Last Updated: May 3, 2026

ERYTHROMYCIN ETHYLSUCCINATE Drug Patent Profile


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


When do Erythromycin Ethylsuccinate patents expire, and what generic alternatives are available?

Erythromycin Ethylsuccinate is a drug marketed by Amneal Pharms, Ani Pharms, Cadila Pharms Ltd, Ph Health, Alpharma Us Pharms, Dista, Naska, Parke Davis, Pharmafair, Aurobindo Pharma Usa, Barr, and Carnegie. and is included in fourteen NDAs.

The generic ingredient in ERYTHROMYCIN ETHYLSUCCINATE is erythromycin ethylsuccinate; sulfisoxazole acetyl. There are one hundred and three drug master file entries for this compound. Additional details are available on the erythromycin ethylsuccinate; sulfisoxazole acetyl profile page.

AI Deep Research
Questions you can ask:
  • What is the 5 year forecast for ERYTHROMYCIN ETHYLSUCCINATE?
  • What are the global sales for ERYTHROMYCIN ETHYLSUCCINATE?
  • What is Average Wholesale Price for ERYTHROMYCIN ETHYLSUCCINATE?
Summary for ERYTHROMYCIN ETHYLSUCCINATE
US Patents:0
Applicants:12
NDAs:14

US Patents and Regulatory Information for ERYTHROMYCIN ETHYLSUCCINATE

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Exclusivity Expiration
Amneal Pharms ERYTHROMYCIN ETHYLSUCCINATE erythromycin ethylsuccinate GRANULE;ORAL 211204-001 Nov 1, 2019 AB RX No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Pharmafair ERYTHROMYCIN ETHYLSUCCINATE erythromycin ethylsuccinate SUSPENSION;ORAL 062558-001 Mar 15, 1985 DISCN No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Cadila Pharms Ltd ERYTHROMYCIN ETHYLSUCCINATE erythromycin ethylsuccinate GRANULE;ORAL 216212-002 Nov 21, 2022 AB RX No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Ani Pharms ERYTHROMYCIN ETHYLSUCCINATE erythromycin ethylsuccinate GRANULE;ORAL 062055-003 Nov 2, 2018 AB RX No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Dista ERYTHROMYCIN ETHYLSUCCINATE erythromycin ethylsuccinate SUSPENSION;ORAL 062177-001 Approved Prior to Jan 1, 1982 DISCN No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Exclusivity Expiration

Erythromycin Ethylsuccinate (EES) Investment Scenario and Fundamentals Analysis

Last updated: April 25, 2026

What is the current commercial and competitive profile for Erythromycin Ethylsuccinate?

Erythromycin ethylsuccinate (EES) is a long-established, oral macrolide antibiotic with a mature, generic-driven market profile. Core commercial fundamentals are shaped by (1) patent status and API commoditization, (2) substitution to newer macrolides in certain indications, (3) antibiotic stewardship constraints, and (4) supply-chain resilience across key API and intermediate producers.

Market structure

  • Therapeutic class: Macrolide antibiotic.
  • Typical positioning: Oral alternative within bacterial respiratory and select pediatric indications where macrolides are appropriate.
  • Value proposition: Long history of use, clinician familiarity, and broad access through generics.

Implication for investment

  • Base-case economics generally hinge on manufacturing scale, cost of goods, regulatory execution for ANDAs/variations, and distribution strength rather than patent-driven premium pricing.

How do patent and exclusivity fundamentals affect revenue durability?

EES is a marketed generic product. Investment durability in a generic or lifecycle-extended structure is determined more by regulatory milestones and manufacturing differentiation than by long-tail exclusivity.

Patent reality (high-level)

  • For the active ingredient and earlier drug-product generations, commercial exploitation is primarily through generics.
  • Late-stage returns depend on:
    • Formulation/device differentiation (if any) that survives bioequivalence scrutiny.
    • Geographic filing strategy and regulatory lifecycle (changes, line extensions, particle-size/manufacturing controls where permitted).
    • Supply continuity (capacity and quality systems) that can capture share during shortages.

Actionable investment lens

  • Treat EES as a cost-and-capacity business in most portfolios, with upside primarily from:
    • Obtaining incremental approvals,
    • Winning tender/wholesale placements,
    • Managing cost shocks in fermentation/API supply.

What is the regulatory and compliance landscape that governs entry and continuity?

EES sits in the antibiotic category regulated under U.S. and global frameworks. In the U.S., generics depend on ANDA approvals and bioequivalence, along with post-approval quality system obligations.

U.S. pathway (generic context)

  • ANDA framework for applicants seeking approval to market EES through bioequivalence to a listed reference product.
  • Bioequivalence requirements: Demonstrate sameness in rate and extent of absorption (standard generic logic).
  • Post-marketing requirements: cGMP compliance and reporting obligations.

Quality and manufacturing controls (where investor value concentrates)

  • Manufacturing consistency for:
    • Oral suspension/tablet performance,
    • Stability under storage conditions,
    • Moisture/solid-state sensitivity typical of older oral formulations.
  • Robust QMS that limits deviations and batch failures, because antibiotic product recalls and batch holds can be value-destructive.

How does the antibiotic market dynamic impact pricing, volume, and margin?

Antibiotics operate under payor and stewardship pressure. EES demand is influenced by:

  • Clinical prescribing norms within macrolides,
  • Pediatric prescribing patterns,
  • Local formulary preferences and tender procurement rules,
  • Out-of-stock events and channel inventory cycles.

Pricing and margin drivers

  • Generic baseline pricing compression over time.
  • Margin protection comes from:
    • Manufacturing yield and downtime reduction,
    • API purchasing discipline,
    • Efficient regulatory operations (fewer batch failures, faster tech transfer).
  • Shortage-driven spikes can lift realized pricing temporarily, but do not create durable structural premiums unless the supplier becomes the default source.

Competitive substitution

  • In many settings, clinicians may prefer alternatives depending on spectrum, tolerability, and dosing convenience among macrolides. That typically caps pricing power for EES.

What are the formulation and product-design fundamentals investors should model?

For a mature generic like EES, fundamentals come down to formulation robustness and consistent performance in dissolution and bioequivalence regimes.

Key product-model parameters

  • Dosage form: Oral formulations (often sold as powder for suspension or tablets/capsules depending on market history).
  • Performance targets:
    • Stable dissolution profile across shelf life,
    • Low variability batch-to-batch,
    • Compliance with specification limits for assay, impurities, and physical characteristics.
  • Stability and impurity management: Ethylsuccinate salt forms require attention to hydrolysis and related impurity formation under heat and humidity.

What moves EBITDA

  • Batch release success rate and yields.
  • Storage and logistics stability (reduces expiries and returns).
  • Ability to support multiple strengths and presentations without destabilizing quality.

How do supply-chain and API economics translate into financial outcomes?

In an API-commodity setting, the supply chain is the margin engine.

Cost structure (typical generic antibiotic economics)

  • API and key intermediates are the largest variable costs.
  • Secondary drivers:
    • Labor and overhead for controlled manufacturing,
    • Quality testing and stability programs,
    • Freight and cold-chain is usually not a factor for oral EES, but humidity control in packaging is relevant.

Risk factors

  • API regional concentration and fermentation supply shocks.
  • Compliance incidents in upstream sites that trigger downstream lot rejections.
  • Batch variability that forces rework or slower release.

Investor implication

  • Value allocation favors sites with:
    • Documented process capability,
    • Low deviation rates,
    • Proven ability to run multiple SKUs from one platform line.

What is the demand outlook by indication class?

EES demand is tied to the use of macrolides in bacterial infections. For investment modeling, use category-level antibiotic demand with adjustments for prescribing shifts and stewardship intensity rather than expecting structural growth.

High-level demand components

  • Respiratory bacterial infections treated with macrolides (seasonality effects).
  • Pediatric prescribing where oral macrolides have established roles.

Constraints

  • Stewardship reduces unnecessary antibiotic use.
  • Over time, formularies and guideline updates can bias use toward other macrolides depending on local availability and clinician preference.

What diligence items determine whether EES is a high-return or low-return asset?

A credible diligence workstream for EES should measure durability of supply, regulatory stability, and unit economics.

Diligence checklist (decision-grade)

  • Manufacturing performance
    • Batch success rate and average time to release
    • CAPA and recurring deviation history (last 24-36 months)
  • Regulatory footprint
    • ANDA approval count and any latest supplements/changes
    • Any warning letters, consent decrees, or major inspection observations for related sites
  • Commercial execution
    • Contracting model (tender vs. direct)
    • Channel inventory management and return rates
  • Cost curve
    • API procurement terms, alternate sourcing, and lead times
    • Fixed-cost leverage across multiple antibiotics on shared lines (if applicable)

How should investors think about scenario outcomes?

EES pricing and volume are most sensitive to (1) competitive intensity and (2) supply constraints.

Base case

  • Stable demand in line with antibiotic category trends.
  • Continued generic competition keeps price constrained.
  • EBITDA depends on manufacturing stability and cost control.

Upside case

  • Temporary supply shortages lift realized prices and improve utilization.
  • Successful regulatory approvals (line extensions or new strengths) add share.
  • Lower-than-expected manufacturing variability reduces cost per unit.

Downside case

  • Batch failures, compliance events, or API shortages force missed shipments.
  • Price compression accelerates due to new generic entrants in key geographies.
  • Increased returns and expiries compress working capital efficiency.

How do input costs and foreign exchange translate into sensitivity?

For older antibiotic products, FX and raw-material costs still matter. Model sensitivity on:

  • API cost per gram and impurity-related yield loss.
  • Packaging costs and freight.
  • Shelf-life-driven expiry risk.

Investment conclusion from sensitivity

  • EES is typically most attractive where the operator has (a) procurement scale, (b) predictable release performance, and (c) strong logistics planning that prevents expiries.

Key takeaways for an EES investment posture

  • Erythromycin ethylsuccinate is a mature, generic-driven antibiotic where returns depend on manufacturing excellence, regulatory execution, and supply reliability, not patent leverage.
  • Competitive dynamics compress pricing; margin resilience comes from cost of goods discipline and high batch release success.
  • Scenario upside is usually supply-driven (shortages, constrained competing supply) and regulatory-driven (adding approved presentations and strengthening distribution).
  • Scenario downside is execution-driven (batch failures, quality events) and market-driven (accelerated price compression from new entrants).

FAQs

1) Is Erythromycin Ethylsuccinate a patent-protected product with long exclusivity?

No. The drug’s commercialization is primarily through the generic market structure typical for an established antibiotic. Returns are therefore driven by operational execution rather than long exclusivity premiums.

2) What is the biggest determinant of profitability for EES products?

Manufacturing cost and quality performance. Batch success rates, time-to-release, yields, and upstream API pricing are the primary profitability levers.

3) What drives volume for EES?

Prescribing patterns within macrolide antibiotic use, local formulary placement, tender contracting, and seasonal respiratory infection demand, moderated by stewardship constraints.

4) What creates upside beyond baseline generic economics?

Supply constraints across the market, successful regulatory launches of additional strengths/presentations, and winning contracted shelf placement during competitive shortages.

5) What are the dominant risks for an EES investor/operator?

Quality or compliance failures at manufacturing sites, upstream API supply shocks, and faster-than-modeled price compression from additional generic entrants.


References

[1] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Generic Drugs: ANDA (Abbreviated New Drug Application). FDA website. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/abbreviated-new-drug-application-anda
[2] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Approved Drug Products with Therapeutic Equivalence Evaluations (Orange Book). FDA website. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cder/daf/index.cfm

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.