You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 19, 2025

DEXEDRINE Drug Patent Profile


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


AI Deep Research
Questions you can ask:
  • What is the 5 year forecast for DEXEDRINE?
  • What are the global sales for DEXEDRINE?
  • What is Average Wholesale Price for DEXEDRINE?
Summary for DEXEDRINE
US Patents:0
Applicants:2
NDAs:3
Raw Ingredient (Bulk) Api Vendors: 1
Clinical Trials: 16
Drug Prices: Drug price information for DEXEDRINE
What excipients (inactive ingredients) are in DEXEDRINE?DEXEDRINE excipients list
DailyMed Link:DEXEDRINE at DailyMed
Drug patent expirations by year for DEXEDRINE
Drug Prices for DEXEDRINE

See drug prices for DEXEDRINE

Recent Clinical Trials for DEXEDRINE

Identify potential brand extensions & 505(b)(2) entrants

SponsorPhase
ShirePhase 4
JPM van Stralen Medicine ProfessionalPhase 4
Yale UniversityPhase 1/Phase 2

See all DEXEDRINE clinical trials

US Patents and Regulatory Information for DEXEDRINE

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Exclusivity Expiration
Glaxosmithkline DEXEDRINE dextroamphetamine sulfate ELIXIR;ORAL 083902-001 Approved Prior to Jan 1, 1982 DISCN No No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free
Impax Labs Inc DEXEDRINE SPANSULE dextroamphetamine sulfate CAPSULE, EXTENDED RELEASE;ORAL 017078-002 Approved Prior to Jan 1, 1982 AB RX Yes No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free
Glaxosmithkline DEXEDRINE dextroamphetamine sulfate TABLET;ORAL 084935-001 Approved Prior to Jan 1, 1982 DISCN Yes No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free
Impax Labs Inc DEXEDRINE SPANSULE dextroamphetamine sulfate CAPSULE, EXTENDED RELEASE;ORAL 017078-001 Approved Prior to Jan 1, 1982 AB RX Yes No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free
Impax Labs Inc DEXEDRINE SPANSULE dextroamphetamine sulfate CAPSULE, EXTENDED RELEASE;ORAL 017078-003 Approved Prior to Jan 1, 1982 AB RX Yes Yes ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Exclusivity Expiration

Market Dynamics and Financial Trajectory for DEXEDRINE

Last updated: July 28, 2025

Introduction

DEXEDRINE, the brand name for dextroamphetamine sulfate, is a central nervous system stimulant primarily prescribed for Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) and narcolepsy. As a Schedule II controlled substance, its market landscape reflects a complex interplay of regulatory constraints, medical demand, and evolving competitive dynamics. This report analyzes the current market environment, key factors influencing its financial trajectory, and future outlooks relevant to pharmaceutical stakeholders.

Regulatory and Market Environment

Regulatory Landscape

DEXEDRINE’s classification as a Schedule II drug under the Controlled Substances Act (CSA) significantly shapes its market dynamics. The strict regulatory framework entails rigorous manufacturing, distribution, and prescribing controls. The Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) enforces quotas on production levels to prevent diversion, which impacts supply stability and pricing.

Additionally, evolving regulatory scrutiny around abuse potential and the opioid epidemic has resulted in increased oversight, influencing prescribing behaviors and potentially constraining market growth [1]. New legislation promoting secure prescribing practices and monitoring (e.g., Prescription Drug Monitoring Programs) further tightens control over distribution.

Medical and Prescribing Trends

Over recent years, the diagnosis of ADHD in adults has risen, expanding the eligible patient population for DEXEDRINE. However, the slight shift toward other formulations and brands—such as dextroamphetamine-based generics and alternative stimulants—competes with DEXEDRINE’s market share.

From a clinical perspective, concerns about abuse liability and side effects have driven clinicians toward alternative therapies, including non-stimulant medications like atomoxetine or behavioral therapies in certain cases. Nevertheless, DEXEDRINE remains a key option owing to its efficacy and long-standing clinical profile [2].

Competitive Landscape

The stimulant market features several key competitors, notably Adderall (amphetamine/dextroamphetamine), Vyvanse (lisdexamfetamine), and generic formulations. The introduction of newer formulations with abuse-deterrent properties or novel delivery systems influences market shares.

Generic equivalents have accelerated price competition, exerting downward pressure on DEXEDRINE’s revenues. However, brand loyalty among practitioners and patients, due to perceived efficacy, sustains DEXEDRINE’s presence.

Financial Trajectory

Revenue Trends

Historical revenue data demonstrate moderate but resilient demand for DEXEDRINE in the context of a growing ADHD diagnosis rate. The drug’s peak revenues occurred during earlier years, but recent trends indicate a plateauing or slight decline, primarily attributable to increased generic competition and regulatory pressures.

In 2021, sales of DEXEDRINE formulations across U.S. pharmacies were estimated at approximately $50 million, representing a decline of about 10% compared to prior years due to substitution by generics and alternative brands [3].

Pricing Dynamics

Pricing strategies reflect the genericization trend. The average wholesale price (AWP) for DEXEDRINE has decreased in line with generic market entry, with per-unit prices dropping by roughly 25% over five years. Conversely, branded DEXEDRINE maintains a premium, often used where prescriber or patient preference persists, especially in specialty markets.

Cost Considerations

Manufacturers face substantial costs related to compliance with DEA regulations, quality control, and securing sufficient quotas. These constrained supply factors can impact gross margins unless offset by high demand or premium pricing strategies.

Future Revenue Projections

Forecasts suggest a continued gradual decline in DEXEDRINE’s revenue over the next five years, driven by:

  • Increasing adoption of generics and alternative therapies.
  • Regulatory measures that restrict prescribing or limit supply.
  • Public health efforts to curb stimulant abuse.

However, niche markets, such as formulations with abuse-deterrent features or targeted pediatric indications, may offer upside potential in specific segments.

Market Drivers and Challenges

Drivers

  • Growing ADHD Diagnoses: Rising awareness and improved diagnostic accuracy broaden the patient base.
  • Clinical Efficacy: DEXEDRINE’s established efficacy solidifies its reputation among clinicians.
  • Reimbursement Policies: Insurance coverage favors well-established drugs, supporting continued utilization.

Challenges

  • Regulatory Constraints: DEA quotas and prescribing restrictions limit supply and availability.
  • Generic Competition: Price erosion due to multiple generic options compresses margins.
  • Abuse Concerns: Heightened scrutiny may affect prescribing patterns.
  • Market Shifts: Trends favoring non-stimulant or alternative medications threaten growth.

Strategic Implications for Stakeholders

For pharmaceutical manufacturers, balancing regulatory compliance, optimizing supply chains, and innovating formulations with abuse-deterrent features are critical to maintaining market relevance.

Investors and market analysts should monitor regulatory developments, prescriber trends, and competitive launches that could influence DEXEDRINE’s market position and financial performance.

Conclusion

The DEXEDRINE market exhibits a nuanced trajectory characterized by stable demand amid competitive pressures and regulatory constraints. While current revenue streams face downward pressures, opportunities exist within specialized formulations and niche clinical indications. Long-term growth hinges on strategic adaptation to policy changes, clinical trends, and innovation in formulation technology.


Key Takeaways

  • Market resilience: Despite generic competition, DEXEDRINE remains relevant due to efficacy and established prescriber trust.
  • Pricing contraction: Genericization drives significant price drops, impacting revenue margins.
  • Regulatory impact: DEA quotas and abuse prevention measures influence supply and prescribing permissions.
  • Future opportunities: Niche formulations with abuse-deterrent features can open new revenue avenues.
  • Market outlook: Anticipate gradual revenue decline with targeted growth in specialized segments.

FAQs

1. How does DEA regulation impact the production of DEXEDRINE?
DEA quotas limit the amount of dextroamphetamine sulfate that can be manufactured annually, constraining supply. These restrictions aim to prevent diversion but can lead to shortages and affect pricing dynamics.

2. What is the current market share of DEXEDRINE relative to other ADHD medications?
While specific percentages fluctuate, DEXEDRINE holds a smaller but stable niche, primarily among patients and clinicians favoring its long-term efficacy. It faces stiff competition from branded formulations like Vyvanse and generic dextroamphetamine products.

3. Are there any recent innovations in DEXEDRINE formulations?
Recent developments focus on abuse-deterrent formulations, extending the drug’s market lifespan by addressing abuse-related concerns. However, widespread adoption remains limited due to cost and regulatory factors.

4. How might regulatory changes influence the future of DEXEDRINE?
Potential tightening of prescribing guidelines and increased monitoring could restrict access, lowering demand. Conversely, reforms easing access or introducing abuse-deterrent formulations could stabilize or rejuvenate the market.

5. What are the key market risks for DEXEDRINE’s financial outlook?
Major risks include regulatory restrictions, declining prescribing due to safety concerns, aggressive price competition from generics, and shifts toward non-stimulant therapies and behavioral interventions.


Sources
[1] U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration, "Controlled Substances Act," 2023.
[2] American Psychiatric Association, "Practice Guidelines for ADHD," 2022.
[3] IQVIA, "Pharmaceutical Sales Data," 2022.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.