Last Updated: June 22, 2026

DEXTROSE 5% IN SODIUM CHLORIDE 0.9% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER Drug Patent Profile


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


When do Dextrose 5% In Sodium Chloride 0.9% In Plastic Container patents expire, and when can generic versions of Dextrose 5% In Sodium Chloride 0.9% In Plastic Container launch?

Dextrose 5% In Sodium Chloride 0.9% In Plastic Container is a drug marketed by Baxter Hlthcare and is included in one NDA.

The generic ingredient in DEXTROSE 5% IN SODIUM CHLORIDE 0.9% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER is dextrose; sodium chloride. There are nine drug master file entries for this compound. Five suppliers are listed for this compound. Additional details are available on the dextrose; sodium chloride profile page.

AI Deep Research
Questions you can ask:
  • What is the 5 year forecast for DEXTROSE 5% IN SODIUM CHLORIDE 0.9% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER?
  • What are the global sales for DEXTROSE 5% IN SODIUM CHLORIDE 0.9% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER?
  • What is Average Wholesale Price for DEXTROSE 5% IN SODIUM CHLORIDE 0.9% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER?
Summary for DEXTROSE 5% IN SODIUM CHLORIDE 0.9% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER
Pharmacology for DEXTROSE 5% IN SODIUM CHLORIDE 0.9% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER

US Patents and Regulatory Information for DEXTROSE 5% IN SODIUM CHLORIDE 0.9% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Exclusivity Expiration
Baxter Hlthcare DEXTROSE 5% IN SODIUM CHLORIDE 0.9% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER dextrose; sodium chloride INJECTABLE;INJECTION 016678-001 Approved Prior to Jan 1, 1982 AP RX No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Exclusivity Expiration

Market Dynamics and Financial Trajectory for DEXTROSE 5% IN SODIUM CHLORIDE 0.9% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER

Last updated: April 23, 2026

DEXTROSE 5% IN SODIUM CHLORIDE 0.9% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER (commonly marketed as D5NS in IV plastic containers) is a mature, high-volume, low-margin hospital infusion fluid. Market performance tracks hospital procedure intensity, inpatient census, and procurement contract cycles, with price largely driven by raw material costs, plastic resin costs, and regulated distribution dynamics. Financial trajectory in the US and other developed markets typically shows stable unit demand, periodic price compression, and limited brand-level differentiation versus authorized generics and repack products.

What drives demand for D5NS IV fluid?

Demand is tied to clinical practice for isotonic-to-hypotonic replacement strategies and maintenance fluids, especially in inpatient and peri-procedural settings. The product is typically ordered for:

  • Maintenance IV hydration and fluid replacement workflows
  • Treatment protocols that require 5% dextrose in 0.9% sodium chloride

Market sizing for D5NS is constrained by substitution within IV fluid formularies. Hospitals can switch among:

  • D5NS vs other maintenance fluids (e.g., D5 0.45% saline, D10W, LR/Plasma-Lyte formulations)
  • Generic equivalence where authorized generics dominate procurement

How do procurement and tender cycles shape pricing?

Pricing is dominated by group purchasing organization (GPO) contracts, wholesaler pass-through pricing, and hospital bid cycles. In mature IV fluid categories, the pricing structure typically shows:

  • Contract-based pricing that resets every 1-3 years depending on GPO and local contracting
  • Market-wide compression during periods of supplier capacity normalization
  • Volatility during supply disruptions, resin price spikes, and regulatory or manufacturing interruptions

Because D5NS is a commodity-like infusion solution, ASP (average selling price) variance tends to be narrow across authorized manufacturers, with distribution and contract terms determining realized revenue more than brand.

What is the competitive landscape?

Competition concentrates at two levels:

  1. Manufacturers of IV solutions: multiple FDA-approved/authorized sources (often via authorized generics)
  2. Repackagers/distributors: may supply through alternative channels depending on labeling and distribution rules

In mature infusion products, market share typically tracks:

  • National distribution reach
  • Contract penetration with GPO and hospital systems
  • Availability and lead time (critical during intermittent shortages)

How does plastic container format affect market economics?

Plastic container manufacturing and resin costs influence COGS and supply stability. Plastic containers generally have higher sensitivity to:

  • Resin procurement and conversion costs
  • Freight and warehouse cubic efficiency (depending on packaging and case configuration)
  • Shelf-life and logistics handling requirements

For D5NS, these factors usually translate into:

  • Margin variability around resin and supply-chain events
  • Less differentiation to prescribers, since the clinical dosing unit remains the same

What is the regulatory and substitution posture?

Regulatory expectations for IV solutions emphasize consistent formulation, labeling, container integrity, and sterility assurance. Substitution in formularies is driven by:

  • Product equivalence (same active ingredients and concentration)
  • Supply reliability
  • Contract pricing

This positions D5NS as a “formulary standard” product category where branded differentiation is limited.

How does the hospital purchasing mix impact revenue stability?

Revenue stability typically correlates with:

  • Inpatient bed-days (core driver of IV fluid usage)
  • Surgical procedure volume and post-operative care intensity
  • Seasonal variation in admissions and acuity

Financial outcomes for suppliers usually show:

  • Stable volume across normal years
  • Price and margin swings during supply tightness or cost spikes
  • Contract-driven volume stability offset by periodic re-bidding risks

What does a typical financial trajectory look like?

Unit demand and pricing pattern (typical commodity IV fluid behavior)

  • Volume: steady baseline with moderate sensitivity to hospitalization patterns
  • Price: pressured by authorized generics and tender competition
  • Margin: constrained; improves mainly when supply tightness allows contract pricing to lift, or when cost inputs fall

Revenue and earnings drivers

Revenue moves with:

  • Market share in contracted hospital systems
  • Ability to meet allocations and maintain fill rates
  • Case pack logistics and distribution effectiveness

Earnings move with:

  • Raw material costs (dextrose and sodium chloride)
  • Plastic container resin and conversion costs
  • Manufacturing yields and batch efficiency
  • Working capital cycle and chargebacks/returns (less prominent than in specialty injectables but still relevant in distribution-heavy channels)

What are the risk factors for financial performance?

Key risks are operational and macro-driven:

  • Supply disruption: manufacturing downtime, container supply constraints, or quality holds can shift volume to competitors temporarily
  • Raw material and resin price spikes: dextrose and salt input costs are generally manageable, but plastic resin can move more sharply
  • Contract re-bidding: losing a major system or GPO tier can reduce volume and force price reductions
  • Formulary substitution: if hospitals tighten fluid choices under stewardship protocols, mix can shift away from D5NS
  • Policy and utilization controls: broader initiatives that reduce unnecessary IV maintenance can lower total demand

Benchmarks for “financial trajectory” under commodity conditions

The most decision-relevant pattern is that D5NS financial performance is usually characterized by:

  • Low differentiation: revenue depends on distribution footprint and contract retention
  • Price elasticity: limited; hospitals switch among equivalent fluids more than among brands
  • Supply elasticity: higher; in shortages, effective pricing and throughput can improve revenue, but only for periods tied to capacity constraints

In practical terms, supplier trajectories look like:

  • Short-term upside during shortage windows
  • Subsequent normalization to contract pricing and margin compression once supply stabilizes

Where does the money sit across the value chain?

For D5NS (a hospital commodity infusion fluid), economic value generally concentrates in:

  • Manufacturing scale and yield (lower unit manufacturing cost)
  • Contract positioning (GPO and system bids)
  • Distribution execution (fill rate, inventory turns, handling cost minimization)

Less value is captured through:

  • Marketing investment (clinical usage is protocol-driven)
  • Specialty reimbursement mechanics (commodity billing structures differ from complex specialty drugs)

What market signals matter most for forecasting?

The strongest leading indicators for D5NS financial direction include:

  • Hospital tender award outcomes (GPO and system level)
  • Supplier capacity additions or withdrawals affecting supply stability
  • Lead-time shifts reported through wholesale channels
  • Regulatory actions impacting specific lots or container specifications

How should investors and R&D/BD teams frame this category?

For business-planning purposes, D5NS should be treated as:

  • A volume and contract business rather than a branded lifecycle product
  • A category where operational excellence (yield, supply reliability) and procurement access drive returns
  • A segment with incremental innovation cycles that typically come from packaging, container compliance, or manufacturing efficiency rather than new clinical claims

Key Takeaways

  • D5NS in plastic containers is a mature, contract-driven IV fluid category where revenue follows inpatient and procedure intensity, and pricing follows GPO and tender cycles.
  • Financial trajectory typically shows stable baseline demand with margin compression under normal supply and cost conditions, and temporary upside during supply tightness.
  • Competitive advantage concentrates in manufacturing scale, container supply reliability, and contract penetration, not in clinical differentiation.
  • Forecasting should prioritize tender outcomes, capacity and allocation conditions, resin and container supply stability, and formulary substitution behavior.

FAQs

1) Is D5NS typically reimbursed like a specialty drug?
No. It is generally treated as a hospital-administered commodity infusion fluid within institutional procurement and billing workflows, where pricing is driven by contracts and distribution channels rather than specialty drug reimbursement models.

2) What determines realized pricing more: ASP or contract terms?
Contract terms dominate realized pricing. In IV fluids, GPO and hospital bids drive discounts, rebates, and effective purchase price far more than list price.

3) Does the plastic container materially change clinical adoption?
Clinical adoption mostly depends on active concentrations and dosing protocols. Container format primarily affects manufacturing economics, logistics, and supply continuity rather than prescribing choice.

4) What is the largest operational risk for manufacturers?
Supply continuity. Any manufacturing, quality, or container supply disruption can shift volume quickly to competitors and compress margins when supply normalizes.

5) Where can suppliers find margin lift in this category?
Margin lift usually comes from cost-down initiatives (yield, resin and packaging efficiency) and periods of supply tightness that allow contract pricing to rise. Sustainable lift is harder because authorized generics constrain brand pricing power.


References

[1] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Drug Shortages. FDA.gov. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/drugshortages/ (accessed 2026-04-23).
[2] FDA. Orange Book: Approved Drug Products with Therapeutic Equivalence Evaluations. Drugs@FDA. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cder/daf/ (accessed 2026-04-23).
[3] U.S. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Hospital Outpatient and Inpatient Payment Policy resources (provider pricing and acquisition context). CMS.gov. https://www.cms.gov/ (accessed 2026-04-23).
[4] Vizient. Pharmacy Procurement resources and formulary contracting context. https://www.vizientinc.com/ (accessed 2026-04-23).

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.