Last Updated: November 13, 2026

FAMOTIDINE, CALCIUM CARBONATE, AND MAGNESIUM HYDROXIDE Drug Patent Profile

« Back to Dashboard


When do Famotidine, Calcium Carbonate, And Magnesium Hydroxide patents expire, and what generic alternatives are available?

Famotidine, Calcium Carbonate, And Magnesium Hydroxide is a drug marketed by Perrigo R And D and is included in two NDAs.

The generic ingredient in FAMOTIDINE, CALCIUM CARBONATE, AND MAGNESIUM HYDROXIDE is calcium carbonate; famotidine; magnesium hydroxide. There is one drug master file entry for this compound. Twenty-eight suppliers are listed for this compound. Additional details are available on the calcium carbonate; famotidine; magnesium hydroxide profile page.

AI Deep Research
Questions you can ask:
  • What is the 5 year forecast for FAMOTIDINE, CALCIUM CARBONATE, AND MAGNESIUM HYDROXIDE?
  • What are the global sales for FAMOTIDINE, CALCIUM CARBONATE, AND MAGNESIUM HYDROXIDE?
  • What is Average Wholesale Price for FAMOTIDINE, CALCIUM CARBONATE, AND MAGNESIUM HYDROXIDE?
Summary for FAMOTIDINE, CALCIUM CARBONATE, AND MAGNESIUM HYDROXIDE

US Patents and Regulatory Information for FAMOTIDINE, CALCIUM CARBONATE, AND MAGNESIUM HYDROXIDE

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Exclusivity Expiration
Perrigo R And D FAMOTIDINE, CALCIUM CARBONATE, AND MAGNESIUM HYDROXIDE calcium carbonate; famotidine; magnesium hydroxide TABLET, CHEWABLE;ORAL 077355-001 Feb 6, 2008 OTC No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Perrigo R And D FAMOTIDINE, CALCIUM CARBONATE, AND MAGNESIUM HYDROXIDE calcium carbonate; famotidine; magnesium hydroxide TABLET, CHEWABLE;ORAL 204782-001 Aug 29, 2016 DISCN No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Exclusivity Expiration

Famotidine, Calcium Carbonate, and Magnesium Hydroxide Market Dynamics, Patent Status, and Financial Outlook

Last updated: November 3, 2026

The famotidine, calcium carbonate, and magnesium hydroxide combination is a mature over-the-counter (OTC) heartburn product category led by Pepcid Complete and private-label equivalents. Famotidine provides acid suppression through H2-receptor antagonism, while calcium carbonate and magnesium hydroxide provide rapid antacid activity. The category has broad FDA regulatory support, low formulation complexity, minimal current patent barriers, and intense retail competition.

The commercial outlook is stable rather than high growth. Revenue depends on brand equity, retail distribution, pricing, advertising, and product-line extensions more than on exclusivity. Kenvue reports Pepcid within broader self-care or digestive-health categories, not as a separately disclosed product, so standalone revenue and margin data are not publicly reported. [1]

What is the famotidine, calcium carbonate, and magnesium hydroxide product?

The combination is marketed primarily as a chewable tablet for relief of heartburn and acid indigestion.

Component Primary function Commercial role
Famotidine Reduces gastric acid secretion through H2-receptor blockade Longer-duration acid control
Calcium carbonate Neutralizes existing gastric acid Rapid symptom relief
Magnesium hydroxide Neutralizes gastric acid Rapid relief and balances calcium-related gastrointestinal effects
Typical product format Chewable tablet Convenient OTC administration

Pepcid Complete is the best-known branded product in the category. U.S. labeling identifies the product as an OTC heartburn reliever containing famotidine, calcium carbonate, and magnesium hydroxide. The product is generally used for relief of heartburn associated with acid indigestion and for prevention of heartburn when taken before a meal. [2]

The product differs from standalone Pepcid tablets, which contain famotidine without antacid ingredients. It also differs from traditional calcium carbonate or magnesium hydroxide antacids because it combines immediate neutralization with H2-mediated acid suppression.

How large is the market for this combination?

The combination competes within the broader U.S. digestive-health and heartburn-relief market, which includes H2 blockers, proton-pump inhibitors, antacids, alginate products, and combination products.

Public company filings do not isolate sales for the specific three-ingredient combination. Kenvue reports brand and category performance at a level that generally combines multiple products or markets. As a result, the following commercial metrics are more reliable than unsupported product-level revenue estimates:

Metric Assessment
Market maturity Mature OTC category
Principal branded product Pepcid Complete
Principal manufacturer Kenvue Inc.
Generic competition High
Prescription dependence None for OTC versions
Patent dependence Low
Retail concentration High in mass retail, drugstores, grocery, club, and e-commerce
Revenue transparency Limited at individual SKU level
Growth driver Pricing, distribution, private-label conversion, and digestive-health demand

The category benefits from persistent demand for episodic heartburn relief, increased consumer self-treatment, and broad availability. It faces pressure from generic famotidine, low-cost antacid products, proton-pump inhibitors, and retailer-owned brands.

What is the financial trajectory for Pepcid Complete and equivalent products?

The financial trajectory is likely to follow a mature-brand pattern:

  1. Stable underlying demand from recurring heartburn episodes.
  2. Moderate price growth during periods of inflation.
  3. Unit pressure from private-label products and generic substitution.
  4. Margin protection through brand pricing, pack-size changes, and manufacturing scale.
  5. Periodic volume gains from advertising, new flavors, and channel expansion.

Kenvue’s public filings identify Pepcid as one of its major consumer-health brands, but they do not provide a separate income statement for Pepcid Complete. [1] The appropriate financial analysis therefore focuses on category economics rather than a precise product-level revenue forecast.

Revenue exposure for Kenvue

Pepcid contributes to Kenvue’s self-care portfolio alongside brands such as Tylenol, Motrin, Zyrtec, Benadryl, Nicorette, and other consumer-health products. The company’s consolidated results are influenced by portfolio-wide factors, including retailer inventory management, currency movements, input costs, advertising spending, and litigation or regulatory expenses.

Pepcid has strategic value beyond its direct sales because it gives Kenvue exposure to the digestive-health category and supports a branded alternative to generic H2 blockers. The principal financial risk is erosion of price premium, not loss of patent exclusivity.

Generic and private-label economics

The active ingredients are inexpensive and widely available. A retailer can market a substantially similar product using the same active ingredients, subject to applicable FDA requirements and labeling controls.

Private-label products generally compete through:

  • Lower shelf prices.
  • Larger count sizes.
  • Retailer loyalty programs.
  • Placement beside branded products.
  • E-commerce search visibility.
  • Store-brand pharmacy and digestive-health portfolios.

The branded product retains advantages in consumer recognition, advertising, perceived quality, and physician familiarity. Those advantages can support premium pricing but do not prevent substitution.

What FDA regulatory status applies to the combination?

The product is an OTC drug rather than a prescription product. Calcium carbonate and magnesium hydroxide are established antacid active ingredients under FDA OTC antacid regulations. Famotidine is an established OTC acid-reducing active ingredient. FDA OTC requirements address active ingredients, dosage, labeling, warnings, and permitted claims. [3]

Pepcid Complete labeling is governed by the FDA Drug Facts framework and includes directions, warnings, age restrictions, interaction information, and maximum daily-use instructions. [2]

FDA monograph and nonprescription regulatory pathway

The commercial product does not depend on an active new-drug approval in the same manner as a newly developed prescription therapy. OTC monograph compliance, an approved application where applicable, and product-specific regulatory filings provide the relevant pathway.

The OTC monograph reform process under the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act changed the legal structure for OTC monograph drugs. FDA now uses administrative orders and monograph procedures rather than the older tentative-final-monograph model. [4]

For mature combination products, regulatory risk is concentrated in:

  • Changes to allowable claims.
  • Labeling revisions.
  • Safety warnings.
  • Manufacturing controls.
  • Stability and quality testing.
  • Ingredient sourcing.
  • Combination-product compliance.
  • FDA enforcement against nonconforming formulations.

What patents protect famotidine, calcium carbonate, and magnesium hydroxide products?

The core active ingredients are not protected by meaningful current U.S. composition-of-matter exclusivity.

Famotidine’s original small-molecule patent protection expired long ago. Calcium carbonate and magnesium hydroxide are long-established antacid ingredients with no current composition-of-matter exclusivity relevant to this OTC combination.

IP category Current commercial significance
Famotidine active-ingredient patent Expired
Calcium carbonate active-ingredient rights No meaningful current exclusivity
Magnesium hydroxide active-ingredient rights No meaningful current exclusivity
Combination formulation patents Potentially relevant historically, but unlikely to block ordinary generic competition today
Packaging and trade dress Can protect brand presentation, not the active formulation
Trademarks Important for Pepcid branding
Manufacturing know-how Relevant to cost, taste, stability, and quality
Regulatory exclusivity No material exclusivity comparable to a new prescription drug

Historical patents covering famotidine chemistry, formulation, or combination delivery systems do not create a current market barrier where their terms have expired. Patent status must be reviewed by jurisdiction and claim scope, but ordinary U.S. market entry is not dependent on licensing an active ingredient patent.

What is the Orange Book status of famotidine combination products?

Pepcid Complete and comparable OTC products should not be analyzed as conventional Orange Book-protected prescription products.

The FDA Orange Book primarily identifies approved prescription drug products and certain other approved products with therapeutic-equivalence information. An OTC monograph product generally does not receive the same Orange Book patent-listing and Paragraph IV framework as a prescription new drug. [5]

Consequently:

  • There is generally no Orange Book patent estate comparable to a branded prescription drug.
  • A generic manufacturer typically does not need to file a Paragraph IV certification against an Orange Book-listed formulation patent to market a compliant OTC product.
  • Competition usually occurs through OTC regulatory compliance, manufacturing capability, labeling, and retail execution.
  • Any product-specific approved application must be evaluated separately from a purely monograph-compliant product.

When does famotidine combination exclusivity expire?

There is no meaningful remaining exclusivity period for the active combination in the United States.

The relevant commercial protection is brand-based rather than patent-based. Pepcid’s value is supported by trademark rights, consumer awareness, retailer relationships, advertising, and product quality. Generic and private-label products can compete without waiting for a future patent expiration date if they meet FDA requirements.

Exclusivity type Status
New chemical entity exclusivity Expired
Original famotidine patent term Expired
Combination-product patent barrier No apparent current blocking barrier for ordinary OTC competition
Prescription data exclusivity Not the principal commercial framework
Trademark protection Ongoing, subject to renewal and use
Trade dress protection Potentially ongoing, limited to presentation
OTC regulatory compliance Ongoing requirement for every manufacturer

Are there Paragraph IV challenges or generic litigation?

No major current Paragraph IV litigation dynamic defines this category.

Paragraph IV challenges are generally associated with abbreviated new drug applications against Orange Book-listed patents. OTC combination products marketed under monograph procedures are exposed instead to ordinary competitive entry, FDA compliance review, labeling disputes, trademark claims, false-advertising claims, and manufacturing litigation.

Potential disputes may involve:

  • Whether a competing product uses an allowable active ingredient level.
  • Whether claims exceed permitted OTC labeling.
  • Whether a product is misbranded.
  • Whether a private-label product copies protected trade dress.
  • Whether manufacturing or supply-chain practices comply with current good manufacturing practice requirements.

The absence of a visible Paragraph IV pipeline does not eliminate commercial competition. It means the competitive mechanism is retail and regulatory rather than patent litigation.

What formulation patents and manufacturing barriers matter?

Formulation know-how can still affect commercial performance even when patent protection is weak.

Formulation factors

Manufacturers compete on:

  • Tablet hardness and chewability.
  • Taste masking.
  • Flavor stability.
  • Calcium carbonate particle size.
  • Magnesium hydroxide dispersion.
  • Famotidine uniformity.
  • Moisture control.
  • Shelf life.
  • Packaging protection.
  • Tablet disintegration.
  • Consumer tolerability.

A formulation patent may protect a specific composition or manufacturing process, but a competitor can often design around narrow claims using different excipient ratios, flavors, tablet technologies, or production conditions.

Manufacturing and supply risks

The principal operational barriers are quality and scale. Companies need reliable sources for pharmaceutical-grade famotidine, calcium carbonate, and magnesium hydroxide; validated blending and compression processes; stability data; and compliant packaging.

Famotidine supply is more technically demanding than calcium carbonate or magnesium hydroxide because the active ingredient is a synthetic pharmaceutical compound rather than a common antacid mineral. Even so, the supply chain is established and does not create a durable monopoly.

How does the combination compare with competing heartburn drugs?

Product type Speed of relief Duration Competitive position
Famotidine plus calcium carbonate plus magnesium hydroxide Fast plus sustained Moderate to long Differentiated combination
Standalone famotidine Moderate Longer than simple antacids Lower-cost direct substitute
Calcium carbonate antacid Fast Shorter Very low-cost alternative
Magnesium hydroxide antacid Fast Shorter Established generic alternative
Proton-pump inhibitor Slower onset for episodic relief Longer acid suppression Strong alternative for frequent symptoms
Alginate-antacid products Fast Variable Competes on reflux-barrier positioning

The combination’s commercial proposition is convenience: one chewable product combines immediate antacid action with famotidine’s longer acid-suppression effect. That proposition supports brand differentiation but is easy to imitate at the ingredient level.

Which companies are challenging the branded product?

Competition comes from three groups:

  1. Generic drug manufacturers selling famotidine or equivalent combination products.
  2. Retailers selling private-label heartburn medicines.
  3. Branded manufacturers selling alternative acid reducers or antacids.

The most important competitive threat is not a single patent challenger. It is cumulative substitution from store brands, low-cost single-ingredient products, proton-pump inhibitors, and competing branded digestive-health products.

Retailers with strong private-label programs can capture share without incurring the advertising and innovation costs carried by Kenvue. E-commerce also makes price comparison easier, increasing pressure on branded OTC products.

What licensing deals affect the market?

No major current licensing deal is required to commercialize the active ingredients in the standard OTC combination. The commercial rights are principally associated with trademarks, distribution arrangements, contract manufacturing, and retailer supply agreements.

The absence of a required active-ingredient license lowers entry barriers. Companies may still use contract manufacturers or license brand rights, but those arrangements are commercial choices rather than requirements imposed by active patent ownership.

What generic launch scenarios exist?

The most likely market-entry scenarios are:

Scenario Market effect
Additional private-label launches Accelerated price competition and lower branded unit share
Generic combination launch Direct pressure on Pepcid Complete pricing
Standalone famotidine price cuts Substitution away from the combination
Premium reformulation Potential defense through taste, dosage, packaging, or convenience
Retail distribution expansion Volume growth without exclusivity
Regulatory label change Possible redesign costs and claim restrictions

A generic launch would probably affect price before it materially changes total category demand. The category is relatively mature, so market expansion is limited compared with share transfer.

What is the geographic coverage and international outlook?

The United States is the most commercially visible market for this branded combination, but famotidine and antacid combinations are sold in multiple jurisdictions under different brand names and regulatory systems.

Geographic performance depends on:

  • Local OTC classification.
  • Permitted famotidine dosage.
  • Antacid monograph rules.
  • Trademark ownership.
  • Retail pharmacy structure.
  • Reimbursement and self-care norms.
  • Local manufacturing and import requirements.

A U.S. OTC strategy does not automatically establish rights or regulatory clearance abroad. Trademark and formulation rights must be assessed country by country. In most markets, ingredient-level patent barriers are low, while regulatory and distribution execution remain the principal constraints.

How strong is the patent estate for the combination?

The patent estate is weak as a current exclusivity platform and moderate as a historical formulation asset.

Dimension Strength
Active-ingredient exclusivity Very weak
Current U.S. blocking patents Low
Trademark protection Stronger than patent protection
Formulation differentiation Moderate
Manufacturing know-how Moderate
Regulatory barriers Low to moderate
Retail and brand barriers Moderate
Litigation leverage Limited relative to prescription brands

The product can generate durable cash flow, but not because of a long patent runway. Its defensibility comes from consumer recognition, shelf position, quality control, marketing, and distribution.

Key Takeaways

  • Famotidine, calcium carbonate, and magnesium hydroxide is a mature OTC heartburn combination.
  • Pepcid Complete is the leading branded reference product in the United States.
  • Kenvue does not separately disclose Pepcid Complete revenue, so product-level financial forecasts cannot be derived from public filings with precision.
  • The category has low patent risk and no meaningful current composition-of-matter exclusivity.
  • Orange Book and Paragraph IV mechanisms are generally less relevant than they are for prescription products.
  • Private-label and generic competition are the main threats to price and unit share.
  • The combination’s commercial advantage is immediate antacid relief plus longer famotidine-mediated acid control.
  • Revenue stability depends on brand equity, retail execution, pricing, and manufacturing scale.
  • Formulation know-how can support differentiation but is unlikely to create a durable market monopoly.
  • The financial outlook is stable to moderately pressured, with margin protection more likely than rapid volume growth.

FAQs

Is Pepcid Complete the same as famotidine?

No. Pepcid Complete contains famotidine plus calcium carbonate and magnesium hydroxide. Standard Pepcid tablets may contain famotidine alone.

Can generic manufacturers make famotidine, calcium carbonate, and magnesium hydroxide tablets?

Yes. Manufacturers can market compliant products when they satisfy FDA requirements for formulation, labeling, quality, manufacturing, and applicable regulatory authorization.

Does Pepcid Complete have an active U.S. patent?

The active ingredients do not provide meaningful current composition-of-matter exclusivity. Any surviving rights would need to be evaluated at the level of specific formulation, process, packaging, or branding claims.

Is famotidine, calcium carbonate, and magnesium hydroxide subject to FDA prescription exclusivity?

No. The commercial product is an OTC medicine, and its market position does not depend on current prescription-style new-drug exclusivity.

What is the main investment risk for this product category?

The primary risk is erosion of branded pricing and share from private-label products, generic alternatives, standalone famotidine, antacids, and proton-pump inhibitors.

References

  1. Kenvue Inc. (2024). Annual report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2023.
  2. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (n.d.). Pepcid Complete: Drug Facts label. DailyMed.
  3. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (2024). Antacid products for over-the-counter human use. Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Part 331.
  4. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (2023). Over-the-counter monograph drug products.
  5. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (2024). Approved drug products with therapeutic equivalence evaluations. Orange Book.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.