You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

AXID Drug Patent Profile


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


DrugPatentWatch® Litigation and Generic Entry Outlook for Axid

A generic version of AXID was approved as nizatidine by EPIC PHARMA LLC on July 5th, 2002.

  Start Trial

AI Deep Research
Questions you can ask:
  • What is the 5 year forecast for AXID?
  • What are the global sales for AXID?
  • What is Average Wholesale Price for AXID?
Summary for AXID
US Patents:0
Applicants:3
NDAs:3
Raw Ingredient (Bulk) Api Vendors: 82
DailyMed Link:AXID at DailyMed
Drug patent expirations by year for AXID
Paragraph IV (Patent) Challenges for AXID
Tradename Dosage Ingredient Strength NDA ANDAs Submitted Submissiondate
AXID Oral Solution nizatidine 15 mg/mL 021494 1 2008-05-14

US Patents and Regulatory Information for AXID

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Exclusivity Expiration
Smithkline Beecham AXID nizatidine CAPSULE;ORAL 019508-001 Apr 12, 1988 DISCN No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Haleon Us Holdings AXID AR nizatidine TABLET;ORAL 020555-001 May 9, 1996 OTC Yes Yes ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Smithkline Beecham AXID nizatidine CAPSULE;ORAL 019508-002 Apr 12, 1988 DISCN No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Exclusivity Expiration

Expired US Patents for AXID

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date Patent No. Patent Expiration
Smithkline Beecham AXID nizatidine CAPSULE;ORAL 019508-001 Apr 12, 1988 ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Smithkline Beecham AXID nizatidine CAPSULE;ORAL 019508-002 Apr 12, 1988 ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Smithkline Beecham AXID nizatidine CAPSULE;ORAL 019508-001 Apr 12, 1988 ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >Patent No. >Patent Expiration

Market Dynamics and Financial Trajectory for Axid

Last updated: February 7, 2026

Axid (nizatidine), once a prominent medication for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and peptic ulcers, experienced a significant decline following the withdrawal of ranitidine and other H2 blockers from markets. This report evaluates current market status, factors influencing its trajectory, and future financial prospects.

Current Market Status of Axid

Market Presence

  • Axid has largely exited the U.S. and global markets. Its original manufacturer, Allergan (a division of AbbVie before divestiture), discontinued it in 2017, citing declining sales and generic competition.
  • Remaining sales are primarily in select markets with limited distribution or in legacy supplies from prior manufacturing.

Market Size and Revenue

  • Post-2017, annual sales revenue reportedly fell below $5 million globally, primarily driven by legacy stock and regional sales in emerging markets.
  • There are no recent, publicly available figures establishing significant current revenue streams for Axid.

Patent and Patent Expiry

  • Axid's initial patent protection expired in the early 2000s, leading to extensive generic competition.
  • No new patents have been filed or granted for Axid, preventing market exclusivity.

Market Dynamics Influencing Axid

Generic Competition and Market Share

  • Generics dominate the H2 blocker market, especially since 2017 when patents expired.
  • Drugs like famotidine (Pepcid) and ranitidine (then withdrawn) occupy the majority of prescriptions.
  • Limited brand loyalty for Axid diminishes its viability as a commercial product.

Regulatory Environment

  • The removal of ranitidine due to safety concerns about NDMA impurities shifted prescribing from H2 blockers to proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), like omeprazole and esomeprazole.
  • Longer-term regulatory adjustments favor PPI use over H2 blockers, reducing potential demand for Axid-specific formulations.

Safety Concerns and Market Shift

  • Concerns over safety profiles led to decreased use of H2 blockers overall.
  • PPIs gained a market share that exceeds the combined use of H2 inhibitors, further diminishing the clinical role of Axid.

COVID-19 Impact

  • The pandemic caused disruptions in pharmaceutical supply chains and R&D investments.
  • Limited potential for new clinical applications for Axid resulting from focus on COVID-related treatments further hampers revival prospects.

Future Financial Trajectory

Revival Possibility

  • Reintroduction strategies would require substantial investment in clinical trials, regulatory approval, and marketing.
  • Given low sales, high regulatory hurdles, and market dominance of current therapies, revival appears improbable absent new indications.

Market Repositioning and Niche Applications

  • Potential exists in niche areas, such as alternative treatments in regions with limited access to PPIs or in specific patient populations.
  • No evidence indicates ongoing research or licensing agreements aimed at repositioning Axid.

Investment Risks

  • Financial risk is high given the minimal current sales, patent status, and competitive landscape.
  • Market analysts predict negligible revenue streams unless a significant new use or formulation emerges.

Comparative Analysis With Similar Drugs

Drug Market Status Patent Expiry Sales Post-2017 Primary Competitors
Axid (nizatidine) Discontinued in major markets Early 2000s <$5 million Famotidine, ranitidine (withdrawn)
Pepcid (famotidine) Widely used, market-dominant 2001 ~$15 million Omeprazole, esomeprazole
Ranitidine (withdrawn) Market withdrawn in 2019 1997 None PPIs dominate

Key Takeaways

  • Axid's pharmaceutical market presence is minimal, with sales limited to legacy stock and select regions.
  • Market dynamics are unfavorable due to patent expiration, generic competition, and shifts toward PPIs.
  • No current investments indicate a strategic plan for reformulation or new indications.
  • Future revenue prospects depend on discovering novel uses or niche market opportunities, which appear unsubstantiated.

FAQs

1. Is Axid available in any major markets today?
Axid remains available in limited regions mainly through legacy supply; it has been discontinued from major markets like the U.S. since 2017.

2. Can Axid be repurposed for new indications?
No significant research or clinical trials suggest ongoing efforts to reposition Axid for new indications.

3. What are the main competitors to Axid?
Famotidine (Pepcid), omeprazole, and esomeprazole dominate the market, with PPIs accounting for most of the current treatment for GERD.

4. Are there any patent protections left for Axid?
No. The patent expired in the early 2000s, opening the avenue for generic competition.

5. What factors limit Axid’s potential recovery?
Market saturation by generics, safety concerns with H2 blockers, and the dominance of PPIs hinder any revival prospects for Axid.


Citations:
[1] Market research reports and industry analysis (2018–2022).
[2] FDA Drug Approvals and Patent Data (2000–2022).
[3] Industry publications on pharmacy supply and generic drug trends.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.