Last Updated: August 2, 2026

MULTIHANCE MULTIPACK Drug Patent Profile


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


When do Multihance Multipack patents expire, and what generic alternatives are available?

Multihance Multipack is a drug marketed by Bracco and is included in one NDA.

The generic ingredient in MULTIHANCE MULTIPACK is gadobenate dimeglumine. One supplier is listed for this compound. Additional details are available on the gadobenate dimeglumine profile page.

AI Deep Research
Questions you can ask:
  • What is the 5 year forecast for MULTIHANCE MULTIPACK?
  • What are the global sales for MULTIHANCE MULTIPACK?
  • What is Average Wholesale Price for MULTIHANCE MULTIPACK?
Summary for MULTIHANCE MULTIPACK
Pharmacology for MULTIHANCE MULTIPACK

US Patents and Regulatory Information for MULTIHANCE MULTIPACK

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Exclusivity Expiration
Bracco MULTIHANCE MULTIPACK gadobenate dimeglumine INJECTABLE;INTRAVENOUS 021358-001 Nov 23, 2004 RX Yes Yes ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Bracco MULTIHANCE MULTIPACK gadobenate dimeglumine INJECTABLE;INTRAVENOUS 021358-002 Nov 23, 2004 RX Yes Yes ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Exclusivity Expiration

Expired US Patents for MULTIHANCE MULTIPACK

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date Patent No. Patent Expiration
Bracco MULTIHANCE MULTIPACK gadobenate dimeglumine INJECTABLE;INTRAVENOUS 021358-001 Nov 23, 2004 4,916,246 ⤷  Start Trial
Bracco MULTIHANCE MULTIPACK gadobenate dimeglumine INJECTABLE;INTRAVENOUS 021358-002 Nov 23, 2004 4,916,246 ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >Patent No. >Patent Expiration

Supplementary Protection Certificates for MULTIHANCE MULTIPACK

Patent Number Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration SPC Description
0230893 SPC/GB97/081 United Kingdom ⤷  Start Trial PRODUCT NAME: GADOBENATE DIMEGLUMINE; REGISTERED: UK 06099/0006 19970722
0230893 99C0013 Belgium ⤷  Start Trial PRODUCT NAME: GADOBENAATDIMEGLUMINE; NAT. REGISTRATION NO/DATE: 3503 IE 48 F 12 19990201; FIRST REGISTRATION: GB PL 06099/0006 19970722
0230893 C980024 Netherlands ⤷  Start Trial PRODUCT NAME: GADOBEENZUUR,DESGEWENST IN DE VORM VAN EEN ZOUT MET EEN ALKA- LIMETAAL, AARDALKALIMETAAL, OF BASISCH GEPROTONEERD AMINOZUUR OF VAN EEN ALKYLAMMONIUM-, ALKANOLAMMONIUM- OF POLYHYDROXYAL- KYLAMMONIUMZOUT, IN HET BIJZONDER DIMEGLUMINI GADOBENAS; NAT. REGISTRATION NO/DATE: RVG 22324 19980706; FIRST REGISTRATION: GB PL 06099/0006 19970722
0230893 33/1998 Austria ⤷  Start Trial PRODUCT NAME: GADOBENAT DIMEGLUMIN; NAT. REGISTRATION NO/DATE: 1-22773 19981109; FIRST REGISTRATION: GB PL 06099/0006 19970722
>Patent Number >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration >SPC Description
Last updated: July 28, 2026

MULTIHANCE MULTIPACK (gadobenate dimeglumine) Market Dynamics and Financial Trajectory: Pricing, Share, Exclusivity, and Competitive Risks

MULTIHANCE MULTIPACK is a packaged presentation of gadobenate dimeglumine (a gadolinium-based contrast agent, GBCA) for MRI. The financial trajectory is driven by: (1) steadily low unit economics after market consolidation in contrast media, (2) channel pricing pressure from hospital group purchasing and contracting, and (3) competitive substitution risk versus alternative GBCAs and multi-dose formats. Patent and exclusivity protection shapes near-term supply and generic entry windows, while FDA labeling and clinical positioning determine substitution velocity across radiology networks.


How is the MULTIHANCE MULTIPACK market performing and what drives demand for gadobenate dimeglumine?

Demand fundamentals in MRI contrast media

GBCA usage is routine in outpatient and inpatient MRI. Demand for gadobenate dimeglumine is shaped less by physician preference in isolation and more by:

  • Formulary access at hospital systems and IDNs (integrated delivery networks)
  • Contracting by group purchasing organizations (GPOs) and buying consortiums
  • Radiology workflow compatibility, including single-dose vs multi-dose preparation and waste minimization
  • Safety-driven selection trends (risk perception around gadolinium retention, renal safety screening)

Why packaged “MULTIPACK” matters

A multipack typically affects economics and logistics:

  • Enables inventory planning in high-throughput sites
  • Reduces per-dose administrative handling vs loosely stocked single packs
  • Can align with bulk purchase pricing tiers under hospital contracts

Where contracts favor multi-dose purchasing, multipack presentations tend to maintain shelf share even when unit list prices compress.

Competitive substitution pressures

Across MRI contrast media, competitive substitution is common because:

  • All GBCAs target similar imaging outcomes
  • Comparative effectiveness is usually driven by labeling nuances, relaxivity profile claims, and safety communications
  • Formularies can switch within a class when pricing or supply conditions change

What is the competitive landscape for gadobenate dimeglumine and how does MULTIHANCE compare with other GBCAs?

Key class competitors

Gadobenate dimeglumine competes against both macrocyclic and linear GBCAs used for MRI contrast, including branded and generic products depending on jurisdiction and tender cycles. Competitive positioning in practice is driven by:

  • Access to preferred formulary slots
  • Contract pricing and rebate structures
  • Supply reliability

How multi-dose and hospital contracting changes share

Multipack listings can raise “stickiness” by fitting ordering patterns. A GBCA may remain on formulary even as list prices decline, if:

  • The multipack format is available at contracted rates
  • Pharmacy operations prefer fewer SKU handoffs
  • Waste calculations favor the available pack size

What patents protect MULTIHANCE MULTIPACK and how do they affect financial trajectory?

Patent estate impact on revenue durability

For gadolinium agents, the financial ceiling is often determined by:

  • Timing of first generic entries (if any) and subsequent erosion
  • Additional patents that cover manufacturing, formulation, or packaging-related claims
  • Regulatory exclusivity, if applicable to the drug’s original approval path

Patent protection typically supports revenue durability until the first meaningful competitive entry, after which price compression accelerates.

Practical effect on earnings

Once generic or alternative branded competitors gain access, margins compress quickly due to:

  • Hospital tender resets
  • Loss of branded inventory share
  • Reduced contracting leverage for incumbent wholesalers

When does MULTIHANCE MULTIPACK lose exclusivity and what is the generic entry risk?

Exclusivity-to-generic transmission

Financial trajectory tends to follow a predictable sequence:

  1. Pre-expiration stability: pricing mostly stable within contracted windows
  2. Legal or regulatory lead time: market anticipates entry; wholesalers adjust allocation
  3. Post-entry erosion: branded volume declines; net price drops
  4. Long-tail settling: residual branded share remains where contracts or clinical workflow sustain it

If the multipack is not separately protected from generic equivalents, a generic entrant can capture share rapidly through tender cycles.

Paragraph IV dynamics

For contrast agents, Paragraph IV challenges can drive litigation and potential settlement outcomes that determine:

  • Launch timing
  • Eligibility for 180-day exclusivity (where it applies)
  • The set of products that enter first (specific strengths or pack configurations)

What is the Orange Book status of gadobenate dimeglumine products and how does it map to MULTIHANCE?

Orange Book relevance for packaged presentations

Orange Book listings often determine whether:

  • A generic can seek approval for the same active ingredient, dosage form, and strength
  • Method, formulation, or packaging patents are barriers

For a multipack, the commercial question is whether the listed patents cover:

  • The drug product itself (active ingredient and formulation)
  • Manufacturing steps
  • Packaging or kit configuration

If patents are tied to the same NDA-level product, the multipack generally faces similar entry timelines once barriers clear.


What patent litigation affects gadobenate dimeglumine and does it change launch timing?

Litigation outcomes and financial implications

When patent litigation exists, its financial impact typically shows up as:

  • Delayed generic launches
  • Settlement-driven timing changes
  • Partial design-around outcomes (e.g., different pack format or manufacturing method)

For incumbents, litigation can extend revenue and preserve contracted pricing through uncertainty, but long duration increases the probability of broader erosion once any entry occurs.


What FDA regulatory pathway governs MULTIHANCE MULTIPACK and how do approvals influence market access?

Regulatory stability and switching speed

FDA approval of the GBCA and maintenance of labeling (indications, safety warnings, dosing) influences switching speed. Faster substitution occurs when:

  • Labeling is equivalent across competitors
  • No new safety restrictions emerge that disproportionately affect competitors
  • Hospitals can rely on consistent risk mitigation steps (e.g., screening processes)

MRI contrast labeling and procurement

Procurement teams often treat GBCA selection as:

  • A standardized category decision with limited clinical customization
  • A contract-based decision under radiology service line procurement

Multipack availability can therefore influence switching speed by reducing pharmacy friction.


How does hospital contracting and pricing pressure shape the financial trajectory of MULTIHANCE?

Price compression mechanics

After generic or alternative branded competition, net pricing falls through:

  • Lower contracted unit prices
  • Competitive tender resets
  • Reduced acquisition costs via alternative suppliers

Even without immediate generic entry, pricing can compress as competitors lower bids to secure formulary access.

Reimbursement considerations

For imaging agents, reimbursement structures vary by payer and setting. The financial trajectory is usually driven by:

  • Net reimbursement versus contract acquisition cost
  • Utilization patterns tied to MRI volume and case mix
  • Site of care, including hospital outpatient vs inpatient reimbursement dynamics

Financial trajectory: what to expect for revenue, margins, and volume for MULTIHANCE MULTIPACK

Baseline trajectory pattern for legacy GBCAs

Absent specific company guidance or disclosed segment-level financials for multipack SKUs, the expected pattern in the GBCA class after maturity is:

  • Volume stability early in the life cycle if contracted
  • List price erosion through procurement pressure
  • Gross margin compression after competitive entry
  • Residual branded share depending on pack format availability and contracting inertia

Commercial metrics that typically move first

  1. Share at key IDNs
  2. Net price vs list price
  3. Wholesaler inventory turns
  4. Contract renewals and formulary persistence
  5. Supply allocations and fill-rate performance

Which generic entry scenarios would most threaten MULTIHANCE MULTIPACK sales?

Scenario A: Generic entry with equivalent presentation

Highest threat when:

  • Generic offers align with the multipack configuration and dosing pattern
  • Launch timing coincides with contract renewal windows
  • Incumbent loses preferential contracting status

Scenario B: Partial entry in other formats

Still material when:

  • Competitors gain preferred formulary status in any equivalent strength
  • Hospitals switch to competitor multipacks even if incumbent remains stocked
  • Pharmacy substitution reduces branded multipack demand

Scenario C: Delayed entry but continued pricing pressure

Financial threat persists even before launch if:

  • Competitors secure contracts via lower bids
  • Hospitals negotiate rate cuts with incumbent based on “entry near-term” expectations

How strong is the patent estate for gadobenate dimeglumine compared with other GBCAs?

Relative strength is typically defined by

  • Number of active patents listed in Orange Book
  • Coverage of formulation and manufacturing vs only “core” compound claims
  • Ability to obtain and sustain injunction or launch delays
  • Whether competitors can design around claimed manufacturing or packaging steps

In most mature GBCA products, revenue protection can weaken quickly once generic penetration begins, regardless of secondary patents, because hospitals prioritize price and supply.


Market outlook: what matters most for the next 12 to 36 months for MULTIHANCE MULTIPACK?

Primary drivers

  • Competitive tender outcomes at large health systems
  • Whether alternative GBCA pack configurations displace multipack purchases
  • Any labeling changes affecting utilization patterns
  • Litigation and exclusivity developments that determine whether credible launch timelines exist

Secondary drivers

  • Supply chain stability and wholesaler allocation patterns
  • MRI volume growth or contraction by region and hospital service mix
  • Safety communications influencing selection within GBCA class

Key Takeaways

  • MULTIHANCE MULTIPACK is a GBCA multipack whose sales are governed by hospital contracting, formulary placement, and substitution dynamics within MRI contrast media.
  • Financial trajectory in mature GBCA markets typically follows: list price compression and net price declines first, then volume erosion after meaningful competitive entry.
  • Patent and Orange Book status determines whether incumbency persists through launch timing uncertainty; once barriers clear, tender-driven switching accelerates.
  • The multipack format can create shelf and workflow stickiness, but it does not usually prevent erosion if equivalent generic products achieve contract access.
  • Over the next 12 to 36 months, the most material indicators are formulary changes at large IDNs, net price trajectory versus list, and any exclusivity or litigation milestones that alter launch credibility.

FAQs

1) Does MULTIHANCE MULTIPACK have separate patent coverage for the multipack configuration?

It depends on whether relevant Orange Book patents are tied to the specific NDA product presentation and pack configuration, or only to the underlying drug substance and product.

2) What happens to MULTIHANCE volume if competing GBCAs are preferred at IDNs?

Volume typically shifts quickly at the contract level because MRI contrast procurement is standardized, with substitution facilitated by equivalent imaging indications and reduced pharmacy friction.

3) How quickly do hospitals switch from branded gadolinium contrast after generic launches?

Switching usually occurs at contract renewal or tender cycles, with accelerated switching if the generic meets the same strength and presentation needs for multipack procurement.

4) Are method-of-use patents a practical barrier for generics of gadobenate dimeglumine?

In practice, method-of-use barriers matter only if they prevent FDA approval for the intended labeled use and are successfully litigated or avoided through design-around.

5) What are the most important Orange Book entries to monitor for future generic threats?

Active patents listed for the NDA covering product/formulation and any manufacturing-related claims, plus the earliest expiration dates that define the realistic entry window.


References

  1. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Orange Book: Approved Drug Products with Therapeutic Equivalence Evaluations. FDA.
  2. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. FDA Drug Approval Reports and Labeling Archives. FDA.
  3. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Drug Safety Communications and Labeling Updates for GBCAs. FDA.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.