Last Updated: August 2, 2026

Dista Company Profile


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


What is the competitive landscape for DISTA

DISTA has eight approved drugs.



Summary for Dista
US Patents:0
Tradenames:6
Ingredients:6
NDAs:8

Drugs and US Patents for Dista

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Exclusivity Expiration
Dista ILOSONE erythromycin estolate FOR SUSPENSION;ORAL 061893-001 Approved Prior to Jan 1, 1982 DISCN No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Dista NALFON fenoprofen calcium TABLET;ORAL 017710-001 Approved Prior to Jan 1, 1982 DISCN Yes No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Dista ERYTHROMYCIN ETHYLSUCCINATE erythromycin ethylsuccinate SUSPENSION;ORAL 062177-002 Approved Prior to Jan 1, 1982 DISCN No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Dista ILOTYCIN GLUCEPTATE erythromycin gluceptate INJECTABLE;INJECTION 050370-002 Approved Prior to Jan 1, 1982 DISCN No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Dista ERYTHROMYCIN ETHYLSUCCINATE erythromycin ethylsuccinate SUSPENSION;ORAL 062177-001 Approved Prior to Jan 1, 1982 DISCN No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Dista ILOSONE erythromycin estolate TABLET, CHEWABLE;ORAL 061895-002 Approved Prior to Jan 1, 1982 DISCN No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Dista ILOTYCIN erythromycin OINTMENT;OPHTHALMIC 050368-001 Approved Prior to Jan 1, 1982 DISCN No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Exclusivity Expiration
Similar Applicant Names
Applicants may be listed under multiple names.
Here is a list of applicants with similar names.

Last updated: July 9, 2026

Dista Competitive Landscape Analysis: Market Position, Patent/Exclusivity Barriers, and Strategic Options

Dista’s competitive position depends on (1) the drug’s FDA status (Orange Book listings, exclusivity, and approvals), (2) the scope and remaining term of its core patent estate (composition, formulation, method-of-use, and manufacturing), and (3) whether challengers can enter before legal or exclusivity barriers clear. A complete, business-grade landscape requires the exact Dista drug (active ingredient, dosage form, strength) and the specific national market being modeled (US only vs. multi-country).

No market or patent results are provided in the prompt, and “Dista” is not uniquely identifying in the way a drug-legal landscape requires. Under the constraints, an incomplete or ambiguous response cannot be produced.

Which Dista drug is this: what active ingredient and dosage form are we analyzing?

Direct answer: Not determinable from the provided input.

Why “Dista” can’t be mapped to an IP and regulatory footprint

  • “Dista” can refer to multiple branded products, including different active ingredients and dosage forms, which changes:
    • Orange Book listing eligibility and exclusivity listings
    • patent family structure (composition vs. method-of-use vs. process)
    • generic/biosimilar entry pathways and timing
    • litigation and Paragraph IV history

What “Dista” must resolve to for a competitive landscape

  • Active ingredient
  • Strengths and dosage forms (tablet, capsule, inhalation, injection, etc.)
  • Route of administration
  • US vs. ex-US rights and approvals

What patents protect Dista, and when do they expire?

Direct answer: Not determinable from the provided input.

Patent categories that drive market exclusivity

A defensible Dista landscape must break down the patent estate by:

  • Composition of matter (active ingredient, salt/polymorph, chemical entity)
  • Formulation (excipients, coatings, controlled release, particle size, stability)
  • Method of use (indications, dosing regimens, patient subsets)
  • Manufacturing and process (steps, conditions, intermediates, purification)
  • Device/combination patents if applicable

What to quantify in a Dista patent map

A complete map would list:

  • Patent numbers, assignees, inventors
  • Filing and priority dates
  • Estimated expiration (including adjustments, if relevant)
  • Jurisdiction coverage (US, EP, CN, etc.)
  • Relationship to FDA-listed products (Orange Book “listed” vs. “not listed”)

When does Dista lose exclusivity under the Orange Book?

Direct answer: Not determinable from the provided input.

Exclusivity types that change launch timing

  • 5-year new chemical entity (NCE) exclusivity
  • 6-year pediatric exclusivity extensions
  • 7-year orphan drug exclusivity (if applicable)
  • 180-day generic exclusivity triggers after first Paragraph IV ANDA
  • Residual exclusivities tied to specific indications for combination products

What a timing model requires

  • FDA approval dates for each relevant strength/label
  • Orange Book patent expiration dates
  • Exclusivity expiration calendar
  • Whether ANDAs/BLA s are “pending” or “approved” for the same active and route

Are there Paragraph IV challenges to Dista, and which companies filed them?

Direct answer: Not determinable from the provided input.

What matters in Paragraph IV-driven competition

  • Whether challenges are to the “listed” patents or rely on legal non-infringement/invalidity
  • Whether the challenger is first-filer (180-day exclusivity risk)
  • Settlement terms that delay or carve launch dates
  • Injunction status or consent judgments affecting entry timelines

What is the Orange Book status of Dista, and what is listed per strength?

Direct answer: Not determinable from the provided input.

What the Orange Book table must include

  • Proprietary name (Dista) and active ingredient(s)
  • Dosage form and route
  • Strengths
  • Patent numbers listed for the drug product
  • Patent expiration dates
  • Exclusivity codes and expiration dates per FDA product listing

How strong is the patent estate for Dista versus key competitors?

Direct answer: Not determinable from the provided input.

How to score patent strength for competitive risk

A business-grade assessment needs:

  • Remaining term weighted by claimed scope
  • Breadth of independent claims (composition vs. narrow formulation)
  • Number of independently enforceable patents after potential invalidity attacks
  • Litigation history and current enforcement posture
  • Freedom-to-operate impact from manufacturing and process claims

What formulations of Dista are protected by IP, and what generic entry risks exist?

Direct answer: Not determinable from the provided input.

Typical formulation/IP fault lines for generics

  • Controlled-release mechanisms
  • Rate controlling membranes or matrices
  • Coating systems and dissolution profiles
  • Polymorph or particle size constraints
  • Stability and shelf-life process dependencies

What litigation or settlement agreements affect Dista generic launch dates?

Direct answer: Not determinable from the provided input.

Litigation artifacts required for a launch-timing model

  • Court filings and case numbers
  • Asserted patents in each case
  • Filing dates for ANDA Paragraph IV or BLA equivalents
  • Settlement dates and agreed “at-risk” or delayed launch windows
  • Any stipulated injunction or carve-outs

What is the FDA regulatory status of Dista, including approval pathway and label scope?

Direct answer: Not determinable from the provided input.

Regulatory facts that drive competitive behavior

  • NDA vs. ANDA vs. 505(b)(2) vs. BLA pathway
  • Orphan designation, if any
  • Labeling exclusivity scope by indication
  • Pediatric study completion status (if it drives exclusivity extension)
  • Any postmarketing changes tied to IP or supplemental exclusivity

How does Dista compare with competing brands and authorized generics by mechanism, dosing, and IP exposure?

Direct answer: Not determinable from the provided input.

Competitive comparison dimensions

  • Same-mechanism competitors (class competitors)
  • Same-indication brands
  • Therapeutic alternatives (different MOA)
  • Authorized generics or licensees
  • Delivery system differences that reduce substitutability

Who are the leading generic or biosimilar entrants that could challenge Dista?

Direct answer: Not determinable from the provided input.

Generic entrant indicators

  • Pending ANDAs in the same dosage forms
  • Known first filers or authorized generics
  • Litigation dockets that show challengers and their product design around formulation/polymorph claims

Biosimilar indicators (if biologic)

  • BLA pathway attempts
  • Scientific/clinical similarity packages that can bypass certain IP
  • Product comparability and interchangeability constraints

Which jurisdictions matter most for Dista’s competitive landscape?

Direct answer: Not determinable from the provided input.

Jurisdictional modeling requirements

A multi-market landscape requires:

  • Patent coverage mapping by country
  • Local exclusivity regimes
  • Regulatory approval status by agency (FDA/EMA/PMDA/etc.)
  • Parallel litigation and enforcement variability

How do manufacturing/IP barriers affect Dista’s cost position and generic feasibility?

Direct answer: Not determinable from the provided input.

Where manufacturing claims raise barriers

  • Process step patents (conditions, temperature profiles, chromatography, crystallization)
  • Intermediate purification constraints tied to claimed purity specs
  • Equipment- or parameter-specific claims

Key Takeaways

No competitive landscape for Dista can be produced from the provided input because “Dista” does not uniquely identify an FDA-regulated product, and IP/regulatory analysis requires unambiguous mapping to:

  • active ingredient(s)
  • dosage form/strength
  • route of administration
  • jurisdiction-specific FDA product listing and patent/exclusivity data

FAQs

  1. What Orange Book fields determine Dista’s exclusivity end date?
  2. How do Paragraph IV settlements typically shift Dista’s generic entry timing?
  3. What patent types most often block formulation generics for branded drugs like Dista?
  4. How should a Dista competitive model treat 180-day exclusivity first-filer risk?
  5. What litigation signals indicate whether Dista will face near-term ANDA launches?

References

No sources cited.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.