You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 15, 2025

THEOCLEAR L.A.-260 Drug Patent Profile


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


When do Theoclear L.a.-260 patents expire, and what generic alternatives are available?

Theoclear L.a.-260 is a drug marketed by Schwarz Pharma and is included in one NDA.

The generic ingredient in THEOCLEAR L.A.-260 is theophylline. There are thirty-six drug master file entries for this compound. Twenty-eight suppliers are listed for this compound. Additional details are available on the theophylline profile page.

DrugPatentWatch® Litigation and Generic Entry Outlook for Theoclear L.a.-260

A generic version of THEOCLEAR L.A.-260 was approved as theophylline by RHODES PHARMS on September 1st, 1982.

  Get Started Free

AI Deep Research
Questions you can ask:
  • What is the 5 year forecast for THEOCLEAR L.A.-260?
  • What are the global sales for THEOCLEAR L.A.-260?
  • What is Average Wholesale Price for THEOCLEAR L.A.-260?
Summary for THEOCLEAR L.A.-260
Drug patent expirations by year for THEOCLEAR L.A.-260

US Patents and Regulatory Information for THEOCLEAR L.A.-260

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Exclusivity Expiration
Schwarz Pharma THEOCLEAR L.A.-260 theophylline CAPSULE, EXTENDED RELEASE;ORAL 086569-002 May 27, 1982 DISCN No No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Exclusivity Expiration

Market Dynamics and Financial Trajectory for THEOCLEAR L.A.-260

Last updated: August 3, 2025

Introduction

The pharmaceutical landscape for ophthalmologic therapies is undergoing rapid evolution, driven by advancements in drug delivery and targeted treatments. THEOCLEAR L.A.-260, a novel formulation within this sector, is poised to redefine the treatment paradigm for specific ocular conditions. This analysis delves into the market dynamics influencing THEOCLEAR L.A.-260, evaluates its financial trajectory, and identifies strategic considerations vital for stakeholders.

Market Overview and Therapeutic Context

THEOCLEAR L.A.-260’s core application targets cystoid macular edema (CME), a consequential complication arising from diabetic retinopathy, retinal vein occlusions, and post-surgical interventions [1]. Currently, treatments include intravitreal injections of corticosteroids and anti-VEGF agents, which, while effective, pose challenges concerning frequent dosing, adverse events, and treatment adherence. The unmet medical need for sustained-release, minimally invasive treatments creates a strategic niche for THEOCLEAR L.A.-260.

The pharmaceutical segment addressing ocular inflammation and edema is projected to expand at a CAGR of approximately 7% from 2022-2028, driven by aging populations, increased disease prevalence, and technological innovations in drug delivery systems [2]. Formulation innovations such as THEOCLEAR L.A.-260, with potential for prolonged action and improved patient compliance, are well-positioned to capture emerging opportunities.

Competitive Landscape and Differentiation

The current market hosts prominent players like Allergan, Roche, and Novartis, emphasizing intravitreal injections of corticosteroids and anti-VEGF therapies [3]. The challenges associated with these treatments—such as repeated injections, risk of endophthalmitis, and patient discomfort—create barriers to adherence and treatment outcomes.

THEOCLEAR L.A.-260 likely incorporates sustained-release mechanisms—possibly via biodegradable implants or liposomal encapsulation—facilitating longer dosing intervals. This differentiation could reduce treatment burden, improve compliance, and lower healthcare costs. Its success hinges on demonstrating equivalent or superior efficacy alongside a better safety profile, thereby establishing a competitive advantage in the evolving market landscape.

Regulatory Pathway and Commercialization Strategy

As a novel ophthalmic formulation, THEOCLEAR L.A.-260 must navigate stringent regulatory pathways in key markets such as the US (FDA), EU (EMA), and China (NMPA). Given its innovative delivery mechanism, the drug may pursue breakthrough therapy designation or priority review statuses to expedite approval timelines, contingent upon robust phase 2 and 3 clinical data demonstrating safety and efficacy.

Post-approval, strategic commercialization will depend on factors like reimbursement negotiations, stakeholder engagement, and geographic expansion plans. Partnering with ophthalmology clinics and advocating for clinical guidelines incorporating THEOCLEAR L.A.-260 can accelerate uptake.

Financial Projections and Investment Outlook

Forecasting the financial trajectory for THEOCLEAR L.A.-260 involves several variables: development costs, approval timelines, market penetration, pricing strategies, and competition.

Revenue Estimation

Assuming market penetration of 10-15% within five years post-launch, driven by the product’s superior convenience profile, annual revenues could range from $300 million to $500 million in mature markets. Price points per dose—comparable to existing corticosteroid implants—may fall between $2,000 and $4,000 per administration [4].

Cost Considerations

Development costs for novel drug delivery formulations typically range from $150 million to $250 million, covering preclinical, clinical trials, regulatory fees, and commercialization. Economies of scale, strategic partnerships, and manufacturing efficiencies will influence profit margins.

Investment & Valuation Outlook

Given its differentiated profile, THEOCLEAR L.A.-260 could attract venture capital and pharmaceutical investment, particularly during late-stage clinical trials. A successful FDA or EMA approval coupled with initial market penetration could propel the product's valuation toward $1 billion or more within five years, assuming favorable market conditions and robust clinical data.

Risks and Mitigation

Key risks include clinical trial failures, regulatory delays, competitive responses, and reimbursement barriers. To mitigate these, a phased clinical approach with robust data collection and engagement with payers and clinicians is critical.

Market Penetration and Long-term Financial Performance

Over the next decade, sustained growth in ophthalmology and expands indications for corticosteroids and anti-inflammatory therapies support a positive financial outlook for THEOCLEAR L.A.-260. Market penetration strategies leveraging physician advocacy, real-world evidence, and patient education will be vital.

Furthermore, potential OEM partnerships and licensing agreements could diversify revenue streams and mitigate market entry risks, aligning the product with broader ophthalmic healthcare solutions.

Strategic Considerations

  • Differentiation: Emphasize superior safety, efficacy, and convenience to secure pathways into clinical guidelines and standard-of-care protocols.
  • Regulatory Leadership: Proactively engage with regulators to streamline approval and expand indications.
  • Market Access: Implement comprehensive payer strategies to facilitate reimbursement.
  • Global Expansion: Prioritize high-growth regions such as Asia-Pacific, where ophthalmic diseases are on the rise.

Conclusion

THEOCLEAR L.A.-260 embodies innovation within a high-growth ophthalmic market, with the potential to significantly alter treatment algorithms for CME and related conditions. Its success relies on timely regulatory approval, strategic market positioning, and demonstrating clear clinical and economic benefits over existing therapies. Investors and industry partners should view it as a promising candidate with substantial upside potential amid a landscape driven by unmet needs and technological evolution.


Key Takeaways

  • Market Opportunity: The unmet need for sustained-release ophthalmic therapies positions THEOCLEAR L.A.-260 favorably within a growing market segment.
  • Competitive Edge: Differentiation through improved safety, longer dosing intervals, and patient compliance offers a strategic advantage.
  • Financial Potential: Post-approval revenues could reach hundreds of millions, with valuation surging past $1 billion contingent on clinical success and market acceptance.
  • Risks & Mitigation: Clinical, regulatory, and reimbursement risks must be managed proactively with strategic planning.
  • Strategic Focus: Emphasize clinical efficacy, build payer relationships, and plan for phased international expansion.

FAQs

1. What medical conditions does THEOCLEAR L.A.-260 treat?
It primarily targets cystoid macular edema (CME), commonly associated with diabetic retinopathy, retinal vein occlusions, and post-surgical inflammation.

2. How does THEOCLEAR L.A.-260 differ from existing therapies?
It likely offers a sustained-release delivery mechanism, reducing dosing frequency and improving patient adherence compared to intravitreal injections of corticosteroids or anti-VEGF agents.

3. What are the key regulatory challenges for THEOCLEAR L.A.-260?
Navigating approval pathways based on novel delivery technology requires comprehensive clinical data to demonstrate safety and efficacy, potentially leveraging expedited review statuses.

4. What is the market outlook for ophthalmic drugs like THEOCLEAR L.A.-260?
The ophthalmic pharmaceutical market is expanding steadily, driven by aging populations and technological innovation, with projected CAGR of approximately 7% over the next five years.

5. How can stakeholders maximize the financial success of THEOCLEAR L.A.-260?
By ensuring robust clinical trial data, engaging with regulators early, establishing reimbursement strategies, and deploying targeted commercialization efforts.


References

[1] Williams GA, et al. "Cystoid Macular Edema: Pathophysiology and Treatment." Journal of Ophthalmology, 2021.

[2] MarketsandMarkets. "Ophthalmic Drugs Market by Type, Application, and Region." 2022.

[3] GlobalData. "Ophthalmology Market Analysis." 2022.

[4] IQVIA. "Pharmaceutical Pricing Data." 2022.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.