Vertex Pharmaceuticals v. MSN Pharmaceuticals (1:26-cv-00306): Litigation Summary, Claims at Issue, and Near-Term Patent/ANDA Exposure Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated sued MSN […]

Litigation Summary and Analysis: Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation v. Cipla USA Inc. (D.N.J.) | Case No. 1:26-cv-00272 Executive summary. The action

Litigation summary and analysis: Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Ridhisidhi PLLC, 1:26-cv-00372 Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Inc. (BIPI) sued Ridhisidhi PLLC

Ultragenyx Pharma v. Navinta 2:26-cv-03585: Litigation Summary, Claims, and Business Impact Executive summary: The case Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc. v. Navinta

SHIONOGI v. LUPIN (2:26-cv-06218): Litigation Summary, Patent Estate Impact, and Generic Launch Risk Shionogi Inc. v. Lupin Limited, case number

A patent expiry for a blockbuster drug is not a legal event. It’s a commercial trigger. The twelve months before

The biosimilar wave was supposed to be simple. Blockbuster biologics lose patent protection, cheaper copies enter the market, prices collapse,

The assumption is logical: if a tool costs nothing, you save money using it. That arithmetic breaks down badly when

Every year, generic pharmaceutical companies write off hundreds of millions of dollars on programs that were commercially viable on paper