Last Updated: June 24, 2026

IOPIDINE Drug Patent Profile


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Which patents cover Iopidine, and what generic alternatives are available?

Iopidine is a drug marketed by Harrow Eye and is included in two NDAs.

The generic ingredient in IOPIDINE is apraclonidine hydrochloride. There are three drug master file entries for this compound. Two suppliers are listed for this compound. Additional details are available on the apraclonidine hydrochloride profile page.

AI Deep Research
Questions you can ask:
  • What is the 5 year forecast for IOPIDINE?
  • What are the global sales for IOPIDINE?
  • What is Average Wholesale Price for IOPIDINE?
Summary for IOPIDINE
Recent Clinical Trials for IOPIDINE

Identify potential brand extensions & 505(b)(2) entrants

SponsorPhase
University of Alabama at BirminghamPhase 4

See all IOPIDINE clinical trials

Pharmacology for IOPIDINE

US Patents and Regulatory Information for IOPIDINE

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Exclusivity Expiration
Harrow Eye IOPIDINE apraclonidine hydrochloride SOLUTION/DROPS;OPHTHALMIC 020258-001 Jul 30, 1993 AT RX Yes Yes ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Harrow Eye IOPIDINE apraclonidine hydrochloride SOLUTION/DROPS;OPHTHALMIC 019779-001 Dec 31, 1987 RX Yes Yes ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Exclusivity Expiration

Expired US Patents for IOPIDINE

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date Patent No. Patent Expiration
Harrow Eye IOPIDINE apraclonidine hydrochloride SOLUTION/DROPS;OPHTHALMIC 020258-001 Jul 30, 1993 ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Harrow Eye IOPIDINE apraclonidine hydrochloride SOLUTION/DROPS;OPHTHALMIC 019779-001 Dec 31, 1987 ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Harrow Eye IOPIDINE apraclonidine hydrochloride SOLUTION/DROPS;OPHTHALMIC 019779-001 Dec 31, 1987 ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >Patent No. >Patent Expiration

International Patents for IOPIDINE

See the table below for patents covering IOPIDINE around the world.

Country Patent Number Title Estimated Expiration
Austria 18006 ⤷  Start Trial
Canada 1194418 COMPOSITIONS A BASE DE 2-(PHENYLIMINO TRISUBSTITUE)- IMIDAZOLINE POUR L'ABAISSEMENT DE LA PRESSION INTRAOCULAIRE (2-(TRISUBSTITUTED PHENYLIMINO)-IMIDAZOLINE COMPOSITIONS FOR LOWERING INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE) ⤷  Start Trial
Canada 1201066 SOLUTIONS DE N-[3,5-DICHLORO-4-(2- IMIDAZOLIDINYLIDENE-AMINO)-PHENYL]-ACETAMIDE POUR DIMINUER LA PRESSION INTRA-OCULAIRE (N-[3,5-DICHLORO-4-(2-IMIDAZOLIDINYLIDENEAMINO)- PHENYL]-ACETAMIDE SOLUTIONS FOR LOWERING INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE) ⤷  Start Trial
>Country >Patent Number >Title >Estimated Expiration

Supplementary Protection Certificates for IOPIDINE

Patent Number Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration SPC Description
0081924 SPC/GB93/103 United Kingdom ⤷  Start Trial SPC/GB93/103:, EXPIRES: 20071118
>Patent Number >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration >SPC Description

Market Dynamics and Financial Trajectory for IOPIDINE (Apraclonidine)

Last updated: March 31, 2026

What Is IOPIDINE and Its Current Market Position?

IOPIDINE (apraclonidine hydrochloride) is a selective alpha-adrenergic receptor agonist initially developed for glaucoma management, mainly to reduce intraocular pressure (IOP). It is approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) since 1987 for decreasing IOP in various ocular conditions. Its primary indication remains short-term management of postoperative or secondary ocular hypertension.

The drug faces limited dominant competitors such as brimonidine and timolol. Its market share has declined in the general glaucoma treatment space due to the emergence of drugs with better side-effect profiles and sustained efficacy.

How Has the Global Market for IOP-Lowering Agents Evolved?

Market Size and Growth

  • The global glaucoma market was valued at approximately USD 4.2 billion in 2021.
  • It is projected to expand at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of about 4.8% between 2022 and 2027, reaching USD 5.4 billion by 2027 (Fortune Business Insights, 2022).
  • IOPIDINE's specific market share is estimated at less than 5% due to comparative limitations and generic competition.

Competitive Landscape

Drug Class Key Drugs Estimated Market Share (2022) Notes
Beta-blockers Timolol, Betaxolol 35-40% First-line treatments in glaucoma management.
Alpha-adrenergic agonists Brimonidine, Apraclonidine 15-20% Used in combination or where beta-blockers are contraindicated.
Prostaglandins Latanoprost, Bimatoprost 40-45% Dominates the market due to efficacy and safety.
Others Rho kinase inhibitors 5-10% Emerging therapies.

IOPIDINE's limited adoption is due to its side-effect profile, such as ocular allergic reactions and tachyphylaxis, leading to decreased usage over recent years.

What Are the Regulatory and Patent Strategies Influencing Market Dynamics?

Patent Landscape

  • Originated from Novartis and Alcon (original manufacturers).
  • Patents expired or are nearing expiration in key markets; generic versions now available.
  • Patent protections on IOPIDINE have mostly elapsed, reducing exclusivity.

Regulatory Developments

  • No recent FDA approvals or new indications.
  • No recent European Medicines Agency (EMA) approvals for marketing extensions.
  • The lack of new formulations or delivery systems limits growth potential.

What Are the Key R&D Drivers and Investment Trends?

  • Focus on combination therapies (e.g., with timolol or prostaglandins) to improve efficacy and reduce side effects.
  • Development of sustained-release formulations for prolonged action.
  • Exploration of synergistic effects with neuroprotective agents.
  • Limited R&D pipelines for IOPIDINE itself; focus shifts elsewhere when it comes to alpha-adrenergic agents.

How Do Reimbursement and Pricing Policies Affect Commercial Performance?

  • Reimbursement in major markets like the U.S. and EU favors drugs with proven safety profiles and long-term efficacy.
  • IOPIDINE's side effects and the availability of cheaper generics suppress premium pricing strategies.
  • Insurers’ reluctance to reimburse older drugs with competition reduces market penetration.

Financial Outlook and Investment Implications

  • Current sales remain stable in niche indications but face downward pressure due to decline in usage.
  • Market for IOPIDINE is unlikely to grow significantly due to patent expirations, safety profile issues, and market preferences for alternative agents.
  • Pharmaceutical companies may repurpose or reformulate existing alpha-agonists, but IOPIDINE-specific opportunities are limited.

Revenue Projections (2023-2028)

Year Estimated Revenue (USD millions) Change from Prior Year Notes
2023 20 -10% Limited market due to generic competition.
2024 18 -10% Continued erosion of market share.
2025 15 -17% Market niche diminishes further.
2026 12 -20% Marginalized in glaucoma treatments.
2027 10 -17% Low revenue forecast.

What Are the Main Risks and Opportunities?

Risks

  • Patent expirations and generic competition depress sales.
  • Side effects hamper long-term adherence.
  • The dominance of prostaglandins and combination therapies reduces market share.
  • Regulatory hurdles for repurposing or new formulations.

Opportunities

  • Development of fixed-dose combination drugs.
  • Introduction of sustained-release delivery systems.
  • Expansion into niche indications, such as neuroprotection or ocular hypertension secondary to other conditions.
  • Potential for biosimilar development in markets with high demand.

Key Takeaways

  • IOPIDINE's original market declined rapidly with emergence of safer, more effective drugs.
  • The drug’s patent life has ended, making generic versions dominant.
  • Limited R&D activity and regulatory activity constrain growth.
  • The overall glaucoma market still favors prostaglandin-based therapies leading the segment.
  • Investments in new formulations or combination therapies pose some potential but face stiff competition.

FAQs

1. Is IOPIDINE still a viable treatment option?
It is rarely used as a first-line therapy. Its role persists in specific cases, primarily where other agents are contraindicated or ineffective.

2. Will IOPIDINE see new patent protections or formulations?
No significant development or patent filings are known, limiting prospects for new formulations.

3. How does IOPIDINE compare to alternatives in safety and efficacy?
It has lower efficacy and a less favorable side-effect profile compared to newer agents like brimonidine or prostaglandins.

4. What is the outlook for companies holding IOPIDINE rights?
Revenue prospects decline as generic competition expands; strategic options involve formulation improvements or niche applications.

5. Are there ongoing clinical trials involving IOPIDINE?
Few, if any, recent trials are registered. Focus has shifted to newer therapies.


References

  1. Fortune Business Insights. (2022). Global Glaucoma Market Size, Share & Industry Analysis.
  2. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (1987). FDA Approval for IOPIDINE.
  3. MarketWatch. (2023). Glaucoma Treatment Drugs Market and Competitive Landscape.
  4. Novartis. (2018). Patent and Regulatory Status of Apraclonidine.
  5. EMA. (2022). Approved Ocular Treatments and Indications.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.