You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

TOPOSAR Drug Patent Profile


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


When do Toposar patents expire, and what generic alternatives are available?

Toposar is a drug marketed by Teva Parenteral and is included in one NDA.

The generic ingredient in TOPOSAR is etoposide. There are eleven drug master file entries for this compound. Six suppliers are listed for this compound. Additional details are available on the etoposide profile page.

DrugPatentWatch® Litigation and Generic Entry Outlook for Toposar

A generic version of TOPOSAR was approved as etoposide by HIKMA on July 17th, 1995.

  Get Started Free

AI Deep Research
Questions you can ask:
  • What is the 5 year forecast for TOPOSAR?
  • What are the global sales for TOPOSAR?
  • What is Average Wholesale Price for TOPOSAR?
Drug patent expirations by year for TOPOSAR
Drug Prices for TOPOSAR

See drug prices for TOPOSAR

Recent Clinical Trials for TOPOSAR

Identify potential brand extensions & 505(b)(2) entrants

SponsorPhase
University of California, San FranciscoPhase 2
RenJi HospitalPhase 2
Incyte CorporationPhase 2

See all TOPOSAR clinical trials

US Patents and Regulatory Information for TOPOSAR

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Exclusivity Expiration
Teva Parenteral TOPOSAR etoposide INJECTABLE;INJECTION 074166-001 Feb 27, 1995 DISCN No No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Exclusivity Expiration

Market Dynamics and Financial Trajectory for the Pharmaceutical Drug: TOPOSAR

Last updated: July 30, 2025


Introduction

TOPOSAR (thioguanine) remains a critical chemotherapeutic agent utilized primarily in the treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). As an established antimetabolite, TOPOSAR’s role in oncology has persisted, yet its market landscape is evolving amid advancements in targeted therapies and personalized medicine. This report analyzes current market dynamics and projects the financial trajectory for TOPOSAR, considering factors such as clinical efficacy, competition, regulatory environment, and emerging trends in oncology pharmacotherapy.


Market Landscape of TOPOSAR

Historical Context and Usage

Developed in the mid-20th century, TOPOSAR, marketed by Pfizer, has long served as a cornerstone in chemotherapy regimens for ALL patients. It functions as a purine analog, disrupting DNA synthesis in rapidly dividing cancer cells. Despite its longstanding use, TOPOSAR’s clinical application is now primarily confined to specific treatment protocols, with declining monotherapy popularity due to newer agents.

Current Therapeutic Positioning

While once a first-line agent, TOPOSAR now functions mostly within combination therapy frameworks (e.g., in protocols with corticosteroids, asparaginase, or vincristine). Its utility is reinforced by its cost-effectiveness and well-characterized safety profile, but competition from targeted agents including tyrosine kinase inhibitors and immunotherapies limits its standalone market share.


Market Drivers

Clinical Efficacy and Safety Profile

The proven efficacy of TOPOSAR in achieving remission in ALL has sustained its relevance, particularly in pediatric oncology. Its tolerability, especially in resource-constrained settings, underpins ongoing demand. Nonetheless, side effects such as hepatotoxicity and marrow suppression necessitate vigilant management, influencing prescribing patterns.

Regulatory and Reimbursement Factors

Regulatory approvals for TOPOSAR are well-established globally. Reimbursement landscapes are stable with institutional preferences favoring established, cost-effective chemotherapies. However, regulatory shifts favoring novel agents could impact market access.

Emerging Therapeutic Alternatives

The rise of targeted therapies, including monoclonal antibodies (e.g., blinatumomab) and CAR-T cell therapies, introduces competition, particularly in relapsed/refractory settings. Nevertheless, these are often cost-prohibitive and less accessible in low-middle income countries, preserving the demand for traditional agents like TOPOSAR.


Market Challenges

Competition from Novel Agents

Novel immunotherapies have demonstrated higher remission rates in refractory ALL, attracting institutional attention and funding. This trend compresses the market for conventional chemotherapeutics, including TOPOSAR, especially outside front-line treatment.

Regulatory and Patent Landscape

While TOPOSAR’s patent expiry is unlikely, the evolving regulatory paradigm imposes additional clinical trial requirements for off-label or supplemental uses, potentially limiting promotional flexibility.

Manufacturing and Supply Chain Considerations

As a compound with longstanding manufacturing protocols, TOPOSAR benefits from stable supply chains. However, disruptions due to geopolitical factors or regulatory tightening could impact availability and financial performance.


Financial Trajectory Analysis

Revenue Trends

Global sales of TOPOSAR, historically steady owing to its essential role in childhood leukemia, face gradual decline aligned with the adoption of newer regimens. Pfizer’s revenue from TOPOSAR has plateaued, with estimates suggesting a slow decline over the next five years.

Market Penetration and Geographic Distribution

High-income regions, such as North America and Western Europe, prioritize targeted agents, marginalizing TOPOSAR’s market share. Conversely, emerging economies, where cost-effectiveness is pivotal, sustain a consistent demand for TOPOSAR, contributing to continued revenue streams.

Forecasted Growth and Decline

Analysts project a compound annual decline rate (CAGR) of approximately 2-3% over the next five years, driven by decreasing monotherapy use but stabilized in combination protocols. The drug’s role in pediatric protocols and in low-income regions provides a buffer against rapid obsolescence.

Potential Revenue Opportunities

Development of new formulations—oral options or combination kits—could revitalize sales marginally. Additionally, expanding indications (such as in specific hematologic malignancies or other cancers) may temporarily offset declines.


Future Market Outlook

Innovations and Pipeline Developments

Indeed, while no major late-stage pipeline products are directly challenging TOPOSAR, research into its derivatives or new delivery systems may influence future market positioning. Meanwhile, continual improvements in supportive care can prolong clinical utility.

Market Consolidation Trends

Pharmaceutical companies are increasingly consolidating to optimize oncology portfolios. Smaller players focused on generic production may increase market pressure, further compressing TOPOSAR’s revenue prospects.

Global Access and Emerging Markets

In low-income settings, where cost remains the foremost concern, TOPOSAR’s role is likely to persist. Increasing access initiatives by global health agencies could reinforce its market in these regions.


Key Factors Influencing Financial Outcomes

  • Competitive landscape evolution with targeted immunotherapies.
  • Generic availability reducing price points.
  • Regulatory adjustments affecting prescribing guidelines.
  • Advancements in supportive care extending treatment regimens.
  • Geographic disparities influencing regional demand.

Conclusion

The market dynamics for TOPOSAR are characterized by gradual attrition, consistent utility in pediatric and resource-limited settings, and growing competition from innovative therapies. The drug’s financial trajectory reflects this landscape, with a modest decline anticipated over the coming years. Nonetheless, its proven efficacy, familiarity, and affordability sustain specific segments of its market. Stakeholders should monitor regulatory shifts and emerging clinical data, considering adaptation strategies to maintain relevance and optimize revenue streams.


Key Takeaways

  • Stable Role in Resource-Limited Settings: TOPOSAR retains demand where cost-effectiveness outweighs the appeal of targeted therapies.
  • Gradual Market Decline: Projected at a CAGR of 2-3%, driven by competition and evolving treatment standards.
  • Innovation Opportunities: Development of new formulations and expanded indications may mitigate revenue decline.
  • Global Health Equity Impact: Increasing access programs could prolong TOPOSAR’s usage in low-income regions.
  • Strategic Positioning: Companies should align with clinical guidelines and monitor pipeline developments to sustain market presence.

FAQs

1. What is the primary clinical use of TOPOSAR?
TOPOSAR is chiefly used in chemotherapy regimens for treating acute lymphoblastic leukemia, especially in pediatric cases, owing to its effectiveness as an antimetabolite.

2. How does the emergence of targeted therapies affect TOPOSAR’s market?
Targeted therapies offer higher remission rates and novel mechanisms, gradually supplanting traditional chemotherapeutic agents like TOPOSAR in developed regions, although cost and accessibility issues persist in many markets.

3. Are there any new developments planned for TOPOSAR?
Current research is focused on optimizing formulations and expanding indications; however, no significant late-stage pipeline products are directly challenging TOPOSAR’s core use at present.

4. What regions are expected to maintain strong demand for TOPOSAR?
Emerging markets and low-income countries will likely sustain demand, driven by cost considerations and existing healthcare infrastructures.

5. Will regulatory changes impact TOPOSAR’s market share?
Possibly. Stricter safety and efficacy requirements could influence prescribing practices, but TOPOSAR’s established approval status provides some resilience.


Sources

  1. [1] Pfizer’s official product information and global marketing reports.
  2. [2] Market intelligence reports from IQVIA and EvaluatePharma.
  3. [3] Clinical guidelines and treatment protocols for leukemia from NCCN and WHO.
  4. [4] Industry analyses on oncology therapeutics market trends.
  5. [5] Scientific literature on TOPOSAR’s efficacy and safety profiles.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.