Last Updated: June 6, 2026

NEXIUM 24HR Drug Patent Profile


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Which patents cover Nexium 24hr, and when can generic versions of Nexium 24hr launch?

Nexium 24hr is a drug marketed by Astrazeneca Lp and is included in two NDAs.

The generic ingredient in NEXIUM 24HR is esomeprazole magnesium. There are seventy-four drug master file entries for this compound. One hundred and ten suppliers are listed for this compound. Additional details are available on the esomeprazole magnesium profile page.

DrugPatentWatch® Litigation and Generic Entry Outlook for Nexium 24hr

A generic version of NEXIUM 24HR was approved as esomeprazole magnesium by MYLAN on August 2nd, 2015.

  Start Trial

AI Deep Research
Questions you can ask:
  • What is the 5 year forecast for NEXIUM 24HR?
  • What are the global sales for NEXIUM 24HR?
  • What is Average Wholesale Price for NEXIUM 24HR?
Recent Clinical Trials for NEXIUM 24HR

Identify potential brand extensions & 505(b)(2) entrants

SponsorPhase
Livzon Pharmaceutical Group Inc.PHASE3
Bio-innova Co., LtdPHASE1
Alexandria UniversityPhase 3

See all NEXIUM 24HR clinical trials

Pharmacology for NEXIUM 24HR
Paragraph IV (Patent) Challenges for NEXIUM 24HR
Tradename Dosage Ingredient Strength NDA ANDAs Submitted Submissiondate
NEXIUM 24HR Delayed-release Capsules esomeprazole magnesium 20 mg 204655 2014-04-24

US Patents and Regulatory Information for NEXIUM 24HR

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Exclusivity Expiration
Astrazeneca Lp NEXIUM 24HR esomeprazole magnesium CAPSULE, DELAYED RELEASE;ORAL 204655-001 Mar 28, 2014 OTC Yes Yes ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Astrazeneca Lp NEXIUM 24HR esomeprazole magnesium TABLET, DELAYED RELEASE;ORAL 207920-001 Nov 23, 2015 OTC Yes Yes ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Exclusivity Expiration

International Patents for NEXIUM 24HR

See the table below for patents covering NEXIUM 24HR around the world.

Country Patent Number Title Estimated Expiration
Montenegro P18008 ⤷  Start Trial
Egypt 22373 New pharmaceutical formulation ⤷  Start Trial
South Korea 100540720 ⤷  Start Trial
Finland 114008 ⤷  Start Trial
Hungary 0001849 ⤷  Start Trial
China 1126993 ⤷  Start Trial
>Country >Patent Number >Title >Estimated Expiration

Supplementary Protection Certificates for NEXIUM 24HR

Patent Number Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration SPC Description
0984957 430 Finland ⤷  Start Trial
0984957 1290006-4 Sweden ⤷  Start Trial PRODUCT NAME: ACETYLSALICYLSYRA OCH ESOMEPRAZOLMAGNESIUMTRIHYDRAT; NAT. REG. NO/DATE: MTNR 44371 20110930; FIRST REG.: PT 5402359MFL 20110812
0984957 300483 Netherlands ⤷  Start Trial PRODUCT NAME: NAXOPREN EN ESOMEPRAZOL ALS MAGNESIUMTRIHYDRAAT; NATIONAL REGISTRATION NO/DATE: RVG 106235 20101118; FIRST REGISTRATION: GB PL 17091/0263 - 0001 20101105
0984957 122012000017 Germany ⤷  Start Trial PRODUCT NAME: ASPIRIN UND ESOMEPRAZOL - MAGNESIUM-TRIHYDRAT; NAT. REGISTRATION NO/DATE: 81047.00.00 20110930 FIRST REGISTRATION: PORTUGAL 5402359 5402367 5402375 20110812
0124495 SPC/GB01/006 United Kingdom ⤷  Start Trial PRODUCT NAME: ESOMEPRAZOLE AS MAGNESIUM TRIHYDRATE; REGISTERED: SE 15945 20000310; SE 15946 20000310; UK PL 17901/0068-0069 20000727
0984957 C300517 Netherlands ⤷  Start Trial PRODUCT NAME: ACETYLSALICYLZUUR EN ESOMEPRAZOLMAGNESIUMTRIHYDRAAT; NAT. REGISTRATION NO/DATE: RVG 107516 20110912; FIRST REGISTRATION: 540235954023675402375 2011120812
>Patent Number >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration >SPC Description

NEXIUM 24HR (esomeprazole magnesium) — Market Dynamics and Financial Trajectory

Last updated: April 24, 2026

What is NEXIUM 24HR’s market position and revenue model?

NEXIUM 24HR is an over-the-counter (OTC) and prescription branded product containing esomeprazole magnesium, a proton pump inhibitor (PPI). In the US, its market position is shaped by (1) long-term class demand for acid suppression, (2) competitive generic penetration for esomeprazole, and (3) brand retention through OTC format, dosing convenience, and historical prescribing familiarity.

Pricing and channel reality

  • Prescription channel: Revenue is constrained by generic esomeprazole erosion as branded NEXIUM prescription share declines with patent/generic availability.
  • OTC channel: OTC continues to support a premium brand price versus generics sold as store-brand PPIs, but it faces periodic promotional intensity from category competitors (other PPIs and H2 blockers).
  • Formulation constraint: “24HR” branding tracks once-daily acid suppression expectations, which is a core purchase driver for consumer selection within OTC GI products.

Business model implications

  • Brand spend discipline matters: Once generics dominate the base molecule, incremental branded revenue depends on maintaining shelf presence, trade terms, and DTC/field pull-through (for Rx) where applicable.
  • Mix shift drives financial outcome: If OTC mix strengthens, brand economics can improve even when Rx declines, because OTC can carry a higher effective price per unit sold.

How do market dynamics affect Nexium 24HR demand?

1) Generic substitution is the dominant structural force

For established PPIs, the primary long-run dynamic is generic substitution of esomeprazole. That pressure reduces branded unit share and compresses pricing. As a result, branded financial trajectory tends to follow:

  • Early branded durability driven by differentiation and clinician habits
  • Then a steady decline in Rx share as generics expand
  • Then stabilization via OTC branding if consumer awareness and convenience remain strong

2) OTC category competition sets promo intensity

OTC GI acid products are typically value-engineered and promo-driven around seasonal and promotion calendar cycles. Nexium 24HR competes against:

  • Other OTC PPIs (class competitors with similar onset and duration claims)
  • H2 blockers in overlapping “occasional heartburn” segments
  • Store brands and private labels that reduce consumer willingness to pay

3) Regulatory and labeling constraints impact claim-driven growth

OTC PPIs have defined indications and usage limitations that reduce growth optionality. Growth tends to come from:

  • Expanded distribution access (shelf and ecommerce)
  • Maintaining compliance of consumer messaging with labeling
  • Leveraging “complete 24-hour coverage” style positioning within allowed marketing claims

What is the financial trajectory pattern for Nexium 24HR (brand economics under generic pressure)?

Because branded NEXIUM revenues are influenced by both Rx and OTC, the financial trajectory generally follows a two-phase curve:

Phase 1: Prescription-led brand peak

  • Branded revenues grow or remain robust when fewer generics compete.
  • Financial trajectory is sensitive to managed care contracting, formulary status, and payer step therapy.

Phase 2: Sustained decline with OTC ballast

  • Generic penetration lowers net price and share in Rx.
  • OTC can partially offset decline if brand trust and shelf performance persist.

Observed trajectory logic (what moves the P&L)

Key levers that determine whether NEXIUM 24HR stabilizes or keeps sliding:

  • Effective net price (gross price less rebates and trade spend)
  • Unit share (store and online shelf placement)
  • OTC category growth (household adoption of daily acid suppression vs intermittent relief)
  • Competitive promo cycles (especially during seasonal heartburn and back-to-routine periods)

What does “NEXIUM 24HR” vs “esomeprazole generics” imply for margins and sustainability?

Brand premium is not permanent, but it is recurring

Even with generic pressure, branded PPIs often sustain a margin advantage where:

  • Consumers perceive better outcomes or convenience
  • Retailers maintain brand-endorsed shelf space
  • Trade terms support a stable distribution footprint

Generic price ceilings

Generics set a pricing floor in many channels. That compresses branded gross margin over time, making branded profitability more dependent on:

  • Cost discipline (marketing and supply chain)
  • Share protection actions
  • OTC mix optimization

Which competitive forces most directly shape Nexium 24HR performance?

Competitive set

NEXIUM 24HR competes within the OTC and Rx PPI universe. Competitive pressure typically comes from:

  • Same-class PPIs with similar once-daily positioning
  • Payers shifting to generics post formulary churn
  • Retail promo calendars that influence OTC conversion

Switching dynamics

Switching is frequent after generic entry because:

  • The active ingredient is the same (esomeprazole)
  • Substitution is easier for consumer products where differentiation is less about molecule performance and more about price, pack size, and claim confidence

How do US regulatory and channel structures influence sales volatility?

OTC accessibility lowers friction, but also raises price competition

OTC availability supports steady demand, but it also invites:

  • Private label competition
  • Aggressive retailer promotions
  • Periodic shifts in consumer basket mix

Rx channel depends on formulary rules

Where branded Rx remains present, performance depends on:

  • Step therapy policies
  • Formulary tiering (generic preferred)
  • Prior authorization and quantity limits

These policies can cause abrupt volume declines even when total class demand grows.


What is the likely financial trajectory for NEXIUM 24HR over the next several years?

A branded PPI like NEXIUM 24HR typically trends toward:

  • Long-run volume pressure from generic substitution
  • Net sales stabilization via OTC presence
  • Gradual margin compression from pricing pressure and promotional intensity

Net effect: a slower decline or plateau in top-line is possible if OTC mix holds up; otherwise, declines continue with branded unit share loss. The decisive determinant is whether OTC share and effective pricing remain resilient against competitor promo cycles.


Key Takeaways

  • NEXIUM 24HR’s demand is structurally constrained by generic substitution for esomeprazole, which drives long-term Rx erosion.
  • OTC format supports stabilization, but it also increases exposure to retail promotion intensity and private label competition.
  • Financial trajectory is dominated by net price and mix, not by fundamental expansion of the PPI class alone.
  • Sustainability depends on share protection in OTC channels and cost discipline as pricing pressure intensifies.

FAQs

1) Is NEXIUM 24HR growth driven by new clinical breakthroughs?

No. Its market behavior is primarily driven by channel mix (Rx versus OTC) and pricing power under generic substitution, not by new mechanism-based differentiation.

2) Why does the 24-hour branding matter economically?

It aligns with consumer purchase logic for once-daily convenience and “duration” expectations, supporting shelf conversion even when active ingredient equivalence exists across competitors.

3) What most often causes branded revenue drops for NEXIUM in the US?

Formulary and step-therapy shifts that favor generics, plus trade and promotional dynamics that compress net pricing.

4) Can OTC fully offset Rx losses for NEXIUM 24HR?

It can offset only part of Rx erosion. Sustained OTC performance depends on maintaining effective price and share amid heavy retail competition.

5) Where is the biggest risk to NEXIUM 24HR profitability?

Margin compression from ongoing promotional intensity and pricing pressure, especially as competitor OTC PPIs and private labels compete for share.


References (APA)

[1] Eli Lilly and Company. (n.d.). Nexium 24HR (esomeprazole magnesium) product information. https://www.nexium24hr.com/
[2] FDA. (n.d.). Drug products and databases (labeling/approval information for esomeprazole products). https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.