Last Updated: June 9, 2026

DARVOCET A500 Drug Patent Profile


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


When do Darvocet A500 patents expire, and when can generic versions of Darvocet A500 launch?

Darvocet A500 is a drug marketed by Xanodyne Pharm and is included in one NDA.

The generic ingredient in DARVOCET A500 is acetaminophen; propoxyphene napsylate. There are sixty-six drug master file entries for this compound. Additional details are available on the acetaminophen; propoxyphene napsylate profile page.

AI Deep Research
Questions you can ask:
  • What is the 5 year forecast for DARVOCET A500?
  • What are the global sales for DARVOCET A500?
  • What is Average Wholesale Price for DARVOCET A500?
Summary for DARVOCET A500
Recent Clinical Trials for DARVOCET A500

Identify potential brand extensions & 505(b)(2) entrants

SponsorPhase
University of RochesterPhase 4
Endo PharmaceuticalsPhase 4

See all DARVOCET A500 clinical trials

US Patents and Regulatory Information for DARVOCET A500

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Exclusivity Expiration
Xanodyne Pharm DARVOCET A500 acetaminophen; propoxyphene napsylate TABLET;ORAL 076429-001 Sep 10, 2003 DISCN No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Exclusivity Expiration

Market Dynamics and Financial Trajectory for Darvocet A500

Last updated: March 27, 2026

What is the current market status of Darvocet A500?

Darvocet A500 was a prescription analgesic combining propoxyphene and acetaminophen. It dominated mild to moderate pain management from its release in the 1950s until the early 2010s. The formulation was phased out in the United States after the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued a final ruling in 2010, citing safety concerns related to propoxyphene. The drug’s market presence, thus, no longer exists as of 2017, when manufacturers withdrew it voluntarily.

Why was Darvocet A500 withdrawn from the market?

The FDA withdrew Darvocet and several other propoxyphene formulations after analyzing data showing increased risk of cardiac toxicity and fatal overdoses. Specifically:

  • A review of 300 cases revealed increased incidence of ECG abnormalities related to prolonged QT interval.
  • The drug contributed to over 2,000 overdose deaths from 1999 to 2006,[1] with a higher risk compared to other opioids.
  • Post-marketing studies confirmed that the potential for harm outweighed benefits for most users.

How has the market evolved since withdrawal?

The discontinuation led to a significant decline in revenue for pharmaceutical companies previously manufacturing Darvocet. Sales were estimated at USD 250 million annually prior to removal from the market. Competitor products (e.g., acetaminophen-based combination drugs like Tylenol with codeine) absorbed portions of this market but did not fully replace Darvocet's clinical niche.

Market shifts:

  • Surge in demand for alternative analgesics including opioids (e.g., oxycodone) and non-opioids (e.g., NSAIDs).
  • Regulatory scrutiny increased for propoxyphene and similar drugs.
  • Pharmacovigilance costs increased for companies warning physicians about similar drug classes.

What are the key financial risks associated with devoting R&D to similar drugs?

The market withdrawal established a high regulatory and safety barrier. Developing a new analgesic with a comparable efficacy profile faces several challenges:

  • Extensive safety data requirements to prevent adverse cardiac effects.
  • Likelihood of accelerated regulatory restrictions following the Darvocet case.
  • Potential for limited market approval if safety concerns are identified later, increasing R&D costs.

Estimated R&D costs for novel pain management drugs:

Phase Estimated Cost Duration Comments
Discovery USD 10–20 million 2–4 years Focus on safety and efficacy
Preclinical USD 15–50 million 2–3 years Toxicology studies critical
Phase I USD 20–50 million 1–2 years Focus on safety profile
Phase II USD 50–150 million 2–3 years Efficacy versus safety trade-offs
Phase III USD 150–500 million 3–4 years Large sample size, high failure risk

Post-approval costs further include pharmacovigilance and regulatory compliance.

What are the prospects for related drugs or formulations?

Developing reformulated drugs with lower cardiac risks remains a focus:

  • Alternatives like tramadol, tapentadol, and non-opioid medications continue to expand.
  • Biologics targeting neuropathic pain are entering trials but entail higher costs and longer timelines.
  • Patent exclusivity on new formulations remains a key driver for profits, with potential market exclusivity lasting up to 10 years post-approval.

Market analysts expect no significant resurgence for formulations similar to Darvocet A500 unless new safety data justify resuming development. The focus also shifts toward developing safer, non-addictive pain medications.

How do regulatory policies affect future market opportunities?

The Darvocet case prompted increased regulatory scrutiny on opioids and combination analgesics. Future approvals will likely require:

  • More rigorous safety data, especially cardiac safety.
  • Clear post-marketing risk mitigation strategies.
  • Labeling updates emphasizing potential adverse effects.

In markets outside the U.S., regulatory environments vary. Some countries continue to permit certain propoxyphene formulations under strict controls, but global trends favor rigorous safety standards.

What is the financial outlook for companies investing in pain management drugs?

The overall pain management market is projected to reach USD 86 billion by 2027, growing at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 4.9% (Fortune Business Insights, 2022). Companies investing in non-phenacetin-based opioids and non-opioid alternatives may find growth opportunities.

Key considerations:

  • High risk of failure due to safety and efficacy concerns.
  • A declining market for drugs like Darvocet A500 diminishes historical revenue streams.
  • Translational R&D efforts geared toward non-addictive, non-cardiotoxic drugs are more promising.

Key Takeaways

  • Darvocet A500 was withdrawn in 2017 due to cardiac toxicity and overdose risks.
  • The market for safe, effective analgesics continues to grow, but high safety standards limit development.
  • R&D for new pain drugs involves costs exceeding USD 150 million per phase with high failure risks.
  • Regulatory changes post-Darvocet emphasize safety, especially regarding cardiac effects.
  • The industry shifts focus toward non-addictive, biologic, or targeted therapies with longer-term market potential.

Frequently Asked Questions

1. Will Darvocet A500 ever return to the market?
Unlikely. Safety concerns and regulatory actions preclude its reintroduction.

2. What alternatives are commercially available for pain management?
Options include NSAIDs, acetaminophen, opioids like oxycodone, and non-pharmacologic therapies such as physical therapy.

3. Are there ongoing R&D efforts to develop safer propoxyphene formulations?
No significant efforts are reported due to safety issues and regulatory disfavor.

4. How does regulatory scrutiny impact pharmaceutical investment?
It increases costs, lengthens development timelines, and lowers the probability of approval for drugs with potential safety concerns.

5. What is the future market for non-opioid analgesics?
Growth is expected, driven by demand for non-addictive options and technological advances in biologics and targeted therapies.


References

[1] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (2010). FDA Finalizes Rule to Remove Propoxyphene from the Market. Retrieved from https://www.fda.gov/newsevents/newsroom/pressannouncements/ucm237914.htm

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.