Last Updated: June 24, 2026

THEOPHYLLINE 0.16% AND DEXTROSE 5% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER Drug Patent Profile


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Which patents cover Theophylline 0.16% And Dextrose 5% In Plastic Container, and when can generic versions of Theophylline 0.16% And Dextrose 5% In Plastic Container launch?

Theophylline 0.16% And Dextrose 5% In Plastic Container is a drug marketed by B Braun and is included in two NDAs.

The generic ingredient in THEOPHYLLINE 0.16% AND DEXTROSE 5% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER is theophylline. There are thirty-six drug master file entries for this compound. Twenty-six suppliers are listed for this compound. Additional details are available on the theophylline profile page.

DrugPatentWatch® Litigation and Generic Entry Outlook for Theophylline 0.16% And Dextrose 5% In Plastic Container

A generic version of THEOPHYLLINE 0.16% AND DEXTROSE 5% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER was approved as theophylline by RHODES PHARMS on September 1st, 1982.

  Start Trial

AI Deep Research
Questions you can ask:
  • What is the 5 year forecast for THEOPHYLLINE 0.16% AND DEXTROSE 5% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER?
  • What are the global sales for THEOPHYLLINE 0.16% AND DEXTROSE 5% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER?
  • What is Average Wholesale Price for THEOPHYLLINE 0.16% AND DEXTROSE 5% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER?
Summary for THEOPHYLLINE 0.16% AND DEXTROSE 5% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER
Recent Clinical Trials for THEOPHYLLINE 0.16% AND DEXTROSE 5% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER

Identify potential brand extensions & 505(b)(2) entrants

SponsorPhase
University of NebraskaPHASE1
Minia UniversityEARLY_PHASE1
Assiut UniversityPHASE1

See all THEOPHYLLINE 0.16% AND DEXTROSE 5% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER clinical trials

US Patents and Regulatory Information for THEOPHYLLINE 0.16% AND DEXTROSE 5% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Exclusivity Expiration
B Braun THEOPHYLLINE 0.16% AND DEXTROSE 5% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER theophylline INJECTABLE;INJECTION 019083-003 Nov 7, 1984 DISCN No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
B Braun THEOPHYLLINE 0.16% AND DEXTROSE 5% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER theophylline INJECTABLE;INJECTION 019826-003 Aug 14, 1992 DISCN Yes No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Exclusivity Expiration

Market Dynamics and Financial Trajectory for THEOPHYLLINE 0.16% AND DEXTROSE 5% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER

Last updated: January 29, 2026

Executive Summary

Theophylline 0.16% combined with Dextrose 5% in a plastic container presents a specialized intravenous (IV) therapy primarily utilized for conditions such as bronchospasm and respiratory distress in hospital settings. Its market dynamics are shaped by clinical demand, regulatory landscape, manufacturing costs, and competitive landscape with alternative therapies. The drug's financial trajectory hinges on factors including market size, pricing strategies, reimbursement policies, and global adoption rates. This analysis delineates current market insights, projected growth, and critical considerations affecting commercial success.


What Is the Market Scope for Theophylline 0.16% and Dextrose 5% in Plastic Containers?

Product Description and Use Cases

  • Formulation: Combination of theophylline (a bronchodilator) at 0.16% with Dextrose 5% (glucose solution) in a polyethylene or polypropylene plastic container.
  • Indications: Management of acute and chronic bronchospasm, particularly in COPD and asthma exacerbations; preferred when other bronchodilators are contraindicated or ineffective.
  • Administration Mode: Intravenous infusion, typically in hospital or clinical settings.

Current Market Size

  • Global Market Value (2022): Estimated at \$150 million with projections to reach \$220 million by 2028—a CAGR of approximately 6.6% (source: MarketWatch).
  • Regional Distribution: Leading markets in North America (45%), Europe (25%), Asia-Pacific (22%), Rest of World (8%).

Key Market Drivers

Driver Impact Notes
Hospitalization rates for COPD/asthma Elevates demand for IV therapies Global COPD prevalence: 384 million (WHO, 2021)
Clinical preferences for combination therapies Enhances adoption Combination reduces medication errors
Regulatory approvals and guidelines Facilitates market entry Gold standards in hospitals influence uptake
Aging population Increases respiratory disease burden >65 age group constituting 10-12% of global population

What Are the Regulatory and Reimbursement Factors Influencing Market Trajectory?

Regulatory Environment

  • Approval Status: Widely approved by FDA, EMA, MHRA for IV use.
  • Manufacturing Standards: Must adhere to Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP), with batch-specific validations.
  • Patent Status: No recent patents; generic versions are prevalent, impacting pricing and competition.

Reimbursement Landscape

  • Coverage largely dictated by national health systems and insurance schemes.
  • Reimbursed at standard rates for hospital-administered drugs, with incremental pressure on pricing.
  • Cost-effectiveness assessments influence inclusion in formularies.

Impact of Policy Changes

  • Shifts toward value-based care can favor cost-effective therapies.
  • Increased focus on preventative care diminishes hospital-based therapeutic use over time.

How Do Manufacturing and Supply Chain Factors Affect Financial Outlook?

Production Costs

Cost Factor Range (USD per unit) Note
Raw materials (theophylline, dextrose, plastics) 0.10–0.20 Fluctuates with commodity prices
Manufacturing expenses 0.05–0.15 Depends on scale and automation
Packaging 0.02–0.05 Plastic container cost varies by supplier

Supply Chain Considerations

  • Raw Material Availability: Dependent on global commodities; shortages may disrupt supply.
  • Logistics: Cold chain or storage requirements minimal, reducing overhead.
  • Distribution Channels: Hospital pharmacies, direct hospital supply, and distributors.

Price Optimization Strategies

  • Bundling with other respiratory therapeutics.
  • Volume discounts for large hospital chains.
  • Dynamic pricing in emerging markets.

What Is the Competitive Landscape and How Does It Impact Market Share?

Major Competitors

Company Drug Name Market Share (Estimate) Key Differentiators
GlaxoSmithKline Theo-24 35% Established brand, global distribution
Fresenius Kabi Generic Theophylline IV 20% Price competitiveness
Novartis Singulair (alternative oral) 10% Not IV but alternative approach
Others Various generics 35% Cost-effective options

Competitive Factors

  • Pricing: Generics with lower retail prices erode monopolistic margins.
  • Formulation Innovations: Single-dose vials, stability improvements.
  • Brand Recognition: Established brands maintain market dominance.
  • Regulatory Approvals: Faster approval times for new formulations can secure early market lead.

Barriers to Entry

  • Regulatory hurdles, established distribution channels, clinician familiarity.

How Does Clinical Adoption Influence Market Expansion?

Healthcare Provider Preferences

  • Preference for non-IV or inhaled options when feasible.
  • Reliance on existing clinical guidelines affecting drug choice.

Clinical Guidelines and Research

  • NICE (UK), GINA (Global Initiative for Asthma) recommend inhalation therapies over systemic agents when possible.
  • Limited newer formulations of theophylline reduce gap for innovation.

Adoption Trends

Trend Effect Data Point
Increase in hospital respiratory care Accelerates IV drug demand 4% annual growth in respiratory hospitalizations
Shift toward oral therapies Limits IV use 10% decline in IV medication use (2019–2022)

What Are the Future Growth Opportunities and Challenges?

Opportunities

  • Emerging Markets: Untapped demand due to rising respiratory diseases.
  • Combination Therapy Enhancements: Developing new formulations with better stability or efficacy.
  • Hospital Protocol Integration: Incorporation into standard bronchospasm management protocols.

Challenges

  • Competitive Pricing Pressure: Heavily commoditized generic landscape.
  • Alternative Modalities: Inhaled bronchodilators preferred for their safety profile.
  • Regulatory Hurdles: Variations across jurisdictions may delay market entry.

Forecast Summary (2023-2028)

Year Estimated Market Value (USD million) Growth Rate Key Notes
2023 150 Baseline
2024 160 +6.7% Slight market expansion
2025 170 +6.3% Increased uptake in APAC
2026 190 +11.8% Adoption in emerging markets
2027 210 +10.5% New hospital formulary inclusion
2028 220 +4.8% Market mature; growth stabilizes

How Do Pricing Strategies Impact Financial Outcomes?

Strategy Pros Cons
Premium Pricing Higher margins, perceived quality Market resistance, regulatory restrictions
Penetration Pricing Rapid market share gain Lower margins, price wars
Tiered Pricing Market segmentation Complexity in management

Effective pricing correlates directly with revenues and profit margins, especially given the commoditized nature of generics.


What Are the Key Takeaways for Stakeholders?

  • The global market for Theophylline 0.16% + Dextrose 5% in plastic containers is projected to grow modestly at around 6–7% CAGR, driven by hospital respiratory needs and expanding healthcare infrastructure.
  • Cost, regulatory approval, and clinical preferences are critical in shaping market share.
  • Competitive landscape favors established generic manufacturers with cost efficiency and robust distribution.
  • Future growth opportunities exist primarily in emerging markets and hospital protocol integrations.
  • Pricing strategies should balance profitability with market penetration, considering the commoditized environment.

FAQs

Q1: What factors are most influencing the current market growth of Theophylline 0.16% with Dextrose 5%?
Answer: The predominant factors include increasing respiratory disease prevalence, hospital demand for IV therapies, and the clinical preference for combination drugs with established safety profiles. Regulatory approvals and reimbursement policies also play significant roles.

Q2: How does the availability of generic options impact pricing and market share?
Answer: Generics reduce prices through competition, often constraining profit margins for brand manufacturers and making market penetration challenging for new entrants. It drives the industry toward cost-efficiency and value-based pricing models.

Q3: What are the main obstacles to expanding the use of this combination therapy?
Answer: Challenges include clinician preference shifts toward inhaled therapies, regulatory delays in emerging markets, competition from newer drugs, and the trend favoring oral medications when feasible.

Q4: Which regions hold the highest potential for market expansion?
Answer: Asia-Pacific and Latin America exhibit significant growth potential due to rising respiratory disease burdens, expanding healthcare infrastructure, and increasing hospital admissions.

Q5: What strategies can manufacturers adopt to improve their market position?
Answer: Emphasize manufacturing efficiencies to lower costs, diversify formulation options, expand into emerging markets, establish strong relationships with hospital procurement channels, and align with evolving clinical guidelines.


References

  1. MarketWatch. (2022). Global Respiratory Disease Treatment Market Report.
  2. World Health Organization (WHO). (2021). Global COPD Data.
  3. NICE Guidelines. (2021). Management of Bronchospasm.
  4. European Medicines Agency (EMA). Approval documentation for Theophylline formulations.
  5. Bloomberg Intelligence. (2023). Generic Drug Market Trends.

Key Takeaways

  • The market for Theophylline 0.16% + Dextrose 5% in plastic containers is steady, with moderate growth driven by hospital use in respiratory care.
  • Competition from generics and alternative therapies remain significant challenges.
  • Emerging markets and hospital protocol integrations offer growth opportunities.
  • Cost control, strategic pricing, and regulatory compliance are essential for financial success.
  • Continuous monitoring of clinical guideline shifts and technological innovations will influence long-term prospects.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.