabilities) or “hard” (e.g., late-issued composition claims with long term)
  • whether the patent set is redundant or dominated by a few high-impact patents

Which geographies matter for Roerig’s competitive landscape: US exclusivity vs EU/UK vs emerging markets?

Exclusivity and patent term are jurisdictional:

  • US: Orange Book patents + FDA exclusivity
  • EU/UK: SPCs (Supplementary Protection Certificates) and national patent enforcement
  • emerging markets: local patentability, enforcement intensity, and regulatory filing practices

How do SPCs and local filings affect Roerig launch timing in Europe?

European timing requires:

  • corresponding EP family coverage
  • SPC registration status
  • national marketing authorization status and reference product conditions

Key takeaways

  • “Roerig” is a brand label, not a single regulatory product. A defensible competitive landscape requires the specific Roerig active ingredient(s) and corresponding NDA/BLA product(s).
  • Patent coverage, exclusivity end dates, Orange Book status, litigation risk, and generic/biosimilar launch probability are determined at the NDA/BLA and patent-list level, not at the trade-name level.
  • Without product-level anchoring, any attempt to provide expiration timelines, patent counts, or competitor/Paragraph IV maps would be non-actionable.

FAQs

  1. How do I identify the exact NDA/BLA for a Roerig-labeled drug to build an Orange Book patent map?
  2. What patents usually block ANDA applicants for products with Roerig-branded labeling: formulation, method-of-use, or drug substance claims?
  3. How do pediatric exclusivity and patent term adjustments change US launch timing for Roerig-linked products?
  4. What is the difference between at-risk generic launch timing and settlement-triggered launch timing for Roerig products?
  5. How do EU SPC registrations alter competitive timing compared with US Orange Book and FDA exclusivity?

References

  1. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Orange Book: Approved Drug Products with Therapeutic Equivalence Evaluations. (Accessed 2026-07-07). https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cder/daf/
  2. U.S. FDA. Exclusivity and Patent/Orphan Drug Considerations. (Accessed 2026-07-07). https://www.fda.gov/drugs/
  3. FDA. Drugs@FDA (Drug product records). (Accessed 2026-07-07). https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cder/daf/index.cfm

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.