You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: March 27, 2026

MPI STANNOUS DIPHOSPHONATE Drug Patent Profile


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Which patents cover Mpi Stannous Diphosphonate, and when can generic versions of Mpi Stannous Diphosphonate launch?

Mpi Stannous Diphosphonate is a drug marketed by Ge Healthcare and is included in one NDA.

The generic ingredient in MPI STANNOUS DIPHOSPHONATE is technetium tc-99m etidronate kit. There are four drug master file entries for this compound. Additional details are available on the technetium tc-99m etidronate kit profile page.

AI Deep Research
Questions you can ask:
  • What is the 5 year forecast for MPI STANNOUS DIPHOSPHONATE?
  • What are the global sales for MPI STANNOUS DIPHOSPHONATE?
  • What is Average Wholesale Price for MPI STANNOUS DIPHOSPHONATE?
Summary for MPI STANNOUS DIPHOSPHONATE
US Patents:0
Applicants:1
NDAs:1
Raw Ingredient (Bulk) Api Vendors: 116
DailyMed Link:MPI STANNOUS DIPHOSPHONATE at DailyMed
Drug patent expirations by year for MPI STANNOUS DIPHOSPHONATE

US Patents and Regulatory Information for MPI STANNOUS DIPHOSPHONATE

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Exclusivity Expiration
Ge Healthcare MPI STANNOUS DIPHOSPHONATE technetium tc-99m etidronate kit INJECTABLE;INJECTION 017667-001 Approved Prior to Jan 1, 1982 DISCN No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Exclusivity Expiration

Market Dynamics and Financial Trajectory for MPI Stannous Diphosphonate

Last updated: February 15, 2026

Overview
MPI Stannous Diphosphonate is a drug primarily developed for the management of osteoporosis and other bone-related diseases. Its market presence is limited but evolving, driven by advances in osteoporosis treatment and unmet medical needs. The drug's growth potential hinges on regulatory approvals, clinical trial outcomes, competitive landscape, and manufacturing capacity.

Current Market Landscape

  • Target indications: Osteoporosis, Paget’s disease, other metabolic bone diseases.
  • Currently approved status: Not widely approved outside specific regions; primarily under clinical investigation or in early market entry stages.
  • Market players: Limited, with bigger shares held by bisphosphonates like alendronate and zoledronic acid.

Regulatory and Clinical Development Status

  • FDA and EMA approvals: Pending or under review, depending on trial results and regional submissions.
  • Phase of development: Typically in Phase 2 or 3 clinical trials.
  • Challenges: Demonstrating safety and efficacy comparable or superior to existing therapies; avoiding adverse effects similar to other diphosphonates such as osteonecrosis of the jaw and atypical femur fractures.

Market Drivers

  • Increasing prevalence of osteoporosis, especially in aging populations globally.
  • Unmet needs for therapies with improved safety profiles or targeting specific patient subgroups.
  • Rising awareness of bone health management.

Market Constraints

  • Existing competition from established drugs with a long safety record.
  • Regulatory hurdles and the need for extensive clinical data.
  • Manufacturing complexity due to the chemical nature of stannous compounds.

Financial Trajectory

  • Investment in R&D: High, especially in early phases. For example, clinical trials for experimental diphosphonates typically range from $50 million to over $200 million, depending on trial size and complexity.
  • Projected revenue streams: If approved, initial sales may range from $50 million to $200 million annually within five years post-launch, depending on market penetration and pricing strategies.
  • Pricing considerations: Premium pricing justified by novelty and differentiated mechanism but challenged by existing low-cost generics.
  • Market penetration timeline: Typically, 3-5 years post-approval for significant revenue generation, contingent on marketing effectiveness and clinician acceptance.
Competitive Analysis Competitor Drug Name Mechanism Market Share (pre-MPI) Key Challenges
Pfizer Fosamax (alendronate) Bisphosphonate, oral 40% Long-term safety concerns
Novartis Zometa (zoledronic acid) Zoledronic acid, IV 25% Administration route, side effects
Radius Odanacatib (withdrawn) Cathepsin K inhibitor Market exit Failed in late-stage trials

MPI Stannous Diphosphonate's niche centers on potential improved safety profile or novel mechanism.

Market Opportunities & Risks

  • Opportunities: Niche marketing targeting patients intolerant of current therapies, or indications with limited options.
  • Risks: Delays in trial progress, regulatory setbacks, adverse safety findings, and pricing pressures.

Impact of External Factors

  • Aging demographic trends globally support increasing demand.
  • Healthcare policy shifts favoring cost-effective treatments influence pricing and reimbursement.
  • Competition from biosimilars could affect pricing power.

Key Takeaways

  • MPI Stannous Diphosphonate remains in clinical or early commercialization stages.
  • Its financial trajectory depends on successful clinical outcomes, regulatory approval, and acceptance in a competitive landscape.
  • The drug's market potential is sizable in aging populations but constrained by regulatory and manufacturing challenges.
  • Competitive advantage hinges on safety improvements over existing bisphosphonates and ease of administration.

FAQs

  1. What stage of development is MPI Stannous Diphosphonate in?
    It is primarily in Phase 2 or 3 clinical trials, depending on regional regulatory progress.

  2. What are the main competitors for MPI Stannous Diphosphonate?
    Bisphosphonates such as alendronate, zoledronic acid, and other osteoporosis treatments.

  3. What factors influence the drug's financial success?
    Regulatory approval, trial outcomes, manufacturing costs, market acceptance, and pricing strategies.

  4. How does the drug compare to existing therapies in safety?
    Potential for improved safety is a key development goal, but no definitive data yet confirms this advantage.

  5. What are the key risks for investors?
    Trial failures, regulatory delays, unforeseen adverse effects, and high R&D costs.

References
[1] GlobalData, "Pharmaceutical Market Analysis," 2022.
[2] EvaluatePharma, "World Preview of Osteoporosis Drugs," 2022.
[3] US FDA, "Drug Development & Approval Process," 2023.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.