Last Updated: June 18, 2026

Alpharma Us Pharms Company Profile


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


What is the competitive landscape for ALPHARMA US PHARMS

ALPHARMA US PHARMS has sixty-one approved drugs.



Summary for Alpharma Us Pharms
US Patents:0
Tradenames:43
Ingredients:40
NDAs:61

Drugs and US Patents for Alpharma Us Pharms

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Exclusivity Expiration
Alpharma Us Pharms THEOPHYLLINE theophylline SYRUP;ORAL 086545-001 Approved Prior to Jan 1, 1982 DISCN Yes No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Alpharma Us Pharms LOPERAMIDE HYDROCHLORIDE loperamide hydrochloride SOLUTION;ORAL 073187-001 Sep 15, 1992 DISCN No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Alpharma Us Pharms METHDILAZINE HYDROCHLORIDE methdilazine hydrochloride SYRUP;ORAL 087122-001 Approved Prior to Jan 1, 1982 DISCN No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Alpharma Us Pharms CHLORPROMAZINE HYDROCHLORIDE chlorpromazine hydrochloride SYRUP;ORAL 086712-001 Approved Prior to Jan 1, 1982 DISCN No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Alpharma Us Pharms FLURANDRENOLIDE flurandrenolide LOTION;TOPICAL 087203-001 Apr 29, 1982 DISCN No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Alpharma Us Pharms HYDROXYZINE HYDROCHLORIDE hydroxyzine hydrochloride SYRUP;ORAL 088785-001 Feb 3, 1988 DISCN No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Exclusivity Expiration

Expired US Patents for Alpharma Us Pharms

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date Patent No. Patent Expiration
Alpharma Us Pharms SERAX oxazepam CAPSULE;ORAL 015539-002 Approved Prior to Jan 1, 1982 4,620,974 ⤷  Start Trial
Alpharma Us Pharms SERAX oxazepam CAPSULE;ORAL 015539-006 Approved Prior to Jan 1, 1982 4,620,974 ⤷  Start Trial
Alpharma Us Pharms SERAX oxazepam CAPSULE;ORAL 015539-004 Approved Prior to Jan 1, 1982 4,620,974 ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >Patent No. >Patent Expiration
Similar Applicant Names
Applicants may be listed under multiple names.
Here is a list of applicants with similar names.

Last updated: June 9, 2026

Alpharma US and Alpharma US Pharm Competitive Landscape Analysis: Market Position, Patent Strength, and Strategic Options

Alpharma US Pharm is positioned as a distributor and supplier brand in the US market, with business value tied to (1) obtaining supply chain access for finished dosage forms, (2) securing formulary and contracting relationships, and (3) navigating generic and branded product lifecycles. A full patent estate and exclusivity/timing map for “Alpharma US Pharm” cannot be produced from the information provided. A defensible competitive landscape analysis requires the underlying product portfolio, NDC-to-API mapping, and the specific FDA-labeled products that Alpharma US Pharm commercializes.

What products does Alpharma US Pharm sell in the US, and what are the active ingredients?

Featured snippet answer: A product-level competitive landscape for Alpharma US Pharm depends on its specific FDA-labeled offerings (NDCs), not on the company name alone.

Portfolio mapping needed for a patent-and-competition view

A product-level analysis requires:

  • Exact drug name and dosage form for each NDC sold
  • Route of administration (oral, injectable, topical)
  • Whether the product is branded, authorized generic, or distributor-only
  • The active ingredient(s) and strength
  • Label indications (method-of-use relevance for patent coverage)

Without the NDC list and product names, patent coverage and competitive risk cannot be quantified.

How strong is the patent estate for Alpharma US Pharm’s marketed drugs?

Featured snippet answer: Patent strength is product-specific and cannot be attributed to “Alpharma US Pharm” generically.

Patent estate components that determine strength

For each marketed product, patent strength is typically assessed through:

  • Orange Book listing count and patent categories (drug substance, drug product, method of use)
  • Remaining term by patent family
  • Status of litigation (asserted patents, settlement terms, ongoing appeals)
  • Proximity of launch risk windows for generics and authorized generics

Litigation and exclusivity signals

A credible competitive forecast uses:

  • Orange Book “Hatch-Waxman” exclusivities (if applicable)
  • 180-day exclusivity events (first filer triggers)
  • Federal Circuit or district court decisions impacting enforcement

No product-level identifiers are provided, so no patent calendar can be created.

When does exclusivity end for Alpharma US Pharm competitors’ reference products?

Featured snippet answer: Exclusivity end dates vary by reference product and indication, and are only calculable from the specific NDA/BLA holders and Orange Book listings.

Exclusivity timelines to model

  • Brand exclusivity expiration (5-year, 7-year, 3-year)
  • Patent expiry and “last to expire” dynamics
  • 180-day generic exclusivity triggers
  • Tender-specific pharmacy contract dynamics

No reference products are specified.

Which companies compete with Alpharma US Pharm in US distribution and supply?

Featured snippet answer: Competitive set depends on whether Alpharma US Pharm is selling branded products, generics, or acting as a distributor/marketer for third-party manufacturers.

Typical competitive clusters (industry patterns)

  • Large generic manufacturers (multiple ANDAs per molecule)
  • Branded specialty companies for high-margin segments
  • Contract manufacturers and distributors in wholesaler networks
  • Authorized generic entrants tied to branded litigation outcomes

A molecule-level roster is required for a precise competitive map.

What generic entry risks exist for Alpharma US Pharm’s marketed products under Paragraph IV?

Featured snippet answer: Paragraph IV risk is evaluated per NDA and per Orange Book listing, not per company name.

How Paragraph IV affects supply risk

For each marketed product, the model tracks:

  • Number of ANDA filers challenging listed patents
  • Whether eligibility exists for 180-day exclusivity
  • Current stage: filing, litigation stay, final court outcomes
  • Settlement-driven “design-around” launches

No NDA/BLA and patent identifiers are provided.

What formulations and delivery systems are protected for Alpharma US Pharm drugs?

Featured snippet answer: Formulation IP is assessed per drug product patent listing (composition, solid state, dissolution, device, etc.) by NDA.

Formulation patent categories that affect competition

  • Drug product formulation and process
  • Bioavailability-enhancing technologies
  • Controlled release and dissolution profile
  • Combination product ratios and stability/formulation approaches

No formulation/product listing data is available.

What method-of-use patents cover Alpharma US Pharm’s indications?

Featured snippet answer: Method-of-use patent risk depends on label indications for each NDC.

Indication-specific competitive impact

  • Method-of-use patents can block ANDA carve-outs and require labeling design
  • Litigation often hinges on whether the generic’s proposed labeling infringes
  • “Carve-out” labels determine whether FDA approval can proceed without launch injunction risk

No indication list is provided.

What is the Orange Book status of Alpharma US Pharm’s drugs?

Featured snippet answer: Orange Book status is determined per NDA/BLA and specific patent listings.

Orange Book elements needed for an actionable status view

  • Listed patents and expiration dates
  • Patent type (drug substance, drug product, method of use)
  • Exclusivity flags
  • Enforcement/expiration status and any recent amendments

No Orange Book identifiers are provided.

What patent litigation affects Alpharma US Pharm’s competitive position?

Featured snippet answer: Litigation risk is product-specific and requires the asserted patent numbers, case captions, and jurisdictions.

Litigation components used in competitive forecasts

  • Parties (NDA holder vs ANDA applicant)
  • Asserted patents and asserted claims
  • Interim injunctions, dismissal outcomes, and remand history
  • Settlement-triggered launch covenants and “drop-dead” dates

No cases or patent numbers are provided.

How do settlement agreements and license deals shape market timing for Alpharma US Pharm?

Featured snippet answer: Timing changes if settlements include non-infringement stipulations, covenant not to sue terms, and agreed launch windows.

Deal mechanics that move timelines

  • Authorized generic launch carve-outs
  • Net sales protections and switching restrictions
  • Royalty structures and reporting obligations
  • Exclusivity waivers and “no further challenges” provisions

No deal documents are provided.

How does Alpharma US Pharm compare with peers by commercial exposure and lifecycle stage?

Featured snippet answer: Exposure and lifecycle stage require each marketed molecule’s maturity (brand age, generic saturation, and remaining exclusivities).

How to rank exposure (what the analysis would score)

  • % of sales in molecules nearing patent expiry
  • Share of revenue at risk from first filer or design-around generics
  • Contract exposure to wholesaler or PBM formularies
  • SKU breadth and supply constraints

No product revenue or SKU list is provided.

What manufacturing and IP barriers affect Alpharma US Pharm supply continuity?

Featured snippet answer: Manufacturing barriers are evaluated per product and facility, including process IP and regulatory constraints.

Common bottlenecks that create competitive advantage

  • Specialized sterile manufacturing qualification
  • Device integration and combination product controls
  • Supply chain exclusivity with source API suppliers
  • Facility-level consent decree restrictions

No manufacturing/facility details are provided.

Key Takeaways

  • A high-information competitive landscape for “Alpharma US Pharm” cannot be completed without the company’s specific US marketed products (NDCs/NDA/BLA) and their active ingredients.
  • Patent strength, Orange Book status, exclusivity timelines, Paragraph IV risk, and litigation calendars are all molecule-specific. No defensible patent estate can be mapped from a company name alone.
  • A complete market position assessment must start with a product roster, then connect each product to Orange Book listings, litigation records, and regulatory status.

FAQs

  1. How do I determine whether a distributor brand like Alpharma US Pharm is tied to a specific NDA or multiple manufacturers?
  2. What Orange Book patent categories matter most when forecasting generic launch risk for a given drug product?
  3. How is 180-day generic exclusivity typically triggered after a Paragraph IV notice, and how does that affect launch timing?
  4. What are the most common settlement terms that shift market access in Hatch-Waxman cases?
  5. How do labeling carve-outs change method-of-use infringement risk for generics seeking FDA approval?

References (APA)

  1. FDA. (n.d.). Drugs@FDA. US Food and Drug Administration. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cder/daf/index.cfm
  2. FDA. (n.d.). Orange Book: Approved Drug Products with Therapeutic Equivalence Evaluations. US Food and Drug Administration. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cder/ob/
  3. United States Patent and Trademark Office. (n.d.). Patent Assignment Search. https://assignment.uspto.gov/
  4. Federal Circuit and district court dockets via PACER. (n.d.). https://pacer.uscourts.gov/

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.