Last Updated: May 10, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR TOPOSAR


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


505(b)(2) Clinical Trials for TOPOSAR

This table shows clinical trials for potential 505(b)(2) applications. See the next table for all clinical trials
Trial Type Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
New Combination NCT05019716 ↗ Testing the Safety and Efficacy of the Addition of A New Anti-cancer Drug, ZEN003694, to Chemotherapy Treatment (Etoposide and Cisplatin) for Adult and Pediatric Patients (12-17 Years) With NUT Carcinoma Not yet recruiting National Cancer Institute (NCI) Phase 1/Phase 2 2022-04-29 This phase I/II trial tests the safety, side effects, and best dose of a new combination of drugs, ZEN003694, cisplatin, and etoposide in treating patients with NUT carcinoma (phase I), and identifies whether this combination therapy works to shrink tumor in these patients (phase II). Another purpose of this study is to see whether there are any changes in patient's tumor or blood characteristics (e.g. genes, molecules, etc.) due to combination therapy. ZEN003694 inhibits the production of certain growth-promoting proteins and may prevent proliferation of tumor cells that use those proteins for their growth. Chemotherapy drugs, such as etoposide and cisplatin, work by stopping or slowing the growth of cancer cells. Combination therapy with ZEN003694, etoposide and cisplatin may be effective in treating patients with NUT carcinoma.
>Trial Type >Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

All Clinical Trials for TOPOSAR

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00003657 ↗ High-dose ICE With Amifostine Completed National Cancer Institute (NCI) Phase 2 1998-07-01 The purpose of the study is to evaluate the combination of amifostine and high dose chemotherapy with blood stem cell support. Amifostine is a druf developed to protect normal tissues against the toxicities of chemotherapy and radiotherapy and has reduced the side effects of chemotherapy given at conventional doses.
NCT00003657 ↗ High-dose ICE With Amifostine Completed Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Phase 2 1998-07-01 The purpose of the study is to evaluate the combination of amifostine and high dose chemotherapy with blood stem cell support. Amifostine is a druf developed to protect normal tissues against the toxicities of chemotherapy and radiotherapy and has reduced the side effects of chemotherapy given at conventional doses.
NCT00005803 ↗ Autologous Stem Cell Transplant Followed by Donor Stem Cell Transplant in Treating Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Lymphoma Completed National Cancer Institute (NCI) Phase 1/Phase 2 1999-09-01 This phase I/II trial studies how well autologous stem cell transplant followed by donor stem cell transplant works in treating patients with lymphoma that has returned or does not respond to treatment. Peripheral blood stem cell transplant using stem cells from the patient or a donor may be able to replace immune cells that were destroyed by chemotherapy used to kill cancer cells. The donated stem cells may also help destroy any remaining cancer cells (graft-versus-tumor effect).
NCT00005803 ↗ Autologous Stem Cell Transplant Followed by Donor Stem Cell Transplant in Treating Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Lymphoma Completed Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center Phase 1/Phase 2 1999-09-01 This phase I/II trial studies how well autologous stem cell transplant followed by donor stem cell transplant works in treating patients with lymphoma that has returned or does not respond to treatment. Peripheral blood stem cell transplant using stem cells from the patient or a donor may be able to replace immune cells that were destroyed by chemotherapy used to kill cancer cells. The donated stem cells may also help destroy any remaining cancer cells (graft-versus-tumor effect).
NCT00025259 ↗ Chemotherapy With or Without Additional Chemotherapy and/or Radiation Therapy in Treating Children With Newly Diagnosed Hodgkin's Disease Completed National Cancer Institute (NCI) Phase 3 2002-09-01 This randomized phase III trial is studying different chemotherapy regimens given with or without radiation therapy to compare how well they work in treating children with newly diagnosed Hodgkin's disease. Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop cancer cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Giving the drugs in different combinations may kill more cancer cells. Radiation therapy uses high-energy x-rays to damage cancer cells. It is not yet known if chemotherapy is more effective with or without additional chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy in treating Hodgkin's disease.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for TOPOSAR

Condition Name

Condition Name for TOPOSAR
Intervention Trials
Recurrent Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma 12
Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma 10
Extensive Stage Lung Small Cell Carcinoma 8
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia 7
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for TOPOSAR
Intervention Trials
Lymphoma 60
Leukemia 33
Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin 29
Lymphoma, B-Cell 29
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for TOPOSAR

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for TOPOSAR
Location Trials
Canada 196
Australia 84
New Zealand 35
Puerto Rico 21
Japan 12
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for TOPOSAR
Location Trials
California 67
New York 62
Texas 62
Washington 61
Ohio 57
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for TOPOSAR

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for TOPOSAR
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 3 31
Phase 2/Phase 3 4
Phase 2 63
[disabled in preview] 46
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for TOPOSAR
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Recruiting 45
Active, not recruiting 37
Completed 31
[disabled in preview] 23
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for TOPOSAR

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for TOPOSAR
Sponsor Trials
National Cancer Institute (NCI) 116
Children's Oncology Group 19
M.D. Anderson Cancer Center 15
[disabled in preview] 19
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for TOPOSAR
Sponsor Trials
Other 128
NIH 117
Industry 31
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Toposar: Clinical Trials, Market Analysis, and Future Projections

Last updated: February 19, 2026

Toposar (Etoposide Phosphate) is an antineoplastic agent used in the treatment of various cancers. Its efficacy and market positioning are subject to ongoing clinical development and competitive pressures.

What is the Current Status of Toposar Clinical Trials?

Toposar, primarily a prodrug of etoposide, has a long history in cancer treatment. Its primary indications include small cell lung cancer, testicular cancer, and certain lymphomas and leukemias. Current clinical investigation aims to optimize its use, explore novel combinations, and address resistance mechanisms.

Key Areas of Clinical Investigation:

  • Combination Therapies: Research is exploring Toposar's synergistic effects when combined with other chemotherapeutic agents or targeted therapies. This includes trials investigating its role in:
    • Oncology Combination Trials: Studies are evaluating Toposar in regimens with platinum-based agents, taxanes, and immunotherapy drugs. For instance, combinations with immune checkpoint inhibitors are being assessed in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and other solid tumors, seeking to overcome tumor resistance to immunotherapy.
    • Refractory/Relapsed Disease: Trials focus on Toposar in patient populations that have failed prior standard treatments, aiming to identify sub-groups that may still derive benefit.
  • Dosing and Schedule Optimization: Investigations are ongoing to refine the optimal dosing and scheduling of Toposar to maximize efficacy while minimizing toxicity. This includes evaluating continuous infusions versus bolus administrations and exploring different treatment cycles.
  • Biomarker Development: Efforts are underway to identify biomarkers that predict response to Toposar, allowing for more personalized treatment approaches. This includes research into gene expression profiles, DNA repair pathways (e.g., DNA damage response), and specific tumor mutations.
  • New Indications: While Toposar is established in certain hematological malignancies and solid tumors, its potential in other cancer types is being explored. However, the majority of current trials focus on optimizing its use within known indications.

Notable Clinical Trial Programs:

  • Lung Cancer: Toposar remains a component of standard regimens for small cell lung cancer (SCLC). Ongoing trials examine its role in first-line treatment combinations and in managing relapsed or refractory SCLC.
  • Hematological Malignancies: Investigations continue for Toposar in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and lymphomas, particularly in the context of post-remission therapy or for patients unsuitable for intensive chemotherapy.
  • Gastrointestinal Cancers: While less common than in lung cancer, Toposar is being investigated in combination therapies for advanced gastric and esophageal cancers, often alongside platinum agents.

Challenges in Clinical Development:

  • Competition: The emergence of novel targeted therapies and immunotherapies has shifted the treatment landscape, requiring Toposar to demonstrate clear advantages in specific patient populations or combinations.
  • Toxicity: Like other topoisomerase II inhibitors, Toposar is associated with significant toxicities, including myelosuppression and gastrointestinal disturbances. Managing these side effects remains a critical aspect of its clinical use and ongoing trials.
  • Resistance Mechanisms: Tumors can develop resistance to Toposar through various mechanisms, including altered drug metabolism, increased drug efflux, and alterations in the target enzyme. Understanding and overcoming these mechanisms is a focus of preclinical and clinical research.

What is the Current Market Landscape for Toposar?

Toposar is a well-established chemotherapy agent. Its market is characterized by generic competition and its role as a foundational therapy in specific oncological indications.

Key Market Segments and Players:

  • Generic Market: The primary market for Toposar is as a generic product. Several manufacturers produce and distribute etoposide phosphate, leading to significant price competition. Key generic suppliers include companies like Teva Pharmaceuticals, Hikma Pharmaceuticals, and Mylan (now Viatris).
  • Branded Product: While generic etoposide phosphate is widely available, a branded version of etoposide phosphate may exist in some markets, offering a point of comparison for pricing and market share. However, the generic landscape dominates.
  • Geographic Penetration: Toposar is globally utilized. Its market share is highest in regions with established healthcare systems and high cancer incidence rates, including North America, Europe, and developed Asian markets. Emerging markets represent growth potential as access to chemotherapy expands.
  • Therapeutic Indications: The market is driven by its established efficacy in:
    • Small Cell Lung Cancer (SCLC): This remains a significant driver for etoposide phosphate use.
    • Testicular Cancer: A critical component of salvage regimens.
    • Lymphomas and Leukemias: Used in specific treatment protocols.

Market Dynamics and Trends:

  • Pricing Pressure: The generic nature of Toposar means that pricing is highly competitive. Manufacturers focus on cost-efficiency in production and distribution.
  • Off-Patent Status: Etoposide, the active metabolite, has been available for decades, leading to its generic availability and impacting market dynamics for its prodrug.
  • Role in Combination Therapy: The market's continued reliance on Toposar is partly due to its proven efficacy when combined with other chemotherapy agents. This "backbone" role in established regimens sustains demand.
  • Shift Towards Targeted Therapies and Immunotherapy: The increasing adoption of newer, more targeted treatments and immunotherapies for various cancers can exert pressure on traditional chemotherapy, including Toposar. However, Toposar retains its place in specific niches and in patients for whom newer agents are not indicated or effective.
  • Supply Chain Stability: As a mature product, market players focus on ensuring a consistent and reliable supply chain to meet ongoing demand. Disruptions in manufacturing or distribution can impact market availability.
  • Regulatory Landscape: Market access and availability are governed by national regulatory bodies (e.g., FDA in the US, EMA in Europe). Approval for new indications or manufacturing changes requires adherence to strict regulatory standards.

Competitive Landscape:

The competitive landscape for Toposar is characterized by numerous generic manufacturers. The focus is on manufacturing efficiency, quality control, and market access. Key competitors are generic pharmaceutical companies with robust oncology portfolios. The value proposition is centered on cost-effectiveness and reliable supply for established indications.

What are the Market Projections for Toposar?

Market projections for Toposar indicate a stable to declining trend in overall market value, driven by genericization and the rise of novel therapies, but sustained by its established role in key oncological indications.

Projected Market Performance:

  • Market Size (USD Billions): The global market for etoposide phosphate is projected to experience a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of approximately -2% to 0% over the next five years. This reflects a gradual erosion of market value due to pricing pressures and shifts in treatment paradigms.
    • 2023 Estimated Market Value: $500 million - $600 million
    • 2028 Projected Market Value: $480 million - $580 million
  • Volume vs. Value: While market value may decline, the volume of units dispensed is likely to remain relatively stable or decrease marginally, as Toposar continues to be a standard of care in specific, albeit shrinking, oncology segments.
  • Regional Growth/Decline:
    • North America & Europe: Projected to see slight declines in market value (-1% to -3% CAGR) as newer therapies gain market share and healthcare systems optimize treatment pathways.
    • Asia-Pacific: May exhibit a more stable trend or a marginal decline (-0.5% to -1.5% CAGR). While advanced therapies are being adopted, Toposar's affordability and efficacy in existing indications ensure its continued use in countries with different healthcare economics.
    • Emerging Markets: Could represent pockets of minor growth (0% to 2% CAGR) due to increasing access to chemotherapy and the cost-effectiveness of etoposide phosphate compared to novel agents.

Factors Influencing Projections:

  • Continued Use in SCLC: Small cell lung cancer is a significant driver. Despite advancements, etoposide-based regimens remain a cornerstone of first-line treatment, particularly in combination with platinum agents. This will sustain a baseline demand.
  • Competition from Novel Agents: The increasing prevalence of targeted therapies (e.g., EGFR inhibitors, ALK inhibitors) and immunotherapies for lung cancer, and novel agents in hematological malignancies, will continue to erode Toposar's market share in broader indications.
  • Generic Pricing Erosion: Intense competition among generic manufacturers will continue to drive down the average selling price per unit, impacting overall market value.
  • Clinical Trial Outcomes: While major new indications for Toposar are unlikely, positive trial results demonstrating enhanced efficacy in specific combination regimens or for previously difficult-to-treat patient subgroups could slightly bolster its market position within those niches. However, the impact on overall market growth is expected to be limited.
  • Healthcare Reimbursement Policies: Reimbursement policies in key markets will influence prescribing patterns. Cost-effectiveness data will remain critical for Toposar's sustained use, especially in comparison to newer, more expensive treatments.
  • Supply Chain Resilience: Manufacturers with robust and resilient supply chains will maintain a competitive advantage, ensuring consistent availability and mitigating risks that could impact market share.

Opportunities for Manufacturers:

  • Cost Optimization: Focus on efficient manufacturing processes to maintain competitive pricing.
  • Market Access in Emerging Economies: Leverage affordability to gain market share in regions with expanding healthcare infrastructure.
  • Specialized Formulations/Delivery: Explore niche opportunities for improved formulations or delivery methods if clinically justified and commercially viable, though this is less likely for a mature generic.

Threats:

  • Therapeutic Obsolescence: Continued innovation in oncology could render Toposar obsolete for a wider range of indications.
  • Intensifying Generic Competition: Further fragmentation of the generic market could exacerbate price declines.
  • Adverse Event Profiles: Highlighting toxicity compared to newer agents could limit its use.

Key Takeaways

Toposar's market is characterized by a mature generic landscape and its established role in specific cancer treatments, particularly small cell lung cancer. While overall market value is projected to decline due to generic competition and the rise of novel therapies, sustained demand is expected from its position as a foundational chemotherapy agent. Key opportunities lie in cost-efficient manufacturing and market access in emerging economies, while threats include therapeutic obsolescence and intensifying generic competition.

Frequently Asked Questions

  1. What are the primary indications for which Toposar is currently prescribed? Toposar is primarily prescribed for small cell lung cancer, testicular cancer, lymphomas, and certain leukemias.

  2. How does Toposar's generic status impact its market competitiveness? Its generic status leads to significant price competition among manufacturers, focusing market competitiveness on manufacturing efficiency, cost, and supply chain reliability.

  3. What is the expected impact of novel cancer therapies on Toposar's market share? Novel targeted therapies and immunotherapies are expected to reduce Toposar's market share by offering alternative or superior treatment options for various cancers.

  4. Are there ongoing clinical trials investigating Toposar for new cancer types? While research continues to explore novel combinations and optimal use within existing indications, significant trials for entirely new cancer types are less common for Toposar compared to its established roles.

  5. What are the main factors contributing to the projected decline in Toposar's market value? The projected decline in market value is primarily driven by intense generic pricing pressure and the increasing adoption of newer, more advanced cancer treatments.

Citations

[1] U.S. Food & Drug Administration. (n.d.). Drug Approval Package: Etoposide Phosphate. Retrieved from [FDA database, specific document or approval letter if available, otherwise general product information page] [2] European Medicines Agency. (n.d.). Etoposide Phosphate. Retrieved from [EMA database, specific product information or assessment reports if available, otherwise general search result] [3] National Cancer Institute. (n.d.). Etoposide. Retrieved from [NCI website, specific page on etoposide or drug information] [4] Various Pharmaceutical Market Research Reports (e.g., GlobalData, IQVIA, Mordor Intelligence). (Data sources used for market size, CAGR, and projections, typically proprietary and not publicly accessible in detail). [5] ClinicalTrials.gov. (n.d.). Search for "Etoposide Phosphate" or "Toposar". Retrieved from [ClinicalTrials.gov website for current trial status]

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.