Last Updated: May 10, 2026

ZEGERID Drug Patent Profile


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


AI Deep Research
Questions you can ask:
  • What is the 5 year forecast for ZEGERID?
  • What are the global sales for ZEGERID?
  • What is Average Wholesale Price for ZEGERID?
Summary for ZEGERID
Recent Clinical Trials for ZEGERID

Identify potential brand extensions & 505(b)(2) entrants

SponsorPhase
Syndax PharmaceuticalsPhase 1
Population Health Research InstitutePhase 3
NorginePhase 3

See all ZEGERID clinical trials

Paragraph IV (Patent) Challenges for ZEGERID
Tradename Dosage Ingredient Strength NDA ANDAs Submitted Submissiondate
ZEGERID Powder for Oral Suspension omeprazole; sodium bicarbonate 20mg/1680mg per packet 021636 1 2007-11-13
ZEGERID Powder for Oral Suspension omeprazole; sodium bicarbonate 40 mg/1680 mg per packet 021636 1 2007-08-24
ZEGERID Capsules omeprazole; sodium bicarbonate 20 mg/1100 mg and 40 mg/1100 mg 021849 1 2007-04-30

US Patents and Regulatory Information for ZEGERID

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Exclusivity Expiration
Salix ZEGERID omeprazole; sodium bicarbonate CAPSULE;ORAL 021849-001 Feb 27, 2006 DISCN Yes No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Riley Consumer ZEGERID OTC omeprazole; sodium bicarbonate CAPSULE;ORAL 022281-001 Dec 1, 2009 OTC Yes Yes ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Salix ZEGERID omeprazole; sodium bicarbonate FOR SUSPENSION;ORAL 021636-002 Dec 21, 2004 DISCN Yes No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Riley Consumer ZEGERID OTC omeprazole; sodium bicarbonate FOR SUSPENSION;ORAL 022283-001 Jun 17, 2013 OTC Yes Yes ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Salix ZEGERID omeprazole; sodium bicarbonate CAPSULE;ORAL 021849-002 Feb 27, 2006 DISCN Yes No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Exclusivity Expiration

Expired US Patents for ZEGERID

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date Patent No. Patent Expiration
Santarus ZEGERID magnesium hydroxide; omeprazole; sodium bicarbonate TABLET, CHEWABLE;ORAL 021850-001 Mar 24, 2006 6,699,885 ⤷  Start Trial
Salix ZEGERID omeprazole; sodium bicarbonate CAPSULE;ORAL 021849-002 Feb 27, 2006 6,699,885 ⤷  Start Trial
Salix ZEGERID omeprazole; sodium bicarbonate CAPSULE;ORAL 021849-001 Feb 27, 2006 6,699,885 ⤷  Start Trial
Santarus ZEGERID magnesium hydroxide; omeprazole; sodium bicarbonate TABLET, CHEWABLE;ORAL 021850-001 Mar 24, 2006 7,399,772 ⤷  Start Trial
Salix ZEGERID omeprazole; sodium bicarbonate FOR SUSPENSION;ORAL 021636-002 Dec 21, 2004 7,399,772 ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >Patent No. >Patent Expiration

International Patents for ZEGERID

See the table below for patents covering ZEGERID around the world.

Country Patent Number Title Estimated Expiration
Israel 150696 PHARMACEUTICAL COMPOSITIONS CONTAINING BENZIMIDAZOLE DERIVATIVES AND PROCESSES FOR THE MANUFACTURE THEREOF ⤷  Start Trial
Israel 159725 ⤷  Start Trial
Mexico PA04000223 FORMAS DE DOSIS DE BENCIMIDAZOL SUBSTITUIDAS NOVEDOSAS Y METODO PARA USAR LAS MISMAS. (NOVEL SUBSTITUTED BENZIMIDAZOLE DOSAGE FORMS AND METHOD OF USING SAME.) ⤷  Start Trial
Spain 2275650 ⤷  Start Trial
Poland 357144 ⤷  Start Trial
>Country >Patent Number >Title >Estimated Expiration

Supplementary Protection Certificates for ZEGERID

Patent Number Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration SPC Description
0984957 CR 2012 00035 Denmark ⤷  Start Trial PRODUCT NAME: ET KOMBINATIONSPRODUKT AF NAPROXEN OG ESOMEPRAZOL MAGNESIUM TRIHYDRAT; NAT. REG. NO/DATE: 49583 20120327; FIRST REG. NO/DATE: GB PL 17901/0263-001 20101105
1020461 300482 Netherlands ⤷  Start Trial PRODUCT NAME: NAXOPREN EN ESOMEPRAZOL ALS MAGNESIUMZOUT; NATIONAL REGISTRATION NO/DATE: RVG 106235 20101118; FIRST REGISTRATION: GB PL 17091/0263 - 0001 20101105
1499331 SPC/GB13/034 United Kingdom ⤷  Start Trial PRODUCT NAME: IZINOVA CONCENTRATE FOR ORAL SOLUTION. THE ACTIVE SUBSTANCE IS A MIXTURE OF 3 SALTS:SODIUM SULPHATE ANHYDROUS, MAGNESIUM SULPHATE HEPTAHYDRATE AND POTASSIUM SULPHATE.; REGISTERED: BE BE434323 20130220; UK PL34926/0016 20130313
1499331 122014000007 Germany ⤷  Start Trial PRODUCT NAME: NATRIUMSULFAT, MAGNESIUMSULFAT UND KALIUMSULFAT; NAT. REGISTRATION NO/DATE: 86203.00.00 20130808; FIRST REGISTRATION: BELGIEN BE434323 20130220
1499331 13C0055 France ⤷  Start Trial PRODUCT NAME: SULFATE DE SODIUM ANHYDRE, SULFATE DE MAGNESIUM HEPTAHYDRATE, SULFATE DE POTASSIUM; NAT. REGISTRATION NO/DATE: NL41696 20130426; FIRST REGISTRATION: BE - 434323 20130220
>Patent Number >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration >SPC Description

ZEGERID: Market Dynamics and Financial Trajectory

Last updated: April 25, 2026

ZEGERID (omeprazole/sodium bicarbonate) is a marketed proton pump inhibitor (PPI) product in the U.S. that competes in a mature, high-generic-share segment for acid suppression. Its market dynamics are driven by patent/market exclusivity expiry effects, payer-driven generic substitution, and franchise competition within PPIs. Financial trajectory indicators in this class are typically tied to unit volume declines after generic entry, ongoing pricing compression, and partial offsets from brand lifecycle actions (labeling, pack/brand extensions, and channel strategy). Public, audited financial metrics by product for ZEGERID itself are not consistently disclosed in accessible sources, so the most reliable market-facing trajectory view is built from (1) U.S. formulary and generic-share behavior patterns for PPIs and (2) the branded-to-generic market transition timeline for omeprazole bicarbonate products.

What drives ZEGERID’s market demand?

1) Core indication concentration and class substitution

ZEGERID is positioned for acid-related gastrointestinal conditions where PPIs are clinically interchangeable at the class level. That structure shifts demand away from molecule-specific brand differentiation toward:

  • Plan formularies that steer patients to lowest net cost PPI options
  • Automatic substitution to lower-priced generics by pharmacy benefit design
  • Switching behavior among prescribers driven by guideline-concordant efficacy within the PPI class

The implication for ZEGERID is stable underlying class demand, but weaker brand retention once low-cost entrants dominate the tiering.

2) Payer economics and net price pressure

In mature PPI markets, brand margins compress as:

  • Generic entrants expand across dosage forms
  • PBMs negotiate rebates based on net cost benchmarks
  • Copay tiers and preferred drug lists push utilization toward generics

For ZEGERID, this typically shows up as declining share at launch-to-follow-on time horizons after generic penetration, followed by stabilization at a reduced branded share.

3) Delivery-form and timing as a tactical differentiation

The sodium bicarbonate component is designed to affect onset characteristics versus delayed-release omeprazole-only products. In practice, that creates a narrower differentiation wedge:

  • Used where clinicians or payers view formulation-driven onset as beneficial
  • Retained selectively on formularies compared with equivalent generic-only options, when managed-care exceptions are granted

This tends to slow, but not stop, the overall brand share erosion once generic substitution is entrenched.

How does competition shape ZEGERID’s trajectory?

Competition set

ZEGERID competes inside a dense PPI and immediate/rapid-onset acid suppression landscape. The competitive set includes:

  • Other branded PPIs with historical claims-based share retention (depending on period)
  • Low-cost generics spanning omeprazole and multiple PPIs (e.g., pantoprazole, lansoprazole, esomeprazole)
  • Reformulations and brand extensions that attempt to protect managed-care access

Competitive mechanisms

ZEGERID’s market share outcome depends on how often it is:

  • Placed on non-preferred tiers
  • Excluded from preferred status in response to PBM contracting cycles
  • Replaced at pharmacy counter by AB-rated generics

Because PPIs are broadly interchangeable for many indications, the competitive battlefield is pricing and access, not pharmacologic superiority.

What does the market lifecycle imply for ZEGERID’s financial performance?

Expected financial pattern after generic penetration

For PPIs, branded product revenue typically follows a repeatable pattern:

  1. Pre-generic or early transition: higher net revenue, rebate-driven managed-care contracts maintain some share
  2. Generic entry and expansion: revenue declines as scripts move to generics, with net price falling
  3. Late-stage maturity: revenue stabilizes at a lower base if the brand retains any formulary or clinical niche access

For ZEGERID, this lifecycle is consistent with a mature PPI brand profile: market demand exists, but brand monetization declines as unit mix shifts to generics.

Key financial metrics that tend to move

Even without ZEGERID-only audited statements, financial trajectory for PPI brands generally reflects:

  • Prescription volume decline after generic substitution
  • Net price per unit compression from rebate resets and competitive contracting
  • Channel mix shifts (retail vs mail order) as PBMs manage utilization

ZEGERID’s U.S. commercial standing

Public product and regulatory documentation establishes ZEGERID as an approved PPI formulation with active commercial presence in the U.S., including pediatric-related labeling that can influence physician selection and coverage decisions. ZEGERID’s approval and labeling framework is documented in the FDA product labeling record. (See FDA labeling and product listing sources below.)

Market dynamics at a glance (PPI franchise mechanics)

The following mechanics typically govern branded PPI revenue trajectories after generic entry:

Driver What changes in the market Likely ZEGERID impact
PBM formulary positioning Movement to non-preferred tiers Share loss and lower net revenue
Generic substitution Pharmacy counter replacement with AB-rated products Unit volume compression
Net price and rebates Contract resets based on lowest-cost benchmarks Margin pressure
Clinical switching Prescribers switch to preferred PPI generics Sustained demand shift away from brand
Niche access Some continued use where formulation timing matters Partial revenue stabilization vs total collapse

Financial trajectory framework for ZEGERID (investment-use view)

Since ZEGERID’s standalone audited financials are not reliably available from public filings in a product-level form across time, the actionable approach for decision-makers is to map it to observable market outcomes in PPI:

Trajectory stages

  • Stage A: High brand access
    Brand revenue linked to protected contracting and brand-preferred positioning.
  • Stage B: Generics scale-up
    Revenue declines accelerate; net price drops and rebate intensity often rises.
  • Stage C: Mature low-share stability
    Brand revenue plateaus; trend becomes slower and driven by ongoing niche retention and pediatric/label-specific use.

What to watch to infer the trajectory

For ZEGERID, the most decision-useful indicators are:

  • Formulary coverage changes by major PBMs
  • AB substitution rates for the relevant strength and formulation
  • Prescription trends in retail and mail channels for PPI category, especially omeprazole-based products
  • Pricing disclosures and pharmacy reimbursement behavior that reflect net price compression

Key implications for strategy and budgeting

For R&D, licensing, or acquisition decisions tied to ZEGERID-like assets, the commercial reality is that:

  • Revenue growth is unlikely without differentiated clinical or payer value beyond standard PPI performance.
  • Competitive access is the dominant lever post-generic entry.
  • Formulation-based onset claims can matter, but the durability of those claims in managed care is limited unless supported by payer economics and outcomes data.

Key Takeaways

  • ZEGERID operates in a mature PPI market where branded revenue is structurally exposed to generic substitution and payer-driven tiering.
  • The financial trajectory is typically a post-generic decline followed by stabilization at reduced branded share, with net price compression and unit volume loss as the primary mechanisms.
  • Formulation and label specificity can slow erosion in niche segments, but they rarely reverse the broader managed-care substitution trend for PPIs.
  • The most actionable proxy indicators for ZEGERID’s trajectory are formulary placement, AB substitution behavior, and category prescription trend movement for omeprazole-based PPIs.

FAQs

1) Is ZEGERID’s revenue driven by new clinical differentiation or by managed-care access?

Managed-care access and formulary placement drive the dominant part of revenue outcomes in mature PPI markets; differentiation can influence niche prescribing but typically cannot offset generic substitution at scale.

2) What typically happens to branded PPI prices after generic entry?

Net price compresses through rebate renegotiations and PBM contracting against lowest-cost alternatives, reducing brand revenue per unit even if some share remains.

3) Does pediatric or label-specific use change ZEGERID’s market trajectory?

It can improve retention in targeted prescriber and coverage segments, but it generally supports a slower decline rather than a high-growth profile once generics dominate the formulary.

4) Which market signals best indicate ZEGERID’s direction?

Formulary tiering changes, AB substitution patterns, and PPI category prescription trends tied to omeprazole-based products.

5) Where does competitive pressure come from?

From generic omeprazole and competing PPIs within the managed-care preferred list framework, plus ongoing PBM renegotiations that shift utilization toward the lowest net cost.


References (APA)

[1] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (n.d.). ZEGERID (omeprazole and sodium bicarbonate) prescribing information / label. FDA label and drug database records. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.