You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Parke-davis Company Profile


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


What is the competitive landscape for PARKE-DAVIS

PARKE-DAVIS has one approved drug.



Summary for Parke-davis
US Patents:0
Tradenames:1
Ingredients:1
NDAs:1

Drugs and US Patents for Parke-davis

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Exclusivity Expiration
Parke-davis ZARONTIN ethosuximide SYRUP;ORAL 080258-001 Approved Prior to Jan 1, 1982 AA RX Yes Yes ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Exclusivity Expiration
Similar Applicant Names
Applicants may be listed under multiple names.
Here is a list of applicants with similar names.

Pharmaceutical Competitive Landscape Analysis: Parke-Davis – Market Position, Strengths & Strategic Insights

Last updated: July 30, 2025

Introduction

Parke-Davis, a historic name in the pharmaceutical industry, has evolved through mergers and acquisitions, notably becoming a part of Pfizer in 2000. As a longstanding entity with a rich portfolio spanning across neurological, cardiovascular, and infectious diseases, Parke-Davis maintains a distinct, yet integrated, position within Pfizer’s global strategy. In a rapidly changing pharmaceutical landscape characterized by innovation, patent cliffs, and burgeoning biotech competition, understanding Parke-Davis’s current market positioning and strategic outlook is crucial for stakeholders seeking growth opportunities and risk mitigation. This analysis provides a comprehensive overview of Parke-Davis’s market position, core strengths, competitive environment, and strategic trajectory.


Market Position and Historical Context

Legacy and Integration
Founded in 1875, Parke-Davis established a reputable legacy through pioneering pharmaceutical research and marketing. Its integration into Pfizer in 2000 solidified its role as a vital component of a global drug development powerhouse. Despite corporate restructuring, the Parke-Davis brand persists, especially in neurological, psychiatric, and ophthalmic segments, leveraging Pfizer’s extensive R&D resources and global distribution network.

Product Portfolio Dynamics
Parke-Davis’s portfolio remains characterized by brands like Neurontin (gabapentin), Maxalt (rizatriptan), and Detrol (tolterodine), which continue to generate substantial revenue, though some face patent expirations. Pfizer has strategically shifted focus toward novel biologics and targeted therapies, impacting Parke-Davis’s traditional drug segments but also offering opportunities for pipeline expansion.

Market Share and Competitive Position
Within Pfizer’s diversified portfolio, Parke-Davis maintains a significant footprint in neurology and mental health medications. Its market share is influenced by patent exclusivity status, with some flagship products nearing patent cliffs, threatening revenue streams. Competitively, the brand contends with both global pharma majors and biotech firms innovating in neurology (e.g., Biogen, Eli Lilly).


Strengths of Parke-Davis

1. Established Market Presence and Brand Recognition

Parke-Davis benefits from over a century of brand equity, especially in neurology and psychiatry, fostering prescription loyalty among clinicians. This recognition facilitates market acceptance of both existing and new formulations.

2. Robust R&D Infrastructure via Pfizer

As part of Pfizer, Parke-Davis gains access to cutting-edge research infrastructure, enabling pipeline diversification. Pfizer’s investment in biologics and personalized medicine enhances the potential for innovation within the former Parke-Davis portfolio.

3. Extensive Distribution Network

Leveraging Pfizer’s global footprint, Parke-Davis benefits from a wide-reaching distribution network, ensuring product availability in mature markets and emerging economies. This distribution strength aids in market penetration and access.

4. Regulatory Expertise and Compliance

Pfizer’s strong compliance record and regulatory experience streamline approval processes, particularly for complex neurological and psychiatric drugs, providing a competitive advantage in lifecycle management.

5. Focus on Niche and High-Value Segments

Parke-Davis concentrates on specialized therapeutic areas such as epilepsy, migraine, and urinary disorders. These niches often command higher margins and less price erosion compared to blockbuster drugs subject to patent expiry.


Strategic Challenges and Competitive Environment

1. Patent Expirations and Generic Competition

Key products like Neurontin faced significant generic erosion post-patent expiry, reducing revenue and highlighting the vulnerability of legacy drugs. Maintaining market relevance necessitates continual innovation and lifecycle management.

2. Rapid Innovation in Biotechnology

Biotech firms introduce precision therapies with smaller patient populations, challenging traditional small-molecule drugs. Parke-Davis must adapt through biologics, gene therapies, and digital health integrations.

3. Evolving Regulatory and Market Access Dynamics

Pricing pressures, especially in U.S. Medicare and global markets, compel strategic adjustments in pricing models, rebates, and value demonstration.

4. Competition in Neurology and Psychiatry

Major players like Biogen and Eli Lilly aggressively develop novel therapies, including antisense oligonucleotides and monoclonal antibodies, disrupting traditional markets where Parke-Davis operates.

5. Innovation Gap and Pipeline Development

Historically reliant on legacy products, the need to diversify and accelerate pipeline development is urgent to sustain growth, especially in high-growth therapeutic areas like neurodegeneration and mental health.


Strategic Insights and Recommendations

A. Focus on Pipeline Diversification

Leveraging Pfizer’s extensive R&D, Parke-Davis should prioritize developing biologics and gene therapies targeting neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s. Personalized medicine approaches will be critical to differentiate offerings.

B. Lifecycle Management for Established Products

Implement strategies like reformulations, combination therapies, and new delivery methods (e.g., transdermal patches) to extend product life cycles and mitigate revenue loss from patent expiries.

C. Strategic Partnerships and Acquisitions

To compensate for innovation gaps, forming alliances with biotech firms or acquiring smaller companies with promising neuroscience assets can accelerate access to novel therapies.

D. Embrace Digital Health and Real-World Evidence

Integrating digital tools for patient monitoring and leveraging real-world data can improve clinical outcomes, support reimbursement negotiations, and provide a competitive edge.

E. Market Access and Pricing Strategies

Adopt value-based pricing models and demonstrate cost-effectiveness to navigate regulatory pressures and secure reimbursement, especially in high-cost neurological therapies.

F. Expand in Emerging Markets

Leverage Pfizer’s infrastructure to grow presence in Asia, Latin America, and Africa. Tailored pricing and local partnerships can facilitate market entry and product acceptance.


Conclusion

Parke-Davis remains a historically significant entity within Pfizer’s global pharmaceutical framework, with a stable market position rooted in its brand recognition and specialized therapeutic focus. However, facing patent expiries, intense competition from new biotech entrants, and the need for continuous innovation, it must execute strategic initiatives centered on pipeline diversification, lifecycle management, and digital integration. By aligning its legacy strengths with Pfizer’s innovation capabilities, Parke-Davis can navigate the evolving landscape and sustain a competitive edge in neurology and beyond.


Key Takeaways

  • Leverage historical brand equity in neurology and psychiatry to maintain hospital and clinician loyalty.
  • Prioritize pipeline innovation in biologics, gene therapy, and personalized medicine to meet emerging therapeutic demands.
  • Manage patent cliff risks through lifecycle strategies such as reformulation and combination therapies.
  • Invest in digital health and real-world evidence to enhance product differentiation, reimbursement, and market access.
  • Expand geographically in emerging markets to offset stagnating revenues in mature markets.

Frequently Asked Questions

1. How does Parke-Davis differentiate itself amidst increasing competition from biotech firms?
Parke-Davis leverages Pfizer’s extensive R&D infrastructure, strong legacy brands, and global distribution networks. Strategic focus on niche neurological segments allows it to maintain a distinct market presence, but ongoing innovation in biologics and personalized medicine is essential for future differentiation.

2. What are the primary risks facing Parke-Davis’s legacy products?
Patent expirations and resulting generic competition threaten revenue. Additionally, rapid biotech innovation may render traditional small-molecule drugs obsolete unless significant pipeline diversification occurs.

3. How can Parke-Davis capitalize on emerging therapeutic areas?
By investing in biologic research, gene therapy, and precision medicine, and forming strategic partnerships with biotech startups, it can develop innovative treatments for neurodegenerative and psychiatric conditions.

4. What role does digital health play in Parke-Davis’s strategic planning?
Digital health tools support real-world evidence collection, patient engagement, and adherence, which can improve clinical outcomes, guide pricing strategies, and strengthen reimbursement negotiations.

5. In which emerging markets does Parke-Davis have growth opportunities?
Countries in Asia, Latin America, and Africa offer expanding patient populations and favorable regulatory environments. Tailored marketing and local partnerships are critical to establishing a foothold.


References

  1. Pfizer Annual Reports and Investor Presentations.
  2. Industry Reports on Neurology and Psychiatric Pharmaceuticals.
  3. Market Research on Patent Cliffs and Generic Competition.
  4. Strategic Analyses from Pharmaceutical Market Intelligence Firms.
  5. Regulatory Guidelines and Market Access Frameworks.

By understanding Parke-Davis’s strengths and strategic imperatives, stakeholders can better navigate its evolving landscape, fostering investment and innovation aligned with global pharmaceutical trends.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.