You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Acetaminophen; propoxyphene napsylate - Generic Drug Details


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


What are the generic drug sources for acetaminophen; propoxyphene napsylate and what is the scope of patent protection?

Acetaminophen; propoxyphene napsylate is the generic ingredient in five branded drugs marketed by Xanodyne Pharm, Teva, Able, Actavis Elizabeth, Cornerstone, Halsey, Ivax Sub Teva Pharms, Mallinckrodt, Mirror Pharms, Mutual Pharm, Mylan, Mylan Pharms Inc, Sandoz, Superpharm, Vintage Pharms, Watson Labs, Watson Labs Florida, and Wockhardt Ltd, and is included in twenty-nine NDAs. Additional information is available in the individual branded drug profile pages.

Summary for acetaminophen; propoxyphene napsylate
US Patents:0
Tradenames:5
Applicants:18
NDAs:29
DailyMed Link:acetaminophen; propoxyphene napsylate at DailyMed

US Patents and Regulatory Information for acetaminophen; propoxyphene napsylate

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Exclusivity Expiration
Actavis Elizabeth PROPOXYPHENE NAPSYLATE AND ACETAMINOPHEN acetaminophen; propoxyphene napsylate TABLET;ORAL 070910-001 Jan 2, 1987 DISCN No No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free
Teva PROPOXYPHENE NAPSYLATE AND ACETAMINOPHEN acetaminophen; propoxyphene napsylate TABLET;ORAL 070732-001 Jan 3, 1986 DISCN No No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free
Xanodyne Pharm DARVOCET-N 100 acetaminophen; propoxyphene napsylate TABLET;ORAL 017122-002 Approved Prior to Jan 1, 1982 DISCN No No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free
Watson Labs PROPOXYPHENE NAPSYLATE AND ACETAMINOPHEN acetaminophen; propoxyphene napsylate TABLET;ORAL 070399-001 Dec 18, 1986 DISCN No No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free
Halsey PROPOXYPHENE NAPSYLATE AND ACETAMINOPHEN acetaminophen; propoxyphene napsylate TABLET;ORAL 072105-001 May 13, 1988 DISCN No No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Exclusivity Expiration

Last updated: July 29, 2025

rket Dynamics and Financial Trajectory for Acetaminophen and Propoxyphene Napsylate

Introduction

The pharmaceutical landscape surrounding acetaminophen and propoxyphene napsylate reflects substantial shifts driven by regulatory scrutiny, consumer safety concerns, and evolving clinical practices. Both drugs have played significant roles within analgesic markets, yet their trajectories now diverge amid changing health guidelines and patent landscapes. This analysis explores the market dynamics and financial outlook for these compounds, emphasizing key factors impacting their commercial viability and regulatory status.

Acetaminophen: Market Overview and Trajectory

Ubiquity and Market Penetration

Acetaminophen, known internationally as paracetamol, remains one of the most widely used over-the-counter (OTC) analgesics and antipyretics. Its extensive market presence is underpinned by a favorable safety profile when used within dosage guidelines, alongside its affordability and availability. According to a report by Grand View Research, the global acetaminophen market was valued at approximately USD 1.2 billion in 2021, with projections indicating steady growth driven by rising demand in emerging economies and increasing awareness of pain management options[1].

Regulatory Landscape and Market Challenges

Despite its popularity, acetaminophen faces regulatory challenges, particularly concerning hepatotoxicity risks at high doses. Several jurisdictions have imposed dosage limits and labeling requirements to mitigate liver injury risks. The FDA has mandated that manufacturers include prominent warnings, impacting sales volume growth potential slightly but not hampering overall demand due to the drug’s entrenched clinical role. The restriction on maximum daily doses (typically 4,000 mg) and combination products containing acetaminophen complicate formulations, but patent issues are minimal because generic versions dominate the market.

Market Trends and Driver Factors

The rising prevalence of chronic pain conditions, combined with the opioid epidemic's impact, has shifted consumer preferences toward non-opioid options like acetaminophen. Moreover, increased focus on medication safety has promoted its position compared to NSAIDs, especially in populations vulnerable to gastrointestinal or cardiovascular side effects. The COVID-19 pandemic further amplified demand as a primary over-the-counter treatment for fever and mild pain, reinforcing its market resilience.

Financial Outlook

The long-term financial trajectory for acetaminophen remains positive, with modest but consistent revenue streams projected. Key revenue drivers include global healthcare expenditure, increasing acceptance in pediatric and elderly populations, and ongoing formulations within combination products. However, growth is tempered by regulatory constraints and commoditization, leading to a mature but stable market environment. Industry forecasts suggest a compounded annual growth rate (CAGR) of around 3–4% over the next five years[1].

Propoxyphene Napsylate: Market Decline and Closure

Historical Context and Market Presence

Propoxyphene napsylate was once a widely prescribed opioid analgesic, marketed notably under brand names like Darvon and Darvocet. Its popularity peaked in the mid-20th century as a mild analgesic and antitussive. However, mounting safety concerns, regulatory actions, and withdrawal of approval by the FDA have sharply curtailed its market presence. In 2010, the FDA ordered the removal of propoxyphene from the U.S. market due to evidence of serious cardiac toxicity, including cardiac arrhythmias and death related to toxic effects of the drug’s metabolites[2].

Regulatory and Legal Factors

The FDA’s decision was prompted by extensive post-marketing reports and clinical data highlighting the drug’s propensity to cause dose-dependent QT prolongation and cardiotoxicity. Subsequent legal liabilities and increased scrutiny from healthcare authorities led to its market withdrawal. Many other countries followed suit, either banning or severely restricting propoxyphene’s use. The removal significantly diminished the drug’s financial footprint, with no practical resurgence expected absent breakthrough safety data or reformulation efforts.

Market Implications and Financial Trajectory

The decline of propoxyphene napsylate has resulted in a near-total market cessation, with residual revenues stemming from ongoing generic sales prior to its withdrawal. The drug’s phase-out exemplifies the impact of safety-related regulatory interventions on revenue streams and stockholder profits. The pharmaceutical industry has adjusted by focusing R&D on safer, non-opioid analgesics, aligning future investments with more sustainable, regulatory-compliant solutions. The financial outlook for propoxyphene napsylate is unequivocally negative, with no anticipated recovery in the foreseeable future.

Future Outlook: Trends and Strategic Considerations

Shift toward Safer Analgesics

The analgesic market is increasingly dominated by non-opioid, non-steroidal options, driven by safety concerns and regulatory pressures. Healthcare providers are favoring drugs with proven safety profiles, which constrains the growth potential of older opioids like propoxyphene. This shift benefits acetaminophen and emerging alternatives like gabapentinoids or opioids with improved safety profiles, signaling a clear paradigm change.

Impact of Regulatory Frameworks and Public Policy

Regulatory agencies worldwide are tightening oversight on analgesics, emphasizing risk-benefit assessments. The trend favors formulations with enhanced safety margins and transparent evidence of efficacy, impacting companies with proprietary formulations or patents. For acetaminophen, regulatory developments primarily focus on dosage safety; for opioids, restrictions and bans continue to limit market access. The long-term financial trajectory favors diversification into safer drug modalities, with investments aligned accordingly.

Market Consolidation and Innovation

Industry consolidation is likely as companies aim to develop new, safer analgesic compounds, incorporating innovative delivery systems or combination therapies. Patents on new formulations or delivery mechanisms could temporarily bolster profitability. For notable drugs like acetaminophen, lifecycle management strategies include combining with other agents or reformulating for enhanced safety and efficacy.

Key Takeaways

  • Acetaminophen remains a cornerstone non-opioid analgesic with steady growth driven by global health trends, despite regulatory safety measures. Its mature market expects a CAGR of approximately 3–4%, with continued revenue from generics and combination therapies.

  • Propoxyphene napsylate’s market is effectively defunct following FDA withdrawal in 2010, exemplifying how safety concerns can permanently eliminate a drug’s commercial viability. No recovery or new developments are anticipated absent transformative safety data.

  • Market dynamics favor the development and adoption of safer analgesics, with regulatory reforms shaping future investment priorities toward innovative, low-risk options.

  • Industry consolidation and lifecycle management strategies will be central to maintaining profitability of existing safe drugs like acetaminophen, especially amid intense competition and price pressures.

  • Stakeholders need to monitor regulatory trends and safeguard against obsolescence by investing in novel therapeutics aligned with safety-first paradigms.

FAQs

  1. What are the primary concerns associated with acetaminophen that impact its market?
    Risks of hepatotoxicity at high doses lead to regulatory restrictions and warnings, influencing formulations and labeling but not significantly diminishing overall demand due to its safety profile within recommended doses.

  2. Why was propoxyphene napsylate withdrawn from the market?
    The FDA withdrew approval in 2010 because of evidence linking the drug to serious cardiac toxicity, including arrhythmias and increased mortality risk.

  3. How do regulatory changes affect the profits of analgesic drugs?
    Stricter safety regulations can reduce market size, compel reformulations, or lead to withdrawal, impacting revenue streams unless companies innovate with safer alternatives.

  4. What future trends are expected in analgesic markets?
    The trend favors safer, non-opioid, non-NSAID options, with regulatory emphasis on risk mitigation and pharmacovigilance driving innovation and market shifts toward novel therapeutics.

  5. Can reformulated versions of propoxyphene or similar opioids re-enter the market?
    It is unlikely unless substantial safety improvements are demonstrated. Current regulatory environments favor low-risk options, and reformulation efforts are constrained by prior safety controversies.

References

[1] Grand View Research. "Acetaminophen Market Size, Share & Trends Analysis Report." 2022.

[2] U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). "FDA Requests Removal of Propoxyphene Products from the Market." 2010.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.